He is actually Satan
Then who is the other guy?
TWO FUNNY GAMES THREADS AT ONCE
I'M SO PROUD OF YOU ANON
>>85752971
No that would be too cheap and make the whole scenario less disturbing.
No, the whole point is to jab at meaningless violence in the film industry by sucking everything out of one film and whittling it down to a film about meaningless violence.
He's not satan. He's not a real character. He's not relevant.
Unpopular Sopranos reading: it wasn't Tony who died, it was the cameraman who was following him around for years
>>85753195
Why?
>>85753177
You are right. So I should dump all my unpopular reading at once.
John Doe in Seven
Tyler Durden in Fight Club
They are both Satan
Evidence: the possessed men are marked by devil. They smell sulfur. They cannot hear "Bible" (good words).
>>85753457
By making him a force of pure supernatural evil he becomes silly and too easily hateable and too difficult to take seriously. He's far more terrifying if he's just a human being.
>>85753123
God
what do you think anon, do movies have a right way to be interpreted? of course, there is a way the director sees it, but is it really the "official" correct way?
>>85755151
I said unpopular but I never said mine isn't right
By right and correct I mean that there is only one way to explain a movie and that way is mine.
He really was though