ITT: Flawless films

>>86557655
>ITT: Films that are overrated by casual viewers because they're at the start of alphabetical "classic films" lists.

ftfy

>>86557740
T H I S

>>86557919
was HEEERES JOHNNYYYY intentionally comedic? dont get me wrong,i love the film

>>86558029
I always found it funny. Shelley Duvall pissed herself though.

>>86558070
She was on coke, though.

File: 55d79fa23dff1b001140ac02.jpg (1MB, 1609x2247px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1609x2247px

>the perfect film doesn't exi...

>>86558029
>was HEEERES JOHNNYYYY intentionally comedic? dont get me wrong,i love the film
I mean, it's supposed to come off as so ludicrously batshit. That's why it's so memorable. She's fleeing for her life, and he's having a grand old time. It's the equivalent of if, in a slasher film now, the killer busted through the door screaming a line from Conan or SNL.

>>86558142
If you're going to push a scorcese film as "perfect", at least pick something from his Top 5.

>>86558304
Not having Goodfellas in your Scorsese top 5 is a sign of down's syndrome.

>>86557655
>How to Cause a Mistrial: The Film

File: 1496167189846.jpg (32KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x427px

>>86557740
No one's allowed to make this kind of post without providing an example so we can all shit on their taste.

>>86558609
does she show pusy

>>86559106
B A S E D
P U S S Y
P O S T E R

File: 1501812865849(1).jpg (24KB, 237x441px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 237x441px

>>86557655

>Flawless Films

No women, No blacks, no Asians, No Hispanic. You can keep your dated racist movie.

>>86557655

they shouldn't have shown the accused in the beginning of the movie

Paths of Glory is the best Kubrick film.

>>86559301
The accused is a spic, though.

White people let a guilty man go becuase of white guilt

The "racist" guy was right. And there all a bunch of cucks

>>86558029
Iirc it was a Nicholson adlib. Kubrick probably had him doing dozens of different takes and JN was probably really starting to lose his shit when he just gave no fucks and then made cinematic history.

>>86558647
only true answer

>>86559382
That's a good point

File: The-Godfather.png (274KB, 960x480px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 960x480px

>>86557655
>>86557919
>>86558142
>>86558304

>>86560211
nice, reminded me I wanted to rewatch this a few days ago, perfect film imo

File: 4HyFAvuj[1].jpg (32KB, 506x506px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 506x506px

>>86557655
I like it, but it's not as smart as it seems, or rather, it's more manipulative than deep. It's written in a way that makes the viewers feel smarter than they actually are. Very often the viewer will connect the dots a lot quicker than the characters, which is a very cheap way to make the audience member feel intelligent. Juror 7 is particularly bad, as he is just a straight-up poorly written caricature of a simple person, literally saying "duh" at certain points.

The racism scene also feels very contrived and preachy.

It's good and very entertaining, but not particularly deep, though the sheer craft of it is spectacular. Wonderful cinematography and pacing, and the rising tension is exhilarating.

File: 12_angry_men_.jpg (291KB, 2100x1441px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 2100x1441px

>>86557655
>owns the exact same switchblade and took it with him to jury duty
BULL FUCKING SHIT