[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Jacob's Ladder Remake

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 127
Thread images: 22

File: aaah.png (2MB, 2170x1102px) Image search: [Google]
aaah.png
2MB, 2170x1102px
>Michael Ealy, Jesse Williams and Nicole Beharie will star in a reboot of the 1990 psychological thriller “Jacob’s Ladder.”
>Producers previously said the new film would be “more akin to an homage and not mimic the original.” The new "Ladder" has been conceived as a modern-day paranoid action thriller about two brothers.
Thank god someone is gonna turn that outdated, boring psychological horror movie into a fun action thriller I can watch with my bros. Lead actor's most notable roles were even Underworld and 2 Fast 2 Furious, fuckin dope bro!
>>
I feel like this is probably fake but then again I wouldn't put it below the current film industry.
>>
gee i wonder who could be behind this
>>
>>85928029
FAKE
Nice bait, of course that won't stop /tv/ from melting down
>inb4 200 replies
>>
Remaking Jacob's Ladder is already a terrible idea; changing the races of characters unnecessarily is even worse of an idea.
>>
>>85928029
>movie called jacobs ladder
>not an adaptation of Spec Ops the Line
weuw, vlad
>>
File: 62N811qB.jpg (203KB, 1239x1239px) Image search: [Google]
62N811qB.jpg
203KB, 1239x1239px
>Jamal's Ladder
>>
>>85928263
>>85928189
Google it, it's real.
>>
So, if early 2010's was capeshit films, will late 2010's be niggerwashed remakes?
>>
>>85928327
is this a new blacked title?
>>
>>85928029
This is fucking news from literally last year.
http://www.indiewire.com/2016/04/nicole-beharie-joins-michael-ealy-and-jesse-williams-in-jacobs-ladder-remake-287694/
>>
>>85928029
they can't keep getting away with this
>>
>>85929004
You know it can take more than a year to make a movie.
>>
>black man with blue eyes

So genetical trash that's even more trashier? How is that possible?
>>
>>85929213
>Don't worry goyess! You can fuck a negro and still produce a light eyed child!
>>
>we need more minority representation
>get a bunch of half breeds with light eyes
>>
>>85928282
>>85928908
>>85929102
>>85928189
Hollywood has been remaking the rest of the world's movies for ever because US movie goers can't into subtitles.
Seems logical at some point to fragment the US audience and re-make movies for every kind of niche audience (WASPs, educated, uneducated, women, blacks, Asians...).
The same logic applies and has been for decades.

That said, you did a good job with True Lies. the original French version was too French, even for the French. Except that, it is mostly greed and laziness on your part with mostly poor results.
>>
>>85928029
>reboot

But it's not a franchise, it's a one-off psychological art movie-type of thing made in 1990. Is everything now a franchise? Are they going to "reboot" My Dinner with Andre? Ordinary People? The Piano? It's inane.
>>
>>85928189
>>85928282
>>85928327
>>85929102
>>85929606

Jacobs's blacked her
>>
File: Chocolate Milk.webm (743KB, 1280x718px) Image search: [Google]
Chocolate Milk.webm
743KB, 1280x718px
>>85928029
>Nicole Beharie
yup im gonna watch it
>>
>>85928029
So hol' up. Why blacks gotta steal everything?
Oh, right, black people have no culture of their own!
LOL
>>
>>85929401
That's because they want black people to watch, and the worst-kept secret of black people is that they prefer lighter-skinned people too. Look at the old "race movies" that used to be made for black audiences in the Golden Age of Hollywood - all the stars look "high yeller", some so pale you can't believe they're actually black. Look at black movies now - not many darker chicks in the leads.
>>
Guys

>a little known one-off flop from 26 years ago
>THIS is the movie that needs to be remade
What the fuck
>>
>>85928029
Until this remake was announced, the only posts on here that mentioned Jacob's Ladder were list posts or one-line "Jacob's Ladder is underrated" comments that nobody ever replied to.

