[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

ITT: Marxistkino

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 528
Thread images: 117

File: zizekfilm.jpg (1MB, 1400x2100px) Image search: [Google]
zizekfilm.jpg
1MB, 1400x2100px
>>
>>85007887
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQJlvqeXrC8
>>
>>85007887
Is it good? The poster's good but I imagine it's shit
>>
>>85007916
It's basically just Zizek reviewing a bunch of random movies and the ideologies presented within them.
>>
File: Man_with_a_movie_camera.jpg (3MB, 1717x2667px) Image search: [Google]
Man_with_a_movie_camera.jpg
3MB, 1717x2667px
Literally pure kino
>>
File: dir_large_414.jpg (6KB, 152x210px) Image search: [Google]
dir_large_414.jpg
6KB, 152x210px
>>85007995
>Capitalists do movies
>Kiddie shit, westerns and bland love stories
>Commies do movies
>literally invent kino

what did they mean by this? Also, trump babbies might have co-opted Pepe but Dziga was literally Pepe 100 years agon.
>>
>>85008344
>>
File: image-original.png?1478101707.png (55KB, 240x285px) Image search: [Google]
image-original.png?1478101707.png
55KB, 240x285px
>>85008381
You sound mad cuckboy, maybe you should go watch some capitalist produced "cinema" like Iron Man Homecoming and leaving real kino to the actual revolutionary class
>>
File: 0109214273.jpg (21KB, 427x240px) Image search: [Google]
0109214273.jpg
21KB, 427x240px
The only marxistkino is any movie that murders all marxist pseudo-intellectuals and implements free market capitalism.

Marxists don't even believe humans have biological instincts, it's a delusional religion that belongs in the dustbin of history.
>>
>>85007944
>>85007916
but zizek is the most brainwashed ideological person around

is this documentary supposed to be a joke?

>>85008344
commies hate art and are unable to comprehend human nature, they make garbage, forgettable movies
commies need to be killed desu
>>
>>85008432
>capitalist produced "cinema"
like 99.9% of movies ever made ever?

what has authoritarianism and slavery(communism) produced except pure shite?

>revolutionary class
Marxists need to be gassed
>>
>>85008459

PURE
IDEOLOGY
>>
>>85008494
Sure, Zack Snyder the objectivist creates real cinema, commies create thrash! Keep believing that!
>>
Can someone explain to me why the cult of marxism still exists when it makes no sense and has failed so hard.
inb4 some asspained commie reverses the words
>>
>>85008530
>actually unironically being a marxist
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PURE IDEOLOGY AND PURE PSEUDOINTELLECTUALISM

Why do you people want to be poor and enslaved?
what a bunch of cucks
>>
File: anna-karina-vogue-01.jpg (1MB, 2373x2998px) Image search: [Google]
anna-karina-vogue-01.jpg
1MB, 2373x2998px
>>85008533
zack snyder will never have a wife as qt as this
>>
>>85008432
jesus fucking christ man you sound like an insufferable faggot
>>
I like Slavoj. When it's time, I'd like for him to be spared
>>
>>85008533
>Zack Snyder the objectivist creates real cinema, commies create thrash!
He's not an objectivist, his movies aren't that great, commie """"movies"""" are far far worse.

>>85008584
Nah, on the day of the helicopter, he'll be thrown out too.
>>
>when your ideology killed millions and collapsed everywhere it was tried but you convince yourself they weren't ideologically pure enough
Literally a cult
>>
>>85008601
Yeah libertarians are pretty nutty
>>
>>85008571
>Why do you people want to be poor and enslaved?

I do not want to be, that is why I support socialism
>>
File: tout-va-bien-jean-luc-godard.jpg (34KB, 606x470px) Image search: [Google]
tout-va-bien-jean-luc-godard.jpg
34KB, 606x470px
>>85008575
Neither will post 68 Godard
>>
File: 1486328908531.png (582KB, 1000x897px) Image search: [Google]
1486328908531.png
582KB, 1000x897px
What are some movies about free helicopter rides for pseudo-intellectual marxists that don't even believe in evolution or human instincts?
>>
>>85008344
>>85008432
Imagine being this jaded and supporting a system that collapsed worldwide over a quarter century ago.
>>
Daily reminder

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWqvaMEFIdI
>>
File: luis-bunuel.jpg (126KB, 421x526px) Image search: [Google]
luis-bunuel.jpg
126KB, 421x526px
>>85008581
>>85008600
What's the deal boys, your Netflix™ account isn't paid and you can't watch Avatar again?
>>
>>85008630
>projecting

>>85008637
That doesn't make any sense.
Why would you support a system that enslaves you and takes away your rights?
Why are you people so incredibly brainwashed?
Why don't you want to have a free market like Switzerland mostly has. They have the highest living standards in europe because they for the most part embrace free markets.

