Dunkirk

File: IMG_20170715_125018.jpg (18KB, 386x386px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 386x386px

>>85141588
>ratings from people who haven't seen the movie
Hmm....

>>85141588
OY VEY LOOK AT ALL DOSE WHITE MEN
DIS IS AN OUTRAGE

>>85141624
There have been pre-screenings nub. And Metacritic is obviously not what you're saying.

File: resident6-poster4.jpg (1MB, 2025x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2025x3000px

>>85141588
>88 dubs
what did op mean by this

File: 1500395970796.png (460KB, 667x660px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 667x660px

>>85141630

>>85141588
>Y'all
God fucking damn it i hate that

>>85141855
OOPS I DIDNT MAN TO HAVE THAT IMAGE THAT WAS FROM ANOTHER THREAD THAT I MADE AND NOW THAT IMAGE IS IN THIS REPLY??

WTF

File: 16 WWII Luftwaffe Manfred Boelcke German Military Actiion Figure.jpg (124KB, 671x1200px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 671x1200px

So will we actually see any Germans in this or is the entire movie just British soldiers crawling on the ground as Germans are shooting from above?

he did it, he actually fucking did it

>>85141885
People upset British soldiers in WW2 are mostly white men. Why are liberal extremists this stupid?

>>85141945
>So will we actually see any Germans in this

No.

>>85142003
Well they're liberals so that should be some indication

nah world war stuff has been done to death. just not my cup of tea so to speak.

>>85142070
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

No but I'm looking forward to actual cinema like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radegund_(film)

File: 45931168810460c061b7f4481caaeb58--war-of--colonial-america.jpg (60KB, 616x960px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 616x960px

>>85142003
SO U BE SAYIN
WE WUZN'T BONGS N SHEEEIT?

File: CODWWII-PC.png (117KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 500x600px

>>85142144
>nah world war stuff has been done to death
Well brace yourself for the end of the year because WW2 just got more interesting

>106 minutes
I am surprised Nolan made a movie so short. This makes me concerned that most of the movie will be just watching people escaping

>>85141588
YEEEE BOIIIEEE

MA NYUKKA CHRIS NOLAN

DIS MOVIE GUN REPRZNT ME N MUH PEEPS

>>85141711

That's IMBD. Literally all fan submitted.
The same website that got The Dark Knight as the Number 1 Best Movie of All Time

File: 1450918234770.png (28KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 200x200px

>>85144566
bye-bye box nood

File: amused.png (154KB, 364x428px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 364x428px

>>85141588
>Movies has no niggers
>No women
>Non-linear plot
>Complaints that lacks humor
Are SJW/Numales really retarded? How can they believe this is "valid criticism"?

>>85141588
has anything ever had higher rating on imdb?
yeah i know it will go down eventually

File: IMG_9469.jpg (35KB, 220x330px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 220x330px

>DUNKINO IS HERE TO STA-
C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER.... ER ... ER ... er.. er

File: machiavelli.jpg (6KB, 181x236px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 181x236px

>21 July in Canada
>mfw I get to see it later today in my 2nd world shithole

>>85144714
10BUX HE LIKES IT, TO SPITE THESE >>85144566

No because I'm not a tasteless redditor. You see the label 'Reddit' is thrown around here pretty casually but never has the hat fit as snugly as it does on Christopher Nolan's bloated head. The man is a living, breathing representation of everything wrong with the film* industry.

Everything the man touches seems intent on making stupid people feel smart. Every shot, cut and line of dialogue feels like a not-so-subtle nudge to make the intellectually stunted feel like they're in on some intricate evolution in the art of plot.

The sad truth is that Nolan is indeed a genius. Not a filmmaking genius, but a genius at pulling the wool over the eyes of the stupid, ignorant and uncultured swine that currently shovel money into the pigsties of Hollywood.

Christ have mercy on cinema's legacy if this man is to be inducted within its great halls.

*I shudder to use the word 'film' in the same paragraph as the name 'Nolan' but it is unavoidable in this case.

>no shoehorned minorities
>untouched by feminism
>presumably no quips
MOTY confirmed

File: 1480129304880.jpg (43KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 400x400px

>>85144792
>2017
>watching movies in theaters

I've seen the film already and I can say for sure this will be a future classic.

Patrician Tier

>>85141588
I max cost 40 bucks when will this gimmick die.

>>85144843
It's just 8 eurodollars I'm not going to avoid /tv/ for months then watch a shitty rip.

>>85144566
she deleted it like the cowardly racist pos she is

>>85144714
>>85144795
he will like it
I have no doubt

this movie sounds like Armond White: the movie

>>85141588
This sounds fucking great, first time I've been hyped for a movie in a while.

>>85145214
I don't care about the money, I can't fathom how people actually find it enjoyable to watch movies in theaters. I don't think I've had 1 enjoyable experience, at least not comparable to when I'm at home and watching the movies on my monitor.
>I'm not going to avoid /tv/ for months
threads won't last for too long, I usually just hide them as soon as I see them (for movies I want to see) and that's that.
>then watch a shitty rip
why watch a shitty rip? wait for 1080

why don't you guys think it will be good?

