>(((1080))) what went wrong with torrents?

>>85711438
you're like a hobo complaining about your free food

>>85711438
1080p is just the resolution, it can look and sound like absolute shit and still be "1080".
You have to look at bitrate.
Nowadays I don't even look at the video specs anymore, just audio. Audio is the first thing crappy encoders cut on because normies don't care about the atrocious 96kbps digitally distorted uncomprehensible audio, but they sure do love to complain on facebook "CANT HEAR DIALOGUE BUT LOUD EXPLOSIONZ HEHE WHAT GIVES"
That's the main thing why YIFY is trash, even the "1080p" versions had dogshit audio, you listened to better quality audio in 2008 when you downloaded dodgy bootleg versions of songs on fucking Limewire.

So please start downloading decent atleast 6GB+ encodes and look at the specs beforehand.

>>85712162
>atleast 6GB+
but then how will they all fit on my HDD?


I am a hoarder

>>85712162
My only issue with Yify audio has always been that it's unbearable quiet

File: 29080168.jpg (72KB, 328x319px)

72KB, 328x319px

>>85712162
>1080p 6gb
Top kek, legitimately thanks yify tier
6-8gb is passable for 720p, 1080p should be at the very least 10gb
>but I've only got a 500gb hdd and 400gb of that is porn
Get an external hdd then
>muh money
Then download 700mb yify rips and stop whining fuck

>>85712654
actually, I have a 4 Tb HDD, with 1000+ movies

>>85712735
I was directing that at this guy
>>85712330

File: 1920x1080p.png (27KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1920x1080px

>>85711438
>listed as "1080p"
>is actually 1080x607

File: kay.png (5KB, 412x124px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 412x124px

>>85712807
mkay

>>85711438
Get the REMUX is possible. It's the closest to Blu-ray quality. The only downside is that a feature film at that quality is like 30 GB.

File: 1491699469042.png (102KB, 746x717px)

102KB, 746x717px

>>85713019
Then what's even the problem
Aw shit download what you want I don't fucking care

>>85713113
the problem is movies are only half the story...


there's also series....

and 4Tb HDD are expensive as fuck boyyy

>>85712162

Audio bitrate has nothing to do with the audio's dynamic range.
96kbps (assuming it's mp3) is enough for films, because it's mostly just voice.

File: Untitled.png (255KB, 1246x984px)

255KB, 1246x984px

>>85713146
>and 4Tb HDD are expensive as fuck boyyy

Get a job.

YiFY is all we'll ever need.

>>85712162
You say that like you can find seeders for anything over 2 gb for most things

>not getting 4k x265

Why live?

>>85713314
private trackers

>>85713294
>exterenal HDD

lolno.

do you think I am some sort of retard?

File: Untitled.png (394KB, 1225x977px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 1225x977px

>>85713377
>do you think I am some sort of retard?

Indeed. Internals are cheaper.

>>85713471
didn't claim they were more expensive.

but then again, I didn't expect you to think that far

File: les.webm (3MB, 384x288px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 384x288px

>>85713373
invite

>>85713471
No they're really not, If you look into the hoarder communities, it is almost 100% people buying 8tb externals and then taking the drives out

File: Untitled.png (36KB, 291x397px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 291x397px

>>85713523
>t. retard

Get a job.

>>85713621
We were talking about 4TB drives. And those pics prove you are wrong, retard.

File: 1496988948552.jpg (23KB, 245x325px)

23KB, 245x325px

>theaters receive a 150GB data drive for a single 100 minute film
>consumers can watch a single 100 film on a 50GB blu-ray disc
>people bitching about shit media ranging from 700MB to 4GB on illegal file sharing sites.

ok peasants

>>85713179
It does indirectly. When the bitrate is low (like 96kbps is) that means a lot of artefacts and digital distortions are in the waveform and the quiet voice in film becomes even more uncomprehensible so you turn the volume up to hear what the fuck are they talking and then you suddenly get blasted with a brickwall of digital distortion whenever something loud happens.
If you watch a film with high audio bitrate, you can understand what they are saying just fine even on low volumes and loud sounds like explosions are untouched by the horrible bitrate compression so you can listen to it with ease.

>>85713624
butthurt much?

must be hard being so low IQ that the only way you hope to have a chance at winning online discussions is by strawmanning the ever living shit out of your opponent.

>>85713688
>Private trackers can watch movies at 50gb Blu Ray bitrate
Feels good man

>>85713314
Yes you can, especially for mainstream films, they just won't have 20k seeds

>>85713769
Seems the only one here that is butthurt is you, kid.