I find the idea of "rebooting" a single film laughable, but I find the sudden pretended concern for the original film even more laughable. I almost hope they make a nigger Satantango next just so you dipshits have to sit through the original "on principle", or else bullshit transparently on /tv/ about how much you love it.
>>
>>85930712
Most people with an interest in movies have seen it but it is kind of ridiculous because remakes usually look for marketability
>>
>>85930568
How it works is this - producer owns a property. Property stopped making most of the money it'll ever make some time ago. The rights revert to someone else soon, or just become profitless baggage. The producer wants to see if he can make some more money without having to buy a new property. He decides to remake it. This is also why Herzog's asinine Bad Lieutenant remake happened.

There's nothing to worry about. People love saying shit like "have you seen the original? I saw it. It's better", so the original film will get more viewers and become, briefly, slightly overrated rather than underrated - in any case it was only underrated because it was underseen. How many people even remember the Total Recall remake with Marky Mark?
>>
>>85929606
We used to tell good stories, and people wanted to remake our films. Delete this post.
>>
>>85930856
>How many people even remember the Total Recall remake with Marky Mark
Apparently not even you, because it was Colin Farrell
>>
>>85930809
>Most people with an interest in movies have seen it

Give me a break, man! In the history of /tv/, you'll find not one thread dedicated to it until the darkie version was announced.

As for the marketability of it, see >>85930856. They'll use the very basics of the plot - enough that anyone else who owns a piece of the original would sue the producer for using a different title, which is as much incentive as it takes.
>>
This is one of the whitest movies you could've picked, too. What are they going to do. Have hooded KKK members following a black dude around in a car? Wheeling the guy through a bunch of job applications at the end? >>85930712
>but I find the sudden pretended concern for the original film even more laughable
What is there to even talk about the original.
>>
>>85930889
That proves my point!

>>85930884
>WE WUZ LOUIS B. MAYER N SHIET
Funny, but some people really think like that.
>>
>>85930975
this meant for >>85930712
>>
File: jake.png (178KB, 796x758px) Image search: [Google]
jake.png
178KB, 796x758px
>>85930939
Why would you make such an easily falsifiable claim?
>>
>>85930712
I don't love Jacob's Ladder or even think it's underrated -- I actually think it's somewhat overrated, but that's another matter.

That being said, I usually get peeved over Horror remakes because 99% of the time it's remaking an already good movie which takes very little effort, as opposed to taking a bad movie and making it good.

And changing the races is a stupid political move, imo. I hate when it's done because it's so fucking lazy and clearly used to score brownie points.

In summation: there's zero reason to remake the movie, as is the case with nearly all Horror remakes.
>>
>>85928327

>Yakub's Ladder
>>
>>85931011
>why would we ever talk about a film we admire which has tons to analyse in it
OK.


>>85931038
Because I wanted to see how desperate you'd be to prove me wrong. You sure showed me how much it means to you to lie about this. The first of those got five replies. Most of the replies in the second thread are underwhelmed. The third is on *page 53*!
>>
>>85931365
>In the history of /tv/, you'll find not one thread dedicated to it
- some faggot, 2017
>>
>>85931365
>>why would we ever talk about a film we admire which has tons to analyse in it
>OK.
I said WHAT is there to talk about you aut. You can't just respond to "what is there to talk about this movie" with "There's a ton to analyze in it"
>>
>>85931176
They are remaking old IPs that made money before to make more money out of them. There's no reason remaking a good movie - in your opinion - would be easier than remaking a bad one, and generally speaking, bad movies don't get remade because there's little money associated with them as properties.

>And I allow myself to get angry that black people exist.

I know.
>>
File: #progress.png (328KB, 669x585px) Image search: [Google]
#progress.png
328KB, 669x585px
>>85930387
Umm... no, sweetie. Try again. We are being more inclusive.
>>
>>85931476
>They are remaking old IPs that made money before
This isn't an IP that made money before

It pulled in $26 million on a $25 million budget, which means between marketing and the theater's cut of the profits the studio must have lost millions.
>>
>>85928029
Googled it. It's real. What the fuck. It's so random.
>>
>>85931413
You're saying that not desperately scrolling back to page 27 makes me some faggot? I think you're some faggot to have been so thirsty to contradict me, and SHIT, I just noticed, the third thread in your image has SIX REPLIES! So only one of these threads that prove me wrong ever got more than ten replies, and the one that did was mostly people saying "eh, it's alright".

