What went wrong?

>>85557216
I'm sorry, but did The Emoji Movie already lose best picture? Oh, that's right. It's not even out yet. In fact, it comes out next month. Does not having box office sales before it's out count as a loss? Is that what you're saying? Because if you're saying that I can assure you that you're wrong. Why would you make this topic when the movie isn't out? The Emoji Movie is still playing next month and Sony has been the best studio in Hollywood for how many years now? It's playing during one of the worst seasons in film and Nolan just happens to have a lead because they're feeding off the energy of alt-right drumpfkins. But you know what? He still fucking sucks. Sony is still one of the best fucking studios in Hollywood, they had hits like Sausage Party and Don't Breathe last year and would have won Best Picture if Paul Feig didn't choke. Maybe you should shut the fuck up before you make retarded topics like this. You know why? Because you're going to be embarrassed when The Emoji Movie wins best picture and someone bumps this topic. Oh look at that, a critic just gave The Emoji Movie a fresh tomato. Are you a fucking drunk? Are you retarded? Are you autistic? You are a fucking idiot and you should never make a topic on this board again and I'm fucking serious. I almost have a feeling you're the only guy making all these anti-Emoji topics because you're a faggot hater who doesn't like the movie because it's good. Fuck you, be good at something in YOUR life and then maybe try to troll these fucking movies on the board, like I give a fuck. It's so easy to spot out your threads now, you're a retard. Always doing stupid shit like this. Why don't you try to be a good poster? Just for once? For once in your fucking life try not to make a topic like this. That's just you, you're always right at getting it wrong. Fuck you. You are nothing.

>>85557216
Industry pro here, critics were paid off to give this picture a bad score so it would not compete against Disney's summer slot. It's dirty, but what the hell, so it goes.

>>85557216
Looks like a completely innocuous children's film in the vain of Trolls, Minions, etc. But modern critics are all literal trash and now that this is at zero they will have no desire to be fair, but rather try to use their position to make it 'le worst film of all time'

This movie looks gay but film criticism is genuinely dead for the most part. I hope Armond gives it a positive review.

>>85557216
critics were paid off by disney liberals

>>85557216
Nothing. It's better than The Lego Movie (2014).

In a way, 0% is better for them than, say 13%. It will get a lot buzz just for that

>>85557216
It's not a film for drumptards, you have to have a sense of humour to enjoy it. I fucking loved it, its the first movie since The LEGO movie that had me laughing from beginning to end.

>>85557229
classic

>>85557349
>>85557366
Whoa, hey, do we have sony shills in here too? /v/ was a mistake.

>TFW /tv/ hates RT and is contrarian so much that they'll fool themselves into liking the emoji movie

File: 1500179383782.jpg (51KB, 501x382px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 501x382px

>>85557229
FUCK
Y E S

>>85557229
NICE