What is the significance of the final scene of Stalker?
Does she really have telekinesis?
I guess it is asking too much for /tv/ to have an actual film discussion.
Not hairy enough.
>>85641091
Yes
>>85642445
Yes
the meaning of the scene and the repercussions of the zone are obvious brainlet
>>85643385
Why don't you enlighten us then?
>>85641091
The point is that The Room resides in all of us and what we wish for is easier to find than we make it. However, the journey also has merits and lets us realize out gifts' value instead of it merely existing within us.
>>85643579
>The Room resides in all of us and what we wish for is easier to find than we make it
How did you infer this from that last scene?
>>85643766
She had supernatural powers without entering The Zone or The Room. She was either born with those powers, or granted them by a higher purpose (i.e. god, aliens, or radioactivity). She looks sad or dejected, thus treating her gift with less respect than one who thought they earned it. The Gift is mundane to her, or pointless.
Therefore it is the journey or hardship which gives value to our inherent or god-given gifts. Tarkovsky's treatise on the purpose of art, both production and consumption of.
>>85643909
It's implied she was born with it as a result of her father being a Stalker. Not hard.
>>85643909
She was just a child of a stalker, which meant she was 'damaged' by the zone's 'radiation'.
They talked in the beginning about how all the children of ex-stalkers grew up to become freaks.
>>85643982
>The post reflected on my own cynicism so I had to correct that.