>end movie with monologue that basically contradicts anything Parker decides in Spiderman 2 or 3, but would ultimately be better for the world
>have the hero ignore that and take away all his character development because Hollywood cash grab
Fuck Raimi. Yet you praise him like the sun.
>>85618944
>sequel still has the greatest villain in superhero movie history
>implying it would have been better had it not existed
>>85619087
>it is okay to retcon charactee development
>>85619502
Explain
>>85619568
Watch this end clip, then tell me why the other 2 movie inner-conflicts needed to exist
https://youtu.be/aFXGSFhPwXE
>>85619087
>greatest villain in superhero movie history
>>85619684
I think it justifies the second movie existing to some degree as it expanded on it, but I don't quite understand how his realization about his newfound life ties into 3 though upon deeper inspection.