>>85713621
>people buying 8tb externals and then taking the drives out
why the fuck would one do that?

that can't possibly be cheaper

>>85713669
>buying 4tb drives
are you poor or is this 2012

>>85713831
>projecting

>>85713734

> a lot of artefacts and digital distortions are in the waveform and the quiet voice in film becomes even more uncomprehensible so you turn the volume up to hear what the fuck are they talking and then you suddenly get blasted with a brickwall of digital distortion whenever something loud happens.
That has nothing to do with the dynamic range being affected by the bitrate.

>If you watch a film with high audio bitrate, you can understand what they are saying just fine even on low volumes
That's not how it works, you retard.

I could play you back the same clip of an audio recording at 96kbps and 320kbps MP3 and you wouldn't be able to tell a difference, you pretentious idiot.

>>85713832
It is only cheaper when the seller has too many they can't unload. That happens every once in a while with limited supplies. Though, you really need to compare what the harddrive is that is inside with what the price is for an internal HDD

>>85713873
seems >>85713146 is a major poorfag

File: 1489935704931.png (300KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 640x640px

>download 50gb blu-ray rip
>watch in VLC

File: 1500534496298.png (239KB, 272x448px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 272x448px

>>85713880
>>85713873
>>85713787
>>85713769
>>85713621
>>85713523
>>85713377
Wow, I've not seen someone get their ass handed to them and get this assrekt online then fumble around with rebuttals in a long time. I bet it is the OP.

>>85713910
are u fucking retarded? use some good headphones and a good source and playback the same song at 96 and 320 kbps then tell me you dont notice the difference you absolute retard.
>b..but i cant tell the difference on muh $20 walmart headphones

kys

>>85713910
>I could play you back the same clip of an audio recording at 96kbps and 320kbps MP3 and you wouldn't be able to tell a difference
Is this bait? Is your audio system your fucking iphone speaker? It has to be bait.

>>85714068
>>85714076
Of course it is bait. Strait up iShit with ear buds level of bait.

File: stock-vector-emoticon-laughing-and-wiping-tears-away-while-pointing-at-something-or-someone-with-his-other-hand-564985714.jpg (30KB, 450x317px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 450x317px

>>85714012
Yes, the OP is a total badass that completely destroyed that
>muh_6Gb_or_bust.mkv
faggot.


Also, (You) are totally not involved in this at all.

>>85714068

>song

Why are you changing the topic? We're talking about voice recordings, idiot.

>>85714076

Prove that you can by doing a verified blind test.

>>85714154
download a yify rip then download a 6 gb rip and tell me you don't notice a difference in audio.

>>85713832
>>85713471

It's counterintuitive but it's true. The reason is, if you fuck up and break the external case when you're opening it, you get no warranty

Don't buy either of these for anything other than archival, but in this case external is $50 cheaper

https://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Expansion-Desktop-External-STEB8000100/dp/B01HAPGEIE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1501530606&sr=8-1&keywords=8tb+external

Corresponding internal drive

https://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Archive-6GBps-128MB-ST8000AS0002/dp/B00XS423SC/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1501530718&sr=1-2&keywords=seagate+8tb+internal

>>85714203
>amazon

Enjoy your grey market, kid.

>>85714202

I don't when it's dialog, which is about 98% of every film that isn't capeshit.

>>85714203
External: $174.99 + $49.40 Shipping = 224.39

Internal: $224.98 + free shipping = 224.98

totally worth it.

>>85711438
doesn't happen on my private trackers™

>>85714322
>implying there are no background effects or music in movies. kys. also dialogue sounds more detailed too.

>>85714333
Do you live in canada or something? If so, just order from somewhere close to you

>>85714231
fucking what, both are directly from seagate. I've never had a problem RMAing a drive from amazon

>>85714322
It's immediately indentifiable even with just the voice. You can hear the difference probably with the cheapest Logitech speakers even.
What about soundtrack? What about sound design? Foley? Or do those exist only in "capeshit"?

FLAC vs 320kbps MP3 could be a debate, but this is just retarded, to think that there is no apparent difference between a 96kbps and a 320kbps audio.

>>85714203
>>85714467
You do know that those are two different HDDs with different speeds right?

>>85714411

>dialogue sounds more detailed too
Sure it does, buddy. Sure it does and you can prove it in a blind test.

>>85714539
Find me a new internal 8tb that's cheaper than that external, and I'll agree with you. Otherwise, you're wrong.

>>85714598
Those are different hard drives. Why should I placate your asspain over a statement you are always incorrect about? You are the one who has the burden of proof.