And why did you do this? So you can insist that your fake outrage is legitimate. It's funny, man.
>>
>>85931546
Then by their standards they ARE remaking a bad movie, what more could you ask?
>>
Jacob's ladder was the only movie that I'd seen that ever went into the topic of chemical weapon deliriants.
I don't see how a drug that has intense, dysphoric and realistic hallucinations the user can't distinguish from reality isn't more interesting to film makers.
>>
File: 4plebs.png (35KB, 444x688px) Image search: [Google]
4plebs.png
35KB, 444x688px
>>85931612
>page 27
Those threads are from page two here. The threads on the first page don't meet your "made after the remake was announced" criteria.
>>
>>85931678
I was looking at the mentions given the film overall - remember I mentioned all the namechecks of it that went nowhere?
>>
>>85931835
Remember when you said no one in the history of /tv/ has ever made a thread about the movie?

Pepperidge Farm remembers.
>>
>>85928029
HAHHAHAAHAHAAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHA
>>
>>85928029
>existential movie remade with niggers

is Sony making this shit?
>>
>>85931612
Nobody has to even like a movie to be able to be outraged by the useless blackwashing of its "reboot". Being fine with this kind of behavior is just encouraging the film industry to keep doing it which could eventually result in a film you do like having an embarrassing 201X black reboot. They're literally making a whole race a trend by doing shit like this. You still haven't said what there is to even talk about Jacob's Ladder either. It's a pretty straight forward film.
>>
>>85931678
>>85931835
The point is, if you found a total of three threads, only one of which got more than ten replies, and in that thread, most people are either more interested in Silent Hill, possibly watched it because of the Silent Hill connection, or are overall mixed about its merits... it isn't a film that "everyone who cares about film", as one post claimed, has seen or valued.

So yes, this is going to be /tv/ running around like headless chickens for months because niggers got cast in a remake of a movie they don't give a shit about anyway.
>>
File: close door bb.gif (925KB, 212x176px) Image search: [Google]
close door bb.gif
925KB, 212x176px
>Jacob's Ladder
>remake

what? I strongly doubt the people that go to the movies nowadays have even seen the original

why not just make a brand new franchise or is the ultimate goal to just piss everyone off
>>
>>85931870
Which, as I said, I said to see how desperate people would be to contradict me, and what they'd find. They found two threads that died, and one 40-post thread of ambivalence. Ever. You haven't proven me wrong, just saved me legwork. Thanks.
>>
>>85931920
>a total of
Those were just samples. If I had posted more, you would have said "look at this autist who put together all these threads"

There's five pages of these, and they're almost all either "talk about Jacob's Ladder" or "recommend me a movie like Jacob's Ladder"

http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/jacob%27s%20ladder/type/op/page/2/
>>
>>85931985
See >>85930856. And the last sentence of >>85930939.
>>
>>85931994
>>85931997
*Curb Your Enthusiasm theme starts playing*
>>
File: 1481639999367.jpg (154KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]
1481639999367.jpg
154KB, 900x900px
>>85928029
>it's set during the Iraq War because that's the new nostalgia now
>instead of the government testing combat drugs it's some corporation testing pharmaceuticals on soldiers
>'Angels' have Islamic twist to them, because Middle East theme
>There are now also explicit demons, which look like Christian Angels until the end when they become like the Thing
>>
>>85931997
I'm not autistic enough to go through why each of those results isn't what you just described.

>>85931906
>Being fine with this kind of behavior is just encouraging the film industry to keep doing it which could eventually result in a film you do like having an embarrassing 201X black reboot.

