Harry Potter Discussions

Actress who played Luna aged that rotten milk.

>>86060219
Is that Emily "Boyfucker" Kinney?

D

>>86060244
I know, now she looks like shit, but before she was probably the most innocent piece of fuckable human i had ever saw

File: 1453656323224.jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

Why even bother to discuss one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

ullest

>>86060269
nope, its Evanna Lynch

File: IMG_2003.jpg (207KB, 796x566px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 796x566px

I liked the notorious w.i.z.

>>86060323
Do you have some kind of alert set up or do you literally monitor /tv/ all day? I have not seen a single HP thread without this pasta at least in the last several months.

The "No!" still gets me every time though

File: 1468821803136.jpg (120KB, 958x700px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 958x700px

>>86060445

>>86060476
Sometimes the pasta isn't posted right away.
I assume the NEETs who post it are bust doing something else to be monitoring the site.

>>86060323
There it is. This is all these threads are any good for.

>>86060323
desu I kinda like it better when the copypasta takes a little longer to show up in the thread. builds the suspense.

>>86060323
I do agree that most of the time it was shit CoughCoughGobletOfFire but there were some good moments during the movies (books can fuck themselves, too much explaining and over-exaggerating)
Also completley ignoring the fact that i put in the spoiler 'if you find it horrible, dont comment'

>>86060219
chamber of secrets was the worst, ez

>>86060618
"No!"

>>86060618
Is this your first ever post on 4chan? Go back to wherever you came from

>>86060656
Yeaahhh, chamber of secrets was bad, but i fucking despise Goblet, the only scene i bothered to watch was when harry was in the bath with Myrtle, it fucking destroys me to know that Myrtle was 30/31 at the time of that movie

Is this thread full of the same infantiles as the "comfy HP threads" on /v/?

>>86060739
You really wanna send me back to fucking Tumblr? i beg you dont

File: 1469922693677.jpg (12KB, 200x176px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 200x176px

>>86060323
>"No!"

>>86060445
HOL UP

>>86060618
Goblet of Fire was the only worthwhile movie to watch.
Kill yourself.

File: big d.png (1MB, 1359x567px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1359x567px

>>86060219
SHAT UP BLUD

>>86060862
>extremely cliche
>ending was horrible
>bored my family half to death
i have no intention to kill myself

>>86060445
>"Black could be everywhere"

Comedy gold, J.K.

File: 1488703562166.jpg (123KB, 749x750px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 749x750px

>>86060323
Keep it up my man

>>86060813
No one wants anyone from that shithole here, we can sniff you out a mile away obviously. Fuck off

File: 1501710434999.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

>>86060323
Because people want "safe". They want "comfy". They want "familiar". That's why they'll discuss films based on one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: stoppleaseee.jpg (6KB, 151x233px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 151x233px

>>86060932
>Did your mother die
>Dudley's face during speech
>my reaction

File: Second_Task_Lake.jpg (80KB, 872x528px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 872x528px

>"So...now that they're all under the lake, lets just sit here for an hour and wait to see who comes back first."
>...
>"...This is fucking boring"

>>86060751
Goblet is way too long, but the actual trials are comfy

HOLY SHIT WHY DID THIS THREAD CREATE SUCH A SHIT-STORM

>>86060932
Do you think Dudley has a big D?

>>86061096
Trials are ok
the other 1 and 1/2 hour was just shit

>>86061132
Yes a big D
a big Downie

>>86060219
the worst was easily goblet of fire, and I thought prisoner of azkaban before that until I discovered cinematography

>>86060219
I wonder if anyone ever used an orgasm charm and just pointed at random people/ themselves while at school.

>>86060219
this chick looks like she's perpetually high as fuck

>>86061435
I mean, im pretty sure the charm on her neck makes her high, and not the protect her from those creatures.

I couldnt wrap my head around how The longest book(Order Of The Phoenix) became the shortest movie

>>86060445
>it was all a dream
>I used to read Quibbler magazine
>Voldymort and Dumbly D up in the pensieve