>>85713910
>>85714154
here listen to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKoBl7d7VWU

Yes it has no 96kbps and it's on youtube, but it still proves that lower bitrate sounds quieter and more mono even though the actual volume is basically the same. If you don't hear the difference here then my friend you have an actual condition/problem

>>85714489
>FLAC vs 320kbps MP3 could be a debate

There's no debate, there's no discernible difference

>>85714760
>think lossless and something that uses a bitrate is comparable

You do realize FLAC is lossless right and that anything with a bitrate has loss right???

>>85714577
do yourself a favor and buy some decent headphones fucking pleb. I use an external dac/amp + in ear monitors i know what im talking about.

>>85714972
Yea but 320 kbps is enough to contain most of the audio details so its hard to tell it apart from flac.

>>85714972
Yes, but 99.9% of the people can't hear that difference, even if they have perfectly acoustically treated rooms or Audeze headphones.

>>85714003
I use MPC HC, should I be using something else for my 10-20gb rips?

>>85715115
>>85715120
>Yes, but...

That invalidate your argument without ever needing to read the rest of those posts.

>>85715192
No.

h265 is a miracle codec btw

File: wireless-earbuds-lowres-5717.jpg (220KB, 630x420px)

220KB, 630x420px

>>85714760
This you?

>>85711438
>actually paying full attention to your movies on a primary monitor

Plebs get out

>>85715287
Go take a FLAC audio file and find the same file in 320kbps MP3. Hook up whatever best audio system available to you. Let someone play you the files without you looking and you try to hear the difference on the sound alone.

>>85714743

>lower bitrate sounds quieter and more mono
That's absolutely not true and the fact that you think that shows that you're suffering from a placebo effect.
You are an utter idiot.

>>85715255
its a streaming codec u little bitch

>>85715252
People on /g/ say that MPV is the new thing, but it's way too fucking complicated

>>85715049

Sure, if I buy a 1 million dollar worth piano it means I can play the piano.
I'd love to see you try to distinguish a voice recording at 96kbps and even lossless with your gear and fail miserably. You'd probably kill yourself after the realization that you're a pretentious retard.

>>85715450
k anon I'll stream h265 movies from my hard drive to my screen then

>>85715449
>t. neet with $20 walmart headphones and onboard audio.

if u dont have good hardware you cant tell the difference.

>>85715255
>autists here try to convince me that x265 is worse because the colour is shittier
>look up what x265 does
>the colour should actually be better

>>85715476
pretty sure it's a meme seeing as it's so convoluted to use

>>85715449
Did you listen to that link in the post?

>>85715526

This isn't about the alleged quality of hardware, retard. This is about the technical definition of it and that is not how it works. You can delude yourself into your retarded thinking as much as you want, but it won't change the hard facts and reality how digital audio works.

File: 1466551399036.webm (3MB, 1080x606px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1080x606px

>>85715377
forgot my image

>>85715528
it still needs a bit of work so expect to replace some of your h265 movies in a few years

File: 1495474475254.gif (1MB, 250x233px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x233px

>>85715590
>This isn't about the alleged quality of hardware, retard.

I think we are done here.

>>85714686
So you can't locate a similar drive, and this post is just a long way of saying "I was wrong, I am sorry"

I accept your apology

>>85715732

>claims bitrate affects loudness
>claims bitrate affects number of channels

Just disconnect yourself from the internet, idiot.

>1912x1078
reeeeee

>>85711438
>downloading a 600mb torrent expecting good quality
you're the one in the wrong here anon.

File: ass rekt.gif (4MB, 425x425px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 425x425px

>>85715789
That was nearly half an hour ago, kid. Obviously, you've been searching and have come up with jack shit. Did you perchance find some AssCool while searching?

>>85715192
As long as you're using madvr

>>85715831
I think you meant to reply to this idiot >>85715590 or you are shit at following a conversation on this website. What website are you from?

File: 1501282762382.jpg (94KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x640px

>>85714003
What's bad about VLC?

I'm a retard, I don't get it

It plays the video and makes the pictures movie what more could I want?

>>85716082
>What website are you from?

Reddit but that doesn't matter here you fucking moron. Hardware does not DOES NOT AFFECT QUALITY OF DIGITAL PLAYBACK EVER.

>>85716140
It has shitty codecs that make a mess of the video when compared to nearly every other video player. With MPC-HC you can get your own codec package that is up to date which will play everything under the sun at the proper quality and functionality.

>>85716214
>your own codec package
How on earth would I know which "codec package" I want?