Socialism is slavery.
Socialists need to be killed.
>>
>>85008642
Scarface?
>>
>>85008459
"marxists don't believe humans have biological instincts"

what the fuck does this even mean. you've packed so much into your little quibble that its inane to even argue with you. have fun
>>
Why do commies still exist?
Is it the same reason scientologists still exist?

I mean how could you unironically deny human instincts and pretend human nature doesn't exist.
How could you deny science THIS MUCH!!
>>
>>85008713
>Socialism is slavery.
>Socialists need to be killed.

Jesus Christ how can one /pol/tard be this fucking stupid? Classcucked as fuck.
>>
>>85008755
imagine believing such a strawman

life would be so easy to be such a docile sheep
>>
>>85008741
>what the fuck does this even mean
Are common english words too difficult for the average marxist?
You people don't even accept human evolution.
Human neuroscience and the evolutionary instincts that created it exist and dictate human behavior.
You people pretend it doesn't exist and instead believe in pseudoscience called "dialectical materialism"?

Just kill yourself already you shit genetics low iq waste of life.
>>
File: image.jpg (121KB, 612x380px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
121KB, 612x380px
>there are people who are still unironically marxists and communists today
I will never understand this, 1989-1991 should have been enough of a wake-up call.

>>85008756
>classcucked
You're literally part of an economic class you dumb commie
>>
>>85008756
>>Socialism is slavery.
>>Socialists need to be killed.
TOP KEK
How is this contradictory whatsoever?

Yes I want to kill people that use violence to enslave me.
Absolutely.

>Classcucked
DUDE LOL, WHAT A KEK, WHY DOESN'T THIS GUY SUPPORT DICTATORS AND ECONOMIC SLAVERY
AHAHAHHAHA
Holy fuck you people live your entire lives wanting to be slaves.
I bet you believe surplus value exists as well
HAHAHAHAHAHHA
>>
>>85008774
except it's not a strawman, socialism and marxism is a cult and religion that makes no sense

it flies in the face of common sense
>>
File: Death_of_Inejiro_Asanuma (1).jpg (30KB, 456x351px) Image search: [Google]
Death_of_Inejiro_Asanuma (1).jpg
30KB, 456x351px
>SURPLUS VALUE IS REAL
>THE FACT THAT THE WORKING CLASS ALREADY CONSUMES 99% OF CONSUMER GOODS IS IRRELEVANT

AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

HOLY FUCK THESE DUMB MARXIST RETARDS

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>85008844
You are defending a system explicitly designed to exploit your labour and extract wealth from you. You are defending the parasitic millionaire class at the expense of fellow workers. You are 100% cuckolded.
>>
>>85008844
>hates being enslaved by the government and the economy
>supports a system wherein the government gets greater control over his life and wages
>>
>>85008808
no... its not a common english word to say "human biological instincts". in fact it is a very deep and expansive topic which is literally only currently at the forefront of actual science. we are still learning about these things these, they are not fully explored, discovered, known. the way you talk about neuroscience and instincts makes me believe that you "know" these things to be true.

but really we both know that you are an uneducated fuck who uses words they don't fully understand to argue about things that their little tiny lizard brain gets angry about.. you seriously sound so ridiculous i almost want to believe this is bait, but no one could be so fucking stupid.

telling me to kill myself is just sad, and your instant go-to insult being genetics and IQ shows me that you are very upset about your shitskin genetics and sub-100 IQ.
>>
>>85008869
"these entire disciplines of political philosophy are a cult and a religion" what the fuck are you even saying here bud. there are certainly portions of philosophies that aren't coherent. but to deny an entire philosophy? are you fucking simple?
>>
>>85008932
>You are defending a system explicitly designed to exploit your labour
LMAO
HOLY FUCK YOU STILL BELIEVE IN THE LTV

AHHAHA
How fucking stupid are you?

