ONE MORE HOUR GET HYPE

here

>>86106864

Fuck off shill

hyped. rlm haters stay in your containment threads pls.

>>86107486
>Getting 'hyped' for Reddit Letter Media reviews
What is wrong with you people

>>86107549
xd

>>86107622
>getting hyped to be a huge faggot
what is wrong with you

File: rrr.png (68KB, 210x235px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 210x235px

>>86107486

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5YzfJix3F4

40 minutes, I'm gonna cum!

>tfw nothing to goin at happen because it's all gonna be another wacky ironic meme trick

File: and this is the world we live in.jpg (50KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 720x540px

>>86108265
Jesus christ its like they saw the Phil Collin's muppet in the land of confusion video and said "We want that, but creepier."

File: mike.png (487KB, 1202x699px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 1202x699px

>>86108324
>tfw when it's another transformer's review

>>86107486
*inhales*
*leans back*
*hales*

Ok.

File: 1500040472416.jpg (71KB, 265x555px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 265x555px

i'm ready

>>86108612
>swastikas

OY VEY

File: endless mike in your face.png (175KB, 300x458px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 300x458px

>>86108710
JUDEN!

I NEED IT, I NEED IT; WHAT KIND OF VIRGINAL 45 YEAR OLD MAN GOES WITHOUT A PLINKETT REVIEW

File: over 9000 hours of endless trash.png (1MB, 1612x1368px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1612x1368px

>>86109510

inb4 its 20 minutes long

It's here

YOU FUCKING HACKS

IT'S FUCKING HERE YEEEEAEAAAAA

ITS FUCKING TRANSFORMERS!

>>86109913
>it's an hour long

>>86107486
Breddy gud imo. Didn't even go into the shitshow behind the movie.

>>86112910
>https://youtu.be/UWROBiX1eSc
There's the Scientist Man video for that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHUV8QLpEAc

Someone please make a webm of the girl getting slimed at the end

Good shit. Way better than Titanic or TFA.

>>86107566
MODSSSSSSS

when did Lindsay Lohan play a drug addled stripper?

Y'know, just looking at the Ghostbusters movie through the review -- since I never plan on watching it -- they could've followed a plot regarding the woman in the portrait, kind of similar to GB 2.

But, it would've made some sense considering they open in the mansion and mention the portrait. Like, her soul could be trapped in the house and it somehow gains power.

Or whatever; I don't know.

>They added rich evan '''''skits''''' into the plinket review


FUCKING

WHY
H
Y

It was good, and i'm glad it didn't get bogged down in the politics bullshit that surrounded it. I liked TFA review, but it felt like too much of it was focused on responding to prequel apologists and things that had nothing to do with the movie.

This review perfectly points out many of the flaws without needing to delve into that bullshit.

Plinkett Matrix sequels when?

>>86113559
Because ad libbed skits make everything better.

>He was the only holdout on making a third Ghostbusters movie. Bill Murray understood the movies the least. Now this is the result."
Are you kidding me? He was right when he didn't want to make Ghostbusters 2, and he was doubly right to stop them from making the same mistake with Ghostbusters 3. Ghostbusters never should've been made into a franchise, and the reboot would've been made regardless if there was a Ghostbusters 3 or not because Sony loves money. Honestly, in today's cesspool of needless sequels, prequels, reboots, and cashgrabs you seriously think Ghostbusters 3 should've been made? Hell no.

>>86113724
Yeah, I didn't understand his hate towards Bill Murray. He was clearly miserable to be associated with the remake.

>>86113607
Was it meta?
Gave me TGWTG vibes.

File: the razors edge.jpg (76KB, 482x755px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 482x755px

>>86113825
Especially since the sony leak had them basically threatening him with legal action if he didn't play ball.
Also, the only reason he did ghostbusters was so the studio would let him make pic related. A great movie that was considered a flop and is generally forgotten, meanwhile the movie he didn't want to do in the first place becomes the biggest thing ever. He's always been a little bit resentful.

>>86113724
Yes. Sequels are better than reboots.

