Is it possible to watch every film ever made in one lifetime?

/tv/ did the math. no, its not.

>>86489086
No. But if you used some kind of system to eliminate the bottom 50% of absolutely irredeemable trash, maybe.

>>86489086
If you live long enough, yes

>>86489086
It's probably possible to watch only the worthwhile stuff, but no, at least for now it's not.
I'd imagine in the far future they could just beam entertainment directly into your mind or something

>>86489086

if you play it at double speed like a true patrician then yes

>>86489123
But that was like 2 years ago. Could someone do it now in 2017?

>>86489787
How does that make sense?

>>86491037
Through the theorem of Sneedistics.

>>86489123
How long does it take, I'm curious

>>86491037
that thread you're referring to was posted like two years ago. Now there are a lot more movies posted online making them easier to find and thus saving time trying to find all of them.
More time saved searching for them = more time spent watching movies.

Every film, yes. That would eliminate all flicks and movies, and you would also be missing out on all kino, which would be your loss.

What would count as film? Some retards with a cellphone can make a film

>>86489086
just be yourself

>>86489086
No because there are lost films you can never watch if you tried

>>86493134
Let's just say every film on IMDb

>>86493049
kek

>>86489086
Maybe if you were born in the 1800s and were extremely wealthy

>>86493325
1890s**

>>86492750
>it's easier to get media now than two fucking years ago

You're one dumb kid.

Every movie worth watching has already been made. There will never be a good movie release again mark my words boy

>>86493377
Know when to take an L

File: dream-movie2.jpg (141KB, 715x1150px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 715x1150px

>>86493442
>yfw Crime and Punishment is released

>>86489123
link?

>>86489787
keked

>>86493191
There is 378047 feature films in imdb right now, so do the math.

>>86492750
Did you include all the loading that has to be done as well as bathroom breaks and other shit?

>>86495631
It would take at least 43 years watching nonstop. And that is low estimate.

>>86489086
Why would you want to? 85% of everything produced is complete shit.

For a complete shot in the dark let's say the average film is 90 minutes. IMDb says around 337,000 feature films have been released. So that would be roughly 57.7 years of continuous watching.

>>86495955
How many of those are worth watching?

>>86496050
dunno, but there are guys on letterbox with 5-10k films logged, I'd say they watched pretty much everything worth watching

>>86489086
define watch
define film
define made
define possible
define one
define ever
define is
define it
define lifetime
define every
define in

not memeing. depending on your interpretation of these words the answer will vary.

>>86495527
If each film averaged 90 minutes (which it obviously does not) it would take 64 years of back to back watching.

>>86492821
this

>>86496317
So I only need to watch films for 5-20 years to watch everything that is worth watching

we'll reach singularity in forty years or so, then you can upload yourself and watch everything

>>86496468
I just have to survive 40 more years then to truly experience full kino

>>86489086
Considering many silent films are lost forever, no.

>>86496595
stop losing films, loser