Dunkirk >Multi-narrative, non-linear story telling, beautifully

It's difficult living in a post-Dunkino world.

Everything just looks so...plebeian

the audience Dunkirk is aimed at is not the same as capeshit. Capeshit fan base are low on the IQ ladder and in fact probably never attended university. Dunkirk is aimed at non-brainlets.

>>85356760
It's almost like Snyder is a hack.

File: 1461275076182.jpg (86KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 500x500px

>Even at his most pedestrian or bombastic, Snyder makes a far more engaging film than Christopher Nolan ever did—because Nolan presumes to know and to show, whereas Snyder wants to see. Even his slender philosophical world seems like he’s discovering it, not delivering it.

>>85356918
WTF does this even mean? Snyder only makes capeshit. How can any capeshit, especially the shit he has done, be philosophical?

>>85356848
I would say Dunkirk would appeal to your average mechanical engineering student alright. It focuses on ideas rather than characters. You know who else focuses on ideas rather than human beings? Autistic people.

>>85357077
Did you even watch the movie? Superman was a threat to humanity and international order and accountable to no one

>>85356760
I haven't seen Dunkirk in the theaters but now that I know that Nolan is the director it will probably stay that way

File: destruction-of-krypton-man-of-steel.jpg (528KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 1920x800px

>>85356918
>discovering it
>not delivering it
Holy shit that's perfect. I've never been able to describe why Nolan puts me to sleep. It's really like your sitting through a business presentation being told things like you should understand them already. Snyder's films, and others like him, feel like you're along for the journey learning from what you're seeing and hearing; deciphering it for yourself. That's why there can be so much discussion about it, good and bad. With Nolan it's just there, cut and dried. With Snyder it's vague or open enough to carry meaning for anyone who infers and and for anyone who can discover meaning for themselves.

>>85356760

>Unironically liking Dunkirk

It's as if you've never seen anything but capeshit your whole life