>>86114196
They've been teasing the matrix reviews since revenge of the sith. It's a trilogy with a beloved entry, and a really divisive entry or two.
Problem is that they're not really that bad (they have problems, definitely, and are nowhere near as great as the original) and I don't think there's that much to dissect really.

>>86114482
I replied to the wrong post and just realized it >>86113704

He forgot to add jokes.

File: 1453093210388.png (313KB, 701x394px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 701x394px

>Thinks Daisey Ridley is charismatic and Kristin Wiig is funny.

Are you ready to admit he's a pleb?

Baby's Day Out was better

>the movie wanted to be familiar but do it's own thing
>shows Rogue One
>not TFA

Mike really wants people to forget his TFA praise, huh?

what's the biggie smalls instrumental at the end?

>>86113600
I disagree. The political shitstorm that arose out of Sony Corp's shitty remake of an 80's kids movie was more interesting than Paul Feig's mediocity as a director. I understand why Mike didn't want to tackle that, but the approach he took wasn't as interesting as most Plinkett reviews.

>>86114941
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpvcjAhBabA&ab_channel=HassaniSabbahX

>>86114775
I've seen plenty of funny stuff from Kristen Wiig on SNL.

>>86115100
t. Lorne Michaels.

>>86114775
I believe it was Jay who said he thought Ridley was charismatic. I partially agree about Wiig. I think she can be funny when used appropriately, but generally isn't that funny. As for Daisy, I thought her performance in TFA was adequate in that she wasn't a fucking robot (like Felicity Jones in Rogue One), but overacting doesn't = charismatic. Really, a lot of the acting in TFA was characteristic of performances in JJ Abrams movies. He hypercharges everything to distract you from the fact that there's no real character development. Just a bunch of dumb, sweeping action. Star Trek 2009 is a prime example.

Actual critique. Posted in another thread on this shit but it got archived. Fuck it.

I don't understand RLM. Particularly Mike. Is the jaded, cynical, darkly-humorous, alcoholic bully all just an act? It doesn't line up with his objectively pleb taste in just about everything. Just finished watching the Ghostbusters 2016 Plinkett review and it reinforced this idea and felt like a cash grab/clickbait thing a year after the fact. They did fine with their first two videos on it and in this he had nothing new or particularly interesting or witty to say. Ghostbusters '16 has a ton of controversy around it, they got a shitload of views for their videos on it, and any new Plinkett will also get a shitload of views so I feel like that was essentially the only reason this was made. And it sucked. 58 minutes of lazy, rehashed, obvious and unfunny commentary.

Overall, the best comedic RLM moments in the past have come almost entirely from Mike, but only Jay seems to have actually decent taste and a serious interest in film. Rich I'm 50/50 on since he seems legitimately cynical and absolutely never makes excuses for garbage films like the others do, but at the same time he is actually invested in caring about capeshit at age 41. As for Josh and Jack, who cares, they have contributed nothing of value ever.

I feel like Mike is a literal pleb just playing a dark character for laughs (not just Plinkett, but himself in everything he's ever appeared in) whereas the rest of the crew is more or less genuine.

>>86115580
>you have to be dark and cynical to like good movies

you have to be 18 or older to post here

>>86113724
>He was right when he didn't want to make Ghostbusters 2
Murray was a huge reason why Two sucked so much. He didn't wanna do it and it's clearly obvious in the movie that he didn't wanna do it. Not saying the movie would have been automatically good if Murray didn't act like he didn't want to be there, but it definitely would have been better than it turned out.

Man, what the fuck is Sony's problem? Can't Sony shut down their film division yet?

File: 1399474181311.png (439KB, 687x822px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 687x822px

>>86113478

TFA was basically 90% Ring Theory bullshit.

Remember Scarface?

File: 1476211650635.jpg (18KB, 436x365px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 436x365px

>>86117772

Times Square has got to be the most irritating landmark on film, it always certifies that the film will be filled with annoying references and product placement.

