how can one person be so fucking un funny?

>>86246985
why are you watching it then? Stupid faggot you just wrecked yourself.

>>86246985

What holy cow of yours did he slay?

t. Joe Rogan

>>86246985
Pro-Israel, free market pseudo intellectual who thinks Hitler was a liberal
-10/10

>>86246985
He's canadian

I often agree with this guy but he's so damn obnoxious and un charismatic.

File: 1488326572998.jpg (134KB, 577x800px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 577x800px

>>86248234
>That is considered right wing in America

>>86247453
DUDE
WEED
LMAO

>>86246985
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsVONO75utI

i agree but i like this

>>86248251
and french to boot

Completely disagree. His new stuff is really witty and better than all of the current late show hosts who wait for applause every 5 seconds. He was kind of whiny in the old podcasts but he's since stepped up his game.

File: 1440948543928.webm (80KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1280x720px

Lost any and all respect for him when he came out in denial of man made climate change.

Fun fact, he used to voice The Brain on Arthur

>>86248764
>click on crowder vid
>political attack on the left (using strawmans, of course) intercut w 40 gifs

Yeah, you really need a certain level of intel of gents to vibe with him

File: Joe-Rogan-Dana-White-Fight-424x3561.jpg (26KB, 424x356px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 424x356px

>>86246985
>Hey Steve Crowder who voiced Brain on Arthur, what's one issue you don't give a fuck about and don't really feel like discussing.
>Ah probably weed I don't really care if people smoke it or that it becomes legalized and it's basically a non-issue to me, I just don't think that it comes without consequences.
>WHOA WHAT THE FUCK PRINCESS THAT'S ADORABLE FUCKFACE JAIMIE PULL UP GORILLAS DRIVING CARS ON WEED AND NOT CRASHING IN COLORADO
>Joe I'm just saying I'll give you that it's not inherently harmful nor that it may even have traffic violation causal effects based on that study, I just don't really even care about the issue.
>GORILLA WOULD FUCK YOU UP MAN BUT NOT ON WEED WHY DON'T YOU GET ON YOUR SHOW WITH SIX OTHER GUYS WHO ALSO HATE WEED LIKE YOU HAVE STATED THAT YOU HATE WEED AND I'LL FUCKIN' FIGHT YOU ALL, TAKE YOUR BACK, IT'S OVER BITCH
>Joe I feel like you're just getting defensive now about an issue you're particularly biased on and I really have no interest in discussing, if you wanna smoke weed smoke weed I just think it's not the miracle it's cracked up to be.
>LOL THAT'S ADORABLE YOU MISSED YOUR FLIGHT NOW IT'S GONNA BE OKAY AT LEAST YOU'RE NOT A STARVING AFRICAN CHILD GETTING EATEN BY A VULTURE, VULTURES WILL FUCK YOU UP BRO, THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR SPREADING THIS ANTI-WEED PROPAGANDA
>Why are we still talking about weed when I don't eve-
>I BET IF IT WAS A FUCKIN' TAG TEAM MATCH BETWEEN ME AND JAIMIE AGAINST YOU AND NOT-GAY JARED WE'D FUCK YOU UP BRO, JOE ROGANS AND JAIMIES WILL FUCK YOU UP, WINNER DECIDES WHO IS RIGHT ABOUT WEED PRINCESS

>>86249236
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Crowder. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of political theory most of the jokes will go over a typical listener's head.

>>86248974
It's kind of funny when i lisen to the Jekyll Hyde song now I can hear his particular accent in how he says "Hyde"

>>86246985
is he gay?

>>86248234
t. crowcuck

>>86249392
>occasionally cross-dresses for "comedic effect"
>remained voluntarily celibate before marriage
>claims to believe in traditional marriage
The lady doth protest too much, methinks

>>86248450
DUDE
KEK
LMAO

>>86249392
not just gay he's weak bottom

>>86250088
That's the most fun kind of being gay tho

>>86249831
This, if he came out he might be funnier? Less unfunny at least.

>>86246985
I've never understood the not gay thing. I watched one video where they did an entire segment about not gay jared or something.

It was like I could sense that there was a joke being made, but the punchline never came.
Youtube is the bastion of talentless hacks.

File: 2ee.gif (134KB, 287x344px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 287x344px

>>86249357

>>86246985
I like his Bob Ross impersonations

File: 2j44r2b.jpg (32KB, 792x442px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 792x442px

>>86250217
Much like his Cenk impression, it's a dank meme that Steven ran into the ground long ago but just keeps going with.

Same with:

>thug life game on a nigga
>Jihadi Bond
>dancing
>Hopper

The only thing on his show hat doesn't get old is POGO songs.

>>86246985
because the extreme opposite of sjws, hes basicially got salt in his dick hole.

>>86250287
.......................kek....................

>>86246985
All political e-celebs are fucking garbage, don't waste your time watching that crap, read a book or learn a language or something.

>>86249357
Good meme.

>>86249351
This. I'm no Steven Crowder fan, but Joe came off as a total douchebag on that podcast. He gets super butthurt when anyone suggests that weed may have some negative consequences.

His sketches are funny.

>>86250603
>>86250637
>t. crowder shills

>>86250663
You don't think Joe gets overly preachy about weed at times? It made him look like a total dickhead in that episode.

>>86250603
Not true. Ben Shapiro was on last week and Ben outright said, "I think drugs are stupid I don't think you should do drugs blah blah blah" and Joe just sat there, straight-face and let him go on then just asked him another question. I was amazed.

>>86250759
That doesn't erase what happened on the Steven Crowder episode.

>>86250792
It erases your comment that he gets super butthurt when anyone suggests that weed may have some negative consequences.

>>86250603
agreed
>>86250759
joe apologized numerous times for acting obnoxiously when crowder was on and definitely doesnt want a repeat.

>>86250839
Not really, because it happened on the Steven Crowder episode, and he's made other retarded comments about weed before. Just because he was more reasonable this time with Ben doesn't erase everything that happened in the past.

File: 001Gengar.png (184KB, 848x942px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 848x942px

I thought this was a /tv/ board. What's next we're going to have a discussion on rooster teeth shows.

>>86250888
Yes really, because it directly negates the phrasing of your comment. He does not get super butthurt when anyone suggests that weed may have some negative consequences because Ben Shapiro is anyone and he did not get super butthurt when Ben suggested that weed may have some negative consequences.

Steven Crowder is new wave Christian youth minister.

>>86249357
good bait

>>86246985
This was actually pretty funny though. Most of the time he is cringe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcUJgbWrM64

>>86246985
None of these purely "political" comics are funny. It's just nothing but boring cheap shots. John Stewart was probably the best of them and he still became insufferable very quickly.

