http://collider.com/blade-runner-2049-running-time/
>>85273862
>2 and a half hours
>rated R
Jesus WB do you WANT this to bomb?
FILM CONFIRMED
FLICK-WATCHERS BTFO
FREE REFILLS ARE BACK ON THE MENU
>From the director of Prisoners
The most IMDB sensibility film made so far. Anybody who thinks that Prisoners is above mediocre is juvenile about the medium and entirely emblematic of the video game crossposter fueled downfall of this board.
Villeneuve is one of the biggest trashmasters working today, hack's hack. This is hot pocket: the movie. Cheeto dust: the flick.
IMDB "FILM BUFF" pleb fodder. If you like this film then you are an enemy of the medium.
>MUH BASED JAKE
>MUH BASED DEAKINS
>MUH DARK THRILLER
>MUH RELIGIOUS SYMBOLISM
All the memes are there, it's shit.
It looks like its gonna flop but Villeneuve hasn't failed yet so I don't know what to think
>>85273916
who cares if it bombs? would you actually want a blade runner 3?
Why do all movies have to be so fucking long these days? Classic movies from the 40s and 50s were super-tight 90-120 minute affairs with 0% bodyfat.
>>85273862
the cgi looks like shit in the trailers
>Opens with Goose confronting Bautista to start things off with an action scene
>Then see Goose in his workaday life, reintroduction to the World of Blade Runner
>Goose talks to Princess Bride about something
>Goose talks to Jared Leto, gets mission to find Deckard
>Goose looks for clues, travels to where Deckard is, talks to Deckard
>Plot revelations
>Action scene
>Narrative restarts
>Look for more clues
>Arrive somewhere, talk to someone
>Talk to someone else or reexamine clue
>Maybe a few more scenes with Jared Leto and Princess Bride
>Lead in to climax
>Climax
>Denouement
yeah this doesn't need to be 2 and a half hours. is it really going to be paced like the original? modern audiences will just get up and leave.
>>85274264