I'll be useful, sir

>>85619546
Well... he was

>That part where you find out he's the second son the old guy lost
;_;

>>85619589
not his son retard

*dies*

>>85619589
George was not his son, the blond guy uy. George guy is just a local friend.

>>85619546
H E R O O F D U N K I R K
kek

>>85619589

his son was in the air force, they already said this

>>85619546
Based George poster.

>>85619546
This dude is so ugly

>>85619664
Well, that was the point.
Nolan cleverly juxtaposed his sensless and pointless death with that of the other young soldiers in war.
War is pointless and old men get young men to die for them.

>>85619729
>blocks space for living people in the boat
>gets more of a legacy than the pilot
b r a v o

>>85619741
just like a real brit

>>85619806
He's Irish you utter plankton

>>85619799
STOP IT YOU HE'S A HERO OK, HE DIED ATTEMPTING TO RESCUE PEOPLE OK, HE JUST WANTED TO HELP AND WAS KILLED BY THE VERY PERSON HE WANTED TO HELP HE'S A GOD DAMN FUCKING HERO OK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

B R A V O N O L A N

>>85619546
YOU'LL BE DEAD

File: dunkirk.jpg (115KB, 2542x1075px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 2542x1075px

>he done-kirked his head

B R A V O

File: dunkirk_kenneth_branagh.jpg (54KB, 720x484px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 720x484px

>This is it....we have finally become....Dunkirk.

Seriously, Nolan?

File: 1389716607075.jpg (9KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 256x256px

>>85620012

>mfw his lack of lips were more distracting than usual in this movie

>>85619781
>war is pointless
read a fucking book

>>85620012
>where are we going?
>DUNKIRK
how did Nolan get this passed WB?

>>85619546
Why is the same thread posted every day with the exact same quote and pic.
And there's always this fucking post: >>85619953

>>85620143
>why is this post, and only this post, posted everyday

welcome to /tv/ summer friend.

>>85619857
>irish

how inclusive

File: nedroid.png (35KB, 371x487px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 371x487px

>>85619653
>>85619704
>>85619730

File: 881.jpg (12KB, 300x180px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x180px

>What's that in the sky, Commander?
>Its.....Dunkirk.

Hasn't Nolan figured out that he can't write for shit?

>>85620012
what did Graham Norton mean by this?

>>85620143
It's called forcing a meme.

>Sir, are we going to get out of this alive?
>We're done, Kirk
Jesus Christ

>>85620143
they have to make the board seem fun and full of people

File: IMG_8474.jpg (107KB, 405x390px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 405x390px

>mfw Tom Hardy lands
>mfw is the boy going to be okay?

File: 1423642567431.jpg (426KB, 1024x687px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 1024x687px

>>85620317
>when you realize he's going to be a POW for at least 4 years

>>85620370
Explains why he became Bane

>>85619546
he dun kirked himself mate

File: 000d4e89-800.jpg (34KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 800x450px

Will the boy be alright?

File: IMG_8640.jpg (33KB, 298x353px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 298x353px

>>85620724
>...Yeah
I wonder how many people were confused by the timelines converging

>>85619781
BRAVO NOLAN

>>85620317
Did he plan to get caught?

>>85621734
Just came out of the cinema
Hadn't visited any threads to avoid spoilers and forced memes.
Is this one of them? Or is it fresh OC?

the way nolan writes dialogue is memeable

>>85621734
Just came out of the cinema
Hadn't visited any threads to avoid spoilers and forced memes.
Is this one of them? Or is it fresh OC?
Cause it's dank

File: 1500859174465.jpg (285KB, 1125x1252px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1125x1252px

We shall never surender.

>>85619546
Worst part of the movie
>Volunteers to put his life on the line even though there's absolutely no obligation for him to do so
>Dies
Woah totally didn't see that one coming bravo Nolan great writing 10outta10

>>85621734
of course

File: 1500867142118.jpg (214KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1280x720px

>He didn't fly so good.

What did Nolan mean by this?

>>85620317
NOT CRASHING THIS PLANE

>>85621869
Stop forcing this. It might actually catch on.

LANDING THIS PLANE

WITH SURVIVORS

>>85621838
Get this hothead outta here


b-because his head might feel hot f-from the fire?!? G-get it?

