Remove the boring love triangle and this becomes war kino.

>love triangle
what is so appealing about this to women? do they just like the idea of two males fighting over them like some beasts in the wild?

>>85999191

>beckinsale
>based 40s aesthetic
Whole movie is kino

File: 1502060691344.jpg (30KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 590x350px

>HE'S ON ME

>>85999282
Pretty much. It's a concept that also appeals to men, albeit in a sexual way. Men love the concepts of two girls so thirsty for the D that they duke it out.

>>85999191
Thanks capt. Obvious

>>85999980
Read it as:

>dyke it out

>>85999282
Women crave attention

>>86000260
>dyke it out

That works too.

Even without the romance plot you've got shit leads with no charisma and terrible CGI dogfights.

>>85999191
i wnna be her pusy slave

>>86000660
They were good enough. Plus no love triangle could provide more screentime for Alec Baldwin as Doolittle.

Man, I remember when Affleck and Hartnet were the next big Hollywood stars. What went wrong?

Why a love triangle in ANY movie that shouldn't have one?
Oh right, gotta fill dem seats. To hell with NOT filling seats. There's seats what need filling. Mo'money, mo'made up problems.

It would still be no comparison to Tora! Tora! Tora!