What was meant by this?

File: 115241120114.jpg (155KB, 879x703px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 879x703px

>Christopher Nolan's new movie gets high marks from one of the world's foremost experts on the evacuation of Dunkirk.

>GQ: So let's get into it: what did you think of the movie?

>Michael Korda: I was very, very impressed by the film, I have to say. I suppose it would be possible, if I really put my mind to it, to nitpick about certain things. But they really would be such small things. I did not find that there were many things that were wrong. At no point did I say, "Well, that just looks totally wrong and doesn't correspond to anything that happened."

>How does Dunkirk shape up against other war movies?

>[Christopher Nolan] clearly did not want to do a slightly artificial docudrama like Saving Private Ryan. So he doesn't set up a fictional story, there's no central character or narrative to it, and I think that was a very courageous and the correct decision to make.

http://www.gq.com/story/dunkirk-according-to-a-dunkirk-historian

>>85759149
>(((Cohen)))

>>85759149
Cohen
Stopped reading there

opinion writer

>>85759149
well this is the trump era, so everything made in the next 3 1/2 years is made in the trump era

(((Richard Cohen)))

you know if the kikes want to stop proving /pol/ right they just have to stop with this shit

>>85759149
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((Cohen))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

>>85759593
I get these dumb bans all the time. meanwhile porn is on the front page of every board, and people spam gore in threads about Chinese people

File: 1480358672045.jpg (178KB, 841x607px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 841x607px

>>85759149
>(((Cohen)))

>>85759478
*7 1/2 years