>>86250952
Ben Shapiro is one instance where he was fair you dumb nigger. He has a long history of making dopey comments about weed.

>>86246985
He's grown on me a little. This one's kind of funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqniBLBC2WY

>>86250759
rogan knows ben is 100% smarter than him and wouldnt go for the whole tough guy schtick in an argument

>>86248486
This video is great. Showing up to Cenk's empty panel in character was really cringey.

>>86251157
Yes and that was never the contention.

>>86249392
I believe he's actually Canadian so I can see the confusion

his skit on teaching kids about communism is pretty funny. i dont think ive sat through the entirety of any other skit hes ever done.


https://youtu.be/iLI-RxLBnVU?t=4m50s

File: crowder-brain.jpg (53KB, 615x310px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 615x310px

>>86249381
Unfortunately, he was no longer voicing the character in that season. Here's an episode where he did the voice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVheRlsWlz0

>>86251236
Whoa that's crazy, must just have been me imposing his voice on the character thinking it was him

Crowder's the only one whose trying to use sophisticated humor on the right(using movie references, moderately offensive jokes) rather than every one on /pol/ always going to the extreme. You need moderation or else you'll fly too close to the sun.

>>86250913
>tfw no Barbera gf

>>86250754
who mentioned joe? crowder is just a whiny triggered cunt in general.

>>86250913
well they spam rlm here so i guess thats where it comes from

I'm in the Mug Club. You're all welcome for the YouTube videos which are indubitably all demonetized.

Ya cheap bastards.

I don't like him but is it really supposed to be funny? thought it was just a lighthearted casual news show.

>>86251929
Is the mug good?

>>86252295
Mug is no joke, he doesn't lie about the quality. Great heft, sturdy, is identical to the promo pics, no corners cut.

File: leftist tears tumbler.jpg (81KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1200x675px

>>86251929
I prefer Ben Shapiro's tumbler. It is a good looking mug though. If I had more money I'd probably join the mug club, but Benji's show is more important to me.

File: Really makes you think.png (50KB, 642x414px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 642x414px

>>86251186
Ben Shapiro is dumb as shit. Other dumb people think he's smart because he affects the qualities they think an intellectual would have (and since he doesn't have a English accent he conveys this mostly by telling his audience how rational and logical he is over and over). His law school education gave him good training at giving glib answers to complex questions with confidence which works well in his preferred environment in the confines of a debate stage. His shortcomings (lol) become clear if you read something he does in longform like his embarrassing fiction books, or if you just can think about it for a few seconds.

To put in terms his logic dork fans might better appreciate, Joe Rogan is 100x wiser than Ben Shapiro because he knows he doesn't know shit. Where Shapiro spent his youth as a weird sexless teacher's pet surrounded by religious nuts, Rogan did drugs, fucked chicks, got into sports and martial arts and developed a personality instead of pretending to be some kind of cerebral political commentator.

>>86253414
There's nothing wrong with that tweet.

>>86253414
>zero examples of Ben's dumbness

Come on gang.

Idiot show for idiots
Welcome to decline of man

>>86246985
He's fine. It's his sidekicks that are top tier cringe.

>>86253322
I respect this. Same side bros.


>>86253482
Hopper >>> Asian Lawyer >>> Sound Guy Edward >>> Aaron the Intern = G. Mo >>>>>>>>>>>> Gay Jared

>>86251228
painfully unfunny

File: ben in his game of thrones shirt.jpg (161KB, 901x1200px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 901x1200px

>>86253458
I'll give you some examples of Ben being a dumbass.

But first, we have to thank our sponsors at Birch Gold. When the market is unstable. The only thing we can count on is precious metal. You need to invest in precious metals and Birch Gold wants to help you do it. Log onto BirchGold.com/Ben and they'll give you 10% off. Again that's BirchGold.com/Ben.

>>86253414
>Ben Shapiro is dumb as shit.
He has an IQ of 135. Literally empirically smarter than you

>>86250759
Ben was stating an opinion. While Crowder was claiming Denver traffic accidents increased because of legalized weed. Joe decided to refute that claim

>>86248875
Why? There is legit reasons to be skeptical.

>>86254046
Legit reasons to lol at the hysterical anti-science idiot liberal shits on the wrong side of history

https://youtu.be/ZDK1aCqqZkQ

>>86248234
This.

>>86253414
this desu

>>86254041
This. What should have Rogan said to Shapiro?
>weeeell dude you should try it, *giggle* *looks at Jamie*

>>86246985
>how can one person be so fucking un funny?

Because his audience doesn´t want something funny, they just want someone ""important"" to validate their opinions.

File: laughing-jew.gif (2MB, 359x346px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 359x346px

>>86253731

>>86246985
Is there just one really buttburt /pol/tard trying extra hard today with these dozen or so threads? I've seen at least 3 about that stupid tiki protest, Crowder, numerous random Christfag threads all with the same opening line...

Holy fuck dude, relax.

>>86248326
>I often agree with this guy
Then you aren't very smart.

>>86253445
>>86253458

Sanders was making a moral argument that it should be within the means of every American to receive medical care for severe or life-threating injuries. For most people, who find the cost of insurance and possible medical treatment extremely burdensome this has an appeal.

Ben Shapiro responds with one of the most trivial and superfluous activities imaginable, furniture shopping, to counter this. Putting aside that removing healthcare from the marketplace is the entire fucking point of Sanders position, does he think people amenable to what Sanders is saying are going to reconsider out of their deep intellectual commitment to laissez faire capitalism on an issue that is literally life and death for them ? Because, well, thats not the way buying furniture works right ?

If Ben were half as smart as he though he was he was would have made a comparison to an equally serious matter that is handled well through the marketplace; granted a good example of that is hard to find.

>>86254560
Why not bost the segment?

>>86254560
Bud, the only responses you are going to get are "HUR DUR BERNIEBRO FREE STUFF XD".

>>86254191
>"ACTUAL SCIENTISTS" in caps
Woah, this must be real now!

File: bernie 4.jpg (83KB, 960x577px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 960x577px

>>86254560

>>86254734
This isn't an argument.

>>86254560
That wasn't even a moral argument though.

File: bernie hitler.png (793KB, 1272x1840px) Image search: [Google]

793KB, 1272x1840px

>>86254751

File: typical marxist faggots, sweden.jpg (152KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1024x683px

>>86249236
>left (using strawmans

Marxist faggot detected. It is impossible to create a straw man that is worse than you really are.

>>86254724
>dumb cunt lefty picks trite thing to deny facts with

Literally like clockwork, you losers shrink. Legit, you're all young earthers given your inability to realize this very old planet isn't impressed with our ant-like footprints and is merely going thru cycles like it has done for millions of years.

