ITT post bad CGI

>>85540954
What is this? Xavier, Renegade Angel?

>>85541101
>>85541122
Impressive

>>85541023
>not loving 3d kino

>>85540954
I never understood why for a close up like this they wouldn't just film the actor and then use CG on his arms and legs

>>85541472
Essentially bragging about how good their CG is - even though its shit

File: IMG_0579.jpg (32KB, 676x281px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 676x281px

>>85540954

Someone post the lost submarine

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RVeHxUVkW4w

>>85541325
Can't believe they made a movie about jews in Sweden.

>>85541896
Reminds me of a SCP

>>85541047
Scorpion king.

>>85541907
Chuckled.

>>85541148
This is what the animated series should have looked like

>>85541850
Is this real?

Wtf

>>85540954
You ready?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH7Q2y9iKPU

>>85540954
I remember this looking bad when it came out.

>>85542670
yesssss

>>85540954
Honestly, Scorpion King wasn't bad, it is just very dated and was too 'obvious', you look at other films at this time and the CGI is about the same, but they used certain angles and lighting effects to make it less obvious. One that comes immediately to mind is Fellowship of the Ring, which came out the same year as the Mummy Returns

>>85543047
Does Gollum still look good today?
It's been a while since I've seen the trilogy.

File: 1501129784254.jpg (68KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1920x1080px

>>85540954

>>85543212
Gollum still holds up well because of the mo-cap performance.

>>85541265
Reminder that this is not a final shot, it's from behind the scenes. Not defending the prequel trilogy, just hate when people post unfinished renders and try to pass them off as completed shots

File: open-uri20150608-27674-4k4n68_770b3269.jpg (200KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1280x720px

>>85543495

>>85542670
Believe it or not anon, the extreme close-up shots of the demon thing are practical. You can tell, the textures are too real for the CG at the time.

>>85541148
This looks better than stuff that comes out today. Cough age of Ultron opening cough

>>85544166
That's just a shitty green screen.

>>85544166
>>85544285
Please explain to me how this looks bad. I'm not a DC fanboy, not a marvel or anything fanboy, just curious. My eyes don't detect anything technically "wrong" with this.

>>85543047
the cave troll scene still holds up

highlight of the entire 3 movies

>>85543978
yeah the demon looks good i'd believe that, but that whole scene is an orgy of bad cgi

>>85543495
at least they'll go back and re-do it in 10 years for the special edition

also his final scene actually looked pretty good imo

>>85540954
I remember when this came out it did not look bad, if anything it looked cutting-edge. Same with the scenes on the airship, which now look so green-screened it's almost laughable. Still a good movie though.

>>85544395
Bruh, I know you can see that obvious green screen behind them.. And please don't get me started on Cyborg.

>>85544395
the cars in the background and the quindent

>>85543495
My roommate was legitimately shocked when I told him this was CGI. Apparently some people didn't notice at all.

>>85541148
those shots of the clones and droids in the dust are pretty cool desu

>>85541148

But this looks great.

>>85541165
Most impressive

File: 1421732700870.jpg (19KB, 366x380px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 366x380px

>>85543495
why couldnt they just have done a couple of shots from the back with his face in darkness?
why the fuck did they have to do this?
it pulls you out so hard

>>85544395
The trident is pointing down

>>85543394
I figured that would be the case, Andy Serkis usually does a pretty good job with that.

File: livia-soprano.gif (754KB, 400x260px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 400x260px

they shoulda just started the season with her death this scene was unnecessary

>>85541101
>>85541122
fucking based

>>85544554
>>85544487
>>85543495

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPOx5tioLeY

I was originally posting this as bad cgi, but its more of a terrible scene. The cgi is better than the Tarkin even.

>>85541325
This was good, fuck you

>>85543495
Will CGI ever be able to replicate reality? This looks very detailed but is still painfully obvious CGI, to the point that it was annoying to watch during the film. Would've rather had them cast a new actor.

File: IMG_2375.jpg (1MB, 1440x1922px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1922px

Somehow managing to minimize these things

>>85544554
Really, the only time where it was extremely obvious that he was CG was in his first scene.
They didn't even try to conceal his face.
His other 2 scenes where he was more in the shadows looked significantly better.

File: unkar-plutt_4cd0610b.jpg (410KB, 768x433px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 768x433px

>>85540954
unironically this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82DuAKTOrpg

>>85541101
Doesn't look too bad to me. Just the suspension of disbelief is very high in that scene.

