What did they mean by this?

Just because a lot of people want to see something doesn't make it good.

its a reference to the books

It means rotten tomatos has no middle ground because this cant be that bad.

Go then, there are other worlds than these

>>85854009
that would be 19 percent

>>85854098
oh I agree about RT but this looks awful

>>85853981
>go then
Go to see it?
Or go elsewhere?
Go where?

>>85855215
Kek

>>85854098
>can't be that bad
4.1 is a pretty reasonable score for a shitty movie

>>85854098
Watched a screening. Yes, it's that bad. Emoji movie was that bad. Ghostbusters was that bad. Sony is that bad now.

>>85855310
git gone

>>85855377
so you're saying that its 1% better than Underworld: Blood Wars?

>>85855512
It was about on par, yes. The somewhat better special effects constitutes the 1% difference.

>>85855562
I find that hard to believe its only 1% better since even the trailer is twice as good as anything in blood wars

>>85855779
Trailers sell movies. They're supposed to make a movie look good