>>85145381
i like watching movies alone by myself with the theater almost empty
any time I've gone with friends or family I get completely annoyed because they're always making small chitchat during the movie or laughing obnoxiously

>>85141588
>WATCHING REVISIONIST TRASH

>>85145698
I never feel comfortable in the seats and there's always someone or something that breaks my immersion.

>>85145381
Why not? Because of the people?

I'm actually going to a showing supposedly for "film reviewers" or something so I think It'll be alright.

>>85145798
Partly because of people, yeah, see >>85145780

>>85145780
maybe u just have add
when the theater's practically empty with maybe 2-3 people besides me I've never had a problem focusing on the movie

File: Laughing Whore.jpg (214KB, 345x336px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 345x336px

>>85141624
>mfw the those 10/10's BvS had two weeks before the movie came out
>practically 100k posts on the 225k or so user reviews were made before the movie came out
lmao

User reviews are a mistake.

>>85141588
Yes. Only movie I'm really interested in seeing this year

Might as well fork over the academy awards over already.

>>85141945
Why do you care about such a miniscule detail?

>>85141588
ye gon see this shit in 70mm imax pretty excited tbqhwy family

>>85141671
the single rotten review is still a "C" rating which should technically be fresh.

>>85144589
First off no it doesn't. Best superhero movie maybe, but not best movie, that's still Shawshank. Secondly whats so wrong about fan ratings? It's a good contrast to critic ratings to give you an idea how a regular audience members might see it. And plus critics are also giving it super high scores so...

>>85144705
Before it came out? Very few I'd say. I can't actually think of anything that was that high with that many ratings. Even BvS with it's rabid 10 ratings spamming fanboys was only like 9.3 before release.

>>85145381
>I don't care about the money, I can't fathom how people actually find it enjoyable to watch movies in theaters. I don't think I've had 1 enjoyable experience, at least not comparable to when I'm at home and watching the movies on my monitor.
Maybe you're just an unpleasant person to be around?

>>85144799
You represent everything wrong with the bloated head of some movie-goers who think their being intellectuals when they're not even smart enough to realize their incredibly subjective and short-sighted view is seldom the general opinion of what is entertaining to most, and yet they think they can apply it as such.

>>85144843
This is the worst movie to be bringing that up, because the entire thing is shot in IMAX and it's a very visual movie. If there are any movies worth the ticket price it would be this one.

>>85145070
3D is a gimmick, 4DX is a gimmick...but if theres one thing I would say isn't a gimmick it's IMAX. The video and sound quality are actually far superior than regular when the movie is shot in it, and it's easily noticeable.

>>85145070
Where the heck do you live? It's 16$ here.

>>85145381
Watching a fully IMAX shot, visually emphasized, movie in shitty 1080p, what a fucking waste.

>>85145070
Stupid phoneposter.

>>85145560
They don't. It's mostly just memers and Nolan haters.

>>85145698
Get better movie-going friends who respect film and follow proper theater etiquette

>>85145780
Imax seats are pretty spacy

>>85148502
It's all 70mm, not all IMAX.

>>85145872
Pre-screenings and it's out in some markets. hurrrdurr

>hollywood shoehorning minorities and WOMYN STRONK YASKWEENSLAY into everything they can
>movie about straight white men featuring almost no women or minorities is the best of the year

Enjoy it while you can. Now that western armies are letting cunts into infantry you can expect every single piece of media featuring any modern day combatants to be chocked full of bitches (even though they'll be <<1% irl).
Thirty years from now it'll be 'Saving Private Riana' and 'Band of Siblings'.

>>85148853
kek

>PG-13 war movie
I'll pass

File: 1432813400219.png (35KB, 150x255px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 150x255px

>>85144566
>Fat nig nog with a five head
>military historian

File: Armond.png (547KB, 756x510px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 756x510px

But what does pic related think?

>>85148853

That's what I don't understand about this board's reaction to this film. Even though this board is committed to hating everything Nolan, you'd think they'd salivate over a film that doesn't shoehorn SJW agendas into the script to pander to that crowd. But I guess in the end /tv/'s contrarian tendencies win out over the racist ones. What a bunch of tryhards.

>>85149334
I have high hopes for Dunkirk but I just know there is going to be at least one major instance of guys getting killed by something that would've resulted in horrific gore IRL and it's going to look terrible in the movie.

>>85144714
he'll like it because it doesn't force nigs and women into it

File: 1495635614599.png (636KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 1136x640px

>>85141885
I cant believe this is true. Some of you fags must be astroturfing or something. Untill I see pics of real people protesting about it, I just cant.

>>85148739
>pre-screenings and a week BEFORE the world premiere in everywhere but US equal 100k people
lmao, look at the delusion on this retard

>>85148853
war movies tend not to give a shit

>>85154445
>current year + 2
>doesn't realize the retardedness normie liberal discourse

>>85142003
can you blame them based on the current demographics of london? theres so many shitskins, growing up there you'd think it wasnt historically white either

redpill me on 70mm

>>85155300
Bigger and better film allowing more detail to be captured. Better quality than 4k bluray.