>>86117772
Stop dancing

>>86117618
>he spent more time complaining about the prequels again in his TFA review than he did talking about TFA itself

it was really sad

Even though the review itself was kinda funny I felt kind of sad throughout. Plinkett's style works great for reviewing """serious""" trash, because he gets to rip it apart. In this I just saw how much better the jokes could have been, and was reminded yet again that this was a movie that Sony thought needed to exist.

>>86117618
Yeah, because he fell hook line and sinker for TFA's game. At least he admitted that the comedy in TFA went too far.
You know, for one of the more cynical members of RLM, he really likes the crap Hollywood pumps out

>>86107486
this didn't need to be a plinkett review and it's about a year too late
there were better targets, this was meh. reminded me of TFA review

>>86113607

But Reloaded was actually kino.

i won't apologize for Revolutions

>>86118024
I hope that he does a Plinkett review of Star Trek Discovery if it's as big of a shit show as it seems.
That would be prime Plinkett material

>>86113724
Ghostbusters 3 would not have been made in todays cesspool, it would have been made about 20 years ago or so.

Bill Murray holding out on GB3 artificially inflated the perceived value of a third ghostbusters movie, instead of a shitty sequel what fans got was "we're still working on it" for 20 years straight and then this pile of crap. Even people who don't actually care about Ghostbusters had heard of how difficult it was getting a third ghostbusters movie off the ground and so became interested in it for that reason alone. If Murray had either firmly put his foot down publicly or just fucking gone along and did his best with a third movie there would have been no value in Sony creating the new one and therefore it wouldn't have been made.

Now - we can argue all day about whether GB3 would have been good but it definitely would have been better than GB2k16

>>86113607
Reminder that The Matrix Has You is objectively superior to both the sequels.

>>86118245
>instead of a shitty sequel what fans got was "we're still working on it" for 20 years straight
Yeah nah I think it was abundantly clear that Murray and Ramis wanted nothing to do with a third Ghostbusters, only kooky old Aykroyd was desperate for another paycheck and a chance to hawk his delicious vodka.

>>86113607

Would it matter now? No one gives a damn about the Matrix anymore, I'm guessing if they announced a fourth film or a remake then you could definitely expect Plinkett reviews on the two old sequels.

>>86118028

Reloaded wasn't as shitty as Revolutions, but I wouldn't dare calling it kino

The only timeless kino from the Matrix universe is The Animatrix.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 11.23.14 PM.jpg (1MB, 6400x3600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 6400x3600px

>>86107486
I legit laughed at this.

>>86118307
I seem to remember Ramis and Aykroyd both wanting a third movie

might be wrong though

>>86107486
Kind of wished he was a bit more savage with direct comparisons desu.

But it was pretty solid overall. Not quite the same timing and a bit overkill with some repetition. But decent.

>>86118423

Dan Ayykroyd was definitely the most enthusiastic about it, Ramis was more like "If it happens, I'll gladly join", not pushing nor working against it.

File: image.jpg (40KB, 408x336px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 408x336px

>>86108472
>just got back from a road trip a few minutes ago
>last song I listened to on my playlist was Land of Confusion
>first thing I see on /tv/ coming back is those fucking puppets from the music video
I love this board sometimes

I think Plinkett went too far in a few places.

>>86118414

What were YOU thinking

>>86115580
Mike is a pleb pretending to be a patrician
Jay is a patrician pretending to be a pleb

>>86117981
Mike is a pleb and proud of it. He spent an hour tearing Into Darkness apart and then recommended it just because its Star Trek.

>>86113724
Wasn't Murray threatened with legal action if he didn't go along with the reboot according to one of the leaked emails?

>>86118871
Yes

>So many redditors here who don't get RLM

like this idiot
>>86115580

Why did they attack Murray so much, though? Murray was the one trying the most to keep this abomination from being made.

>Blah Blah Blah women can be funny get over it and it's all Paul Feig's fault that they werent funny in this movie.

Mike is a hack.

>>86119801
But women can be funny

>>86119923
True, but none of the women in the movie are funny.

>>86119959
and they were improvising. so it was literally up to them to create the humor. and they failed. Only person who did it well was the Thor guy

>>86120101
If your entire movie is improv it's the editor's job to cobble together a story, e.g. What we do in the shadows.

