[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Why doesn't /tv/ discuss this masterpiece?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 108
Thread images: 40

File: 91hSsrdJfZL._RI_.jpg (706KB, 1920x2560px) Image search: [Google]
91hSsrdJfZL._RI_.jpg
706KB, 1920x2560px
Why doesn't /tv/ discuss this masterpiece?
>>
because this place is overrun with plebs now
>>
File: 1502790238313.jpg (95KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]
1502790238313.jpg
95KB, 1080x1350px
theres like a thread every day
>>
because it missed the mark it easily could have hit 8/10
>>
>Nicolas Refn
>Elle Fanning
>Jena Malone
>Keanu Reeves

So much garbage, i'll pass.
>>
>>86582419
because the acting was shit
>>
>>86582487
>>86582501
>>
>>86582419
She didn't get naked or show tits in it so I don't care.
>>
>>86582419
not a masterpiece
it's 5/10 eye candy, and I BOUGHT THE BLU RAY SO NORMALLY I'D TRY TO JUSTIFY THE PURCHASE BY TELLING MYSELF IT WAS GOOD
>>
Shit movie for shallow faggots who think Refn isn't anything but a total hack.
>>
>>86582419
While it's an amazing movie, I think Only God Forgives is better. Neon Demon kinda loses itself in what it's trying to say sometimes.
>>
It's babby's first art film. Visually striking, low smooth aesthetic, but so full of things that have been done before. The weird triangle that doesn't mean anything, the decorative wallpaper that seemingly comes alive, even the twist at the end. Which, by the way, comes after some ridiculous pacing that sees everything interesting happen in the last 10 minutes.

It's the kind of movie you watch when you simply want to watch a movie, not necessarily one that's memorable or strikes a chord.
>>
>>86582453
I want to nibble her lewd neck
>>
>>86582630
What are some good art films?
>>
>>86582641
p-please stand in line..
>>
>>86582419
it was shit
>>
File: 1487279852509.jpg (48KB, 500x771px) Image search: [Google]
1487279852509.jpg
48KB, 500x771px
"I want to ______ Elle Fanning."
>>
>>86583304
C H O K E
H
O
K
E
>>
>>86582714
Ones you don't like and haven't heard of, obviously.
>>
File: 1492784916815.jpg (450KB, 1748x2100px) Image search: [Google]
1492784916815.jpg
450KB, 1748x2100px
>>86582641
>>86582741
>>
>>86583304
impregnate, and that sister of hers while i'm at it
>>
File: 1497397472625.jpg (1MB, 1997x3000px) Image search: [Google]
1497397472625.jpg
1MB, 1997x3000px
plebs
>>
neon semen demon
>>
File: 1495076709211.jpg (2MB, 3222x4200px) Image search: [Google]
1495076709211.jpg
2MB, 3222x4200px
>>86584640
>>
File: punk elle.webm (177KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]
punk elle.webm
177KB, 480x640px
>>86583480
>no punk Elle
>>
i felt like refn was beating off in the directors chair while making this

it was a bunch of weird/shock shit just for the sake of it
>>
File: 1463774778196.jpg (103KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1463774778196.jpg
103KB, 1080x1080px
>>86585047
he threw out the script halfway during filming and then improvised
>>
>>86582419
It was discussed endlessly when it first came out, more so when the rip came out because, you know, /tv/ doesn't go outside.
It's shit
Refn is an extremely poor director
>>
>>86585106
he's the one of the few uncompromising kino directors
>>
>>86585130
care to expand upon that thought?
>>
>>86584452
HOLY FUCKING SHIT KILL ME NOW
>>
>>86585026
>that jew in the back like
>>
File: 18580250.jpg (119KB, 1080x811px) Image search: [Google]
18580250.jpg
119KB, 1080x811px
>>86585174
he doesn't change his creative vision to suit the producers or to be commercially successful
>>
File: 1488672157896.webm (3MB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]
1488672157896.webm
3MB, 1920x800px
>>86585047
>i felt like refn was beating off in the directors chair while making this
>>
It was visually impressive, with a decent story and decent-ish acting. The characters weren't exactly likeable, however they were written well. It was enjoyable and I'll watch it again. The edgy ending threw me a bit, however, and I'm a bit undecided as to whether or not that's a good thing (think of it like that childhood food you hated at first, but now you don't mind so much - same concept).