>>85622122
THEY EXPECT ONE OF US IN THE WRECKAGE BROTHER

>>85621917
What's bad about it? His death serves as a juxtaposition for the equally pointless deaths on the other side and as a lesson of stoicism for Rylance's blond son when he says to the shellshocked soldier that the boy will be alright.

>yfw one of the German's POW camps was the underground prison where Bane grew up

How could someone take an L like this?

File: 1496168591292.jpg (57KB, 540x533px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 540x533px

>>85621869
Top kek

reminder tom hardy crashed MULTIPLE planes with NO survivors in this film
landing his plane and surviving was just the next step of his master plan

>>85622302
Was it the time for fear, or did that come later?

>>85619546
>ywn have a British twink whisper that to you

File: 1492424741423.jpg (57KB, 1200x609px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1200x609px

>>85622418
I think he was afraid when he realised that he couldn't list the flight plan he filed with the agency

>>85622225
It's cliche, kid puts himself in the line of fire expecting to come out alright because his chances of getting killed aren't too high, actually gets killed instead
Would've been better if the guy's son died instead

>think the scottish pilot is ewan mcgregor
>disappointed when scottish man takes off the mask and he isn't ewan mcgregor

just me?

His character is a big reason why this fucking movie was awful.

>>85622897
FILTERED

>be so afraid of CGI that you refuse to use it in your film
>try to convey the scale of the evacuation with 3 spitfires


Why couldn't he have kept the main action live action and simply CGI'd in some background planes and destroyers? Has anyone been so backwardly afraid of CGI that they actively damaged their vision? It would be like the battle of Helms Deep with only 100 extras

>>85622990
ye fuck how it actually happened!

>>85622990
I think they were trying to keep it more "real", in that there were never really more than 3 spitfires over the beach at any one time
the evacuation took a couple of weeks, there wasnt epic intense dogfighting the whole time

File: 1498094275419.png (132KB, 244x251px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 244x251px

>>85621869

>>85622067
>Shoots plane
>Crashes with no survivors
>Starts the fire
>The fire rises above the water>>85623066

>>85623036
>implying there were only 3 destroyers involved in the evcuation
>not 39
>implying that ther germans only bombed dunkirk beach with 4 planes

>>85622990
Because it's an actual real life event and it happened exactly like that. The airforce was sparse and hated by the soldiers on that beach because he lack of them there, like shown in the film.
Yes, there were not many destroyers and boats and that's why the transportation was a big problem. Why would they need the civil boats if they had 100 destroyers?
Dumb summerfag ameritards my god

>>85620143

Fuck you these threads are great.

Just be glad you don't get spammed with BLACKED threads on this board.

>>85623123
The fan service is what really sets based Nolan apart

>>85623146
39 destroyers were deployed for Dunkirk. 8 were held back for future use after excessive bombing. Hundreds of planes were deployed - most were further inland admittedly but there were certainly more than 3 spitfires over the beach. The germans used more than 4 planes to bomb Dunkirk beach.

Get the fuck out of here you fucking retard.

>>85623213
you're the fucking retard here mate
there were hundreds of planes deployed over the course of the entire evacuation - 8 fucking days. and as you said, most of them were inland I think that looking at a single section of the beach itself, over a single day, you would probably only see 4 bombers and 3 fighters

you think the film showed the entire evacuation and everything that was going on, or tried to? it wasnt like an action movie

>>85623213
But german didn't use 12 Stukas at once, it's not like every bombing in the film is every bombing that happened in that week of the land narrative. And it's not like the brits sent 50 Spitfires at once to the beach, the film follows 3 of them for an hour, like it happened for real.
You are implying like Dunkirk was a big one day battle of 50 Stukas vs 50 Spitfires while 40 Destroyers are having trouble of transporting all the people so they need 900 more boats to get them safe.

>>85623334
>I'm wrong but I'll pretend I'm not - honestly the luftwaffe only sent 4 planes to bomb Dunkirk and one spitfire without fuel shot one of them down!

please stop being so fucking stupid on the internet, the film was good - the fact he used real planes was admirable. Using some small cgi to add some scale would not have been a bad thing. Fight your autism and accept this.

