Box office bombs

>>85584659

i watched ben-hur when it came out and i actually enjoyed it. it wasn't that bad tbqh

>>85584659
recent example, "King Artur Legend of Sword". BO 140mil worldwide against 175 mil budget. it probably wont broke even too, even failed in china, where scored only 8 mil till now.

one i liked was "Waterworld"

>>85584659
Heard the new emoji movie was pretty bad. Can anyone confirm?

>>85586592
At least that kickass Waterworld show is still at Universal, the effects in it are amazing.

>>85586620
Critical it bombed, can't say how mich money it will make

I think Cinderella Man bombed and I really enjoyed the flick.

>>85586592
Waterworld apparently broke even.

I just recall Pluto Nash was a huge bomb, with a budget of over 100 million and making less then 8 million.

>>85586722
That was a very good film that did bomb hard. They where hoping it could run for a long part of the summer as something that wasn't the usual summer fair like seabiscuit. It didn't happen.

Some good movies that flopped

Lord of War
Sunshine
Zodiac
Children of Men

File: lololol.webm (3MB, 1486x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1486x1080px

>>85584659
>actually rebooting/remaking ben-hur

Wow.

The biggest lost (Inflation adjusted) is the "The 13th Warrior" which lost something like 128 million back in 1999, so the inflation adjustment is like 200 million.

And I still say it not a bad film.

>>85587566
Yeah, It was one of those "Someone actually thought this was a good idea"

I mean, I can understand some stuff - like for example "Life" or a movie that was a total mess like "collide" which fell production hell due to a production company going into chapter 11 but contracts requiring a wide release.

but who would think Ben-Hur would be a sell today?

John Carter

Spiderman homecoming

I actually liked Tomorrowland.

>>85588032
i liked that they basically showed the entire movie in the trailer