឴

File: 14.png (299KB, 750x300px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 750x300px

AHHH-HAHA!

it was a different time

File: 1483418897402.jpg (548KB, 1616x2896px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1616x2896px

Truly a profound and often misinterpreted ending shot, in which Radcliffe is seen trying to escape at high velocity, but to no avail, the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>85930088
Do you think it's one person, or an entire cabal of shitposters?

>>85930124
What is really funny about this post, is that it implies the poster doen't know what a meme is in 4chan in 2017. Funny.

File: IT end shot.png (234KB, 750x300px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 750x300px

>>85929643

>>85930124
Many. I know because I'm one of them.

YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAA

>>85929643
What Ps2 game is this?

>>85930027
jej

>>85929643
I walked out of the theater at this scene. Fucking ridiculous.

what was his fucking problem

>>85930339
My fucking drink dribbled out of my mouth jesus

>>85930339

OOH AH AH AH AH

>>85929643
Makes sense all movies after it were utter shit

>>85929643
>>85930339
How did he get up so high? Did he get thrown out of a plane?

>>85930817
Was getting caught part of his plan?

>>85930339
Now make a CIA edit

>>85930088
>in which Radcliffe is seen trying to escape at high velocity, but to no avail, the dullest franchise
Best opening I've seen in a while, well done.

File: 1494512242058.jpg (15KB, 268x307px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 268x307px

>>85930088
>which Radcliffe is seen trying to escape at high velocity, but to no avail, the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises.

>>85930088
Based "No!" Poster

>>85930088
>Catch-22 is low tier
Wtf mate?

>>85930088
>Truly a profound and often misinterpreted ending shot, in which Radcliffe is seen trying to escape at high velocity, but to no avail, the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises.

wew

>>85930088
>that lead-in
you're doing the art proud my son

>>85929643
That bit made me so mad I literally walked out of the theatre right afterwards.

File: 1501259929589.jpg (25KB, 475x284px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 475x284px

>>85929643

File: 1496560511556.png (15KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 600x580px

>>85930088
>Truly a profound and often misinterpreted ending shot, in which Radcliffe is seen trying to escape at high velocity, but to no avail, the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises.

>"No!"

>He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

I will never get tired of seeing this post

>>85930088
>The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
t. a 80 years old reviewer in 2001, before the rest of the books were written.

There is some true to this, but he took a book for kids like way too seriously.

I never minded this ending shot
a bit awkward but it's from the best harry potter movie by a long shot

>>85933301
I laffed

File: Harry Potter_and_the_Prisoner_of_Azkaban_Dementor_on_the_Train.jpg (28KB, 666x361px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 666x361px

You guys do realise that this was done to parallel the previous scenes with the dementors, right?

It looks corny but it's actually pretty clever and great.

>>85930088
Based

>>85933850
P O T T E R Y

>>85933301
wew

>>85933850
>It looks corny but it's actually pretty clever and great.
Ah good, I'll just make sure not to look at the scene then next time then

>>85935505
are you retarded?

>tfw never watched a single HP movie, only parts of random movies
Should I watch them? If so in what order?

>>85933734
Fuck off

File: 1501693470587.jpg (90KB, 960x770px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 960x770px

>>85936791
7>3>5>4>2>1>6
In this order bruh.

>>85936966
any particular reason? Im asking because I know star wars and other movies have a different viewing order for maximum effect

>>85936791
Watch the odd numbered movies first then watch the even numbers in reverse order
1>3>5>7>8>6>4>2

>>85935567
Look, I know the scene has a point and is meant to be a cathartic release from an ongoing visual theme of the movie, but it looks stupid and it's a hilarious way to end a movie.

>>85937068
HP is linear. Watch the dullest movie franchise in order.

>>85936791
Skip the first two, I think they are too kiddy, and then in chronological order.

>>85937151
>too kiddy
Chamber of secrets is arguably the most comfiest movie of the series.

>that ending