now that the dust has settled what does /tv/ think about this movie?
i personally liked it. soundtrack at the end gave me goosebumps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V5lrhIvC_w
>>86508407
It's one of those movies you have to watch in 3D, it's a masterpiece in 3D, otherwise it's a unique claustrophobic horror flick.
Based Price.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hRvsHWTlsw
>>86508407
I saw it in IMAX and it was a great theater experience, I was on the edge of my seat the entire time.
>>86508407
Hated it.
>>86508541
because? cant appreciate space kino ?
>>86508407
absoutely a cinema experience, it loses most of its charm at home unless you have a god tier setup
>>86508407
Great Hindo-Buddhit parable.
>>86508630
most space movies are a must see at cinema, Interstellar, Gravity and The Martian to some extent, especially the last 20min.
As I recall this one is scientifically accurate except one part with those ropes and that chinese station is not that big
>>86508837
the distance between the stations are not accurate (orbiting height wise)
>>86508566
Too pretentious.
>>86508407
Good in imax. Sandra bullock was the weakest part tho. Still better than interstellar or the martian.
7/10
I hate it, I can't believe I paid 18.50 to see it. Fuck everyone involved in this movie, especially the main woman.
>>86508407
Enjoyed it. Way too much fucking talking and I didn't like George Clooney as "George Clooney" but it was a pretty fun suspenseful space movie and the visuals were good.
Should have been a Malick film
5/10
>>86509424
Malick is 0/10 shit tho
>>86509144
>pretentious
Posting this word on /tv/ should just be an autoban.
>>86508407
Bland Hollywood sci-fi that will have left public consciousness entirely in 10 years.
>>86508407
Kinda missing the point without IMAX
>>86509489
>in 10 years
Make it 2.
>>86508407
Sandra Bullock...
>>86508837
What about the part when clooney is hanging on the ropes and then flies into space? That was pure bullshit.