>Buhhhhh scientific consensus!~*~*

Big ol' fat KYS

>>86254912
Strawmen aren't arguments either.

>>86246985
He's hot though. No homo.

>>86253414
Ben Shapiro's novel is literally just Decker but unironic.

>>86254912
why do you lie?
why do you praise pinochet and condemn hitler?
could it be you have no political beliefs beyond "take that liberals"?

File: 380px-Carbon_Dioxide_400kyr.png (65KB, 380x276px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 380x276px

>>86255038
Yes, it's not like I could possibly show any data on the subject, after all I'm just a triggered "leftie". I have no idea what GISS is.

how come every developed country but America can afford national healthcare?
why is it cheaper per capita than Americas privatised mess?

>>86249351
the fact is hes part of a liberal elite that push drugs on to the masses and do not care of the consequences in peoples day to day lives, they just figure if they "cant sell it" they'll magically move onto skilled labor. fucking hate howard stern for this too.

>>86255130
j-j-just shut up, okay?

>>86255038
Rate. Of. Change.

File: download.png (8KB, 279x181px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 279x181px

>>86255122
Oh, silly me, that must have been a faked graph. I'm sure there is no other data that corroborates this.

File: temps.jpg (49KB, 686x542px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 686x542px

>>86255233
Those two may be fake news.

File: Fig.A2.gif (15KB, 664x474px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 664x474px

>>86255263
Ah, that's it! No more liberal climate change nuttery. I'm sure there aren't any other graphs.

File: 1390901711824.jpg (604KB, 1350x2000px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 1350x2000px

>>86255122
hes going to get exactly pummeled by potholer54 in the upcoming debate, hes already sensationalizing any detail, but that dude is a pure autist and literally screen caps his own emails just to make crowder look goofy.

the only possible thing left up stevens sleeve is pointing out how people like al gore scream and yell about the oncoming sea level rise, but are the last to actually propose anything for us to do about it except "give to the good green funds goy, and let us all handle it from then" which only funnels more money into financiers that handle saudi money anyway. it is a sad state of affairs and it literally can be shown how the cognitive elite wage this guilt war on people who still give a fuck about zoo animals outside the zoo. I'm a pro-climate changer, as in i cannot wait for it to come fast enough.

File: fig_17_NG1a_FossilFuel_and_Cement_emissions_longprojection_300.png (251KB, 1600x1143px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1600x1143px

>>86255290
Darn, I keep finding all these liberal cucks and their "science".

>>86255122
lmfao@your life
>post meaningless chart with no context and no argument
Wow, look at that!

>>86255157
Well, ain't shit happening for 50 years because dang, the sun cooled by half a degree. Rats. Welp, I guess all that CO2 is gonna ???????? in the meanwhile, even tho there's no evidence of anything approaching an overabundance of it and maaaaan is it gonna be bad. The bad thing that is going to happen, soon. Whew lad.

KYS :3

File: download.png (48KB, 241x385px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 241x385px

>>86255148
>Joe Rogan
>elite on anything

File: Global-CO2-emissions-by-region-since-1751.png (392KB, 3000x2100px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 3000x2100px

>>86255341
>even tho there's no evidence of anything approaching an overabundance of it
>>86255122
>>86255233
>>86255263
>>86255290
>>86255331
Yes, no proof at all...

File: 24_co2-graph-021116-768px.jpg (248KB, 768x480px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 768x480px

>>86255341
>meaningless chart with no context and no argument
Maybe if you are stupid.

>>86255265
Still isn't an argument.

>posure
>sees cool people
>tries to emulate

It's sad that there are guys who like him. He's an obviously weak person trying to pass as a hulking badass to promote himself as a thought leader when he's Fox News' Youtube installment of retarded Tucker Carlson. If he weren't so ugly he could pull it off.

>>86255389
This keeps getting funnier. Okay, retard...

A. What is an overabundance, how much? How would you know unless it happened before? Since you obviously know, you must know what actually happens, yes? No, you have no answer to any of that. Only conjecture out of you.
B. Why is that graph turned like that? 90 degrees clockwise, it's going down. Fucking learn to graphs and graph selection.
C. Correlation =/= causation, you literal chimp.
D. Meanwhile, actual science about our planet and its history say everything is a-ok and happening like it should. None of which you have an argument for, just your graphs that argue that numbers got bigger.
E - Z. KYS cunt.

>>86255608
*poser
Sorry, I don't read these

>>86255617
>A. What is an overabundance, how much?
Over the consistent and observable median percentage that has remained a constant for the last 400 thousand years?
>How would you know unless it happened before?
Because it isn't normative.
>Since you obviously know, you must know what actually happens, yes?
Well, yes. There are and continue to be, observable consequences for increased CO2 and temperature levels. Did you think the Great Barrier Reef died because of meme magic?
>No, you have no answer to any of that.
I literally do.
>Only conjecture out of you.
That's A funny way of writing hard data corroborated by hundreds of retests.
>B. Why is that graph turned like that? 90 degrees clockwise, it's going down.
Are...are you retarded?
>Fucking learn to graphs and graph selection.
The irony.
>C. Correlation =/= causation, you literal chimp.
There is a direct causal relationship between carbon emissions and world temperature.
>D. Meanwhile, actual science about our planet and its history say everything is a-ok and happening like it should.
Kek, no they don't.
>None of which you have an argument for
Because that scenario isn't happening.
>just your graphs that argue that numbers got bigger.
Right, carbon emissions keep getting worse. Sure is odd, isn't it? Gee whizz, I wonder where they come from?

Are you larping as an autist here?

>>86255038
Dude, you're dumb as hell if you don't think a rise in sea level isn't a big deal. Cities and regions will be under water setting the global economy back massively. You're either a boomer without progeny or your a millenial who hates boomers for fucking us over.

>>86255617
You people are like flat earthers.

>>86254976
Man, you sure are taking your politics seriously.

Good for you, sport.

File: header3.jpg (63KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x360px

>>86255617
>PSHHH GLOBAL WARMING ISN'T HAPPENING GUYS XD

File: Ag_Upsala_Glacier.jpg (39KB, 416x300px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 416x300px

>>86255949
>IT ISN'T BACKED BY ANY SCIENCE!

File: global-warming-climate-change-photographic-proof-united-states-geological-survey-124.jpg (86KB, 915x288px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 915x288px

>>86255990
>THIS IS NORMAL GUYS!

File: Grn920d_cr_L.jpg (93KB, 640x561px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 640x561px

>>86256017
>JUST IGNORE THESE PICTURES! CROWDER IS BASED!

