Why he so mad about youtube videos?

>>86410389
MGS flick already confirmed to be shitty

File: jon.jpg (18KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 600x300px

>>86410389
>>86410420
>>86410483
>He takes Cinema Sins THIS seriously

>Actually responding to fucking Cinema Sins as a working director
wew

>>86410464
>getting this bent out of shape over a Cinema Sins video

wew lad he's going to have a breakdown when autists tear his MGS movie apart every time he's on social media

File: 2017-08-15_20-53-07.png (21KB, 633x199px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 633x199px

Oh, i get it, Jordan. Thanks for answer.

I don't understand why someone would think respond to a video poking fun at a movie and not making too many criticisms of it. It just makes him look retarded

>>86410711
By that logic cinema sins is completely immune to all criticism. How convenient. He's embarrassing the channel by pointing out how frequently the points are just wrong.

File: 1499648985818.jpg (31KB, 311x278px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 311x278px

He's right though. CinemaSins is the most reddit shit ever and a cancer to online film discussion.

>>86410657
>I'm not mad, I just spent time watching it a posting about it on twitter for reasons

man this is some next level autism

>>86410389

He should be. CinemaSins is fucking retarded.

>>86410805
hi Jordan

File: 1415278491791.png (273KB, 368x447px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 368x447px

>>86410389
>getting this mad over cinemasins

>>86410805

No but as a director of a Hollywood Blockbuster, criticising cinemasins seriously (since it became utter shit years ago) should be beneath you. Especially since he's just nitpicking the nitpicks. If he made a single post saying something like "just watched the Kong Island cinemasins, really inaccurate and disappointing" I could understand. But this fag had to go into detail about stupid shit that literally nobody but him cares about. Then he had to add the "I swear I'm not mad though" tweet. Really pathetic

cinemasins is shit but so is roberts and his garbage movie

Mgs will blow

>>86410999
This

>>86410999
Kong wasn't bad. I enjoyed it a lot (as a flick)

>>86410805
His not immune to criticism, its just that most of the time what he says isn't very serious and in a light hearted way, nothing that woulf actually ruin a movie. Its literally just made for comedy

>>86410976
This.
It's as bad as that dude who made the "Everything Wrong with Cinema Sins" videos without realising Cinema Sins already did it.
You're not hurting them by critiquing them. You're doing anything new when you do it. You making them laugh as more people go and watch their video you just appointed the attention too.

>>86410834
He's a working director in Hollywood, he doesn't have to deign to respond to the fucking Cinema Sins YT channel.

>>86410657

He is spot on in that second tweet, those videos are just lazy

>>86410857
>Giving a shitty Youtube channel more hits by addressing them
i dunno, it seems more retarded to give them attention

I hate this "lol ur salty" internet culture that's popped up recently. Like engaging with something in a real way and expressing actual emotions is somehow bad.

It's all just a bunch of little faggots with nothing more to their character than pure misanthropy hiding behind 10 layers of irony at all times or it might open them to actual criticism of their actual beliefs.

>>86410834
Its not good but you just ignore dumb videos like that cause it in no wya affects you instead of disecting the video and make it a big deal.

>>86410657
The irony is palpable in the second tweet.

>>86410657
I mean he's not wrong

>>86410657
>I'm not mad even though my tweets are passive-aggressive swipes at a Youtube channel for overly cynical retards

>>86411107
>made king kong skull island
>complain about the dumbing down of cinema
This guy is actually autistic

>>86411149
>recently
did you just start using the internet a year ago newfriend?

>Enjoy moves that tell a comprehensive and intelligent story that ignite conversation.
>Also like Cinema Sins for light comedy

It's almost as if people CAN enjoy both things for different reasons.

>>8641114
Its just dumb videos made about a movie, they aren't even serious or good, he should just ignore them

>>86410389
Why does it matter?

File: 1463010072522.jpg (297KB, 970x582px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 970x582px

>>86410657
>syphon other people's work for their own gain
>makes movies based on other people's work

>>86411149
This, what I was gonna point out. It's amazing how all genuine expression is derided in modern culture. I think it's because genuine people are threatening to cowards by reminding them what they are, which is why people who express themselves usually start getting harassed by brave Internet warriors from YouTube comments and Twitter.