File: image.png (45KB, 778x512px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 778x512px

>>85546048
giv momy gf

>>85541023
this looks awesome what is it

File: spawn-devil.jpg (71KB, 1280x692px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1280x692px

WHAT THE HELL

>>85544554
i honestly think that not being able to recognize bad cgi or when things look unnatural is a sign of a really low IQ person. its probably not a coincidence that poor people and the chinese are the two biggest demographics for bloated cgi hollywood shitfests.

>>85540954

Fuck off, this movie is old as fuck and it looked fine for its time

start memeing about the alien douchebag in the star wars cantina literally being a cheap rubber suit

File: Kraken_attacks_18_Davy_Jones.png (250KB, 638x267px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 638x267px

How about good cgi? This shit is over a decade old and still remains some of the best looking cgi outside of tech demos

>>85548017
lmao no it didnt it has been mocked since its release for looking shockingly bad

>>85548017
Eat shit, it came out almost a decade after Jurassic Park and looks way worse.

File: 5UH7qq0.png (2MB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x800px

>>85548062
Say what you want about Disney but they have some fucking wizards working for them.

Other companies could learn a few things...

File: lead_large.jpg (30KB, 615x410px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 615x410px

>>85548048
I was shocked when I found out this was CG, it looks phenomenal

>>85548083
no fucking way

Took me a minute to realize what was happening

>>85548130
looks like a fucking ps3 cutscene, look at that awful cgi bloom filter shit, its actually worse than lord of the rings. are you 12 years old? what the fuck is wrong with people now its like theyre putting something in the drinking water thats making everybody a braindead moron who laps up garbage i mean JEEEEESUS FUCK

File: qxoDSI1.jpg (451KB, 1064x1064px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1064x1064px

>Practical never looks as good

>>85548142
but how are you not able to notice the unnatural movement clashing with physical objects? Did you think gollum was actually a guy in a suit? have you had your IQ tested?

>>85548191
Pretty sure he was using that image as an example of shitty visual effects.

File: uemuoi41baznwjdcxfqt[1].jpg (68KB, 620x470px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 620x470px

>the warcraft movie looked worse than the CG bilzzard's in-house team puts together to promote expansion packs

>even overwatch looks better

>>85548357
If this isn't supposed to be a comedy scene I'll be disappointed.

File: 1464140660460.jpg (31KB, 447x345px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 447x345px

>>85548313
holy shit i totally forgot about the warcraft movie

>>85548357

Where's the CGI?

>>85547981
>>85548083
>>85548357
Not CGI

File: wonderwat.webm (1MB, 1280x524px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x524px

>>85548452
The Equilibrium one isn't but the In Time one absolutely is CGI.

>>85542604
>Reddit spacing
Downvoted

>>85548083
I don't understand this one.

>>85548452
the In Time one looked like a mix of cgi and a miniature

File: 1490656793697.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>they actually had a deer on set but for some reason did something in post to make it look like THIS

>>85548214
This is just sad.

>>85541101
>>85541122
James Bond was in Ice Age?

>>85548559
This was SO bad. How the fuck did they think that looked okay? The lighting is completely off.

>>85548559
Is this Walking Dead? How can a show with a budget like that still manage to look like a home movie?

>>85543253
That looks tight

>>85541101
>>85541122
DAND was such fucking garbage that at times it borderlinded on so bad it's good, like that CGI.

It never made that leap though, and was still fucking awful.

>>85548697
It's a shame that Brosnan was the best Bond we ever had and he only got 1 (maybe 1 and half) good movies.

>>85548559
*REAL DEMON GHOST DEAR CAUGHT ON TAPE! Most Scary Ghost Sightings Ever *REAL*

>>85548535

To make it look like they are face to face they had the rock stand about 8 feet away from manlet co-star so they could be looking each other 'eye to eye' with the camera angle obtuse to mask the fact hes like a gorrolion miles away.

>>85548776
1/10, please apply yourself.

File: 1483658191395.webm (768KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 1920x1080px

do greenscreens count?

>>85541148
It's just an episode of the Clone Wa- OH FUCK ITS NOT

>>85548816
I cannot say this is bad because you know Ralph Fiennes was having a blast trying to be the most ludicrous moustache twirling villain of all time.

>>85548214
embarrassing

>>85548615
Kek that's sad

>>85548313
The CG in Warcraft is a mixed bag.
The Orcs themselves were 10/10 and in some
of the earlier scenes the humans actually do blend quite well with them.
But the closer it gets to the end, the worse the humans blend with the CG. It's clear that the budget began to dry up near the end.

hey, this stuff works when used properly
right? remember blade?

