just Snatch with swords

>>85640313
it was so bad it was good

and not in the same way fantastic flop was back in 2015

we wos noights n shite innit bruv

is it really? I like Guy Ritchie movies and noticed that this one still has a relatively decent IMDB score but it's panned everywhere else. Shit I even enjoyed Revolver, so is this worth watching?

>>85640925
It is, big fan of Ritchie too. It's more "man from uncle with swords" than snatch, don't expect an avalanche of fast cut montages or banter at every sentence. The music by Pemberton is gold for your ears, somewhat different from your usual fantasy blockbuster soundtrack, the cinematography is tailored for an epic story when needed, while the gang storyline gets the Ritchie treatment it deserves.

>>85640925
it's entertaining enough for a watch, i loved the music, and the movie itself is very guy ritchie. overall not a good movie, but has a few redeeming sequences.

>>85640834
Underrated post, fucking guy ritchie movies.

I was waiting for a decent budget fantasy film that doesn't take itself too seriously. I like Hunnam's Cockney

abosolutely awful movie. and yes snatch with swords. I looooove snatch but this is supposed to be a classic legend, the wardrobe is too modern and the soundtrack doesn't fit with the tale. very much snatch with swords, just need someone feeding people to pigs

>>85640313
You say that like it's a bad thing.

>>85640925
It's ironically good.

>>85641853
>I was waiting for a decent budget fantasy film that doesn't take itself too seriously.

Did you watch Gods of Egypt?