>>86410657
>makes a fucking king king movie
>assmad about people profiting off the work of others

jesus condom

File: 90182923.gif (613KB, 498x498px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 498x498px

>>86410657
>Guy who does yet another remake of an actual classic film complaining about the dumbing down of cinema

File: 1500849514387.jpg (460KB, 1209x756px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 1209x756px

Why can cinemasins criticize a movie but a director of a movie can't criticize cinemasins without being "le mad"
I'm going to start a youtube channel where I review other youtube channels. Fuck I'm a genius

>>86411364
No its just that you can't just be autistic about stupid shit like cinemasins it has nothing to do about being "real"

>>86411434
everyone in this situation is fucking stupid

>>86411434
Its mostly cuase the director is bgger then a fucking youtuber and shouldn't even be on the same level as them, its like getting mad at fans.

>>86411149
the reason the whole 'lol y so mad tho' shit is so prevalent is because, once upon a time, people were capable of ignoring things online that they didn't like.
But now people NEED to make themselves heard, they NEED the world to know they have opinions on things, especially NEGATIVE opinions. And so they throw their negative opinions willy-nilly, doing nothing but drawing attention to the thing they hate, and attention is quite literally the most sought after commodity online. Everything on the internet hinges on getting people's attention first and foremost.

>>86411475
>misusing the word autistic to slander people who express themselves
>demonizing expression by associating it with a severe, totally unrelated disorder
You're so brainwashed by the culture of irony cowardice that you're accidentally illustrating my point for me.

>>86411434
Because a famous director makes millions of dollars and CinemaSins is some nitpicky Youtube channel. Who cares what he thinks

>>86411434
Cinemasins is always ironically nitpicking and he's taking the video as serious criticism that he feels he needs to respond and defend himself against instead of taking on an actual critic. This makes him look petty af.
Also those types of channels already exist.

People rip on Michael Bay worse than that asshole and even he knows you don't respond to fucking critics in a salty way

>>86411542
>>86411600
Lets be honest though Jordan Vogt-Roberts not only is less well known than cinemasins but probably makes less money than him too.

this is embarrasing

>>86411434
>I'm going to start a youtube channel where I review other youtube channels
WHAT WE DO HERE IS GO BACKBACKBACKBACK

>>86411616
>I-I-it's ironic you c-c-can't criticize it b-because its c-criticizing itself
David Foster Wallace was right about you poisonous fucks.

>>86411575
>on 4chan complaining about culture and how people cna be so mean to others
>gets triggered by the word autist
I think its just funny hwo you are making this a bigger thing then it is, he can ignore this shit amd it wouldn't make any difference to him, he can be mad amd express it but hes just doing it so retardedly

>>86411364
Right on brother. Irony is a cultural toxin.

>>86411641
He gets big blockbuster movies, Id say they are about even, Id also argue he makes better things then cinema sins but thats not that hard to do

>>86411720
>mwaah yes, this is like the teachings of the great Wallace, such philistinery cannot be sanctioned by intellects such as his and mine, muh haawww herm

fuck off, faggot

>>86411794
Irony as a form of expression has existed long before you started whining about it, stupid

>>86411798
DFW is fucking entry level shit you retard. If you think mentioning him is in any way pretentious you're missing a chromosome (unrionically.)

File: film.jpg (43KB, 574x395px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 574x395px

>>86411641
I'd never looked at his filmography before, what the fuck. I mean he directed like two other short films but this is the guy you put in charge of your King Kong movies?

I didn't think anyone took CinemaSins seriously except for the retards on /tv/

>>86411855
>muhgaaaw these plebs don't even know entry-level namedropping, muhoowheeuuw

it's not the 'who', it's the 'how'

>>86411875
>The masses have spoken, they're sick of the same thing again and again and want risks! change!
>okay. we will take risks and make changes
>we will make king kong again but have some literal who direct it

ggwp hollywood. masterstroke.

>>86410605
THIS IS ALL FUCKING TRUMP'S FAULT!
TWO SCOOPS?

I agree otherwise. Nitpicking is the lowest form of criticism. Anyone can do it to any movie and it's embarrassing that these "experts" get so many views doing it.

