Was he the Zodiac?

>>85379292
Of course he fucking was

In the movie? Yes.
In real life? No.

>>85379355
>in real life? No.
Wrong.

He literally says he's not the Zodiac.

>>85379292
Bald head smooth to touch.

>>85379292
There was more than 1 person

>>85379396
Why are you trying to convince us that he's the Zodiac? Are you the real Zodiac?

>>85379292
They were able to obtain Zodiac's DNA from the envelopes from where he licked them.

He was conclusively ruled out via handwriting, fingerprints, and DNA analysis.

>>85379413
Wrong.

>>85379432
Look it up movie fag
It was 2 men working together

Also Darlene did not know Arthur Lee Allen, they never met, the movie just fabricated that whole part.

File: ShortRetard.webm (3MB, 1280x532px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x532px

>>85379390

No, it isn't wrong.

The movie is good because it changed things, if it was a pure parallel it would have been garbage.

>>85379292
Probably not but the director obviously had a chip on his shoulder against him.

>>85379633
the movie is based on a book and the author's pet theory was that Lee did it, people often accuse him of twisting the facts of the case to make it fit his conclussion, although I never read the book so I can't say for sure

>>85379691
This. Fincher is not basing the movie on reality, he's basing it on the book. Same thing with The Social Network.

>be random schoolteacher and former serviceman who dindu nuffin apart from molest a boy but whatever
>some deranged journo takes it upon himself to write a book showing how it really went down
>early next century a major film by acclaimed director featuring ensemble cast portrays the case and strongly implicates you in the killings - parades your visual likeness and namesake as the true identity of some serial killer
>the association will never be expunged from your memory and, in fact, it is the only noteworthy thing about you
J U S T

>>85379951
honestly I'd rather be remembered as the Zodiac killer than as a child molestor

File: IMG_9352.png (4MB, 2208x1242px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2208x1242px

NOBODY MOVE!

>>85379996
lol he sure got them good.

I wonder what the real Zodiac thought of the film.
Did he attend the premier?

if u acyual look in to it, the zodac is merely a gang of the unexpecte, graysmith himseldf, he drew zodiac witout ever seeing him??? identical drawing to the real pics online?? idk man put it to rest already.

>>85379458
Prove it