Who was in the wrong here?

>>86456688
The idea that Hogan wanted censorship and that the press is 'afraid to speak' as that title suggests is pretty weak when you consider that the tape was pornographic and filmed without his permission. Are leaked celebrity nudes free and liberated press? Do we have a right to see people's nude body? Obviously the difference is that this is framed as rooting out racks degeneracy. The fact is that it's not illegal to say you don't want want your daughter to marry a nigger, but it is illegal to steal and distribute blackmail material out of someone's home.

All parties. But Gawker most of all.

They got what was coming to them.

a gama a throne

>>86457932

Also, a lot of this legal battle was funded by a man that Gawker publicly outed against his will.

>>86457932
Rooting out racist degeneracy*
Either way this is simply part of the Netflix entitled and concerned liberal suite.

>>86456688
Imagine a documentary where someone tries to claim Jennifer Lawrence's naked body being posted all over the internet was an act of freedom of speech. Clearly they would be wrong but because this is about a middle aged man they can get away with a bullshit claim like that. Hogan was 100% in the right.

>>86458084
It's incredibly sad to me that people feel completely free to ignore or abuse the law as long as it means fucking with someone for saying something politically incorrect. There are people who sincerely believe you should never utter a racial slur in any circumstance even in your own home. Some people actually think the law should betray itself just to fuck with Hogan for its own sake because he used rude terms to say he doesn't want his daughter to marry a black guy.

so what's the difference between this and the Fappening? Everyone was talking about how evil that was, but suddenly watching someone's home sex tape is okay?

>>86459831
Because equal rights are a myth. Femalds have a legal right to the privacy of their body, but men don't, especially if they've commited a right-wing thoughtcrime.
[spouler]nah I'm exaggerating, courts ruled in favor of Hulk. Hulk only truly suffered socially and in court fees

>inb4 lolbertarians saying that Gawker has freedom of speech but Hogan doesn't have freedom of privacy

The one who spoke

HULKSTER'S GOING WILD LITIGIOUS ON YOU, BROTHER

YOU DISOBEY THE GREAT COURT SYSTEM OF OUR U.S. OF A. YOU BETTER BELIEVE HULK HOGAN'S COMING FOR YA

>>86456688
clickbait sites are the lowest form of scum. pure filth, the ever burping diarrhea of our civilization

Free speech. What chu gonna do when the Hulkster comes for you!?

File: image.jpg (67KB, 600x497px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x497px

>mfw Gawker trying to convince people that it's an outlet for "free speech and journalism" when all they do is leak sex tapes, out gay guys and spew propaganda

Killer Mike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUC2EQvdzmY

>>86461856
Somehow I knew it was some butthurt gawker intern who made this image

File: 2VGlFiI.jpg (400KB, 1438x1968px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 1438x1968px

>>86461856

>movie literally crying about alt right bullies because gawker got sued into obliivon for posting someones private films he asked them to take down. With Gawker being so retarded that they said they would post a pornographic film of an 8 year old on their website while in court.

>>86462008

No one wants to sexualize or jerk off to Hulk Hogan. His sex tape was comedy, nude leaks were violation. Do /pol/tards really not understand this?

>>86462116

>its okay to humiliate someone for their sexuality

body shaming piece of shit

>>86462116
He literally never stated otherwise in his post gawker shill

>>86462116
>judge orders you to cease publication
>you publish it anyway
>blame /pol/

What did he mean by this?

>>86456688
Gawker, and Netflix

>>86458084

That would only work if JL had no real means or intention to sue until some billionaire with a bone to pick with the media funded her. Try actually watching it.

>>86462222
>no real means or intention to sue until
Nice try gawker

File: 1498508633886.png (704KB, 583x772px) Image search: [Google]

704KB, 583x772px

>alt-right murders a woman
>but muh FREEZE PEACH

>>86462008

>one's sex under a cover with little to no actual nudity between exhibitionists with full knowledge of a video being made and possibly distributed
>one's full frontal HD nudes that were stolen
>4chins only cares about the one they can't jerk off to

>>86462349
>has to bring up unrelated subject to defend his shitty website
top kek at least we now know it's a gawker employee spamming this image everywhere

File: Screenshot_20170816-125617.jpg (327KB, 1440x929px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1440x929px

>>86456688
Looks like the audience didn't get it

>>86462349
>alt-left murders five police officers and executes a governor
>but muh MORAL HIGH GROUND

downloading now

File: image.jpg (143KB, 768x504px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 768x504px

>>86462349
>liberals suddenly care about cars hitting people
lmao

File: download.jpg (11KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 260x194px

>>86462349

>suddenly caring about peoples lives

File: Sup pol.jpg (91KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1080x720px

>>86462566
>>86462631
>>86462726
>>86462891
KEK shadilay my fellow pedes you sure showed that libtard

File: hillary voter.jpg (1MB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x1280px

>>86463372
you sure showed them syster #lovetrumpshate

>>86463372
Are you seriously defending Gawker for what they did and accusing anyone rebuking you of being a /pol/tard?

File: 1502901012388[1].png (597KB, 704x682px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 704x682px

>>86463372
>when you run out of arguments

>>86463579
He's an autist who posts the same pics in every thread and gets triggered by anything on here related to politics

>>86463372
I thought this man was baiting, but I'm not so sure now

>>86460075
If hulk won the case, he didn't pay any court fees, those are paid by the loser.

>>86463728
What do you mean

>>86462116
You have to be 18+ to post on 4chan.

>>86462631
>alt-left murders five police officers and executes a governor
wait what did I miss

>>86457980
Racist degeneracy is an oxymoron

File: bernie 2016.png (2MB, 1560x930px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1560x930px

>>86463801
Check any Colbert thread and you'll see he posts the same boring pics, next he'll probably use the ugly dude with the cake.

>>86456688

Gawker considering they deliberately mocked and disregarded a court order from the judge to take down the sex tape.

>>86463882
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/us/dallas-police-shooting.html

>>86463882
I think he is referring to a sniper attack last year by a BLM fan and when a Bernie fan tried to assassinate a Republican politician

>>86464052
I find it funny how much the media is attacking Trump for denouncing violence all around while giving Bernie a free pass for saying the exact same thing with that shooter.

>>86464052
>>86464051
oh okay thanks