>>85545950
>Will CGI ever be able to replicate reality?

Regardless of what you think of the movies overall quality, the reboot of Planet of the Apes movies are really boundary pushing CGI wise.

Not photo realistic mind you, just so you don't think I'm being hyperbolic. Just the most boundary pushing CGI of any current franchise.

>>85548559
post the burned matresses scene too

>>85541148
wut? how is this bad? From 2002 and looks better than shit in 2017

File: Mr_Stretchtastic.webm (3MB, 450x350px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 450x350px

>>85548946
This movie is awful.

>>85548961
Some of the CGI in them is fucking amazing. While it's easy enough to tell it's CGI it's easy enough to ignore that and be completely immersed.

Then people try to act and it's all broken again.

File: 1410984463148.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>85548615

>>85548559
why couldnt' they just put a real deer there? There are thousands round these parts

>>85549082
PETA.

>>85549082
thats the thing
they did have a real deer
theres images with it on set
its fucking bizzare how it ended up like that

File: look at that nature.jpg (100KB, 1169x611px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1169x611px

>>85549129

>>85549162
That truck hit him so hard he turned into Silver Surfer.

>>85548849
Most of Kingsman is so self-aware of how cheesy it is and I love it for that

File: voldyhug.gif (2MB, 350x213px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x213px

>>85548854
:3

File: 1365384221303.gif (2MB, 295x254px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 295x254px

>>85548214

post the webm of him barging through the wall.

>>85547981

every. fucking. time.

this reminds me of some shit you'd see in action league now because that just looks like they filmed a toy car tumbling down a hill.

>>85549002
>it's easy enough to ignore that and be completely immersed

Good way to put it actually. It's one of the few CGI effects that feels of has a weight on the world.

To explain that, I mean that it feels like there's an actual character there, not just an effect. Not quite sure how they achieved that, but it's pretty fucking cool.

>>85549242
They achieved it by having actual fucking actors doing all the acting and just CGing over them. Every shot of Caesar is actually Andy Serkis doing it.

>>85549242

The character has genuine depth and you've formed an opinion, how they appear to be is secondary to you.

File: kingdom-hearts-3-vs-toy-story-movie-comparison-12.jpg (585KB, 920x627px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 920x627px

>Video games have eclipsed movies

Looks like /tv/ is over.

>>85549162
The work print of that movie is fucking kino.

I have it on some hard drive here, and I love it

>>85548511
>this will win an oscar

>>85549162
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N7ZDpIbx10
>the logs at 2:30 just fucking stop

>>85548130
wtf do they all have the same face

>>85548993
>shotgun has zero recoil

>>85549325
Yeah its sad how bad toy story looks now but it's still impressive as hell for the time

>those clearly visible polygons on the cardboard box

>>85548615
the 2nd shot looks pretty good though, something a hack like tarantino would do

>>85549323
Nah, the movement and weight had effect.

I mean Caeser was fine as a character, but he wasn't so good that it would make me overlook ropey CGI. Like that first reboot was just standard in terms of CGI, but they seem to be at the bleeding edge of things since.

>>85549290
>They achieved it by having actual fucking actors doing all the acting and just CGing over them
Good point.

And I guess that monkeys (or apes I guess) are pretty close to humans as is. So they can map those actor movements almost one to one, and make them look even more realistic.

>>85549197
I hate you so much

>>85548083

I thought it was meant to be like that. Shoulder to shoulder staring past each other because they were too pussy to look each other in the eye because "muh man feelz".

>>85548511
It's supposed to be a lasso, not a whip.

>>85549325
>1995 cgi v. 2017 cgi
nice bait senpai

>>85549734
The one on the right is rendered completely in real time, which makes a huge difference.

File: dragon.jpg (83KB, 490x294px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 490x294px

Dragon from "The Witcher" movie. Awful CGI, starts at 0:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6bz4x8Rvo

>>85549162
Can't believe that made the final cut.

File: 1488850928065.gif (2MB, 332x215px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 332x215px

>>85548854
>That fucking laugh in Death Hallows.
Will never not get me.

>>85541148
>dat visual 9/11 reference

fucking poetry

File: draco-and-bowen.jpg (407KB, 1920x816px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1920x816px

>>85549760
This dragon from 1996 looks better. Not great, but not that bad.

>>85548214
It's been pointed out before that is' an unfinished shot that was used in a trailer. In the movie ,it's much better.

