*leans back* I CHECK

Is rounders good?

>>86216078
*leans back*
IT SURE IS!

>>86216012
How many days in a row are we gonna do this

File: Clipboard01.jpg (26KB, 635x321px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 635x321px

>>86216012
THE HOLLYWOOD ACTOR WITH SOME PRETTY BAD ACTING HERE

(11/10 commentary, and Ben's face throughout is priceless)

>>86216078
It was poker kino. It isn't some brilliant masterpiece as a movie in general, but it most certainly is the best poker movie there is and ever will be.

(Poker movies are comparable to video-game adaptations in that they are notoriously shit)

>>86216537

>not Casino Royale

>>86216537
agree 100%

>>86216537
>Comparable to video-game adaptations
This is... extremely accurate

>>86216588
>not In Time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DqqSsFWcHI

>"I knew i was going to win"

>>86216588
The poker in that was straight-up nonsensical trash.

>>86216669
pls explain

>>86216784
Just completely unrealistic in so many ways that I won't even begin to try and list and explain them all here.

are there any hot poker players with big tits?

do any of them get BLACKED?

>>86216821

>Can't even name one thing using a couple of words

Idiot.

>>86216846
Jennifer Tilly

>>86216871
she was so trashy hot in Bride of Chucky.

>>86216537
maverick is better

>>86216669
>>86216784

It wasn't poker at all, it was Pinocle.

>>86216821
Name just a couple. I'm honestly curious.

>>86216012
How is K9 still a 1% chance here? What cards could save it here?

>>86216867
Ok, I'll name the most obvious: the chance that in one hand so many people had such high ranking hands is 1 in a billion. With a "b".

An average professional poker player who has played his whole life will very likely die without ever being in such an unlikely scenario without cheating going on.

>>86216972
running Kings

>>86216953
Also the idea that they would let him, a complete fish, literally gamble with the agency's money in such a high-stakes game is completely retarded.

>>86216972
running kings

>>86216989

Unlikely things happen in movies, that's why people pay money to see them, to escape their mundane reality for 2 hours or so.

Your point is completely worthless.

>>86216999
>>86217032
Read my post yesterday? :^)

>>86216999
>>86217032
Oh right.
In that case why are A8 and A2 0%? Wouldn't running aces also do it for them?

>>86217055
it would be a split so neither of them can win

>>86217055
Someone must have folded an A preflop.

>>86216972
Runner runner K

>>86217051
negative

>>86217046
>>86217046
No, you don't understand: it isn't for a poker movie. This situation is not exciting or interesting to a poker player. The excitements are in amazing laydowns, pattern recognition reads (in movies usually physical reads which suck), and smart plays. A royal flush winning from a straight flush is just dumb. There is no skill involved, nothing to get excited about. You know the good guy is going to win so he'll have a better hand. It's typical shitty movie poker.

>>86217027
>the best poker player in the service
>some fish

>>86217216
>>86217216
That means literally nothing in a nosebleed stakes game.

>>86217174

Another worthless point. James Bond always wins at the end of every Bond movie, and the same goes for just about any movie ever. Normal people can immerse themselves into a movie and experience the tension. It's a common trait of autism to lack the capacity to see the fun in things and instead focus on how something is unrealistic, etc. I don't even understand why you are on this board.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ofzSK3Qy2s

>>86217369
>be 47
>get called kid

>>86217344
>i have a straight
>i have a flush
>i have a full house
>i have a straight flush
>i have a royal straight flush gotcha

>tension

>>86217344
>James Bond always wins
Except that time when his wife was dead

>>86217484

Name a better ending scenario for the movie, something that would have made the scene better and more exciting.

It's the final scene, it's all in, it's millions of dollars. For the average person, that's a pretty exciting moment, and you're not exactly focusing on the nuances at that point, but rather the fate of either Bond or Le Chiffre. What will Chiffre do if he loses? How will he react? What if Bond loses -- what options are left at that point?

If you analyze the nuance of the scene, I.E that the hands are so over the top, then you're reducing the implications of the scene.

It's not just a poker movie, it's a movie where poker is a large theme, and it's integrated pretty effectively considering it's meant for mass distribution. Millions of people probably got interested in poker after watching the movie, and that includes myself.

>>86217287
It means a lot when he is the best at bluffing in a room full of spies

True autism itt kys redditors

>>86217772

>How dare you discuss movies on a movie discussion board

File: William Kassouf_2016 World Series of Poker_EV68_Day 6_Furman_FUR8773.jpg (125KB, 360x450px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 360x450px

Is he, dare I say it, /ourguy/?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kc0sJEkziFs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLqVVkVQDwI

>>86217993
>insufferable cunt is /ourguy/
Sounds about right