Your anger isn't going to change shit, just waste hours of your time.
>a film you do like
Interesting that you assume I don't like Jacob's Ladder. Pointing out that nobody gave much of a shit about it until now isn't a statement that I don't like it. Most movies I like, most of you give even less of a shit about. They are unlikely to ever remake them because they never owned the IP in the first place. I like two that got pointless remakes, The Ladykillers and Bad Lieutenant. Neither of those remakes happening made me feel angry - I just laughed contemptuously then got on with my life. I think you should ask yourself what you're really angry about. Spoiler alert: it's niggers.
>>
>>85932290
>there's zero examples
>here's three examples
>haha you could only give me three examples?
>here's 129 examples
>fuck off those don't count
Fuck's sake man, stop digging
>>
>>85932072
>>it's set during the Iraq War because that's the new nostalgia now

Sure, people were "nostalgic" for the Vietnam war.
>>
>>85932290
holy fuck kill yourself autist
>>
>>85932330
They aren't what you described them as in your summary of them, as you know.

The issue is your anger.
>>
>>85932349
The autists are the people getting angry that niggers exist and are targeted as a demographic - the people who have panic attacks about reality.
>>
>>85932425
you are such a fucking loser holy shit lol
>>
File: 71782030.jpg (9KB, 368x158px) Image search: [Google]
71782030.jpg
9KB, 368x158px
>>85932380
>the issue is your anger, not my constant false claims
>>
>>85932330
Two of these are about the announcement of the remake. Did you just assume I wouldn't look?
>>
>>85932496
That's why you have to go to page two, to find the ones that predate 2016. There's five more pages after that.
>>
File: smilelaugh.jpg (99KB, 798x798px) Image search: [Google]
smilelaugh.jpg
99KB, 798x798px
>>85932290
>Your anger isn't going to change shit, just waste hours of your time.
Me not spending my money to watch this garbage sure is though. I'm practically trying to help them by making sure they don't waste their millions in making a pile of shit.
>Interesting that you assume I don't like Jacob's Ladder
I didn't even say that lmao. Please just save yourself further humiliation and close the thread. You've embarrassed yourself enough for today.
>>
>>85928029
STEP BY STEP
>>
>>85932455
The only results you're offering apart from those first three are post-announcement, list posts, and one other example of someone trying to start a thread that dies after four posts. I consciously made a sweeping statement so that an autist obsessed with validating his own obsession with niggers would do the research, and you did it. Now you've done it, you don't need to keep begging for my attention.
>>
>>85932516
None of which are actually about the film - they're all list posts.
>>
File: 28223-4349-31320-1.jpg (56KB, 410x640px) Image search: [Google]
28223-4349-31320-1.jpg
56KB, 410x640px
>>85932734
>>85932783
This is getting sad now
>>
>>85932605
Right now, you're not not-buying a ticket, you're whining about the fact that the movie's getting made. It's futile.

Yes, you said exactly that:
>could eventually result in a film you do like having an embarrassing 201X black reboot
>a film you do like

Why would I feel embarrassed? You're the ones crying and angry because you're scared of niggers.
>>
>>85932734
>>85932783
>people show interest/enjoyment in the movie
>b-but they're not ACTUALLY discussing it
>nobody on /tv/ has even seen Jacob's Ladder until now!!!
YAh YAh we got london on the track
>>
>>85932800
>please love me

No, I'm not the person who'll take you out of your loneliness, autist.
>>
>>85932888
Everyone can read what I wrote. Why would you (You) my posts if you're trying to misrepresent them? Don't you know how not to be self-defeating?
>>
>>85932878
It was a hypothetical. Sorry the first sentence didn't give that away to you.
>Why would I feel embarrassed?
The same way fans of The Thing are embarrassed by the shitty 2011 The Thing. Please just stop posting. You've got not a single point and now it's just damage control.
>>
Here, at last, is the only other thread about the original movie not to be stillborn on here. It actually makes the other one, which was mostly expressions of indifference, seem positive.

http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/52006127/#52006127
>>
>>85933096
>It was a hypothetical.
No, it had an embedded assumption that I don't like Jacob's Ladder because I'm not having a panic attack about the nigger action movie version.