File: 239085023845.jpg (49KB, 470x706px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 470x706px

>pilot stars tom hardy
>wears a mask, muffles unintelligible things
>turns back to save soldiers- has a lot of loyalty
>nearly crashes his plane with no survivors
>fire rises from the wreckage
>getting caught by the germans appeared to be part of his plan

I refuse to believe that this wasn't a wink to his fans.

>>85619857
what's the difference

>>85623451
>heh, i'll misrepresent his argument and show him I can't read - fucking OWNED!
last (You) for you x

File: 1500867084168.jpg (12KB, 200x192px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 200x192px

>>85620293
underrated

>>85623535
How many destroyers did the Navy deploy in the evacuation? Precisely.
Stop being so assblasted and accept that using CGI to add some background detail whilst keeping the main action in the forefront practical would have helped to show the sheer scale of this incredible evacuation

>>85620069
fuck you, now I can't unsee it

File: 1501136540422.png (271KB, 647x340px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 647x340px

is the boy alright?

>>85623687
>literally implying that you're watching this kino right now
Fuck Drumpf and fuck white people

>>85623631
But they didn't deploy 39 Destroyers at once the first day of the evacuation, did they you absolute braindead turboautist?
That number is the number of total Destroyers deployed, but that doesn’t mean they were there the whole fucking week.
Do you think there really were 39 Destroyers right at the beach the same location at the same place? That would be straight retarded planning. God you are one sub intelligent brainlet

>>85623804
No, they only sent 3 on the first day and all of them got blown up ;)

tell me more not sub intelligent brainlet

>>85623774
This but unironically

File: images (19).jpg (15KB, 443x332px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 443x332px

>that's funny, it didn't dial 911, it was trying to reach a private number
>is it a problem?
>no im dunkirk

>>85623804
>they evacuated all the british people on the first day
>the admiral stayed behind to make sure that the French got evacuated for the remaining 7 days of the evacuation


You got BTFO by anon don't get so anally exploded over it

>>85623892
The Battle of Dunkirk was held from May 26th to June 4th. The film shows bits from one week. 6 british destroyers were sunk in total, about of them shown in the film in that week. Obviously the film doesn't show every single second of that entire week but it's safe to say that there was not one day where there were tens of destroyers there at once because you would be pretty stupid to put so many destroyers in one place with U boats floating around. And to pretend like with those destroyers there were hundreds of planes fighting in the air is just retarded.

File: GordonRamsay.jpg (376KB, 1600x1011px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1600x1011px

Am I the only one who couldn't understand shit? Those mongoloid accents combined with the overbearing music made it impossible to comprehend what the fuck anyone was saying

>>85624107
>they evacuated all the british people on the first day
What? So Nolan just said fuck it and made it into a whole week eh?
Fuck off.

>>85624189
So, in spite of his film’s $150m budget, the Royal Air Force seems to consist of three Spitfires, although real-life pilots flew 3,500 sorties at Dunkirk. The Luftwaffe, which Hitler made solely responsible for wiping out the beached Brits, seems able to summon up little more than a couple of Messerschmitts, three Stukas and one bomber. The Royal Navy appears to comprise just two destroyers; in fact, it deployed 39 destroyers and 309 other craft.

>>85624224
This is why I haven't seen it. I can never understand brits.

>>85624243
It deployed 39 destroyers and 309 craft THROUGHOUT the whole ordeal. Not all at once.

>>85624225
I was taking the piss out of you for getting assblasted about the fact that only 2 destroyers and 3 spitfires were shown over the course of the film, which takes place over a week, whilst your defence was "b-but the film only shows s-scenes from one day a-at a time a-and there wouldnt be more than 2 destryoers on the beach at once"

you're wrong and you got BTFO. Stay eternally anally ravaged.

>>85620095
Go to fucking war some time

>>85624243
>the Royal Air Force seems to consist of three Spitfires, although real-life pilots flew 3,500 sorties at Dunkirk.
But Dunkirk follows just one hour of the air narrative and it's safe to say that about 3 of them were flying then, not all 3500.

>The Luftwaffe, which Hitler made solely responsible for wiping out the beached Brits, seems able to summon up little more than a couple of Messerschmitts, three Stukas and one bomber.
Again, it's not like Nolan portrays every single second of thaf week in the land narrative in a hour and a half long film. And why are the casualties so relatively low and why did more than 300 000 soldiers safely evacuate home, why do you think some historians even think that Hitler just let them go back home?