>>86249351
pro-drug people need to learn how to sell their ideas to conservatives.

it is not at all about how good or bad the drug is. the issue is that if it is illegal, the NIGGERS and SPICS will sell it on streetcorners.

if you let WHITE PEOPLE sell the drugs in legitimate stores, you will take the market share away from the gangs. the gangs will no longer have a source of income.

you will obliterate nigger culture with the stroke of a pen.

>>86256294
>pro-drug people need to learn how to sell their ideas to conservatives.
Why should anyone give a shit what they think?

>>86256294
>you need to repackage your argument to racists who hate da NIGGERS and SPICS
No, I don't.

>>86250759
Yes but the crowder ep was very different. Maybe Joe learned something. He even apologized after.

>>86256045
there is actually no point in arguing on /tv/ about this shit, they're all redditor fags who spend whatever time they're not on /r/the_donald they're false-flagging on /tv/ with cuck porn or posting image macros as if it somehow debunks a long-form argument

this post
>>86255699
>FBI finds someone guilty
illustrates how alt-liters know about politics despite deluding themselves into believing they're "woke"

>>86255130
>how come every developed country but America can afford national healthcare?
Because their healthcare is shit.

You know instead of listening to Crowder or Alex Jones for your scientific opinion to be fed to you, how about you take some measurements yourself, it's not hard. Better yet, prove that atmospheric carbon dioxide doesn't drive temperature change and win a noble prize, donate the prize money to Trump's re-election campaign

>>86255949
>>86255990
>>86256017
>>86256045
HOLY SHIT! SOMETIMES IT'S HOT AND SOMETIMES IT'S COLD! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

>>86246985
Remember watching this guy live on #HWNDU stream

>>86256477
ok keep saying "they're throwing people in a cage for having a plant" and see if anybody changes their mind

File: 1502318410867.jpg (421KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 640x640px

>>86256845
>ignores every graph
>ignores every argument
>ignores every piece of physical evidece
Hope you kill yourself.

>>86256887
How is that not an argument though? You shouldn't be thrown in jail and have your entire life ruined because of weed. I thought conservatives loved personal freedom and free markets?

>>86256899
Why don't you tell me it's the current year while you're at it?

>>86256948
Why?

>>86256948
Why don't you stop looking like a fucking bufoon and actually understand the science behind climate change? Is it hard? Are these graphs hard for you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQshyqCLYHo

>>86257050
Yes, we know fringe anti-scientists with barely any credentials to their name, deny cljmate change. I don't know why you think a YouTube video from a literal who channel is an argument.

>>86257178
>everyone I disagree with is a fringe anti-scientist

>>86257186
He literally is a fringe anti-scientist that was condemned by the entire scientific community years ago, all of his bullshit gets constantly debunked and he never presents any real counter data.

Fuck off, go chat with the flat eathers.

>>86257050
>person who isn't a scientist or studied science in any way says scientific data is false

>>86257233
the reverse is just as bad
>person who isn't a scientist or studied science in any way says scientific data is true

>>86257337
not really, it just means that they trust the studies that have been made based on facts

>>86246985
Because he has the politics opposite of you and you can't stand that.

Meanwhile you probably clap and act like a retarded seal while watching Colbert.

>>86257348
no, it means that they trust the studies are actually based on facts. they themselves wouldn't know if they are actually based on facts.

Say what you want about the gatekeepers of old media but back in the day you had to be at least a little bit talented to break through, now thanks to the Internet it's all fair play and you got talentless hacks like him making a living.

>>86257439
the thing about the internet is that the more talentless and unpassionate you are the likelihood of you being forgotten increases exponentially

Cant wait for the potholer autist to ravage his asshole one more time

>>86257549
Then again you have plenty of people like him who get to turn it into a career and make money. In the 80s he would be destined to never get past the open mic stage, now he's probably making enough money to live off.

>>86257601
that's just because people like him weren't able to find his market before now.

>>86257601
i give you 1-2 years and people will barely remember him

>>86257645
And that is the sad part, that a market for him even exists. Shit, even Sandler had to do years of SNL and a few okay movies before he could move on to making piles of shit. This guy started with the equivalent of Grown Ups 2.

>>86257596
potholer may actually be the smartest Youtube personality on the subject outside AnonRa.

>>86253414

>logic dork

God, I've been trying to remember what that fucking term was. I'm so sick of these glib, one dimensional debaters and their talking point stuffed 'BTFO' videos. Every single time I browse YouTube after clicking one of those videos, the Recommended tab gets filled with BEN SHAPIRO ANNIHILATES FEMINIST - WHINY SJW LOSES IT IN THE FACE OF LOGIC and you'll click the video, check it out and see what it really is. It'll be some lady complaining about women not reaching CEO positions and/or the wage gap while Ben gives the same flaccid, rehashed CONFLATING EARNINGS AND WAGES speech.

It's boring as fuck and nearly every single video is the same thing. Shapiro, Milo and Crowder all do this shit, they'll harp on about how SJWs use stupid studies about adult education campuses and then cite some study from Sage Rock University about how 85% of trans people admit to wanting to masturbate in women's bathrooms. Gavin McInnes, for all of his rhetoric pushing autism, can at the very least have a normal human conversation. Shapiro is a barely functioning robo-autist and Crowder/Milo both have to shove their 'victim of people claiming they are victims' speeches into everything. Boo hoo, I incited violence by calling people freaks and losers, why are people hitting me :(.

>>86257724
Probably. Then again there are hundreds of Crowders so the level isnt that high

File: hmm.png (198KB, 550x535px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 550x535px

>>86248234

Hitler kinda was, hitler also got a lot of his ideas from the democrats in america during that time

most laws that germany still have would be considered extremely liberal even today

>>86257813
>calling people freaks and losers deserves to be met with violence
you werent raised right

>>86257395
wouldn't really be a scientific study if it wasn't based on facts

>>86258198
Well he's a sjw what do you expect.

>>86248234
>massive welfare state
>enormous government sponsored work programs
>constantly rallying on about the rich
>routinely spoke out about laissez-faire
>capitalism existed only in name as the reich had to approve of all trade
>literally has SOCIALISM in the name

If hitler ran for office today he'd be welcomed with open arms into the democratic party, retard

>>86253731
Kek

But he's a dumb ass, I agree.

>>86258198
>expecting no consequences whatsoever from making a career out of insulting people
I don't understand this meme. I wouldn't walk up to someone and call them a freak and expect them to not be annoyed...

Why do you kids hate consequence?

>>86253414
lol
I didn't know dumb people tended to graduate summa cum laude from Harvard. Tell me if even dumb people can do it why can't you?

