What's your favorite aspect ratio? Your favorite uses of it?

1.30x speed

4:3 old TV style's the best.

File: coop thumb.webm (2MB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x1080px

>>86135004
(You) get it.

>>86134845
as long as the cinematography is decent and I can see it correctly, i don't care

>>86134845
16:9
In nothing less than 1920x1080p

>>86135004
This, there is something deeply satisfying about watching films on a 90s crt designed that naturally fill the full frame.

even if a video comes in 4:3
I'll stretch it to 16:9

File: scooby doo dude.jpg (54KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 612x612px

>>86138415
Are you retarded? Why the fuck would you do that?

>>86134845
9:16
Love that portrait effect in mobile footage, lets you focus in on the action

1.85 is objectively the best

anything else is a crutch

>>86138520
I don't like looking at black bars

>>86134845
4:3 is good for things with a lot of close ups like TV shows. 16:9 for movies and sports. Anything wider is just about how the cinematographer handles it.

1:2.39. I hate not knowing what's happening directly below the cameraman's feet.

File: hqdefault.jpg (27KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x360px

4:3 is maximum comfy.

File: 1493948941467.jpg (65KB, 640x439px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x439px

>>86138888
Checkem

>>86138704
>Distorted image is better than normal sharp image
Erase yourself

2.39:1 with things popping out of the frame to give impression of depth can't get enough of that shit

1.618:1