>>86411875
It's pretty common nowadays. Hollywood picks a decent, young director who's made a good indie movie and put them in charge of a huge blockbuster. A young, relatively inexperienced director is way easier to control than someone like Nolan or Spielberg.
see
>Colin Trevorrow
>Josh Trank
>Jordan Vogt-Roberts

>>86410605
What's Trump got to do with it?

>>86410657
he's right at the second tweet but kong was so fucking mediocre i'm glad he's mad

>>86411895
The fact that CinemaSins exists means that people take it seriously, I mean who the fuck wants to watch a video where you're nitpicking a movie for the sake of it, literally what does someone get from it? I don't care if it's "le ironic" there's literally nothing funny about it

>>86411875
>get a literal who as your director so he will just do whatever the fuck producers want since he doesn't want to risk his career
>profit

>>86412095
I know right? This seems to suggest people has different senses of humour than us! As if.

>>86412038
it might be that but it's most likely because they are cheaper than fucking Spielberg

Both reasons are correct

>>86412095
sometimes when i want to rewatch a movie but at the same time i don't want to watch that movie, i watch the 6 minutes of Cinemasins video of that movie and turn it off

>>86412184
>guy shitting on a movie I like for the sake of shitting on it is funny

I wouldn't mind CinemaSins so much if they were correct in their "funny nitpicks".

To people who actually watch the movies they sin, you almost ask yourself, "Did they even watch the movie?"

It's hard to laugh at some sins when they complain about something not making sense or why would a character do this when the movie does actually explain or allude to a reason.

It'd be like someone laughing and making fun of Jerry for slipping on a banana when it was actually Bob who did it. Then when you try to correct him, he says, "WHOA BRO IT'S JUST A JOKE DON'T TAKE IT SO SERIOUSLY LOL"

>>86412199
With the added bonus of hearing some jokes. Or hearing something that makes you look at the scene in a slightly different light.

>>86412256
Lmao nigga what?Show me one good cinemasins joke or something ''enlightning''

>>86412038
>>86412187
The naive reason is because they can bring their indie quality to a big budgeted movies

But really, it's just because they easier to be a yes man

File: 1495774094601.jpg (75KB, 622x1024px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 622x1024px

>>86412004
Liberals melt when Donald has two scoops. I'm surprised he hasn't held a press conference with a two-scoop serving of ice-cream in his hand.

>>86410605
>It's Trump's fault!
lol doesn't this guy understand that CinemaSins are also leftie fags?

>>86412308
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GK5ott5ery8
About one minute in you learn (If you didn't already know) two of the main characters were based off of real people with actual accomplishments.
If you're not a cumbucket, you might take that knowledge and look some shit up, learn yourself some knowledge.

>>86411600
http://www.statsheep.com/cinemasins

This plus merch and probably patreon, i'm sure he is doing fine.

>>86411616
>ironically

There is no irony in his work, what he produces is taken at face value and treated as a genuine flaw of the flick. I know this because I was one of them. If you are anywhere beyond "it's just a movie bro" level you should stop watching him and figure out what actually matters in a movie and how you would go analyzing it as objectively as you could master.

>>86412095
>I mean who the fuck wants to watch a video where you're nitpicking a movie for the sake of it, literally what does someone get from it?
I find it funny because of his voice and I'm also a nitpicking slut. I like to point out stupid shit during a movie and he usually says the same shit I do. Even for movies I like, I can't help but point shit out. Doesn't take away from the movie for me and I don't take it seriously (my nitpicking or CinemaSins') Its all jokes, senpai. People like different shit.

>>86410389
Who cares about Reddit sins anyway.

>>86410389
Because he's a bitch director who's self absorb and full of himself.
Tiny dick syndrome.

Plus I find it kind of funny how he is hating CinemaSins yet shits on other movies.

>>86412786
You're cancer, just wanted to let you know

>>86411542
It's more like a novel writer being mad a a writer for pamphlets.

>>86412853
You sound like a pussy, but I hope you have a good day.

>>86411149
Are you new to this imageboard?

>>86412038
Funny how Trevvorrow is a cuck, Vogts is cavemen moron and Trank is a nutcase. Yet they trust these no talent, styleless losers with 200 million.

