DON'T MIND IF I DO!
This film was patrician
>>85132712
>hear everyone bitch about this sellout cringy shit
>watch the scene
>thats the entire point of the joke, that its cringy sell out shit and Al Pacino begs adam sandler to burn the footage
faggots
Who's fallen farther: Pacino or De Niro?
>>85132849
TRUE
AND THE DUNKACHINO SCENE IS LOWKEY GENIUS
what movie
EVERYONE WANTS MY DUNKACINO
>>85132900
>everyone
you mean RLM and there fans? it is pretty funny for RLM to say someone is a hack sellout and a loser who only makes the same thing
>>85132922
You tell me
>>85132712
how the mighty have fallen eh lads
>>85132900
Well, the thing is the whole movie is just a shitty cashgrab devoid of any grace, except maybe that scene, and also ironic product placement is still product placement.
>>85133318
>also ironic product placement is still product placement.
THATS THE GENIUS OF IT, YET THEY CANT GO OVERBOARD ON THE IRONY AND SHIT ON THE PRODUCT
CUE HIGH EFFORT CLEVERLY ORCHESTRATED MUSICAL NUMBER PLAYING ON CAPPUCCINO/AL PACINO META INSERTED INTO AN AD EXEC STORYLINE
LITERAL SANDLERKINO ONLY RLMPLEBS WILL DENY HIS BRILLIANCE
>>85134182
Kind of like RLM taking money from Disney? Face it, it's a funny scene and doesn't ruin Pacino's "legacy" or whatever pleb shit people were claiming at the time.
>>85134182
Yes showing the advertiser that paid for the movie is a bad thing. Why can't all movies be indie crowd funded films it's so easy just make Kickstarter and that's it hell you can even make a Patreon or two.
>>85132922
De Niro definitely, Pacino is still getting good work and he's in that Penn State movie or whatever coming up soon whereas De Niro hasn't had a decent flick since Silver Linings Playbook (not to mention starred in Dirty Grandpa).
Watching him just depresses me now, Pacino at least works well as a comedian.
>>85134431
What's sad is Pacino seems fried, but Deniro could have been giving great performances for the last 15-20 years if he gave a shit