I love The Thing. I don't feel embarrased by the 2011 Thing. Why would I?
>>
>>85933096
>>85933183
Oh, and
>damage control
- the only people that people like you ever "damage" is yourselves.
>>
>>85928029
Why is making the remake for a different demographic rather than riding the original's coattails a bad thing, exactly?
>>
>>85933310
That's like paying someone to chew food for you.
>>
2 white guys and a hot black chick. Seems good.
>>
>>85934604
How is it like that?
>>
>>85928029
I would bet quite a few shekels that those black guys have a European paternal haplogroup.
>>
>>85934798
Because you don't get to explore something unique and out of your boundaries.
>>
>>85928029

Changing the plot is kinda whack as I'd love to see a black cast/director tackle psychological horror that doesn't involve domestic disputes and schmaltzy dinner scenes where everyone hashes out their problems interspersed with comedy bits. "Action thriller" is definitely not how I'd describe Jacob's Ladder.

But I do love Michael Ealy and will watch just about any garbage with him in it.
>>
>>85934906
But it's not as if the people they're marketing this to would ever have done that.
>>
>>85934939
Action thrillers don't usually have domestic disputes and schmaltzy dinner scenes either, though.
>>
>>85934850
Yep >>85930529
>>
>tyrone's project housing
>>
>>85933023
>Everyone can read what I wrote

>In the history of /tv/, you'll find not one thread dedicated to it
>>
A Clockwork Orange remake when?
>Jamal and his homies sitting in da hood.
>Listening to "fuck the police", because it eases up Jamal while beating up some white cops.
>Break-in at the White House, to rape and kill Mrs. Trump and beat Trump in the hospital.
>Jamal gets brainwashed by them evil white folks, by watching nigger violence, while getting disgusted by the song "fuck the police".
>Gets beaten up by his former homies who are now good corrupt cops.

Would be a great movie.
>>
OH BOY ANOTHER REBOOT REDDIT!!!!!
>>
>>85935103

That's my point. I'd like to see them attempt something different - like an action thriller or a psychological horror film - without remaking a classic film that fits one of those molds and turning it into the other.

I don't want to see it as an action thriller because that's not what Jacob's Ladder could even be slightly described as. But I DO want to see more action thrillers and genuine horror films from black casts/crew. They need to branch out of their niche.

That's why Get Out felt so refreshing. It was a race-centric horror film that didn't rely on domestic disputes or cheating spouses or lovers turned creepy stalkers. It was a black writer/director embracing a genre and making a solid effort of it.
>>
The future is black, get over it losers
>>
>>85928029
Spoiler; MC is dead
>>
File: 2f7.jpg (28KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]
2f7.jpg
28KB, 601x508px
>tfw parents named me after Jacob's Ladder

>mfw my franchise getting BLACKED
>>
File: BLACKED.png (332KB, 665x385px) Image search: [Google]
BLACKED.png
332KB, 665x385px
>>85935667
I agree.
>>
>>85928029

First time I hear of this, already dropped. Negros disgust me
>>
"heyyyy guys, let's shit on a old classic woweeee another franchise ruined yayyyy"
>>
>What a dream I was having.
>I was being remade with a new lead.
>You know who it was?
>Michael Ealy, the black guy.
>You remember him. You saw him in Barbershop and Think Like a Man.
>God, what a nightmare.
>>
>>85935595
See >>85930856 and >>85930939. It's going to be an action thriller that uses enough of Jacob's Ladder that anyone who isn't cut in would sue.
>>
File: 1491225555185.png (2MB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]
1491225555185.png
2MB, 900x900px
>>85935667
I've got bad news for you Herb Shekelstein
>>
>>85935378
>A Clockwork Orange remake

Starring justin bieber!
>>
>>85935238
As you were told five times already, that was said to get you to dig your own grave, and it worked.
>>
>>85935941
>franchise

How was Jacob's Ladder a franchise?
>>
File: I wanna fuck that.png (39KB, 321x322px) Image search: [Google]
I wanna fuck that.png
39KB, 321x322px
>>85930445
>>
File: 00damn3.png (11KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]
00damn3.png
11KB, 429x410px
>they truely treat whites like our purpose is to provide them with roles at the expense of appropriating white ones while playing the eternally-white villian


This shit's getting old fast.
>>
>>85932072
Why not just name it Spec Ops The Line?
>>
File: 1492819878663.jpg (40KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]
1492819878663.jpg
40KB, 900x900px
IT DIDNT NEED ONE