>>86258272
you trust that scientists conduct all of their studies based on facts

>>86258567
because peer review is an actual thing and most of those scientific studies are conducted with the request from an authority that requires you to use actual facts

File: burger guns.jpg (385KB, 1052x1236px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1052x1236px

>>86253414
What is the problem with americans and healthcare? It's like they love going broke because of an appendicitis.
Same with the idea of every retard full of drugs having his house full of guns.

>>86258567
Basically people like you jump to solipsism whenever science reaches a conclusion you dont like. Because all knowledge requires a leap of faith doesnt mean all leaps of faith are equivalent

File: 1491188032491.jpg (25KB, 641x530px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 641x530px

>>86246985

>That episode where they hang out with some liberal college students to protest a bus station.... the whole time wearing shirts saying 'socialism is for fags' and none of the students ever noticed, they just saw socialism and che gueve at the top and let them in
Truly the 'great minds' of tomorrow

>>86258609
you trust the peer review process and you trust that the authority doesn't bias the results

>>86246985
I agree, he's unfunny and Jared always upstages him in the humour department

>>86258656
yes, because having a bunch of other scientists read your work before you publish it makes it more credible as a source

>>86254560
Free healthcare tends to degredate the quality of the care. I live in the UK and the NHS is nigh on the verge of collapse. It simply can't handle the strain.

>>86258624
>whenever science reaches a conclusion you dont like
what conclusion do I not like?
>>86258685
and that is something you have faith in

>>86255130
We can't afford free healthcare. The NHS is a ridiculous burden.

>>86258656
Then be a complete autist and constantly live in a state of paranoia and mistrust regardless of facts. See if I care.

>>86258784
what? you do realize we are talking about whether or not is it bad for a person who isn't a scientist or studied science in any way to say that scientific day is true. this isn't about my position. I'm just saying that for someone like that it is misguided for them to say that the scientific data is true

>>86258813
>day
data*

>>86258813
The data would be true independent on who agrees or not.

>>86258412
its not a meme, you dont get to attack someone cause they called you a freak or a loser, and dont bring up consequences when youre trying to justify crazy people that attack other people for words, essentially reducing any responsibility those people have

>>86259148
in that case you would be trusting that scientists know how to measure all relevant information validly and reliably

>>86258337
daily reminder that liberalism is a right wing ideology

>>86259473
You don't seem to be understanding what I am saying.

>>86259710
No it isn't, retarded faggot.

>>86258337
>literally has SOCIALISM in the name
How many times does this need to be explained? Nazis were nowhere near socialists in any way, shape or form but their name...

>>86259957
i understand completely, youre jumping all over the place, youre saying in one place people are inciting violence by calling people freaks and losers and they deserve violence themselves and then you try to act like getting annoyed by someone is the same as attacking someone, in short youre a little impulsive bud

>>86260097
You are talking to two different anons. I am the anon that merely said consequences exist, not that I condone violence.

>>86259981
It actually is you political illiterate

>>86248234
He was an Arts student.

>>86260224
I don't know what right wing blog told you that, but it is factually and historically incorrect.

>>86246985
>"comedy doesn't have to be funny"-crowder
Yeah it's a real mystery.

>>86260224
>Before 1920 the main ideological opponent of classical liberalism was conservatism, but liberalism then faced major ideological challenges from new opponents, fascism and communism.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

>>86260247
Crack open a history or political theory book sometime m8. Here's some other kernels of knowledge for you to chew on. At their core both historically and in terms of mobilized movements libertarianism and anarchism are left wing ideologies, feudalism exists outside the current political landscape but most closely resembles far right wing assemblies.

>>86260345
What in the living fuck are you on about mate? Here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

Liberalism has virtually never been right wing.

>>86260299
Consider that both liberalism and conservatism exist on the right and the creation of ideologies like socialism saw a breaking away from this tent pole of right wing thought. Likewise fascism arose as a reaction to further consolidate this consensus by pushing for a more extreme all encompassing version of it.

>>86260414
You're literally retarded and have no clue what any of these words mean.

>>86260414
>Consider that both liberalism and conservatism exist on the right
No...they don't...

Are you baiting me?

>>86247164
Maybe this one.
Comedian Steven Crowder draws Prophet Muhammad on popular YouTube channel

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/20/steven-crowder-conservative-comedian-draws-prophet/

>>86260435
>>86260389
You people seem unaware that across the world liberal parties are considered and self identify as centre right.

>>86260478
But that's also not really true. Look, it's clear that you don't really understand what you are talking about so just stop embarrassing yourself.

>>86246985

crowder is B A S E D

>>86260451
Do you think democrats are leftist?

>>86260500
No. Do you think Dems represent every liberal and progressive group in America?

>>86260498
>not really true
One needs look no farther than Australia or Europe to find such examples. Dig into politics in the third world and you'll find even more.

>>86257003
Because the hockey stick has been debunked.

>>86260528
It's not true in either example you gave. You ever actually been to Europe? Or you just basing this bullshit on some Breitbart article you read once?

>>86260522
The Dems are a liberal party. They uphold liberal thought, but they don't uphold leftist views.

>>86260547
>The Dems are a liberal party.
No. Not anymore.
>They uphold liberal thought, but they don't uphold leftist views.
You are retarded and jumbling words together. The Dem party moved Right and is more center Right now.

>>86260544
Of Australia.
>The Liberal Party is the largest and dominant party in the Coalition with the National Party of Australia, the Country Liberal Party of the Northern Territory and the Liberal National Party of Queensland. Except for a few short periods, the Liberal Party and its predecessors have operated in similar coalitions since the 1920s. Internationally, the Liberal Party is affiliated to the International Democrat Union.
>The Liberal Party tends to promote economic liberalism (which in the Australian usage refers to free markets and small government) and cultural conservatism

>>86249351
lol it did pretty much go like that, but I didn't care, love Rogan and Crowder is a fuccboi

>>86260540
What?

>>86260589
Aside from FDR when haven't the dems been centre right?

>>86246985
He misunderstood the basics of comedy.
Comedy can be provocative, so it triggers some people.
He believes if something triggers and is provocative, it is comedy.

>>86260594
What are you quoting? That makes then economically liberal and socially conservative. So, more in line with Libertarianism.

But Liberism itself is not a right-wing ideological stance and it's dumb to argue that. Especially Western Liberalism. I don't think you understand what it is, mate.

File: 1308315102149.jpg (58KB, 533x401px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 533x401px

>>86249357
>you have to have a very high IQ to understand Crowder
The guy isn't even pseudo intellectual let alone intellectual

>>86260622
Who cares? I never argued that the Dem Party was liberal. That doesn't make Liberalism "right wing".

