Dunkirk

>it's fine when the british do revisionism

>>85247257
Learn to use the catalog, dumbo.

>>85247345
this

>>85247345
Where is the revionism in that movie?

>>85247345
>make a movie about the british soldiers at dunkirk (NOT THE FRENCH ONES BECAUSE NOLAN KNOWS RETARDS DON'T LIKE READING)
>complain when half the air time isn't devoted to the frogs
>probably pissy about the little boats approaching so close to the shore

What are you on about, mate?

did the frog shoot the soldier and robbed his shit, lads?

>gets tangled in the chains and drowns

File: tfw no resistance gf.jpg (131KB, 634x866px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 634x866px

>>85248163
No he didn't

>>85247257
>Yup I think Nolan is back

Now tell me why mr critic, or is it just 2deep4me?

bongs will unironically defend this movie

File: faceZhabaFrogToadЖаба15001938093620.jpg (57KB, 639x450px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 639x450px

> frog
Hey, stop it!

File: 1500627276350.jpg (88KB, 600x875px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 600x875px

>get your ass kicked by the Nazis
>have to leave all your gear while you evacuate your troops with everything that floats
>Nazis kind enough not to massacre you on the beaches
>immediately start blaming the French
>make jokes about how they are cowards for getting defeated by the same enemy that defeated you
>claim an embarrassing defeat was actually a victory
>sit back and let daddy America win the war for you
>still lose your entire empire in the process
>continue to make propaganda about it three quarters of a century later

>>85248396
Back to /int/, Kraut.

>>85247257
It was boring