Distinct lack of tittie in the first half, though.
>>
>>86585220
That'd be great if his creative vision wasn't terrible
>>
>>86585412
That's entirely subjective

http://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1503002549085.webm
>>
>>86582419
They should have shown her in glorious full frontal nudity when the creepy fotographer took advantage of her. It would have made the emotional struggles of her character in the model business more believable.

Also the other models should have shown more of their bodies.
>>
File: 1466721537773.png (796KB, 1280x536px) Image search: [Google]
1466721537773.png
796KB, 1280x536px
>>86585492
she was underage
>>
File: tH5vGaC.jpg (67KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]
tH5vGaC.jpg
67KB, 1080x1080px
>>86585026
great outfit
>>
>>86585542
Ok, and you see a connection between your statement and my proposition for which reason exactly?
>>
>>86583512
clever girl
>>
File: abbeyleetoiletroll.webm (2MB, 640x440px) Image search: [Google]
abbeyleetoiletroll.webm
2MB, 640x440px
*blocks Elle's path*
>>
>>86585026
>SPURT SPURT SPURT
that's me emptying my balls right down her neeeeck
>>
>>86585047
>i felt like refn was beating off in the directors chair while making this
no shit
>>
Refn is awful
>>
File: 1492605790198.jpg (209KB, 873x710px) Image search: [Google]
1492605790198.jpg
209KB, 873x710px
>>86585542
F L A P S
L
A
P
S
>>
>>86586157
eww
>>
Tried way too hard.

Great visuals, ok script, drags horribly in the last act.

6/10
>>
>>86583480
Why are neck chokers so fucking hot?
>>
Nigga what? This movie was talked about for months when it came out.
>>
>>86585542
>she was underage
And? Keira Knightley was 15 when she showed her titties.
>>
>>86586209

Style over substance, just like all Refn. "Maybe if I do a lot of slow pan shots and tell the actors to take a long pause in between lines people will like me."
>>
>>86582419

Real Lolita shit
>>
>>86586292
>just like all refn

t.netpleb. stick to your capeshit kid
>>
File: PicassoGuernica.jpg (101KB, 631x283px) Image search: [Google]
PicassoGuernica.jpg
101KB, 631x283px
>Pure style over substance. The characters are two-dimensional at best, and there's barely any plot or dialogue at all!

t. idiot who doesn't understand art
>>
>>86585694
>>86585026
Slutty af
>>
File: 1503145701924.jpg (578KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1503145701924.jpg
578KB, 1080x1080px
>>86585694
>>
>>86586157
perfectly fine and clean cunny
>>
>>86586233
because they symbolize submission
>>
>>86586233
meant for rough sex, that's why
>>
>>86586157
c-c-c-c
>>
>>86585492
>>86585542
>>86586157

I'm still surprised nobody used some after effects magic to make her nude in that scene.
>>
>>86582453
BLACKED when?
>>
It's like the book Le Parfum but if you removed the insight and the originality.
>>
File: 1297802089815.png (102KB, 241x228px) Image search: [Google]
1297802089815.png
102KB, 241x228px
>>86586157
woah woah woah wait

she is a roastie and not a delicious innie?

disgusting!
>>
>>86586751
thats an innie.
>>
File: 1492213146205.jpg (53KB, 641x530px) Image search: [Google]
1492213146205.jpg
53KB, 641x530px
>>86586794
sure about that?
>>
>>86586751
>>86586828
It's pubic hair you moron
>>
>>86586851
you sure about that?
>>
>>86586887
No
>>
File: 1485570758265.jpg (41KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
1485570758265.jpg
41KB, 600x600px
>>86586915
so it might be roastbeef in her panties?
>>
>>86586851
>pubic hair
disgusting bitch
>>
>>86586934
Yes
>>
>>86583304
Marry
>>
>>86585412
This, exactly
>>
>>86586991
damn thats disgusting, stopping the movie download right now because of that.
>>
File: neon demon stripped 2.webm (3MB, 476x892px) Image search: [Google]
neon demon stripped 2.webm
3MB, 476x892px
>>86586157
Looks like a nice slit to me
>>
>>86586277
that was before the rise of SJWs
>>
>>86587079
looks like compressed roastbeef
>>
File: 1486188249847.jpg (5KB, 234x215px) Image search: [Google]
1486188249847.jpg
5KB, 234x215px
>>86587079
>her nervously checking her mound
>>
File: starship_knowmore.jpg (86KB, 640x512px) Image search: [Google]
starship_knowmore.jpg
86KB, 640x512px
>>86587130
It's a lot of beef if that's the case
>>
>>86587193
so I went through my porn folder and searched a bit, pic related is what an innie pussy looks like in panties.