File: 1502169739961.jpg (66KB, 890x876px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 890x876px

>/pol/ has these kids so bent out of shape, where they think Liberalism is right-wing.
>despite how it exists as an ideological opponent to conservatism and has done so for the last few hundred years.
>literally was invented as an opposition to conservative governments, monarchies and aristocricies

>>86260658
>more in line with libertarianism
Again with this?
>Libertarian socialism, libertarian communism and libertarian Marxism are all phrases which activists with a variety of perspectives have applied to their views.[183] Anarchist communist philosopher Joseph Déjacque was the first person to describe himself as a libertarian.[184] Unlike mutualist anarchist philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, he argued that, "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature."

>>86260766
How is this an argument to what I said and what are you even quoting?

>>86256845
That's massive amounts of ice moving not a matter of seasonal temperatures idiot.

>>86260784
To say liberalism is not right wing in nature. But to associate libertarianism with the right boggles my mind.

>>86260808
Do you have trouble reading? Are you honestly on the spectrum or something?

>>86260747
>living in a nightmare alternate reality
I think I ate too many redpills bro
need to get back on blue

>>86260808
Look buddy, I don't think you fundamentally understand the history of liberalism if you calling it right wing. You don't understand the word.

>>86260863
Or just stop using Matrix lingo altogether and talk like a functional adult?

File: hqdefaultq.jpg (27KB, 336x188px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 336x188px

I don't like TYT, but why does crowder act so fucking dumb when he tries to troll them... it's really annoying.

File: DRFFTTAALD DRFFFTTT.jpg (4KB, 181x215px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 181x215px

>>86246985
run stale jokes into the ground like this guy

>>86260066
Okay then refute the 5 points above that

>>86260992
It's exhausting and I don't want to.

File: kek.jpg (26KB, 629x209px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 629x209px

>>86260066
>nazis were nowhere near socialists in any way, shape or form

Yes good goy they were right wing capitalists, milton friedman incarnate!

>>86261032
>I'm going to quote Hitler to prove he's a socialist!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

^literally is characterized as a right wing orgsnization.

>>86256817
>donate the prize money to Trump's re-election campaign

Joke's on you, faggot. He doesn't need this money because there are millions of people who will shill for him without being paid. Conservatives actually believe what they stand for politically. Not like leftists who need to be paid to shill for their political views.

>>86261032
>right wing capitalists
right wing =/= capitalism

If you go far enough right or left you get over control that starts to look the same. Capitalism is just as much right wing as it is left.

>>86261032
>The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.[11] Far-right themes in Nazism include the argument that superior people have a right to dominate other people and purge society of supposed inferior elements.[12] Adolf Hitler and other proponents denied the view that Nazism was either left-wing or right-wing, instead they officially portrayed Nazism as a syncretic movement.[13][14] In Mein Kampf Hitler directly attacked both left-wing and right-wing politics in Germany, saying:

>"Today our left-wing politicians in particular are constantly insisting that their craven-hearted and obsequious foreign policy necessarily results from the disarmament of Germany, whereas the truth is that this is the policy of traitors ... But the politicians of the Right deserve exactly the same reproach. It was through their miserable cowardice that those ruffians of Jews who came into power in 1918 were able to rob the nation of its arms.[15]"

>When asked whether he supported the "bourgeois right-wing", Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class, and he also indicated that it favoured neither the left nor the right, but preserved "pure" elements from both "camps", stating: "From the camp of bourgeois tradition, it takes national resolve, and from the materialism of the Marxist dogma, living, creative Socialism".[16]

>>86261092
Try to elaborate in your own words why it would be deemed as right wing
>authoritarian regime that mimicked communist economics
>right wing

Hitler being right wing is just a lie established by the American left to discredit it, because in reality there is no right wing boogeyman like Stalin.

Same reason democrats (the party of slavery and the KKK) paint the right as the racists.

Sorry bucko

>>86261092
You're an idiot if you think that's a rebuttal...

>>86261144
>authoritarian regime that mimicked communist economics
Except it didn't.

>>86261092
>literally is characterized as a right wing orgsnization

Characterized by fucking left wingers who shit their pants when they realized how this could damage their political agenda for decades.

>>86261163
>definition of Nazism explains how and why it is a far right group
>not a rebuttal
Kill yourself.

>>86261144
>Same reason democrats (the party of slavery and the KKK)
this isnt 1890 lul

>>86261139
>in hindsight we can now classify Hitler as right wing

My fucking sides

File: 1502005917173.jpg (16KB, 447x444px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 447x444px

>>86261144
>/pol/ actually believes there is an ongoing conspiracy orchestrated by liberals to pretend Hitler was a fascist.
You are autistic, buddy.

>>86261018
Lol then shut the fuck up, making arguments but refusing to back them up is idiotic and only hurts your point.

>>86261203
He's been classified as right wing for nearly 70 fucking years. Now all of a sudden, you are old enough to browse forums and magically the entire concept of recent history changes?

>>86261229
>literally can't read
The post clearly says he was a fascist. A fascist with socialist economic policies
>obviously a right winger!

topkek

>>86261172
>muh headcanon

>>86255768
>stomps feet
>cries that there is direct causation which is rofl
>THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE yet you can't point to any way in which that is true
>Warmness!!!! ;_; Deserts becoming green and lush!!!!


You are so goddamn stupid. Enjoy your short ass life as a weepy cunt who was wrong about everything.

>CO2 went up as the number of Chinese grew!!!!!!!!!!!!! Everyone is China is going to jump simultaneously and throw the Earth of its axis!!!!!!!!!!

>>86261258
>A fascist with socialist economic policies
Not really what it said at all.

Look, we get it, it's the same /pol/ argument over and over. "Hur durr well, they were called the SOCIALIST party so they must be socialist". Yet they weren't in practice. You just want to double down and push this autistic shit because of an agenda.

File: CycO964.jpg (20KB, 453x500px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 453x500px

>have a massive central planned economy propped up by borrowed cash
>emphasize how important redistribution is to maintain the wellbeing of your comrades
>rally against the rich (jews) and blame them as the source of your problems
>constantly berate american capitalism and how unfair it is
>spend enormous amounts of your fading wealth on job programs like the autobahn to artificially raise employment rates
>70 years later you're the poster boy for the far right even though you would have gotten the thumbs up from Karl Marx

>>86261303
>THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE yet you can't point to any way in which that is true
Except he literally did you complete fucking tard. You just keep ignoring every argument that was made.

Under both the American left and right, capitalism covers most of the spectrum, but Hitler was 100% right wing. He was a blatant racist which epitomizes right wing philosophies.

>>86261329
>Yet they weren't in practice
t. dipshit who has no idea how the german economy operated

>>86261329
>muh epic revisionism haha vote trump!

>>86261366
>calling Hitler a fascist is revisionist history
Go suck his cock somewhere else.

