>the first movie to kick off a shared cinematic universe
>it's the only good one
what did Marvel mean by this?
>>86279087
he was extreme badass in the new spiderman when he appears during the time of crisis (no spoilers from me, son)
so STFU you OP
picnotrelated
>>86280211
Captivate.
???
Jewgold
>loved the first Iron Man
>enjoyed Iron Man 2
>Iron Man 3...
>>86280613
Iron Man 3 only really lost me at the end where they just went full retard with a fuckton of suits. The only interesting thing about it was the possible message about how disposable and weak they really were.
>>86280613
>enjoyed Iron Man 2
yikes
>>86279087
Ironaman 90% effects 10% cast
Ironman 2 40% effects 60% cast
Ironman 3 0,5% effect 95% cast
>>86280613
>enjoyed Iron Man 2
You have shit taste
>>86280613
3 was much better than fucking Iron Man 2.
Iron man 1 was really organic the way he used technology. It was believable and wasnt just out of nowhere. he spent time making the escape suit and made ones that had vulnerabilities and was difficult to make
Iron man these days just shits deus ex machina. he can literally build thousands of these suits all of them as strong as captain america. whats even the point of avengers when iron man can just make infinite hulk busters just hold thanos down limb by limb
>>86280613
>>86281034
>>86281134
Iron Man 3 is great as a Shane Black movie, aside from a few decisions the studio obviously made like all the 'toyetic' suits, though that's really nothing compared to what they did to Ant-man.
>>86279087
No.