is song to song by Malick a good film?

>>85625814
malick is shit m8

>>85625814
did he consult /tv/ to hire these four meme actors jesus christ

>>85625814
No, not really.

File: waow.jpg (887KB, 1920x808px) Image search: [Google]

887KB, 1920x808px

Yes, it's one of his best.

>>85625814
It's the best film of this decade, Malick really is something else.

File: 21.png (1MB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x1024px

dont listen to meme spouters, it is THAT good.

>>85625965
>>85625979
>>85626176
Stop baiting the poor guy. You're going to make him to actually watch it.

File: Thank you based Malick.jpg (126KB, 554x793px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 554x793px

>>85625965
>tfw no pure kindergarten teacher and waitress hershlag waifu who you drug and force to do lewd things with other women who then tries to seek solace in religion as she turns a blind eye to your philandering but can't cope with all the degeneracy and so kills herself leaving you a broken man while your former protege and romantic rival finds simple happiness with your former lover
jdimsa

>>85626253
How else would he gain the Wonder?

>>85626253
Go watch Dunkirk again faggot, this thread is about good films.

File: bravo.webm (3MB, 1146x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1146x480px

The best

File: 1465396009530.png (61KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 320x320px

Yes, among his best
>In his new film, “Song to Song,” Malick does something new with his familiar technique: he builds his cathedral from the ground up, filming mainly in his home town of Austin, Texas, and anchoring the movie on a starkly clear framework—a simple story of couples in doubt and conflict. But within his story of a shifting romantic triangle he develops both a teeming, harshly emotional web of relationships and an overwhelming, rapturous variety of visual experience. Forging under pressure a new way of telling familiar (and family) stories, Malick also displays a conspicuously painterly boldness, a sort of cinematic Impressionism that locates an indelible force of light and detail in the stuff of daily life.

>>85626510
As if people criticize Mallick's last few movies because they're too artistic and not because they're not artistic enough.
Mallick has become a lite art house director for college kids.

>>85626932
>lite
What are the differences between Pudovkin's montage and Einsenstein's?

>>85626576
>fassbender demonstrates how he seduced his girlfriends