>>85549852
looks really bad actually

>>85549752
yeah, 20 years of difference, and most of video games' budget goes to video and programming, instead of expensive actors

>>85549960
still far better than "The Witcher" 2001 one. Really, just check clip few posts above

File: 1488871502605.jpg (12KB, 249x243px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 249x243px

>>85548961
>Just the most boundary pushing CGI of any current franchise

>>85549456
lmao

>>85541148
>all these positive replies
Is Episode I finally old enough to be considered a underrated classic?

>>85548048
Fuck that was so good. Davy Jones in general was well made, not only his face.

Truly one of the best CGI ever made.

>>85542670
I used to love this movie as a kid. Reboot when?

File: Darkseeker.jpg (87KB, 410x268px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 410x268px

what could have been
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14QYCShlGHA

what we got https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ww3JCRYtrKE

>>85544916
When I saw the back of his head I remember thinking "wow they've gone and done it" but it should have been low key.
Keep him on the other side of the conference table, if you have to do a close-up make sure he's not talking.
The hubris on these cunts to think it was good enough to put a close-up on a 40ft screen.

>>85545730
In fairness, when it was broadcast TV were shit and it wasn't obvious.

>>85548816
>TA-
What did he mean by this?

>>85548615
really didn't think it was so bad.

>>85547712
>there is no reason snoke couldn't be practical effects
okay fucktard, then how would you explain the sudden change in the second film when he's doing shit that's impossible otherwise.

also, fuck this practical effects meme. almost everyone that spouts it is a dumb mong.
yes, cg can be shit. yes, latex animatronics can be shit. yes, stop motion can be shit. matte painting can be shit. green screen can be shit. rear projection can be shit.all this focus on "mug practical effects, muh cg" makes me think these tards don't actually care about what's onscreen, they care about the story behind it, so they can die in a fucking fire.

>>85550982
If you were watching on cable broadcast in standard def on a tube TV it probably looked ok.

>>85551002
very funny, thanks for that. I'm guessing if they took the time to maybe find an actor that fit the description of snoke, maybe a decrepid looking guy with a fucked up looking face, they could use make up and prosthetics to make it look good and believable.

>how would you explain the sudden change in the second film when he's doing shit that's impossible otherwise
I don't know, I'm not a film maker, but I guess they would use body doubles, various angles, the good ole concept of RESTRAINT, and editing techniques to make a believable scene that doesn't break the immersion for the scene.

your second paragraph is funny too. Practical effects have an edge because even when they look like shit, they have the advantage of looking real. You're right tho, look at Iron man 2 at the birthday party scene. They clearly had RDJ in a plastic iron man suit and it looked like shit. The director, or CG director, or whoever is responsible should always use the most effective tool in their toolbox ya drunkass triggered fucktard

>>85549852
While it looks ok in your picture, the dragon looked AWFUL in motion. I was 7 when it came out and even back then I thought the CGI looked like ass.

File: KingKong_DinoStampede.jpg (198KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1920x1080px

It's baffling that this is the scene where they dropped the ball. It's fucking dinosaurs! Of course people are going to be paying attention.

>>85549162
>tfw the workprint for the Star Wars prequels will never leak

>>85541850
Just bought a PS4 Pro for this, thanks.

>>85547941
Story: the vfx company was overworked and behind schedule so they pulled the model they created for An American Werewolf in Paris and... did this with it...
the mouth isnt even articulated and i think frank welker was the temp voice actor and they just left it

>>85541850
>>85542604
Pretty sure it's from an early trailer.

>>85551752
the fx are fine. the fact that all these fuckers escape being trampled completely destroys any suspension of belief. it's like when bilbo falls two kilometers in the hobbit and then just bounces off a super mario mushroom and dusts himself off

>No one posting anything from the Hobbit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpsFWBzDHkk

It looks like a fucking video game.

>>85552493
Forgot this gem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aTPiShcm78

>>85549393
The workprint turns a 2/10 movie into a 9/10 comedy.

File: kino.jpg (42KB, 296x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 296x500px

>>85541308

>>85548130
why the fuck is everything glowing?

>>85552584
not an argument

>>85552610
Hahaha, yeah. You have to go back, lassie.

>>85550436
but anon thats episode 2

>>85548214

The practical scene looks like he has playdoh smeared on his head. You chose a terrible example.

>>85552610
at this point it kinda is

>>85549529
>it's a dart gun

>>85552493
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrfNUdSir7Y
I let out an audible groan every time at that bridge jumping part

>>85548608
>The lighting is completely off.

Because it's stock nature footage that's just cropped into the scene, the dear isn't CG.

