kung arthur

Guy Ritchie.

>>85580661
i found it enjoyable to watch but i certainly would never call it a good movie. probably wont watch it again either.

>>85580661
i honestly enjoyed this movie and all its guy ritchie-isms. it's not a top tier movie critically but holy hell is it K I N O

for example, I still laugh at the title screen sequence every time

>>85580661
I agree it had the complete wrong tone to a King Arthur movie. I was hoping he would make it look like a good Robin Hood movie but it looks like he edited it on a bunch of blow or something because it if FUCKED.

A shame because I felt he did a good job with the Sherlock Holmes movies in setting the tone and feel.

It's not too easy to follow in the beginning which explains why it got shit on by critics, but it was enjoyable.

I like Guy Ritchie's dialogue. Some of the action scenes were great and felt sort of Snyderish.

>>85580661
Upvoted!

>>85581340
>I agree it had the complete wrong tone to a King Arthur movie.

Ritchie was trying to make a King Arthur movie that would appeal to Millenials, since Myth/Legend movies don't generally do well with that demographic.

He intended to do a trilogy, but I doubt the other 2 movies will get made.

It tried so hard to not bore the ADD crowd with the constant cuts and screen flashes and sonic swooshes that it ended up being completely monotonous.

I'm a little pissed that the Emoji movie is going to beat it for worst picture of the year, it's so deserving.

File: 1496276359359.png (25KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 657x527px

>You know what we have to do. In order for him to control Exclalibur, he needs to go to the Darklands.
>That's not happening.

>Welcome to the Darklands

holy shit this is too much kino

Probably the worst movie of the year. Why does Ritchie think it's a good idea to make this movie in the exact same style like all his other movies? It doesn't fit at all. It was already questionable in The Man From U.N.C.L.E. Just stick to making movies about modern English criminals if you don't want to change the way you make movies.

And the villain was like a video game boss from 10 years ago. Terrible.

>>85582506
Yeah that ending was just a video game boss fight, obviously that's what they were going for. "The kids like these video games, we'll make the movie look like a video game and they'll love it"

File: CayeA.jpg (5KB, 194x259px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 194x259px

>>85582192
everyone at our theater showing lol'd at that part

File: 342888.jpg-r_1280_720-f_jpg-q_x-xxyxx.jpg (69KB, 1280x536px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1280x536px

Chick Merlin was the only good part btw.

Aidan Gillen was great. Needed more scenes though.

File: 1347164757076.gif (904KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 150x150px

The scene where Arthur explains whats going to happen when he talks to those nobles was Guy Ritchie taking his shitty one note style too far. It doesnt make any fucking sense. Sherlock Holmes? Ok. King Arthur? Fuck off why do you keep doing this.
Also the CGI sucked and the fight scenes looked like something a 12 year old thought up, along with that videogame end boss.
Total garbage.

>>85580661
>everyone talking in 300 wpm and it cuts faster than mcaffee through a line of coke

So it's a movie I can watch at 1x speed and not get bored? You just convinced me to watch it, thanks.

>>85582506
The man from U.N.C.L.E was a good movie though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIlMAHCiung

File: ladylake.gif (334KB, 245x155px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 245x155px

I think the best scene of the movie was King Arthur and the Lady of the Lake. It was mesmerizing.

Jude Law and Aiden Gillen were bonuses to this KINO

>>85580661
It sucked and Man from UNCLE was a 6/10

>>85583110
Anyone else noticing a strong correlation between people with terrible taste and people who use the word kino unironically?