How are they exploiting my labour when me and my class consumes 99% of the end product of production?

We get what we produce because the working class consumes 99% of all consumer goods. No matter what wage rates are or what the level of inequality is.

>extract wealth
How are they extracting anything when if they gave me all of the profits of production and everyone in my class went to spend that money, prices would have to rise because the same exact level of consumer goods exists.

How would taking over the means of production magically create more consumer goods.
EXPLAIN THIS
Oh wait you CANNOT

>You are defending the parasitic millionaire class
Capital accumulation is what increases living standards for the working class.
Deal with it.

You are the biggest cuckold.
>>
>>85008965
>>supports a system wherein the government gets greater control over his life and wages
I don't though. I support a free market.
I hate central banking.
You support central banking, you cuck.

>>85008966
>no... its not a common english word to say "human biological instincts"
What?
Common people know what human instincts are.
Maybe marxist turds don't understand basic scientific principals, but the rest of society does.

>the way you talk about neuroscience and instincts makes me believe that you "know" these things to be true.
No shit.
Human instincts are commonly accepted fact.
Are we not animals?
Why do you leftist retards openly believe in pseudoscience?

>but really we both know that you are an uneducated fuck
You are probably a legitimate marxist. Holy fuck, you don't have a leg to stand on.
It's like a flat earther or scientologist is talking to me.

>that their little tiny lizard brain
Lizard brain yes.
NOW you're getting it.
Dialectical materialism is bullshit.

>telling me to kill myself is just sad
dude, just fall off a cliff
>>
File: C-Nu9-UUAAAskVt.png (656KB, 650x1350px) Image search: [Google]
C-Nu9-UUAAAskVt.png
656KB, 650x1350px
>>85009009
>but to deny an entire philosophy?
Like marxism?
Yeah, it's fucking bullshit from start to finish.
I mean you can either believe in human instincts or dialectical materialism.
There is nothing in between. They are polar opposites.
>>
File: 1498376532649.jpg (115KB, 750x663px) Image search: [Google]
1498376532649.jpg
115KB, 750x663px
When are we going to kill all of the marxists and central bankers and have a free market economy?
>>
File: pinker_headshot.jpg (25KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]
pinker_headshot.jpg
25KB, 600x400px
>tfw a marxist that smelled like literal feces walked by me
>>
>>85009117
care to explain what "human instincts" are, then? you seem to be unwilling to explain or elaborate. the rest of society does not all hold your view of human instincts, it wildly differs based on culture and religion you fucking wad. did you know that??

the way that you literal fucking shills talk and think is so filled up with nonsense, its amazing that you actually have coherent thoughts. really, I'm surprised you can even manage your fucking retarded convictions.

please explain the contra-indication between "human instincts" and "dialectical materialism" as you so put it.

also hey guess what i'm not a marxist, i've just studied philosophy in general and understand that the entire field can't be reduced to your worldview, lacking in nuance as it is.
>>
Karl Marx:
>never worked a day in his life
>shamelessly lived on handouts from his friend Engels (a factory owner lel)
>refused to work despite his children starving, some dying and his wife begging him to get a job
>championed a new system where """men""" like him would be top of the pile
Anyone buying this shit is a fucking retard
>>
>>85009344
i'm pretty sure ultimately if you ever actually read any of his works you would like them, especially his discussions on secularism and the state.

it truly is sad that you let your mind be clouded like this. truly, understand that there is nuance in this world.
>>
>>85009285
>care to explain what "human instincts" are, then?
Wait really?
You want me to explain commonly accepted scientific principals to you?
Okay I guess.

All humans have innate behavior hardwired in their brains that makes them feel and act in certain ways. Social stimuli can modify this, yes but the hardwired instincts do not change.

I mean the entire range of human emotions, like humor, sadness, hapiness, jealousy, fear, lust, love etc etc are all instincts.
Even the drive in most people to start a family and care for children is instinctual.

>the rest of society does not all hold your view of human instincts
lmao of course they do, it's only recently that a movement of SJWs came along to deny instincts.

