>it says here you've gained 80lbs, anon

File: 1446807612300.jpg (138KB, 930x620px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 930x620px

>>85159019
>be me
>obese to the max
>doctor tells me not to eat carbs
>do it anyway

anyone else /mischievous/ here? the doc has no idea, right now he's theorizing that calories from different sources must not contribute the same amount to weight gain LMAO

File: 1500333457423.png (251KB, 1280x611px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1280x611px

>Sorry, I've got a really stressful job.

>>85159081
I don't think "mischievous" is the word you're looking for, anon.

So who comes on these threads? Fatties, fat haters, ex-landwhales or just curious anons?

Ex-landmass here.

>>85159662

Disgusted bystanders.

>tfw approaching 225

Fug

>>85159693
Fun?

>>85159761
>Fug
That's the spirit.

>>85159761
How tall are you?

>>85159832
exactly what i was going to ask

File: 1496191725507.png (543KB, 462x480px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 462x480px

>tfw your son wont give you pizza

>>85159662
I was shitposting whilst drunk, no idea somebody would respond. While it's true that fewer calories will generally lead to weight loss, it's actually ALSO true that weight loss does depend on the source of those calories. It turns out a carb-rich diet will leave you feeling hungrier, compared to a diet with an equal number of calories from vegetabels/fat sources.

I mean, "fewer calories" is a pretty solid rule to losing weight, but it's worth noting that there actually is some meaning to "different calories from different sources affect behavior."

I'm 140 lbs. and 6'1" btw

Just water fast you bastard

>>85159891
What the fuck was his problem?

File: 1495976601117.jpg (116KB, 1200x672px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1200x672px

>>85159081

>>85159921
>6'1"
>140
Greetings, fellow skeleton