Which makes it even fucking worse.

>>85548655
>How can a show with a budget like that

This is where you're mistaken. Walking Dead only had a massive budget in the first season, it's been steadily tappering off since then, and around 3 seasons in thing started to show through the worsening budget. They explore less in show and stick to familiar locations, lots of episodes are done in singular back lot sets, far less effects shot.

All culminating in that masterpiece of a scene.

>>85541148
CGI may look like shit, but it's well directed and the cinematography is ok. So no.

File: NakedBaldAwesome.gif (964KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]

964KB, 500x250px

>>85552597
They're all really deer.

>>85541148
It may not look very realistic but it does look cool as fuck.

>>85552697
kek what is this a mario game?

>>85552452
Specifically the way they're narrowly avoiding every single step without reacting makes it feel like they're running with hologram dinosaurs.

File: 1499952306956.gif (2MB, 268x268px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 268x268px

>>85549162
>>85549393
>got a bootleg copy of that movie
>was sorta enjoying it
>mfw I saw this scene

still makes me laugh, it only got more ridiculous during the end

>>85541101
>>85548697
>parents split up when i was 8
>dont get to see dad much anymore
>when i do its in his tiny shitty appartment
>decide to go and see a movie together once a fortnight instead
>first film we saw was DAND

It will always be my favourite bond desu

We still see a movie together once a fortnight to this day
>tfw Dunkino with dad

>>85549831
hory sheeeeeeet

>>85548357
How is everyone not just totally deaf in that universe at this point?

>>85541101
That fucking squirrel finally did it.

>>85548313
WoW cinematics have always looked amazing. When they announced the WoW movie and said it was going to be live action, I knew that it'd just be a joke. I realize that a full-length film done in the style of the WoW cinematics is too much of a reach and would never be done for 100 reasons, live-action WoW was a mistake.

As >>85548949 said, the CGI for the orcs did look very well done, but trying to cram them in with humans with little to no CGI was just ridiculous.

>>85541023
Actually laughed out loud.
>that floating jawbone

>>85541148
It's a good thing Yoda told them to shoot the nearest ship, they never would have thought of it

>>85545730
They should go back and re-do this if they ever release a new blu-ray or whatever
Also honestly I didn't notice it when I watched it, I didn't know she died.

>>85554092
why didn't they just throw a model plane in a pool?

>>85554158
Not enough in the budget I guess.

>>85548584

hehe

>>85554092
Did he died?

>>85549629
Why the hate

>>85549952
>In the movie ,it's much better.
it's really not

>>85554237
They probably spent it on getting Harrison Ford, weird how the budget for Air Force One was more than Jurassic Park and looks like shit in comparison

File: quality cgi.webm (2MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x480px

>>85548559

File: Rush.2013.720p.BluRay.x264-tRuEHD.webm (727KB, 1280x534px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 1280x534px

This is Ron Howard tier?

>>85544395
Nothing, they are just memeing

>>85543047

Nah nigga it was terrible. When I first saw it I seriously thought 'what the fuck is this shit' because it looks just bad. I think they honestly ran out of budget when they got to him

>>85554564
Rush is fucking great tho.

>>85548357
the problem with this is that it just goes on for way too long. I would not have a problem with this as a serious scene if it lasted less than 15-20 seconds

>>85545950
>>85543495
I think it would have been okay, had he been in shadow most of the time, or if they didn't cut between shots of him and actual people constantly. It was so much easier to tell he was fake when you could directly compare him to an actual actor.

Still, my brain kind of scrambled when I first saw him. Like, is he an alien? or a mutant? or an android?

File: shootout 655.webm (2MB, 336x164px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 336x164px

>>85548357
DELETE THIS

>>85550532
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
This fucking movie would have been way better without those cgi fuckers.

>>85550184

the cgi is fine, its the whole idea that he would do that or his face would look like that while his suit being relatively okay thats the issue.

File: 2uz3ukm.png (824KB, 1280x544px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 1280x544px

his claws in origin were absolute shit

>>85548794
>>85548776
>>85548535
They're standing side by side, looking away from eachother

>>85555099

Its a meme redditfriend. Find your way back to your proper site.

>>85540954
IRL

File: HBO_intro_1983 - practical effect.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>>85542670
That's almost entirely practical effects.

