Cuck Competition 2017

File: jorah.jpg (331KB, 827x515px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 827x515px

He can never be beaten

File: 116.jpg (192KB, 1200x801px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1200x801px

>>86104972
yes he can

File: tumblr_mp1fu9nQ9e1rmbbv0o1_500.gif (882KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

882KB, 500x281px

>>86105475
Thought that was Tyler

>>86104732
How was snape a cuck, he never raised Harry or was in a relationship with Lilly

File: 1497754313243.jpg (512KB, 1620x2884px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1620x2884px

>>86107497
he was a masochist cuckold that watched over his ex-childhood love's husband's son and he also starred in easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>86107595
>ayn rand
>god-tier
kys

>>86108034
Lmao

I always assumed that Snape was Harry's actual father, in the films anyway - haven't read any of the books

>>86108034
Ahahaha oh god, I forgot about him! xD

[spoilers]I still have hope though. :3[/spoilers]

File: 870e2096c445af86d54053712607ba54.jpg (90KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 960x640px

>>86104972
Not even when he's in a totally different show

What does cuck mean?

>>86104732
me

>>86104732
Cuckolding is pretty common now. Most younger people are in open relationships.

>>86109864
fucking degeneracy

>>86104732
Is Slytherin a robot house?