>>86120195
FIEGGGGG

>>86120258
>"Hey, Paul, I've been checking out those dailies and it looks great. It does not look like barf. But I was thinking maybe we could make the movie look more like barf."

What did he mean by this? https://twitter.com/AngryJoeShow/status/895135855442087936

>Complains about product placement
>Absolutely loved Spider-man homecoming despite really blatant product placement every few minutes including a awkward scene where the camera stays on a dairy queen for no reason

>>86113222
We need more scientist man.

>>86117981
I mean, maybe he just liked the movie? He lays out his thoughts in the review, I don't get why people thought he should've ripped it apart. The first thing he said about it in the half in the bag review was "I loved it. It was everything I hoped it would be." Mike got what he wanted. The review wasn't even just about The Force Awakens, it was about the current state of Star Wars. He doesn't even blindly praise it either, most of the TFA half of the review is him talking about his criticisms. We know he didn't like Rogue One, and I'm surprised we got a Ghostbusters Plinkett review over a RO one considering they even recorded a commentary track for it and had a lot of good points in that. I think The Last Jedi will make Mike more critical of TFA. I know /tv/ is convinced it's a beat-for-beat remake of ESB even though we know next to nothing about the plot and fell for those stupid sloth and force tree leaks even though it makes no sense for such specific plot points to leak when the only TLJ leaks we've gotten so far are spy pics of sets and leaked merch designs.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-09 at 1.15.47 AM.png (209KB, 1282x684px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1282x684px

>>86120714
what the fug

>>86120927
>Linkara has shit taste
Color me surprised.

>>86120757
Don't forget about the five-minute car commercial.

>>86120987
Hard not to have shit taste when you're a literal poopy puffer

>>86120927
Linkara is a misogynist, not surprising.

>>86120865
They were pretty bored during the RO commentary I thought.

>>86120987
Ghostbusters II is better than the first one.

>>86113724
If it's going to get made better that the original Ghostbusters are still fucking alive to star in it

>>86120757
>another sony movie has product placement in it

No shit, but it's a matter of how much, how often, how blatant, and if there's anything else in the movie that redeems it. Nothing in Ghostbusters or Jack and Jill resembles a real movie so the transparent commercialism shines through.

Instead of making "Ghostbusters with women" make a Ghostbusters film that happens to have women who have actual characters.

Plinkett is spot on about Wigg's character; she should have been the straight woman.

>>86117947
Well to be honest, you can at least say more about the Prequels than:

>Is to A New Hope what The Iron Tower is to Lord of the Rings
>"The plot must ever move forward" is the only character motivation
>Got some nice graphics, 1080p, full motion control, barely any frame loss on Ultra
>The creators definitely don't want to touch any Expanded Universe shit, but here's like fifty visual hints at Expanded Universe shit, so you'll buy a ticket to the next 20 movies in hopes of seeing something you actually enjoy
>Kylo has an ark. Maybe. Possibly. Likely has like 4 and the committee in charge of deciding what the only vaguely interesting character's ark is going to be from among the options is which one the internet tells them they want to see the most in the form of speculation

File: Star Trek Wesley Girl.jpg (578KB, 1345x876px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 1345x876px

>>86117618
Mike is a bitch for not going out on TFA. At least other people are stepping up to cover for his failure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g9cJ5WKZeU

>>86120101
>it was literally up to them to create the humor
You obviously have no idea about how movies are done. A good director and editor are needed to make a comedy film work. One liners and improvised jokes that would work in a real life situation don't necessarily translate to a good movie joke and vice-versa. Why do you think there's people who are pretty funny in the movies and not at all in person? It's not just the material itself, but editing is extremely important in comedy.

>>86121147
t. poopy puffer

>editing out the constant talking
>actually somewhat watchable

based Plinkett

Ad lib is fine if you have talent and they genuinely riff something funny, but you can't just tell 98% of actors to "ad lib" because most can't do it

>STOP TALKING

best line of the video and all that needs to be said about the movie

Mike gets it exactly right by pointing out that Feig was too easy to please. You don't want an Ed Wood style director who thinks every take is wonderful.