Similar to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1NKoMNy5bY

Even as a child, I thought that logo was CGI'd - but nope, they made it in a machine shop:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agS6ZXBrcng

>>85542670
nvidia graphics card tech demo from the early-mid 2000s

File: soccer_glitch1359393022520.gif (940KB, 280x140px) Image search: [Google]

940KB, 280x140px

>>85545950
Frankly, you've just been exposed to so much of it you're jaded - you have a practiced eye and can spot it a mile away.

If you went back in time twenty or thirty years, and showed even Avatar to someone, they'd have no idea it wasn't real (or at least in some way practically made). Just remember that those old black and white claymation monsters used to actually scare people.

Albeit, if you've ever seen anyone playing a modern sports game at a distance, I bet it'd take you awhile to figure out if you were watching a game or a sports broadcast, unless a tell tale cursor or target select gave it away.

...or something like pic related.

>>85543978
You're a fucking moron, just look at it
You can see fucking compression on the face textures

>>85552636
thats the point
He is a robot. His skin is fake and artificial.

File: aw yeah this is happening.jpg (24KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x281px

>>85550496
>Reboot when?

Literally now. Low budget Blumhouse R rated horror directed by Mcfarlane himself. Announced at comic con.

>>85549325
>looks like cartoon plastic
vs
>looks like CGI

>>85541101
>>85541122
>2002
It's great

>>85548946
WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT SUPPOSED TO BE

>>85554092
looks fine until it flips

Another instance of special effects trying to be TOO COOL or TOO REAL when the tech isnt there.

Some sort of interior shot from the viewpoint of the guy left on board would've been awesome. Castaway's plane crash scene was awesome.

>>85555183
I'm pretty sure you're only referring to the close ups of the Violator and Spawn. Other than the obvious parts that are not CG, the whole Hell scene is entirely CG other than the aforementioned close ups.

Do you know something I don't about this?

>>85543495
he needed to be in the movie though, they had no other choice. It looked it looked way better on the big screen, that tumblr gif makes it look terrible though

>>85554092
The one dated effect in the entire movie, and it's only because they showed too much for what they could do at the time.

>>85555289
>JPEG texture artifacts on a model
>in fucking 1997

File: left_is_the_videogame.webm (3MB, 1280x624px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x624px

>>85545950
>Will CGI ever be able to replicate reality?
It can, and it does it too well sometimes. It's gotten to the point where vidya game designers deliberately avoid it in favor of stylized shit, like you see in Borderlands.

>>85549197
jesus christ...

>>85549162
Classic

>>85555838
Well, I hated it too - but it was a comedy. Going over the wasn't among the reasons to hate it.

>>85541047
Bahahahh that fucking made me LOL

>>85541148
The only real problem here is that the stormtroopers are also cartoons. Other than that, it's just a product of its time. The soldiers should be wearing suits, though. There's zero excuse.
>>85550436
They're only talking about the effects. The movie is undeniably the worst the series has to offer.

>>85554564
Bait

>>85555953
>Other than that, it's just a product of its time.

>2002
>Highest budget sci-fi film to date
Less of a product of it's time, more of a product of the inability to stand up and tell Lucas to get fucked.

Which, I suppose, is technically a result of the time, as that never would have happened in 1977.

>>85555323
His skin is not fake

>>85555450
Him resetting to his normal face after using his stretch powers for a disguise.

>>85555809
They avoid it because it is actually a shitton of work and only really works in racing games because you just need a good looking car and the rest is too fast to really notice.

>>85549054
Yeah I couldn't believe this scene when i saw it pure shit

>>85548511
Looks pretty cool desu

>>85548083
HOLY SHIT VIN DISEL IS HUGE

>>85555809
Not really close when you see the physics.

>>85556191
H U L K I N G M A S S

File: Borderlands - feels are greater than reals.jpg (156KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1600x1200px

>>85556088
Borderlands wasn't a racing game (well, most of the time.) They started that game with a realistic-as-possible framework under the Unreal engine, but quickly opted for a stylized "comic drawn over" look to set it apart.

In the end, it is actually quite often more work to make something look stylized than realistic, depending on the route you take - which is certainly the case with Borderlands, where they are continuously taking photorealistic objects and textures and cartooning them up. (Not that the results or the game itself is always great.)

And the point of that webm is to demonstrate an instance where the video game actually looks "more real" than the real thing.

>>85548083
>>85548535
>>85548776
Glad someone finally explained this. Every time I saw it, I figured Vin was just telling the guy he wasn't going to like what he would see in there, or something, while not-Vin was just peering in. Didn't realize the intent was to make it look as though they were facing each other.

...Which I suppose just goes to show how bad the effect fail.