I know people hate his big work but I actually like Gareth Edwards. As a person he seems really nice and a decent dude. Wish Disney+Kathleen didn't fuck him so hard

>>86410389

Cinema sins is the cringest shit ever anyway. That weird kid who thinks Simon Pegg movies are literally the funniest thing ever are the types that watch them

>>86410389
Kong: Skull Island was one of the worst movies I've seen in years and a perfect example of the garbage Hollywood is shitting out in the 2010s

Don't you just hate it when people do something that clearly requires at least a tiny bit of effort to complete but then claim that they actually don't "take it seriously"?

>>86410580
Metal gear solid has no chance

>>86410657
I agree with him to an extent but he's obviously butthurt. cinema sins is a terrible channel

File: Point_Laugh.jpg (133KB, 500x371px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 500x371px

>>86410580
Fact: trashing Cinemasins means you DON"T take them seriously. Defending them means you do.

Stop being a hypocrite, faggot.

>>86411149
Any sign that internet insults offend you is considered a sign of weakness and that your opponent one. I don't like it but that's how it is.

>>86411430
This. How about something original.

Watching the video now. It seems funny on and point with it's critiques. What's the source of all the butthurt? Watch it first then respond.

>>86413090
You mean Bobby "I love movies" Burns?
Guy is a total faget. Typical wannabe filmmaker with entry level taste.

>>86413009
That's profitable in the fully-industrialized studio system we have now. Style and character (or at least enough and not too much as to be offensive) can be added in post. A celebrity director disowning the movie after it releases or he leaves the project and badmouthing the studio can't be fixed.

>getting buttmad at a light "comedy" youtube video
how can these people be this dense and functional members of society at the same time

He's 100% right.

Read the whole comment chain on his twitter. He's shitting on clickbait and eceleb snark """""criticism""""" because they have no clue what they're talking about, no point of view other than clickbait and they're often objectively wrong. I've never seen a movie this guy made but his argument here is correct.

>>86414464
Really? Watch the 20 minute long cinemasins video and tell us how much is clueless and clickbait vs rightfully criticizing another cliche Hollywood remake.

>>86413379
KONG Skull Island is a pretty terrible flick indeed, but Cinema Sins is still worse by a wide country mile.

>>86410605
>REEEEEEEEE
>It's all Drumpfs fault!!!

typical libshit numale faggot

>>86413753
this makes absolutely zero sense. And where did he defend Cinemasins exactly? You need to calm down Jordan, lel

>>86410657
>implying these aren't the same opinions that get posted in every thread about cinemasins

stay contrarian, /tv/

>>86411434
There is already a YouTube channel that's dedicated to debunking their videos. I forgot it existed since I just avoid cancer like cinemasins, collider, redlettermedia, dougwalker, etc. A lot of you faggots love them don't you? Vile.

>>86413753
Funfact: you're replying to anonymous people and taking it personally

>>86410657
he's 100% correct

>>86411231
there's nothing passive about it

Guy's really insecure in his movie if it took this little for him to fly off the handle.

>>86413597
Let's see your YouTube channel.

What a fucking retard

>>86411434
Fight the establishment bro! Anything made for consumers is inherently bad! Directors and game devs are the devil, I am entitled!

>>86410580
His screenshots are all valid points, fuck CinemaSins. However, the Trump stuff just revealed how butthurt he was and it's pathetic

>>86410389
>op and all the Cinema Sin fags projecting their anger
>all because they take Cinema Sins seriously
Cinema Sins is shit. Anyone who doesn't take it seriously agrees that it is shit. Those who don't will defend Cinema Sins as if their life depends on it. This is a fact.

What to prove that you don't take Cinema Sins seriously? All you have to do is admit that it's shit.

>>86417538
lol fuck off Jordan

Maybe next time make a better movie

>>86410605
>Oh wait, this whiteboi talked shit about our based lord the MAGAchief?
>REEEEE FUCK this nu-male faggot cuck

>>86410605
lmfao

File: 1502825091496.jpg (74KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 600x450px

>>86417716
who are you quoting?

>>86410654
Fucking this, Kojimafags are more braindead than Cinema sins, he will never recover from the butthurt.

It's like he knows he's a hack and is overcompensating for being a hack. If he didn't have such a complex he could just laugh it off.