I don't even understand what that is, really

>>85716140
It varies per file by my experience. I once downloaded this 10 gig 1080p rip to watch in vlc and it looked blurry as all fuck. Switched to mpv and it looked crystal clear. Switched to mpc hc later because mpv is just a hassle.

>>85716279
Most people just newb out and use CCCP which includes a copy of MPC-HC. I'm not going to give you names of others. You just need to do some googling if you want something better and you probably won't care.

>>85716082

>what website are you from?

This is a virtual space. People aren't "from a website". If you associate yourself with a website then you should kill yourself.

No, I didn't mean to reply to that idiot, because that idiot was me. You should try following a conversation, because it all started with this >>85714743 retard claiming that bitrates affect the channel number and loudness. Hint: they don't.

I solely watch YIFY rips in VLC and there is literally nothing you can do to stop me.

File: BOX.png (25KB, 722x347px)

25KB, 722x347px

>>85716453
>People aren't "from a website".

Welcome to 4chan. How long have you been here today?

>>85716454
your loss anon. no one here gives a shit.

>>85714743
him

>>85715449
you (moron)

>>85715526
him

>>85715590
you (moron)

>>85715732
me

>>85715831
you (moron)

>>85716082
me

>>85716165
>>85716453
you (double moron)

MPAA won the war

why not download another version then faggot instead of whining on here
torrents are one of the best things to happen during my lifetime

File: Untitled.png (41KB, 583x783px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 583x783px

>>85716724

>>85712162
1.6 mbit/s DTS audio decoded natively by Yamaha chips, sent via fiber optic light in SP/DIF cable, output to proper speakers with Cerametallic™ woofers and Tractrix® horns.

>>85716369
can you at least please give the name of the one you use anon?

>>85716988
Just get k-lite and call it a day. That will play everything and not fuck up 99.999% of subs.

>>85716617

I've been here for a long time. There goes your only argument.
Do you have more? Please provide technical source which proves that audio bitrate affects channel numbers and loudness. Hint: you can't, because it doesn't.
But please, keep up with the ad hominems. That seems to be what you do when you have no idea what you're talking about, but you have to "win an internet argument".

excellent thread

>>85717174
I never said that. You said that hardware doesn't affect quality.

>This isn't about the alleged quality of hardware, retard.

Because it isn't alleged.

>I've been here for a long time.

How many hours?

File: 13212.jpg (35KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 800x533px

>>85717174
Hardware always affects audio. What kind of retard are you to think otherwise?

>>85715628
What am I looking at here

>>85711438
So wait, say i'm looking for a torrent of the latest capeshit, in order of importance what should I search for in the video and audio specs if I want it to look and sound decent on my TV?

>>85717628
>say i'm looking for a torrent of the latest capeshit
Just kill yourself immediately and don't bother with the specs at all.

>>85717545
I think its a virtual desktop on VR.

>>85716988
Don't listen to that outdated pleb advice. Here.

• Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 32-bit Installer / http://mpc-hc.org/downloads/
• XySubFilter 32-bit Installer/Archive / http://code.google.com/p/xy-vsfilter/wiki/Downloads
• madVR / http://madshi.net/madVR.zip

1. Uninstall all codec packs, previous instances of the aforementioned, and the like, and delete their settings if prompted.
2. Reboot.
3. Install MPC-HC with default settings.
4. Install XySubFilter.
5. Extract "madVR.zip" into a new "madVR" directory in your "C:\Program Files (x86)" directory.
6. Right-click on the "madVR" directory, click on "Properties", go to the "Security" tab, click on "Edit", click on "Add…",
type your Windows user name, click on "OK", click on the left "Modify" checkbox, click on "OK", and then click on "OK".
7. Right-click on "install.bat" in the "madVR" directory you just populated, and then click on "Run as administrator".
8. Start MPC-HC, go to "View" -> "Options…" -> "Playback" -> "Output", and select XySubFilter as Subtitle Renderer.
9. Go to "View" -> "Options..." -> "Playback" -> "Output" and select "madVR" under "DirectShow Video".
10. Go to "View" -> "Options..." -> "Internal Filters", click on "Video decoder", and select "None" in the
"Hardware Decoder to use" dropdown menu in the "Hardware Acceleration" section. Click on "OK".
11. Play a video file, go to "Play" -> "Filters", click on "madVR", and click on "Edit Settings".
12. Go to "processing" -> "artifact removal" and check "reduce banding artifacts".
13. Go to "scaling algorithms" and select "Spline", or "Jinc" if you have a fast graphics card, and "activate anti-ringing filter"
in the chroma and image upscaling submenus.
14. Go to "rendering" -> "general settings" and check "use a separate device for presentation".
15. Click on "OK", click on "OK", restart MPC-HC, and start watching.
16. Optional: Internal Filters > Audio Decoder: bitstream audio to receiver

>>85719390
>all this to watch porn

My name is autismus maximus, the post.