seems like here >>86587079 she has a TON of roast hiding in her panties.
>>
http://www.strawpoll.me/13740685
http://www.strawpoll.me/13740685
http://www.strawpoll.me/13740685
>>
File: MetArt_Lixue_Melena-A_high_0013.jpg (2MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]
MetArt_Lixue_Melena-A_high_0013.jpg
2MB, 5616x3744px
>>86587387
here a better picture of what an innie in tight panties looks like to further back up my roast beef theory.
>>
File: 1437523771159.jpg (1MB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]
1437523771159.jpg
1MB, 960x1280px
>>86587387
I can see a defined slit in >>86586157. Elle could have very big outer lips and they roll out together when her legs are together. Melena has relatively slim outer lips, so her pussy looks pretty flat with her legs closed.
We just don't have enough information.
>>
>>86585279

Only a gay ass faggot would not be beating off to that in the director's chair while making it.

So... what's your point?
>>
>>86587547
Given that Elle is Refn's self insert he may be a bad example for your point
>>
File: 005.jpg (653KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]
005.jpg
653KB, 3000x2000px
>>86587539
maybe its just a puffy innie then? like Foxy has?

>We just don't have enough information.
goddamnit but this is important knowledge.
>>
>>86587580

What? Nigga, it's a young bitch on a sofa sexualizing herself.

Dial down the autism from 11 to at least five, and just appreciate what the man has given you.

Fucks sake.
>>
File: 1485494318205.jpg (76KB, 480x454px) Image search: [Google]
1485494318205.jpg
76KB, 480x454px
>>86587539
>Elle could have very big outer lips
>>
>>86587547
>So... what's your point?
my point is exactly that.... that he would be beating off if he's making scenes like that.....
>>
>>86587656
Bruh he explicitely said it's about him imagining himself as a desired 16yo girl.
Just shut up. Nobody takes you serious anyway.
>>
File: 1417524718651.jpg (43KB, 599x902px) Image search: [Google]
1417524718651.jpg
43KB, 599x902px
>>86587636
I know that either way I'm a fan of Elle
>>
File: 017.jpg (616KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]
017.jpg
616KB, 3000x2000px
>>86587790
as long as its not roastbeef its alright I guess.
roasties are disgusting.
>>
File: 1419266621808.jpg (243KB, 1728x1106px) Image search: [Google]
1419266621808.jpg
243KB, 1728x1106px
>>86587817
Some roasties aren't too bad imo. And I would have Elle for her neck alone.
>>
>>86587995
>Some roasties aren't too bad
but they often enough look horrible, with pissflaps all over that shit.
there is no aestethic in blown up roasties, but puffy innies are alright.

so
>innie > puffy innie > tiny roastie but somewhat innie (like pic related) > major roasties

would that be something we can agree on?
>>
File: GALA.jpg (94KB, 719x898px) Image search: [Google]
GALA.jpg
94KB, 719x898px
>>86588153
I can agree on that.
I think it looks ok if a girl's lips and clit stick out a bit, as long as they're not huge and brown.
>>
File: feeling good man.jpg (62KB, 396x388px) Image search: [Google]
feeling good man.jpg
62KB, 396x388px
>>86588285
good that we finally could discuss this very important topic and come to an agreement that everyone is happy with.
>>
>>86582419
I don't like sad things
>>
File: image.jpg (131KB, 1082x1098px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
131KB, 1082x1098px
I gave it a 6/10

Cool visual style with some awesome sequences like most of Refn's shit but thematically shallow and uncompelling
>>
>>86582549
Drive was good though
>>
File: 1463750021951.jpg (1MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]
1463750021951.jpg
1MB, 2048x1365px
>>86588350
:3
What are your thoughts on necks?
>>
>>86588490
longer the better until you hit giraffe tier
>>
File: 1489345984000.jpg (21KB, 608x456px) Image search: [Google]
1489345984000.jpg
21KB, 608x456px
>>86588490
necks are always good
long neck + choker = insta boner
>>
File: 1497384374531.jpg (92KB, 681x1024px) Image search: [Google]
1497384374531.jpg
92KB, 681x1024px
>>86588553
I'm not a fan of chokers. They hide too much.
>>
>>86588882
but a good accessoire that only works with a long neck and the only way it looks decent.
>>
File: 1490060239361.jpg (4MB, 4026x1087px) Image search: [Google]
1490060239361.jpg
4MB, 4026x1087px
>>86583304

BLACK
Thread posts: 108
Thread images: 40


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.