File: JUST.jpg (202KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1366x768px

>>86121720

Main difference with Ed Wood though is that Feig doesn't seem to have a vision of his own, he was either a Sony puppet or a yes man who couldn't possibly care less about the film. At the very least Wood was passional.

>>86121871
Not to give Feig any slack in this, but all of the guy's previous work WAS with other studios. Think what you want about Bridesmaids, Spy, or The Heat, but those movies weren't unmitigated disasters like Ghostbusters. I honestly think Sony Pictures is just a toxic work environment in general and soft "nice guy" directors like Feig inevitably get chewed up in its corporate machinery.

>>86121343
Why is Wesley a girl there? is it porn

>>86122278

>Sony Pictures is just a toxic work environment in general

That's undeniable, Sony has been a constant stream of poor decissions for years now, yet they seem to always blame directors, writers and actors or X controversy when their films tank, the whole ghostbusters marketing campaign is a prime example of that.

File: Ghostbusters 1466209400339d.jpg (271KB, 552x1245px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 552x1245px

>>86118245
This guy gets it.

shame on /tv/ for blaming women for this movie's utter lack of comedy

it's obviously just a coincidence

>>86115580
>They did fine with their first two videos on it and in this he had nothing new or particularly interesting or witty to say.
this. The original ghostbusters3 hitb was great. This seemed like pointless clickbait.

>>86122474
Sony is one of the most corrupt dumpsterfires there is

Everyone involved runs home with a few million dollars, the film is shit and bombs, and Japan is dumb enough to foot the bill

Was Plinkett right to criticize Bill Murray?

>>86123077
no, that was bizarre since murray had the only funny line in the whole movie.

>>86123157
What's even the point of this if it looks like cgi crap anyway?

File: mrtflavorwave-200x200.jpg (15KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 200x200px

Have you ordered your convection oven yet?

>>86123077
>>86123125
his criticisms were 100% valid.
Bill was the ONLY holdout on the film, and it was entirely because he was a stuck up arrogant spoiled child during and after Groundhog Day, and it took Harold FUCKING DYING to get him to put even a small damper on that.

Murray also has a massive inferiority complex over it, too, he thinks that Harold made him, and without him he's nothing special, and he resents it and hates him for it.

He's a fucking spoiled prick.

File: 1492658196730.jpg (4MB, 1496x7784px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1496x7784px

Does anyone else miss the shitstorm this movie created?

>>86123462
No, that kind of shitstorm happens every other day now and it's the cancer of modern reality

>>86123125
wow he had a funny line i guess that redeems him!

>>86123375
>>86123512
>judging murray on his personal life rather than his work
Given how many of them like to weigh in on politics and the like, it seems safer to assume all actors irl are idiots/assholes until proven otherwise.

File: more lightsabers more.gif (2MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 960x540px

>>86123157
>>86123219

File: Annie-Potts--Ghostbusters-Premiere--07.jpg (151KB, 1470x2033px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1470x2033px

Would you fuck Annie Potts?

I would.

>>86123375
>he thinks that Harold made him
To be fair, he kinda did. After what Ramis did for him with Meatballs, Caddyshack, and Stripes, writing Bill the comedic role of the century with Peter Venkman basically catapulted the guy to superstar status.

File: 471[2].jpg (6KB, 165x115px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 165x115px

>>86108265
>make a bait video about how awful other reviewers are
>someone is so asshurt he literally creates the video that they are making phone of
>using the literal content they made making fun of it

at this point we dont even need tech, we can just build a road out of salt to mars, like, fuck

He had good points, but it was way too meandering. It felt like he was just going through the same points over and over again, I can't even remember any of the titles for the "sections" since there was so little difference between them.

He should have gone through the plot. He may have had little to say about it, but at least it would have given the review more structure, and maybe more ideas for topics.


Anyway, I liked this other review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcXszrAs5ik

File: 1502066240269.jpg (302KB, 1200x786px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1200x786px

>>86123743
I'd fuck Ghostbusters 2 Annie Potts.