>Not watching CinemaWins
Whats it like being reddit?

>>86410389
I don't know what movie this is, but I LOVE that the director did this. Fuck """critics""" who hide behind "lol I was just kidding bro" and can't take what they deal out.

>>86419479
Ok, appertantly the director is a huge douche, but whatever, I still defend his action here.

>>86410389
he really missed the point
its not that individual the songs themselves are a cliche
its that having the soundtrack be a bunch of songs from the era is like the bread and butter for every single vietnam movie

>>86410657
He's completely right. Every idiot with a youtube channel is considered some enlightened critic once they get enough subscribers.

>>86419662
His viewpoint as a creator is totally different than ours, it makes more sense to him and makes it different than the rest. He's obviously very proud of his work but he has to realize that not everything he tries to do will be noticed by the audience, especially in a fucking Kong movie, does he not know how mentally handicapped kaijufags are?

Culture of nitpicking """"mistakes"""" is cancer, but given the popularity of cinemasins, it's what people are into these days.

I don't know but he sure made a mediorce forgettable movie

>>86417440
They definitely are valid points, but he conveniently ignores the continuity problems and genuine points in the video.

There's not many, but there are at least a few reasonable criticisms. Not least of which that the dialogue in general is cliché garbage.

>getting triggered by some no-name twitter account
>get so mad that you make a thread on 4chan
Why do Cinema Sin fags take this shit so seriously? Honestly, defending Cinema Sins like its the most important thing in the world then acting like you don't take things seriously is just pure stupidity.

Stop to take a breath and just admit that Cinema Sins is shit. You can do it, sweetie.

>>86410657
>this is the man directing the Metal Gear Solid movie

Welp, that's going to be a huge pile of shit.

>>86420687
Dude seems really passionate about MGS in interviews, like he actually gives a shit and wants to make a good video game movie

Hope it's good, if Kong got a pass from critics even though it's a mega schlocky and cheesy movie then I guess it could be the same for this one

>>86411149
U mad bro?

>>86411149
>>86420889
>"IT'S JUST A PRANK BRO"

Literally the only defense CinemaSins has

File: Snake.jpg (52KB, 552x472px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 552x472px

>>86410605
This makes me sad. How is a guy who is just another one of these "Trump is bad" 2/7 folks supposed to adapt Metal Gear into a film? Oh no, no no no. His Metal Gear movie isn't going to be about information control, loyalty, and espionage, it's going to be about identity politics and nazis or something. I hope his MGS movie never actually gets made, I so badly don't want to see it ruined.

Can't they just let Kojima direct the MGS film?

>Cinemasins is bad
Why?
Is this just another instance of "it's popular so 4chan must hate it"?
I found it recently and binge watched it, it's pretty entertaining considering I didn't watch most of the movies.

>>86420916
But "u mad bro" is a 14 year old meme. It's not a recent thing

>>86410580
>im a comedian, dont take me seriously
most annoying excuse

>>86410605

>mentions Trump of of nowhere

Real talk though this guy seems a little mentally "off"

File: 1494683486132.jpg (62KB, 671x665px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 671x665px

>>86414739
>>86413379
Compared to Lost City of Z and the recent Tarzan movie, it was great.

>tfw just want a fun adventure movie but the genre's dead

Metal Gear is fucked

>I'm not taking this too seriously, you're taking this too seriously

every internet argument ever

I don't even know how it's the trump card that people think it is. Oh ho, you thought I was wrong? Well guess what, I'm going to accuse you of taking things too seriously! Didn't see that coming, did ya?

>>86410483
Yeah and it was a retarted decision and now he's coming off even more retarded trying to argue with a ridiculous comedy YouTube channel

>>86422055
How can that be off if that's what everyone does now? Maybe you're off. Maybe you need to be identified and blacklisted.

>>86416917
Nobody here is a working Hollywood director you fucking mong

>>86420505
anon
anon that's the director of the movie
both him and the fag on youtube are being laughed at
why do I have to tell you this

>>86422799
actually sorry I take that back.

It's possible that retard posts here just to defend his film anonymously

>>86410657
>it makes me sad they get so many views/contribute to the dumbing down of cinema

I unironically agree 100% with this at least.