>>85719390
Tried to update that as best as I could. MadVR has its own website now, http://www.madvr.com

XySubFilter might have a different home base now, don't get tricked into getting a different thing like Xy-VSfilter or VSfilter or any pleb shit. The MadVR author made XySubFilter to work with MadVR so that the subtitles will process the same way the video does, not separately like with other sub renderers. MadVR is everything.

>>85719390
I'm going to save this post for another time, hope it doesn't give my PC aids

>>85719445
>he doesn't upscale chroma and luma when he watches porn

>>85719625
The only upscaling happening is my dick.

If you catch my drift

>>85713179
>96kbps is fine
K Y S
Y
S

>>85719579
Using anything other than MPC-HC with MadVR as renderer and XySubFilter as subtitle renderer is AIDS.

If you have a real stereo / 5.1 / 7.1 receiver and speakers and subwoofer and shit, bitstreaming audio through S/PDIF fiber optic or even 75-ohm / RCA is massive. 1s and 0s decoded by the audio chips themselves, not the computer. The opposite of audio sounding quiet. Audio must be precise and perfect just like video.

>>85719735
Can you adjust sub size via hotkey with XySubFilter? That's what is stopping me from moving to MPC-HC from SMPlayer.

>he doesn't know about psa rips
>X265
>10bitmeme
>5.1 AAC 192kbit
>insane size yet quality almost as good as the full rips

>>85719894
There are about 5000 different hotkey configurations, many of which are for subtitles. Also one can set up subtitles to display at whatever font / relative size one wishes to begin with, and alter these with the hotkeys I imagine.

>>85719894
Usually the point of XySubFilter is to render .ASS subtitles accurately. If you're just running text-based .SUB subtitles or something then pick a default style and size and they'll scale with fullscreen or whatever.

>>85719686


In real life:
>You listen to 96kbps audio? that's kind of strange...
> HEY! no need to be so rude about it!

On 4chan:
>you think 96kbps is acceptable? consider fucking killing yourself!
God I hate the outside world

>>85719894
View → Options → Subtitles → Default Style

Go nuts

>>85711438
based yify died

>>85720300
that's not a hotkey anon.

>>85720382
based yify will never die, his name will echo through eternity

>>85720424
There's a hotkey that brings you to it if you need an easy way to change this thing that shouldn't need changing once you set it up

File: tmp_12920-1497832516004-1802294192.gif (2MB, 245x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x200px

>Blu-ray torrent
>It's under 5GB

>>85720546
Also you can apparently set up new hotkeys, haven't looked into it much

>>85716895
unironically sounds like my setup
DTS source pass through fiber to yamaha RX-V795a with onkyo fronts, polk; center, rear, sub.

>>85716140
Nothing wrong with it, atleast not for normal people who actually go out and do things other than complain about bitrates and codecs to people who just want to watch some telly.

>>85716369
>I'm not going to give you names of others
See, this is the kind of guy that does nothing with his life but complain about bitrates and codecs online. He has a superiority complex because he "knew H265 before it went mainstream" or some shit.
>hurr durr can you believe this dickhead anon doesn't know the names of atleast 4 dozen codec packs???? HURHRHRURHRURHUHRUHRUHRUHRHRHRUHR

>>85720972
Did you bi-amp the fronts? Bi-amped stereo speakers > 4 rear speakers instead of 2

>>85721468
All you need are the LAV filters that come with MPC-HC by default, rendered with MadVR >>85719390

Codecs are nonsense

>>85721561
>All you need are the LAV filters that come with MPC-HC by default, rendered with MadVR
It doesn't matter how simple or not it might be, I was just getting at the guy's shite attitude. He assumes everyone just knows everything about stuff most people don't care about. To 99% of people a movie is fine so long as it's 720p or higher and doesn't "get them blotchy square things".

>>85721501
my fronts are 50 watt 2 ways, 1980s vintage, one set of inputs.
other than that it's a standard 5.1

File: Consider the Following.jpg (112KB, 786x514px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 786x514px

>>85721468
>See, this is the kind of guy that does nothing with his life but complain about bitrates and codecs online. He has a superiority complex because he "knew H265 before it went mainstream" or some shit.

>t. is unable to use google