why didn't roger ebert give it the respect it deserved?

>>85460463
He was a hack.

>>85460495
why is he so respected? what did he do that other critics didnt/don't?

Because it's one good scene and 90 minutes of kayaking

>>85460463
Without a doubt the most disturbing movie I've seen.

File: Screenshot_20170726-041019.jpg (216KB, 719x806px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 719x806px

He had his own taste like everyone else except /tv/ memeboys

>>85460463
triggered by personal memories of being assraped in the woods by Siskel

>>85460463
early ebert was very contrarian. refused to give the good the bad and the ugly four stars when he first reviewed it because he thought spaghetti westerns couldn't be art.

>>85460757
he wasn't wrong here

is this what americans who live in the south are really like?

>>85460859

This is what all white "people" are like.

File: american.jpg (137KB, 878x768px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 878x768px

SQUEAL LIKE A PIG

>>85460463
What are some other essential The weak should fear the strong core?

how do i become like burt reynolds?

>>85460859
Yes. I rape city boys who come into my neck of the woods every week. You had it coming.

File: 1451685112351.jpg (5KB, 190x153px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 190x153px

>>85460463
>mfw there's no scene where a hillbilly shoots them from underwater

>>85460849
>>85460849
>refused to give the good the bad and the ugly four stars when he first reviewed it because he thought spaghetti westerns couldn't be art
It deserves 3 at most because it's too slow. For A Few Dollars More is Leone's best. And every movies after that got slower and worse.

the fuck did the fat man just get raped?

>>85461314
Read Kaczynski