You people are fucking creationists and it's embarrassing. I bet you don't even understand that the brain is a complex computer.

>it wildly differs
It differs, but not wildly. The same behaviors are observed in many cultures that never even came in contact with each other.
Man you people are dumb as rock.
You don't even accept science.

>the way that you literal fucking shills talk and think is so filled up with nonsense
The IRONY, you have no refutation.

>"human instincts" and "dialectical materialism" as you so put it
What? Even marxists would agree there is a debate between these two things.
DM basically states that all human action is the result of economic forces, this cannot be true is human action is the result of biological/instinctual forces can it?

>i've just studied philosophy
meaning you're probably a scientifically illiterate idiot
cultist
>>
>>85009436
>im pretty sure i can tell you what you read
>trying to change thecsubject because I can't refute what you wrote about Dear Leader
lel. I read the Manifesto retard. It made me hate you and yours.
>>
>>85009436
>i'm pretty sure ultimately if you ever actually read any of his works you would like them
Nobody likes him.

He believed in the labour theory of value which has since been debunked and mocked for it's stupidity.
He believed in dialectical materialism which has since been debunked and mocked for it's stupidity.

Marxism is so sad and when applied in real life it basically means authoritarianism and slavery.
No wonder it's dying.

Marxists should all be killed desu.
>>
ITT brainwashed shills can't touch concepts that are icky
>>
>>85009436
>>85009501
Just butting in here.
The manifesto isn't the core of marxism.
Das Kapital is.
Das Kapital is bullshit though and filled with circular logic.
There's a reason this fat satanist(I'm not religious, I'm just stating the facts) turd couldn't finish kapital vol 3.
So many people were criticizing his retarded theories and he couldn't refute the criticism so he spent the last 10 years of his life being a rich neet and "grown tired of economics".

He should have been killed when he was a baby.
>>
>>85009584
>can't touch concepts that are icky
like DM, LTV, classes, surplus value etc?

These were all touched on and debunked in this thread.
Get fucking killed you delusional commie turd.
I want to shove McDonalds™ down your throat as you suffocate and I fuck your mother.
>>
honestly its really funny to see you guys cloak yourself in nation, pride, and philosophy. i do hope it makes you feel better about yourself. just remember that no one will ever respect you intellectually unless they are also a yes-man just like you
>>
>>85009344
OURGUY
>>
What do you think zizek will die of?
I hope it's lung cancer or bone cancer.
But sadly it will probably be diabetes. :(
>>
>>85009681
>honestly its really funny to see you guys cloak yourself in nation, pride, and philosophy
I do this daily and have awesome friends and family and live a good life.

What has denying these things ever brought to people except slavery, depression and poverty?
Die commie scum
>>
i'd understand if you were angry at something that was more.. tangible. but this sort of anger or resistance at something so tenuous is literal mental illness.

seriously, there are plenty of people who don't believe that marxism and communism can ever be a truly realized political philosophy (myself included). and then there are people who literally make a cult of this. every criticism you level is simply a projection. not only are your criticisms a simple insight into what makes you afraid or insecure, they are also simply irrational criticisms or gripes. it reminds me of when i was a young child and angry at bullies, how someone lashes out at the thing they believe is holding them down while the whole time not realizing they have wings from the start.
>>
>>85009695
maybe he will die in his own feces

they'll find him and have to lift him out of his rented commieblok with a crane
>>
File: 711slavojzizek.jpg (104KB, 1152x768px) Image search: [Google]
711slavojzizek.jpg
104KB, 1152x768px
>Zizek
"In thish moment *sniff*, by means of pershonal feelings and sho on *swish*, I am in what Lacan would call the jouissance. But not becauje, you know, of any phony liberalism and totalitarianist ideology. Political, buddhism materialism and sho on. No, no *snort*... But becauje, you see, *swallows fly* of marxshist dialectic in the sense of the foucaultian genealogical method, *tugs shirt* there is this *sniff* enlightened shuffering that comes with tolerance, genocide, *unintentional voiced linguolabial trill* anti semitism, analogous to *wipes nose* some religious prophecy *sweats profusely* and sho on! *snort*"
>>
>>85008642
Pinochet died begging for his life to Margaret Thatcher. He was so pathetic they left him in his house and forgot about his body for three days before coming to fetch the corpse.
>>
>>85007995
That is poster kino of the highest degree
>>
>>85009737
there's no sense in denying these things. why deny nation, race, pride, espoused philosophy. I don't deny the things that I love about myself.