>>86420103
It was cheesy as shit. And I know we're talking about a schlocky movie here but they find a record player on a lost island just so the film won't need to go 5 minutes without having a shitty "Vietnam era" musical segment

File: wqwqwqwwq.jpg (29KB, 512x584px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 512x584px

>>86411149
>recently
shit has been around since forever.

>>86423168
I genuinly thought it was a comedy up untill 20 mins into the movie. It was cheesy cliche after cheesy cliche.

>>86413009
>I know people hate his big work but I actually like Gareth Edwards. As a person he seems really nice and a decent dude. Wish Disney+Kathleen didn't fuck him so hard

Agreed, and Monsters is PURE kino.

>thread is continually bumped by Cinema Sin fags
>and they still claim that they don't take it seriously
FUCKIN LOL

>>86411633
I was just thinking the same thing.

Ironically the closest I can think of of a filmmaker being unable to just ignore criticism would be Roland Emmerich creating the fat retarded "Mayor Ebert" in the 90s Godzilla movie after Roger Ebert hated one of his earlier movies

>Getting so mad over a joke channel
What's next? Directors angry at Pewdiepie?

>>86421154
>it's pretty entertaining considering I didn't watch most of the movies.

Well there you go.

Vogt-Roberts isn't a very good director, but he's very right about CinemaSins being anti-art.

>>86423354
it was a shitty movie, get over it.

>>86410657
>there are people on /tv/ this shit board who likes cinemasins

>>86410605
>BLUAAARGH DRUMPF

Hollywood really working hard on that second term i see.

>>86423558
How are they anti-art

>>86423558
when was the last time they covered anything art related?

>>86413009
Same shit as getting Marc Webb to do TASM 1&2 then when the films weren't successful enough they just kicked him to the curb

>>86423248
Oh me too dude that opening sequence was done so badly i was expecting a reveal that they were filming a shitty war film on this island then Kong showed up. Kind of a call back to the set up of other KK films, but no that was the director's actual style

>>86423307
He did Godzilla 2014 right?

That movie had a lot of fuckups but I genuinely preferred it to Kong

I used to watch cinemasins videos way back, but I too got kind of frustrated when they would count just random shit as actual sins, or just blatant bullshit. But I just stopped watching them and my movie watching experiences have been much better.

100% agree with this guy though. It may be a little foolish to go on an entire rant online about it but he's still right. Fuck cinemasins and fuck people that use those videos as actual arguments as to why they don't like a movie.

>>86410605
Replying: people with skin as thin as Trump's

>>86424095
I say fuck people like you who take trash like cinema sins and other people's opinions so seriously that you let it effect you so much.

>>86410389
>watch a Cinemasins video for the very first time after ignoring them for years
>expect a video that points out things like plot holes, continuity errors, and other goofs
>get 20 minutes of painfully unfunny """jokes"""

>>86425427
Just said that i stopped watching cinemasins years ago.

This thread is the first time cinemasins has even popped up in my mind for like a year or something. That's not really "affecting" me at all I don't think.

>live in a liberal city
>don't even read national or local news
>take up a local daily paper (not the actual newspaper but another mini-one)

>nothing but people blaming trump for the most inane bullshit, literally shit that predates him or is out of control

how fucking retarded do you have to be to be a liberal and drool and froth at the mouth to be like TRUUUUUUMP ARGHASEHDASHDSA every day?

>>86410605
>>>86412004 >>86412068 >>86412454 >>86416585 >>86417716 >>86417734 >>86420939 >>86422055 >>86423639 >>86425308
WAT UP /POL/ PICKLE RICKERS IN THE HOUSE TONIGHT WUBBA LUBBA DUB DUB YEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHH BOOOOOOOOOY

File: 1502797998133.png (143KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 600x600px

>nitpicks the weakest sins
>complains about CS nitpicking

Hmm, rly makes you think

>>86423802
Film is art you moron.

>>86425629
>But I just stopped watching them and my movie watching experiences have been much better.
That means that their opinions actually affected you.

>>86410605
Oh shit. This will trigger babies

>>86410389
its a bad look to respond like this but man cinema sins is such total cancer, the worst kind of people look at movies that way

>>86410657
wait that second tweet is right