So has he reviewed Dunkirk yet?
He's going to praise it. Armond loves war movies.
>>85203468
truly a man of taste
BEST REVIEWED MOVIES
— Z
— The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou
— Breathless
— In a Lonely Place
— Transamerica
— Zabriskie Point
— The Warui yatsu hodo yoku nemuru (The Bad Sleep Well)
— Odd Man Out
— Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
— The Lives of Others
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/armond-white/movies
>>85206241
WORST REVIEWED MOVIES
— Every Man for Himself (Sauve qui peut (la vie))
— Me and My Gal
— Goodbye Charlie
— I'm Here
— Will You Dance with Me?
— Akron
— I Can Do Bad All By Myself
— Caché
— Romance & Cigarettes
— Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds End
Tomorrow
>>85203468
someone else did "Dunkirk" in National Review
>>85206241
>— Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
>>85206241
>Enjoys Goddard and Kurosawa
He doesn't seems so bad at all
It takes a really dedicated contrarian to be born a White and then become black.
>>85206837
clearly a gould of taste
>>85207228
it takes a really big pleb to use the word contrarian and get triggered by opinions
no interest in listening to alt-right nigger.
>>85206270
it doesnt work like that, that kyle smith guy reviews movies and armond writes essays usually talking about more than one film. smith also wrote about homecoming (and liked it) then armond shit on it a week later
He's waiting until he sees the score and then does the opposite
the only time he'll go with it, is if SJWs cry about it
>>85206241
>truly a man of taste
>gives man of steel and BVS good reviews
Yeah no
>>85206262
>Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds End
Well I agree with him on that at the very least. I expected nothing and was still disappointed.
>>85203468
He's going to love it. Y'all think he's a contrarian but he's more like /pol/ the critic. If a movie has a progressive/numale/millennial message he comes up with reasons why it's a bad film, if he feels the film has a conservative message he comes up with reasons why it's a great movie.