>The Royal Navy appears to comprise just two destroyers; in fact, it deployed 39 destroyers and 309 other craft.
I don't know where you get your info, there were only 6 british destroyers used at Dunkirk directly, and even if there were 39 Destroyers used, they certainly weren't used all at once in a single fucking day.

>>85624369
>39 destoryers and 309 craft over 8 days
>the film which takes place over the entire 8 days shows 2 destoryers and 3 spitfires


Jesus Christ man, the film was good - adding in some background ships and planes with CGI would have been no bad thing. Why are you all getting so autistic about this?

>>85624392
hehe le trolled xDDD

>>85624442
If you payed any attention you would have known that the air narrative takes place in one hour, the sea narrative in one day and the land narrative in one week. So you are objectively wrong my dear fellow autist.

>>85624415
>3500 planes were deployed
>only 3 flew in the first hour

>only 6 destroyers were deployed over the 8 day evacuation of Dunkirk
objectuvely wrong

>certainly weren't all used at once in a single fucking day
the film doesn't take place over one day. The admiral literally stays behind to make sure the French get evacuated. Are you suggesting all 300000 brits were evacuated on day one?

>>85619653
His wife's son, it was implied

File: 1484509890630.png (70KB, 645x729px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 645x729px

>>85624224
>>85624333

>>85624065
kek

>>85624521
>only 3 flew in the first hour
The film doesn't depict the first hour of the Dunkirk battle not in the air narrative or anywhere else.

>Are you suggesting all 300000 brits were evacuated on day one?
Where the fuck did I even imply anything like that? I just said that there was not a single point in that entire week where there were dozens of destroyers at one place at the same time.

>>85624508
Air narrative takes place in one hour. Fine. Of the 3,500 aircraft deployed are you trying to suggest the only sent 3 spitfires out in the first hour whilst 6 or so german planes were deployed to bomb the beach?

The land narrative taking place over a week doesn't even make any fuckign sense since Tom Hardy literally sees all the guys in their stolen ship shot up with holes in his hour, where he also saves everyone by shooting the bomber with no fuel which supposedly only happened in one hour despite allowing all the men to evacuate over the whole week

why doesn't anyone ever post that one magnificent shot of george sitting on the side of the boat with the magnificent blue sea and sky in the background

>>85624224
>>85624333
wow Americans are fucking retarded

>>85619953
Keked

>>85624685
I'm going ot be honest, tomorrow is my only day off and I'm pretty fucking pissed. I'm finding it hard to keep track of the shit I'm posting

I genuinly likd the film I just think cgiin in some extra planes or boats and shit would have improved it.

I'm a bit falling asleep so I'll just leave it here <3

File: 1491109893621.png (221KB, 429x426px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 429x426px

I WANT BANE POSTING TO DIE

>>85624688
>are you trying to suggest the only sent 3 spitfires out in the first hour
Why do you keep on insisting that it's the first hour, when it clearly fucking isn't?

>The land narrative taking place over a week doesn't even make any fuckign sense since Tom Hardy literally sees all the guys in their stolen ship shot up with holes in his hour, where he also saves everyone by shooting the bomber with no fuel which supposedly only happened in one hour despite allowing all the men to evacuate over the whole week
Yes, Tom Hardy shot that bomber in his hour long flight which interconnects with the week long sea narrative. What exactly doesn't make sense here?

File: bane.jpg (101KB, 1200x944px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1200x944px

Or perhaps he's wondering why someone would close the canopy, before water landing a spitfire?

>>85624840
ok, not the first hour. Just an hour - it's still pretty stupid to suggest only 3 spitfires were deployed at one time

I'm going ot bed soon and I just wanted you to know your alright anon and I would definitely make eye contact with you in public

>>85624726
Must be why 8 of the top 10 universities in the world are in America

I just got back from watching Dunkirk. It was one of the worst films I've seen in years.

>>85625036
By "universities" do you mean those liberal indoctrination centers where young people come out dumber than when they went in?

>>85624709
or that great shot of them sailing past that large boat carrying a load of stone-faced soldiers back, I found that pretty terrifying