>>86123896
whats he supposed to do? say "the movie committed the same dumb shit 9 times, thus ends my 45 second review". you just KNOW if he did everyone would scream "but you didnt address how shit it was multiple times over!"

>>86123891
Who said the person who made that was ass hurt?

>>86123230

THIS IS DELICIOUS

MY TASTE BUDS IS GOING WILD

>>86123462
Jesus Christ no.

File: 1407274602242[2].png (425KB, 447x378px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 447x378px

>>86123969
true, technically, he might really just animated an entire minute long segment of a part of the most out of context segment that to people who wouldnt know was satire

theres a chance. the second most likely chance is that...its click bait riding off rlms popularity.

>>86124004
I know that animator. They just do this stuff for shits and giggles.

>>86124028
yeah id believe it. 22, 000 views out of a minute, why not

File: welcome-to-me[1].jpg (197KB, 845x502px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 845x502px

everytime i look at ghostbusters i feel kinda sorry for Kristen Wiig and her career, she is almost 40 and she is stuck with not-MILF old quirky woman

>>86123945
What kind of an apologist attitude is that? He could have improved the review in many ways, your stupid proposal isn't the only conceivable alternative. And beyond that, he could have just... not made the review. Nobody asked for it, nobody was holding him accountable to make it, he just picked his battle and didn't perform particularly well.

>>86124121
>he shouldnt of made the thing thats got us all shitposting and talking about it all day because we are so assblasted about his opinion on it
lol okay.
>no one asked him
lol, hes viewers are drones, but, no! they were better then that to act drone like!

the problem is, everyone your talking to, has seen it, and you talking about telling its shit, makes


more people see it. feed the machine you hate, bruh

>>86124247
I'll do whatever you want if you stop posting. Are you having a stroke or are you just mentally challenged?

>>86124121
Nah you're just a fag. No one has really made a proper dissection of why the movie didn't work until now because either they didn't want to touch it for fear of touching off another SJW shitstorm or they were hung up on the shitty feminist marketing angle and calling Leslie Jones a gorilla to see what the movie actually failed at.

File: 1500513933141.jpg (28KB, 600x440px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 600x440px

>>86124279
all of them. the only thing you could add is that im maybe, also a child making a better argument then you, on top of all that

Didn't really need the Rich Evans bits, could've at least put on a fake mustache or framed it so he's like a Bond villain or something. Baldy was a pretty good Feig though. Needed more pizza rolls

>>86108472
Those "Muppets" are from Spitting Image. Google it.

File: 1502157772388.png (1MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1334x750px

>>86120714
>>86120927
> it's a "RLM and seven peso Jose crossover episode"

>>86124296
Except you're wrong and I even posted one such dissection you massive brainless retard.

>>86120865
>rogue one commentary
>had a lot of good points in that.
No it didn't. Essentially every point of criticism they made was not a fault of the film itself but due to their own stupidity/inability to process information. By the end of it you feel like they were just desperately finding excuses to justify their blind hatred of the film. You can like their reviews all you want but don't for a second believe what they do is insightful cinematic commentary.

>>86123696

D E N S E

it was shit, and just a reiteration of the points they made in Hitb.

He didnt take advantage of the format of the Plinkett reviews, what a fucking blunder

>no wife
>no son
>no pizza rolls
2/10, hack frauds

Was 2 that bad, bois? I was a little kid when i saw it on cinema, so I remeber it being a blastnever had the opportunity or interest to watch it again
I remember some gremlins2 vibes from it, but i could be wrong

>>86128030
dude how old r u lmao sup gramps lol

>>86128057
35

>>86107486
>Leslie jones is funny

No she fucking isn't you gutless fucks.

>>86117901
STOP DANCING!!!

>>86120927
>"ad-libs"
Oh the irony

>>86118245

>all these lies

NIGGA Total recall was rebooted, like FIFTEEN FUCKING YEARS AFTER IT CAME OUT. Hollywood has no integrity they're gonna take whatever they can grab.

Can we agree the real winner here is Rick Moranis?

>>86113522
from about 2007 onwards