But i also don't seek out their antithesis in order to rile myself up, feed my anger addiction, and feel powerful. there are other ways to spend your time that are more fruitful.

truly, the saddest words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these: pol was right again. truly if all you do is berate people like this online you are doing a disservice to your countrymen.

its hard being a pirate and seeing all you cunts mess about, larping your commie-killing fantasies. if it came to it, you would piss your pants, hahaha
>>
>>85009798
>Pinochet died begging for his life to Margaret Thatcher
pinochet was honestly just another statist that barely did shit to free any markets
chile is still a statist shithole

he only liberalized a tiny bit and made it tolerable to live there

no wonder chile today is the best place to live in SA

People like me think he's based because he rightfully killed marxists.
He did a great job doing that honestly.
>>
>>85009859
>larping your commie-killing fantasies
Nobody is larping here, if push came to shove, commies and leftists would be 6 feet under in america

>you would piss your pants
Why do all of the right wingers have proven gun reserves and constantly train and use them, while leftists are fucking vaginas with no guns?
post those "exception" pictures though, they are pretty hilarious
>>
ITT: burger kids late at saturday night and 1-2 Euros that have woken up early
>>
>>85009941
so?
what is your point?
>>
File: 1480403270375.jpg (54KB, 449x491px) Image search: [Google]
1480403270375.jpg
54KB, 449x491px
>>85009938
>leftists are fucking vaginas with no guns?
Liberals perhaps but not actual leftists.
>>
ITT big strong american MEN who wouldn't think TWICE about killing some god damn commies

FUCK human dignity
FUCK the sanctity of life
FUCK commies

hey guise do i fit in now? do i have friends now?
>>
File: capitalism.png (90KB, 856x1382px) Image search: [Google]
capitalism.png
90KB, 856x1382px
>>
sometimes i think about moving to europe but then i remember guys like marx who shit up the entire continent
>>
>>85010034
no, actual leftists in the world today have very little guns compared to right wingers

>m-muh gorilla bowel movements

marxism is nearly dead

>>85010036
>FUCK human dignity
>FUCK the sanctity of life
>FUCK commies
Wait what?
I support human dignity and human rights.
That's why I support killing commies to defend those rights.
Commies are not human beings.
>>
>>85008659
waaaah producks is bad ™ ™
> posted from his kapitalist appliance
everythan shude b free
from each according to what I say
to each according to what I say lol
socialesmus ™™™ xD
>>
File: image.jpg (433KB, 640x1212px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
433KB, 640x1212px
>>85010040
>implying anybody but ancaps thinks capitalism is infalliable
>commies so unoriginal they have to steal an older meme instead of making their own
>>
>>85010108
All those guns and you still haven't done shit. Sad.
>>
File: cuckitalism.jpg (199KB, 1356x760px) Image search: [Google]
cuckitalism.jpg
199KB, 1356x760px
>>
>>85010108
some human beings are not human beings, by dint of (as shown in this thread) mere disagreement that entire political philosophies are trash. but you support human dignity and human rights.

sounds coherent.
>>
>>85010040
Pinketons did NOTHING WRONG and frick and Carnegie contributed to raising living standards for the working class through the gilded age

>leopold 2
>anything close to free market
lmao no

>shah
>anything close to free market
lmao no

>pinochet
>anything close to free market
he liberalized the economy slightly which dramatically raised living standards for chilians
also the people he killed were NOT innocent, they were marxists funded by the KGB that wanted to turn chile into a place worse than cuba
>>
>>85010166
What the fuck is this even trying to say?
Leftypol memes are the worst.
>>
File: socialismneverworked.png (102KB, 793x2500px) Image search: [Google]
socialismneverworked.png
102KB, 793x2500px
>>
>>85010162
look at all leftypol
they can only copy memes and never make their own shit

>>85010164
patience

>>85010166
lmao kill yourself leftypol, you are unable to refute the surplus value arguments in this thread
are you honestly going to start spamming images?
I can play that game too senpai.
>>
File: 1499581898147.jpg (102KB, 595x420px) Image search: [Google]
1499581898147.jpg
102KB, 595x420px
Marxism is stupid