File: wait what.webm (3MB, 640x266px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x266px

>>85540954

File: rs-18960-apes-1800-1404228817.jpg (50KB, 700x394px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 700x394px

Can someone please tell me HOW the cgi in the planet of the apes movies look so realistic when almost all other cgi in say capeshit looks so cheap and video game like?

Doomsday in BvS is so pathetic looking

>>85548993
Problem though is there any way to make Mr Fantastic's power not look goofy?

>>85542670
kek this is like a cutscene from pre-2000 video game

>>85548559
Holy fuck I refuse to believe this is real

>>85548191
>>85548259
ironic.

>>85556400
I really think the main difference is that of some artists who are in love with their work vs. the work of a bunch of people who are just there for a quick buck.

Which is true of a lot of things in a lot of movies - sometimes, quality is something you can't just by.

(On the other hand Planet of the Apes also has the advantage that their source material isn't fast, flashy, and explosive.)

>>85556400
Because the majority of the budget in capeshit goes to paying the actors to show up, so they skimp on CGI since their target audience(children) don't really care.

>>85556638
The target audience is teens - like most of the kids in this thread. They have laser-vision for shit CGI, but so long as everything is big and exciting, they'll buy in anyways.

>>85556688
>They have laser-vision for shit CGI
Do they? Seems like you never hear kids complain about shitty CGI, just how le epik it was. The only people who complain about CGI honestly is this autistic place.

>>85549760
thats the magnificent golden dragon?

>>85556720
My friend's and cousins teenage kids laugh about crap CGI all the time - and most of my friend's kids talk like this kids here. Indeed, I know some of them post here. Hell, you could be one of them for all I know. ARE YOU ONE OF THEM!?

Hell, the only people that don't complain about CGI are old farts who are just bedazzled by it. Granted, I'm pretty bedazzled by it sometimes - thinking about how far we've come since my favorite game was Defender.

>>85556720
When I was much younger I would notice shit CGI but justify it by thinking "it was meant to look this way."

>>85556720
I'm constantly having to tell my kids, "It was the 90's dammit - lighten up!"

Youtube related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1m9wEyEVvo

>>85556788
When I was younger I couldn't tell. Only now when I go back and watch movies I loved as a kid do I realize how awful the CGI was.

>>85556831
I want to fuck that fish

>>85548313
afaik they outsource their expansion trailers

>>85556831
I thought you were talking about current CGI, like when kids go to the movies now, not old CGI. Of course kids who are exposed to modern CGI are going to notice shit CGI from the 90s.

File: 05.jpg (540KB, 700x1050px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 700x1050px

>>85556831
When will Demo d return to us?

>>85551659
There's still hundreds of scalies who insist it's the greatest movie of all time.

>>85547981
would have been more pissed if they legitimately destroyed an e-type

>>85556919
Find me a kid who has seen Dr. Who and doesn't laugh at the shit CGI, and I'll show you a hard core Dr. Who fan who is lying through their teeth.

Albeit, when I watched Dr. Who, I'd laugh at the zippers in the backs of the alien's costumes.

Still, even of the highest budget modern CGI, I constantly hear even little kids whining afterwards that, "[such and such] looked so fake!" - though, oddly, I rarely find they are complaining of the same scenes I was thinking about, and thought they looked fine, while not mentioning others I thought were atrocious. Growing up with CGI might make you pick out different things, I suppose.

>>85556937
>This is why we can't have nice things 2017

>>85541122
It does look funny but not in a bad way, but in a cheesy way

File: rygel.jpg (29KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x427px

Couldnt find an image, but there were some tremendously funny cgi / animatronic bloopers with this guy.

>>85548357
Reminds me of that resident evil cut scene. You know the one

>>85543495
>.gif
pls webm

>>85558204
The cgi is not bad, the scene just looks funny thats all

>>85556195
Actually all the video game needs to look more realistic, is a shitty shaky camera. CGI has gone so far, it needs to be dirtied to look realistic.

>>85558301
omg wtf, fucking nvidia physicX demos have better physics

>>85558317
This is the golden rule of CG, though. Adding wear to things makes everything look more realistic.

>>85548511
She's the kind of tennis player that would hit the ball even when its clear its going out of bounds.

>>85548130

You know what really bothers me about this? It's that one, just one of the shields has a chip in it. So they had no problem with the cut and paste job on everything else but they cared enough to change that one shield.

>>85558376
I just don't get it, all they had to do was stretch one of the intro cinematics over 2 hours, just CG the whole fucking thing, how do you fuck that up?

