Absolutely Retarded-Ass Crititcal Reception for Fantastic Movies

File: 4c0ed4ef7155ebb961511fb8efcd83e69f98eb85e3c662cbdbfbdd355e4b7cb9_large.jpg (58KB, 640x486px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 640x486px

>>86266523
His whole career

>>86266584
yeah, all of his movies scored too high

File: 1408667719338.jpg (23KB, 290x324px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 290x324px

>>86266523
>one of the finest films from one of the most renowned filmmakers of all of time
>lower tomatometer than every recent Marvel movie
That's why you shouldn't trust these sort of sites. Attack of the Clones has a 65%, almost as good as Dersu Uzala.

>>86266584
Agreed. Man is a mastermind behind the lens

Atleast movie critics are somewhat professional.

find my any /tv/ crit worse than IGNs review of God Hand

File: 20170812_101539.png (440KB, 719x787px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 719x787px

Should be high 90s. This is PTAs best

>>86267309
Ebert's review of Blue Velvet

>>86267399
Inherent Vice is kino and will become a cult classic in your lifetime. Mark my words.

Speed Racer and John Carter of Mars. They were pretty good.

File: rickandmorty.png (19KB, 695x203px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 695x203px

>>86266941
found the youtube autist

tasteless whites try to keep Asian films down because it threatens white hollywood propaganda machine and monopoly

>>86267209
They need to different meters. One that includes blogs and all that horseshit and another for respected critics that actually watch films beyond hollyjew and capeshit. Their top critics thing doesn't cut it.

>>86266523
>Can we have a thread complaining about how retarded critics can be
just take any capeshit movie of the past 16 years.

>>86267636

> Rent this -- don't buy it. That way you'll feel less digusted with yourself for seeing a Mel Gibson film. Otherwise, it's excellent.

> A quite exciting spectacle based on a racist version of indigenous history, one in which the genocidal conquistadors are the New World's liberators.

> As a piece of filmmaking it's certainly strong enough to restore his commercial viability. Whether that's to the good is another question entirely.

> If I were a Christian, I'd be appalled to have this primitive and pornographic bloodbath presume to speak for me.

> Gibson's got a fetish, he likes bondage in a bad way. More than that, he's like that character from 'DaVinci Code' who keeps whipping himself, only... Gibson whips himself whilst masturbating over images of the crucified Christ. WHO THE HELL GIVES GIBSON MONEY TO MAKE FILMS!!!??

> Gibson is just like all the other hateful men who've been successful -- he's the right guy at the right weak moment.

why is this allowed?