>>86246985
he's the personification of cringe

>>86261364
Right wing isn't just an economic theory, my ignorant friendo.

>>86261329
>they didn't seize the means of production just didn't allow private entities to operate without approval from the reich
>see they were totally not socialist

Really makes you think

>>86261402
>>86261364
>>86261340

>The Nazis were strongly influenced by the post-World War I far right in Germany, which held common beliefs such as anti-Marxism, anti-liberalism, and antisemitism, along with nationalism, contempt for the Treaty of Versailles, and condemnation of the Weimar Republic for signing the armistice in November 1918 which later led it to sign the Treaty of Versailles.[17] A major inspiration for the Nazis were the far-right nationalist Freikorps, paramilitary organizations that engaged in political violence after World War I.[17] Initially, the post-World War I German far right was dominated by monarchists, but the younger generation, which was associated with Völkisch nationalism, was more radical and it did not express any emphasis on the restoration of the German monarchy.[18] This younger generation desired to dismantle the Weimar Republic and create a new radical and strong state based upon a martial ruling ethic that could revive the "Spirit of 1914" which was associated with German national unity (Volksgemeinschaft).[18]

>The Nazis, the far-right monarchists, the reactionary German National People's Party (DNVP), and others, such as monarchist officers in the German Army and several prominent industrialists, formed an alliance in opposition to the Weimar Republic on 11 October 1931 in Bad Harzburg, officially known as the "National Front", but commonly referred to as the Harzburg Front.[19] The Nazis stated that the alliance was purely tactical and they continued to have differences with the DNVP. The Nazis described the DNVP as a bourgeois party and they called themselves an anti-bourgeois party.[19] After the elections of 1932, the alliance broke down when the DNVP lost many of its seats in the Reichstag. The Nazis denounced them as "an insignificant heap of reactionaries".[20]

>>86261199
>definition of Nazism: National SOCIALISM
>choke on your mothers dick.

>>86261381
>hitlers views on race is why he's right wing
>but stalin is left wing despite speaking being verbal about his hate for negros

>>86261439
National Socialism is right wing in scope and practice...

>>86261428
>not a single mention of any policy or action that would differentiate them from socialism

wow really well done

>>86261448
Hitler was right wing because the fundamental core of the Nazi party was built upon extreme far-right attitudes and policies you fucking idiots.

>>86261354
He has made no argument but that it's getting warmer because of people and that is BAD.

How is it bad? Why? Who is hurt? How will the damage occur? He, and you, have nothing and have said nothing but pushing fake science as a moral imperative. Why are unfarmable places becoming farmable bad? Why is the Earth, which has been both way colder and way hotter, incapable of handling a tiny change? Lmao, because you brain trusts are here now?

You idiot fucks have nothing. Like, look between your legs. What do you see? Fucking nothing, because that is what you and your "arguments" are.

>>86261479
>and policies
What were these right wing policies?

>>86261459
Again... I don't need to explain how much of a total dumbass you look right now. You did the job for me. kthxbye

>>86261476
You are so fucking frustrsting and retarded.

>>86261479
>the fundamental core of the Nazi party was built upon extreme far-right attitudes and policies

It started as anti communist group you stupid nigger

>>86261510
Nationalism is right wing.

>>86261545
>can't textually address why nazi germany was nearly identical to USSR
>copy pasting wiki entries calling nazis right wing

You don't even know what you're posting. it probably just pains you to realise that every tyrant in history loves his left wing policies

File: 084.png (102KB, 300x256px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 300x256px

>>86261549
>being anti-communist
>doesn't make you right wing at all

>>86261329
>Yet they weren't in practice.

What the fuck are you talking about. They even implemented animal welfare laws like limited research on animals. Because of this they had to improvise....

The "banker" stealing money from the working class refers to the Jew today as it did in the past. Socialists today see the "banker" as they did in the past.

Even eugenics originated in the progressive movement of early last century. Read a fucking book mong.

>>86261581
Does it bother you that Hitler was extreme far right or something? Do you think it makes you look bad so you try to dump him on liberals? Horseshoe theory is a thing so both extremes look similar.

>>86261587
>being anti communist is now far right
>not common sense

t. regressive

>>86261606
>your brain on /pol/
I will never be retarded enough to think that Hitler was a liberal...

>>86261448
The terms "left and right wing" originally come from france were the right wing supported the monarchy and the left did not. You will notice people in Nazi movies saying my fuhrer all of the time. Fuhrer became their monarchy and all powerful leader much like the monarchy hence "right wing".

>>86261625
Buddy, if you are anti-communism (far left) you are either moderate left, center, or right.

>>86261613
You can call him far right all you want, doesn't change the fact that he was an authoritarian socialist whose economics would be applauded by the average mealy mouthed leftist today
>wahh he was patriotic that's why he's right wing

Spare me

>>86261660
>he was an authoritarian socialist
No, he wasn't and if you said that to any modern historian, they would think you were retarded

>>86261606
>Read a fucking book
what books have you read.. name us a few lul

you've read a bunch of posts on /pol/ that are revisionist of history to the point of absurdity, dont pretend you read books

>>86261660
Buddy, nationalism is inherently right wing. If you think Nazi extreme nationalism is healthy, your head isn't on right.

>>86261613
The Right
>Free speech
>Guns in civilian hands
>Freedom in education
>Small government

Nazis
>no free speech
>no guns
>no choice
>ultimate in big government

You
>shit's the same

Say what now? Lol@you

It is only the consequence of the nationalism of the Reich that it is considered far right. Change Hitler's rants to the rich instead of the jews and you essentially have Karl Marx.

>>86261718
american political spectrum =/= global political spectrum

some things dont match up when you compare them but that doesnt mean they're not right wing, use your brain

>>86261506
If you are baiting as a fake retard, congrats. We all fell for it.

If you are unironically this uneducated, there is nothing anyone could say

>>86261688
Explain to me how hitlers social and economic polices weren't socialist-lite
>pro tip : you won't

>>86261639
>Fuhrer became their monarchy and all powerful leader much like the monarchy hence "right wing".

Fuhrer literally translates to Leader. Communist regimes regards their Leader much like a monarchy. Cuba, China, North Korea.....

Makes `em right wing then.

>>86261718
>the Right
>free speech
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

you have no fucking clue about history of these political spectrums or how the foundation of western society is liberalism.

>>86261745
>Hurrrrrrrr nice try pointing out plainly they don't believe in the same shit at all

Loool

>>86261748
Anon, what do you think constitutes an economic system to be socialist? Do you actually know how Nazi Germany's economy operated?

>>86261630
>I will never be retarded enough to think that Hitler was a liberal...

