Is this correct?

>>86256194
All laughtrack sitcoms are bad, but I guess you have their relative badness captured.

>>86256194
i like all of them :)

>>86256194
TOSSED SALADS AND SCRAMBLED EGGS
MERCY
E
R
C
Y

The only show you need for laughs is M*A*S*H* but you younglings probably have no idea what I'm talking about.

HIMYM on the bottom

>>86256194
I loved Seinfeld and kinda disliked Friends, but I never understood the appeal of Frasier. Couldn't even sit through full episodes.

File: IMG_9765.png (492KB, 1284x856px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 1284x856px

>East is east, and west is west and the wrong one I have chose
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FvAWUJCjgQE

friends is absolute shit tier, you got that right
but seinfeld > frasier although both are good

>>86256305
Absolute pleb.

File: 6654645354363452.png (2MB, 857x1202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 857x1202px

Is this correct?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoYAgKGnZ6U

Someone post a scene from any one of these shows that a modern viewer would be able to find funny without nostalgia.

>>86257211
Ridiculously easy considering "modern viewers" regularly laugh at shows like The Big Bang Theory

>>86256236
Having a laugh track doesn't make a sitcom bad

>>86257211
seinfelds writers stole a lot of jokes from comedians too

>>86257197
This is genuinely correct and people who think otherwise are brainlets. It's not "hipster" or whatever to know the first one is the best one.

The rest are great spectacles, the first one is an actual film.

>>86257211
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfVdkhvQX6g

OY