National socialism is the true way forward for mankind.
>>
>>85010166
>meanwhile leftists think they are entitled to the money of other people and want the government to take more from the paychecks of actual workers to support their shitty programs
>>
>>85010208
you do not think that your boss is entitled to your wife because he gives you the job you use to support here. so why do you think he is entitled to the product of your work that he gives you the means to create?

admittedly its a ridiculous meme, but that is what it is implying.
>>
>>85010199
>Real capitalism has never been tried
>>
File: image.jpg (138KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
138KB, 1024x680px
>>85010248
>Hugo Chavez
You serious nigger?
>>
File: 190238476090942.jpg (55KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]
190238476090942.jpg
55KB, 512x512px
>>85010248
literally every single one of those people impoverished their people and needed to be killed

>>85010272
>you do not think that your boss is entitled to your wife because he gives you the job you use to support here. so why do you think he is entitled to the product of your work that he gives you the means to create?
This was ALREADY REFUTED HERE:
>>85008891
>>85009036

Actually attempt to refute arguments about LTV or just kill yourself.
>>
i don't understand, if you are an actual nazi and think this is the way it should be, why don't you start a nazi party in america? surely the people would wake up and support you, because they share your beliefs, right?

right??

lol, instead you post about it in fear online, because you know that you cannot truly make a coherent political argument that would be acceptable. and this is no fault of yours, only the cucked populace.
>>
>>85010272
Because I fucking work for him and he pays me for the work in a voluntary exchange, jesus christ have commies ever worked a real job before?

>meanwhile these idiots want me to pay even more out of my paycheck for their shitty social programs that will collapse within the next few decades
>>
>>85010314
How is this a refutation? I dont see the connection
>>
>>85010274
capitalism has been tried for centuries according to your retarded definitions

We don't necessarily support "capitalism" in the same way we don't necessarily support "breathing".
We support free market capitalism, nothing else.
If a country has a tiny amount of market activity and some business people yet it's a dictatorship that highly restricts economic freedom, then we obviously do not support that and the vast majority of people do not support that.
According to your insane definition, north korea and the USSR are capitalism because they still had some private control over the means of production.

It's so easy to take your strawman stick from you.
>>
>>85008648
That wasn't real communism
>>
>>85010382
>voluntary exchange

kek. KEK.

There is nothing voluntary about work for the vast majority of people.
>>
i have a question for all you free market capitalists:

what would you do if water wasn't cheap. what would you do if some commodities necessary for life raise beyond the means of the lower classes to purchase them? do you simply believe this could never happen?
>>
>>85010440
just off yourself
>>
>>85010389
Okay, I'll type it out again.

The working class already consume the end product of their labour.
99% of consumer goods are bought and consumed by the working class

How is it possible to get anything more than 99%?
If the working class seized the means of production and this profit and "surplus value" was given to the workers instead of the capitalist, it would simply cause prices to dramatically skyrocket and the working class would be in the same exact position they were before.
Why, because the same exact amount of consumer goods will be produced. Like I said, they are already consuming 99%.
There's a tiny amount of capitalists and almost all of them simply save their money, which LOWERS the cost of capital and consumer goods.

Try to debunk this while I go get beer and come back in 30 mins.
>>
>>85010451
If you're some retard who flips burgers maybe
>>
Holy fuck, politics again? Could you really stop it? Don't bring this on /tv/, fuckers. After Trump's elections it's unbearable
>>
>>85010397
>We support free market capitalism, nothing else.

>My specific, perfect, entirely infallible brand of capitalism has never been tried
>>
>>85010451
>DUDE WE CAN ALL MAGICALLY BE RICH IF WE TOOK ALL OF THE BOSSES MONEY

NO, you won't.
You literally will not.
See:
>>85010491
>>
>>85010466
if it were expensive, it would probably be due to an actual shortage
I dunno how your retarded ideology of enslavement and handouts would somehow produce more water
oh wait, you'd probably have some peons die from dehydration so you could pretend the numbers are up

how is this shite ideology still alive
fucking middle class edgelord faggots is why
>>
Thread was actually going good before the autistic capitalists showed up and tried to divert the discussion to them instead of making their own thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqZJrC-4Eng
>>
>>85010504
Free markets by definition are not government activity like war or forced starvation.
There are a few examples of "mostly" free markets in history and they resulted in a massive increase in living standards for the working class and PEACE.
The biggest one would be the gilded age in america. It was the greatest increase in human living standards up to that date.
USA had the highest living standards on earth thanks to their mostly free markets and free banking.
>>
>>85010532
good job not answering the question at all, lmao.