Liberal in a political sense does not translate into European context. As I said, read a fucking book mong.

>>86248234
>free market
What's wrong with this?
Don't you want to be like Switzerland?

>>86261726
It's almost like other policies define them as extreme right...

>>86261752
None of those were true communism though, if you look into communism you will see how those countries were really fascist more than anything. Marx was about expanding personal freedoms to their absolute maximum really.

>>86261810
>I just don't know what the word liberal means and am gullible to /pol/ arguments.

>>86261762
>liberalism
>thinks modern liberalism is anything like liberalism of old

Your average 'liberal' today walks around on campus wearing a che guevara shirt and advocating for censorship.

>>86261829
This isn't an argument.

>>86261797
It was socialism in every form with the exception that the Reich didn't forcefully take over the means of production but merely enforced their authority over them. Capitalism existed only in name under the german Reich, manufacturers were told what to produce.

>>86261825
>None of those were true communism though, if you look into communism you will see how those countries were really fascist more than anything. Marx was about expanding personal freedoms to their absolute maximum really.

Yea. Funny how socialists always end up with fascism.....

>>86261848
Except it is, the left is not the side of classic liberalism anymore.

>>86261825
>Marx was about expanding personal freedoms
>after he used the state to seize their assets
fucking kek

>>86261873
>It was socialism
It literally wasn't. It was a statist, exclusive capitalist society where the government regulated businesses to non-Jews and held a totalitarian final say on production. Socialism is people controlling the means of production.

Why are so many of you retarded about Hitler?

>>86261902
This still isn't a real argument. It's a strawman.

>>86261928
>the state didnt take over the means of production
>just controlled it from afar and dictated the actions of those who controlled them

Yeah sounds nothing close to socialism, very free market indeed

>>86261923
Do you think the means of production should be in the hands of a few lucky people? I believe every great idea should be compensated but to allow a few people to bleed the people dry is wrong.

>>86261991
Nah dude give it to the state they've proven time and time again they're able to maintain, produce and ration effectively just don't google anything about Mao or Stalin it's all right wing lies

>>86261980
I don't think you understand what needs to happen for something to be considered a socialist economy. Nazi Germany literally wasn't.

You have the internet, you can read credible and real research on this fucking shit. How are so many of you uninformed like this? To even think Nazis were left leaning is stupid enough...

>>86261980
>a handful of Germans controlled business interests in Nazi Germany
>this somehow translates to socialism
It is aristocratic limited capitalism controlled by a fascist state, anon.

>>86262020
>Socialism means state ownership!
>The nazis seized them but let the original owners run them under fear of death!

Totally not even close to socialism you're right. Much closer to free market capitalism

>>86262095
>Socialism means state ownership!
That's communism...you don't even know the difference.

>>86261829
Crowder did a report on this:

Students Condemn Free Speech On Video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwF9SFaKy6U

>>86262018
This is why I think the "state" should be artificially intelligent, it would run things fairly for once. Communism never works because to impliment it you need a dictatorship, and absolute power corrupts, but what id you removed the corruption element with AI. We could make the first real communist country and I guarantee you it will flourish like never before. Without the constant patch jobs capitalism has to do to function. Right now capitalism is out best option though.

File: cya.jpg (25KB, 619x144px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 619x144px

>>86262111

>>86262142
Right, that's not State ownership.

>>86262182
Neither was the Reich.

So really we should be saying that it was much closer to Communism. I can get behind that

File: 1501607867474.png (158KB, 417x405px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 417x405px

>I share oxygen with Crowder fans, climate change deniers, people who unironically think Hitler was a liberal and retards who are duped by /pol/ memes into thinking Nazis are left leaning.
>these people vote

PARTY NAMED NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS PARTY IMPLEMENTED EXTREMELY SOCIALIST POLICIES

NEWS AT 11

>>86262215
It was a limited capitalist, aristocratic selective market run by a fascist state. It was not communist either...

Just admit you never knew what you were talking about...

>>86262242
t. john oliver fan who gets his news from occupy democrats on facebook

>>86262252
Except they didn't.

>big welfare
>anti 1%
>gov creating jobs
>dissenters silenced (anti-free speech)
>guns taken from civilians (jews specifically)
>restricted capitalism
>followers used violence routinely to silence people (antifa)
>always circle jerked about the pipedream of equality

He's basically bernie sanders except he loved his country, it probably hurts to acknowledge this because you voted for ol mate

>>86262242
It is pretty disheartening that these people are allowed to vote. Some people are just extremely gullible and stubborn.

>>86262357
t. bernout who donated 200 dollars to a candidate who lost

>>86262357
>gullible and stubborn
Yea but I think it comes down to peer pressure more than anything. Maybe if we taught people to think instead of what to think more.

>>86262388
>academia is ran by the left
>surprised when it produces garbage

>>86262333
Nazis were not anti 1 percent... Where do you kids honestly get these memes? Hitler rejected socialism and immediately turned on the working German class almost immediately.

>>86262441
>DA LEFT RUNS EVERYTHING REEEE OH NOW! SAVE ME HITLER!

>>86262447
>Nazis were not anti 1 percent...
Who do you think the jews were?
Who do you think were completely over represented in the high financial brackets? As wealthy bankers, over represented in literature, as judges, as the elite?

>>86262492
You realize that part of Nazi propaganda was literally most of the memes you are describing? Wealthy? Sure. A good majority of them probably.

>>86262492
>falling for Nazi propaganda 70 years later
>"overrepresentation" meme
How does this happen?

>>86262492
You aren't anti-1 percent if you put five or six Germans in charge of nearly all exports in your country, anon.

>>86262522
>>86262538
>calls out 'nazi propaganda'
>believes allied propaganda that jews held no positions of power

Lol right it makes sense that Hitler would blame the problems of Germany on a small group of individuals who had no power or influence

>>86260896
>and talk like a functional adult?
naeh m8, keep getting triggered

>>86262584
Their "influence" was overblown you fucking gullible faggot. Did you think scapegoats were rooted in factual representations?

>>86248875
>hurr durr all the research is funder by lobbies who make shekkels on this meme

Hiw dare he not believe in it >:o
Fkn retards

>>86262584
>Lol right it makes sense that Hitler would blame the problems of Germany on a small group of individuals who had no power or influence
Right..that's what scapegoats are, anon.

>>86249357
>Literally steals the anti memes of his shitty cartoon show

Want to know how I know that you are a nigger ?

>>86262623
Big Green, amirite MAGA?

>>86262610
>jews being over represented is a meme! pure propaganda!
>jews literally own all of the MSM today
>4 supreme court justices
>wealthier than any other demographic
my sides

>>86262270
I worry about where you get your sources from if you literally think Hitler was a liberal.