/hpg/ Harry Potter general

File: snape.gif (453KB, 490x207px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 490x207px

>fell in love with his oneitus when he was 10
>still in love with her 30 years later

is snape a virgin?

>>85398771
>implying he didn't rape schoolgirls and cast memory charms on them

>>85396553
Turned to shit after the 4th one

File: 1497754313243.jpg (512KB, 1620x2884px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1620x2884px

>>85398771
he was a masochist cuckold that watched over his ex-childhood love's husband's son and he also starred in easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>85396553
YEs.

File: 1406836064157.jpg (201KB, 1200x953px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1200x953px

The last franchise to be predominately white

File: biggie samalls.jpg (198KB, 796x566px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 796x566px

>>85400416
black could be anywhere

>>85400827
it was all a meme
I used to read quibbler magazine
fred, george and me up in the quidditch team
moving pictures on my wall
seems like everyday, snake attack, sleeping in the great hall
way back, when I had the red and gold robe and a hat
with a snitch to catch
remember second year, the flying car
whoever thought that two kids would take it that far
now I'm in the wand-light, that lumos tight
time to be afraid, making potion with some nightshade
born wizzer, opposite of a squibba
bertie bott's every flavour beans for dinner
peace to weasleys, seamus, hermoine
still wearing specs, still fucking ginny
still winning cups like you thought I would
same wand, phoenix feather holly wood
it's all good

the way that tom riddle revealed who he is was awful

chamber of secrets as a whole is such a mess compared to philosopher's stone and azkaban

Yes is do I love them even more than the books. All are good to great.

>>85399373
That's the most pleb statement there is. 5 saved the series from 4.

Deathly hallows pt1 is kino

The last three posts are from the same pleb drone that thinks Emma Watson is an actress