>>85555809
>stylized shit, like you see in Borderlands
Buddy, you've got the wrong door. CoD lovers studio is two blocks down

>>85541896
this is a really great video

>>85541023
This thread is for BAD cgi anon

>>85540954
>[any marfail movie]

>>85552790
Why the fuck did the budget dry up when the show is getting more recognition. Well from season 1 onward now it must be losing speed.
Also first season had like what, only 8 episode.
If they really have budget issue why the fuck would they maintain 24 episode ? it's not like they do something with them half of them is filler

>>85543047
It's their job as filmmakers to do what they can so the CGI doesn't look obvious or outdated. Other films from the time that look better didn't get lucky with lighting or angles. They did it deliberately. It's all part of the care one puts into the creation process and obviously in the case of The Scorpion King the extra effort was not considered and executed.

>>85540954
ELF SHITTERS BTFO

File: Star.Wars.Episode.II.Attack.of.the.Clones.2002.mkv_20170728_033023.923.png (2MB, 1920x816px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x816px

>>85543780
Nah, nigger. That's the final shot. Took this from the BD just now.
Stop getting autistically asspained when people point out what shit shows the prequels are.

File: images.png (7KB, 256x196px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 256x196px

Will CGI ever match reality or is it impossible?

I think the animations are to blame for things looking bad. Too floaty and shit but AI might make this easier. We can specify starting and ending frames and AI can help with the minor movements inbetween.

AI is already being used to mimic human tone and inflection and it does an incredible job

File: blade cgi.webm (3MB, 1280x533px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x533px

>not posting the kinoest

>>85558945
That's the corniest fucking thing I've ever seen.

>>85541148
why do those laser cannons have recoil? That doesn't make any sense, they're not firing projectiles.

File: spawn-movie-malebolgia-e1479862521454.png (357KB, 700x394px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 700x394px

> no mention of Spawn movie
Back to hell I suppose.

>>85543047
Nigga you don't need to look at other films from the time, the CGI in the same goddamn movie didn't age as badly as the scorpion king. The mummies looked great and still look decent, whereas the scorpion king made you go "what the fuck" the first time around and now look atrocious.

>>85541148
Was CGI Yoda really that good or are the CGI troopers so shit it makes him look good?

>>85541896
Holy fuck is that even real?

It's like a dream or a nightmare

>>85559151
retard.

>>85559151
its mention blind man.

>>85558469
Fuck you

>>85558945
CGI is shit but it's still pretty cool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8S0Ipy8yes

Maybe not too bad but very fucking creepy.

>>85559038
>whydidntheopenhiseyes.webm

>>85558418
Blizzard ingame cinematics take shitton of time to make,it wouldnt be realistic to expect whole movie from it.
Didnt you see Rugrats pilot animation quality when compared to the show for instance?

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1zn6rt

>no Son of the Mask webms yet

I'm disappointed. Someone please, post them.

>>85559222
nah of course it's not real, but the whole concept of the video is amazing and terrifying

>>85559495
Why the fuck should he?

t. Blade

>>85559102
Autism

>>85559506
Man, something about that animation is unnerving as fuck.

File: Wolverine2.gif (566KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 500x333px

>>85559613
Its overly animated,if you want to see some really overdone stuff go see The Thief and the Cobbler Recobbled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsxCIkN7Zy8

Anyone has this full scene from Wolverine?

>>85559699
Oh I've seen the cobbler before, nothing unnerving about it. Maybe it's that the rugrats one has jerky moments that throw me off, whereas the cobbler stuff is smooth? I'm not sure, honestly.

>>85549054
>They didn't use an actual niggers
Any hobo nog will do it for a pack of cigs and some liquor

Are you ready?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8S0Ipy8yes

>>85553551
nice blog, faggot
literally no one cares

>>85558469
That was kinda the point... CoD and its ilk are trying to look as photorealistic as possible - but after awhile, everything looks the same. So folks have started making stylized shit to set themselves apart.

>>85559557
CGI is fine, cinematography is bland.

File: the ride never ends.jpg (82KB, 570x320px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 570x320px

>>85541896
>14 Hour Ride...
I think I tried designing that in a game once.

>>85558378
Not really, it's more like it doesn't reproduce different aspects of cinematography, but it can perfectly reproduce what your eyes see.

>>85548511

The worst part about this is that she moves her whip before he throws the shit at her implying that she either has the ability to see into the future or that the other guy has incredibly slow reflexes or purposely aiming at the whip

Seems like a forced scene to demonstrate how skilled she is but it just does the opposite