>original concepts and stories but horribly executed visuals,

>all made to sell toys.

TFA was an abomination.

Episodes 1-3 weren't great but they were at least watchable. I can't distinguish TFA from any of the MCU flicks.

>>85215341
Original Trilogy married both these things.Rogue One had neither but was at least fun for the last 40 mins.

I genuinely don't know how to feel about the prequels anymore, because conceptually they were just so much better than TFA but pretty much the only reason to rewatch them is their meme material and Ewan McGreggor.

>>85217989
>i only watch for the memes lamo
Neck yourself.

>>85215341
Second one is more in the wrong.

The prequels may be bad, but they were actually trying to be different in some way and tried out outlandish new concepts, environments, etc. and George actually cared about building the Star Wars universe with new ideas. He just wasn't good at it. TFA was made to make money and that's exactly what it did. People get it wrong though. They say it's a copy of the original Star Wars. Not exactly. What it is is a collection of re enactments of various iconic scenes from the entire OT. It does pretty much follow the same basic outline of events as the original, but like I said it borrows from the whole trilogy. I'd put a lot of money on betting TFA is at least 80% stolen scenes from the OT, and since it was made only to make money, you don't get the heart and soul you got from the OT, or even the prequels to a lesser extent. You just get the feeling that a lot of money was put into this and the people behind it were very excited about the money it was going to make.