FUCK
>>
>>85936174
>I was j-just pretending to be retarded, you fell into my masterful ruse
>>
Wasn't "The Wiz" enough?
>>
File: 1500218351874.jpg (394KB, 1680x1394px) Image search: [Google]
1500218351874.jpg
394KB, 1680x1394px
>>85936377
You know, when they said they were doing a new Wrinkle in Time adaptation I wasn't surprised that they made the kids all mixed race and cast Oprah as Mrs. Whatsit

But I was a little surprised that they made the evil hivemind suburb planet incredibly diverse and hired a proud Latino to play the satanic villain
>>
>>85934995
You've got a point there.
>>
>>85934995
It's just a shit show and not kino of them. But point taken.
>>
>>85928029
Will it bomb just like the original?
>>
>>85930445
>JOP

good car brand
>>
File: 1428619767729.jpg (95KB, 948x676px) Image search: [Google]
1428619767729.jpg
95KB, 948x676px
>>85935667
You'll miss us.
>>
>>85938316
Nothing will be remembered post-bantu colonization. The future will be double digit IQ "intellectuals" debating how many shekels athletes are paid with gifs of Rianna sipping drank, for eternity.
>>
>>85928029
Jesus, why do niggers in America have so much white admixture in them? Do white women over there love black cock that much?
>>
>>85939231
plz no
Nuke Africa when?[/spoiler}
>>
>>85939231
That's the NEAR future. Computers and professional sports won't exist in a world populated solely by kangz because they can't build or repair them. They won't remember Rhianna after a generation because they don't keep records. The Jews who made this world possible will go extinct because there's no one left to drain, and then everyone suffocates to death when the Chinese make the air toxic.
>>
>>85930939
I only watched Jacob's Ladder on /tv/'s recommendation
>>
File: ng.jpg (139KB, 450x587px) Image search: [Google]
ng.jpg
139KB, 450x587px
AY YO
*smacks lips profusely*
SO HOL UP HOL UP
*steals*
SO U BE SAYIN
*gets jiggy wit it*
SO HOL UP U BE SAYIN
*eats a skittle*
AAAYYYOOO SO U BE SAYIN
*checks for nearest KFC*
U BE SAYIN
*collects welfare*
HOL UP HOL UP
*licks teeth and smacks lips*
AYYYOO U BE SAYIN
*does the crip walk*
SO U BE SAYIN
*opens a up a 40 and pours some for his homies trayvon and michael brown*
HOL UP SO U BE SAYIN
*tweets about dis and goes to check in with his parole officer*
WE GON BE
*dindu nuffins*
FINNA WE GON BE
*sucks air through teeth*
AYYYOO HOL UP WE GON BE
*pulls up sagging pants*
SO WE GON BE
*instinctively looks around for police*
SO U SAYIN WE GON BE
*faints and then gets up repeatedly*
SOM FINNA
*scopes dem titties*
SO WE GON BE
*shouts at movie theater screen*
SOM FINNA
*chucks spear*
AYYYOO SOM FINA
*sets down cotton bale*
HOL UP
*strokes welfare check pensively*
WE GON BE
*throws gang sign*
SOM FINNA
*swings from basketball hoop*
WE GON BE
*grabs dick and shuffles left and right*
SOM FINNA
*participates in a drive-by shooting*
HOL UP MUH NIGGUH
*converts to Islam*
U SAYING WE GON BE
*repeated World Star yelling in the background*
SOM FINNA
*sells crack*
JAKOB LADDAAAAAAAAAAA?!?!?!
*evolves from a primate*
>>
File: 1447450482571.jpg (66KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]
1447450482571.jpg
66KB, 600x800px
>>85928029
You know what worries me, one day we will all be gone, the generations to come, will they remember that movie, that director, that actor, after so many remakes, will they care?
All those movies that were remade, all those actors that were so iconic and gave such a memorable performance, those directors that were so special for being unique, all of them will be gone like tears in the rain.
Thread posts: 127
Thread images: 22


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.