"it would be due to an actual shortage!"

ok well then tell me when telecoms companies charge like 2$/GB of overage when that is nowhere near the cost to generate that bandwidth. my point is that it doesn't take scarcity for goods to be overvalued.

fuck, look at the canadian housing market. million dollar crack shacks in vancouver bud.

what do you do when the middle class can no longer afford homes??
>>
File: 1350829384756.jpg (94KB, 650x978px) Image search: [Google]
1350829384756.jpg
94KB, 650x978px
>>85010549
>autistic capitalists
Why do you literal turds project so hard?
It's fucking hilarious that you actually believe this pseudoscience and are unable to refute it.
>>
>>85010549
marxist cucks are masters of self-delusion
it was never going well for you ITT
everyone hates you snotty spoiled brat fucks with your gay anachronistic "revolution"-talk
fuck off
>>
>>85010583
If you want to talk about capitalist movies make your own thread.
>>
>>85010491
So either way the result is the same but on capitalism you have a group of rich outliers? Why do you like this then?
>>
>>85010549
>FUCKING CAPITALISTS REEEEE
It's like Glasnost and Perestroika, as soon as someone debunks you guys in your thread you sperg out and the whole thing collapses like the Soviet Union lel
>>
>>85010569
>telecoms
oh wait
you instantly go to the one that is controlled by patents and government regulation that cause artificial scarcity instead of actual market based goods like technology or food

tell me how socialism will magically give more bread and food to the working class anon?

>fuck, look at the canadian housing market. million dollar crack shacks in vancouver bud.
Thanks to CENTRAL BANKS that YOU SUPPORT you brainwashed fucking idiot.
Holy shit where do you think the money the government creates ends up in, primarily the housing market.
>>
File: brother laughing.gif (2MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]
brother laughing.gif
2MB, 400x225px
>there are people on this board that are unironically communists
>>
>>85010588
honestly, the way your criticisms mirror your convictions is truly astounding. what a marvel of human nature.
>>
>>85010569
who cares about the housing market if private property is verboten
>>
>>85010640
I'm from an ex-soviet country you peon marxist cuck
you come here, I crush you
fucking pseudointellectual effeminate Stalinist bitch
>>
File: 1487716679298.jpg (71KB, 680x454px) Image search: [Google]
1487716679298.jpg
71KB, 680x454px
>>85010561
>gilded age
>>
>>85010631
alright, if we can get back to my original point here, that scarcity is not required for goods to be overvalued, i will demonstrate explicitly what my argument is:

how can you stop someone who owns some capital from overvaluing it? if the market is truly free, then would there not be collusion to raise the prices of certain capital, for which the lack of scarcity is the actual impetus to increase the price? i.e. what do you do about greed, my friend.
>>
>>85010696
i love that your words are so clearly mental masturbation. truly fascinating. if only it were so easy for everyone to mentally jerk themselves off.
>>
>>85010710
i live in a middle class bubble: the post
>>
>>85010710
But Anon if he lived back then he would totally be a factory owner with tons of wealth! He definitely wouldn't lose his arms in a factory at age 6 before dying on the streets!
>>
>>85010746
I hope you get assraped at a labor camp school boy
>>
>>85010778
oh yeah, you do eh? are you close? are you right on the edge?? call me a stalinist cuck one more time and ur gonna burst eh
>>
>>85010710
Meanwhile commies are fine with the same shit happening in Holodomor with millions dying
>>
File: Flexile Sentry.jpg (15KB, 236x285px) Image search: [Google]
Flexile Sentry.jpg
15KB, 236x285px
>>85010248
>Chavez
That's working out reeeeaaaall well.
>>
>>85010795
fucking weirdo
how the hell do you get THIS washed out from studying for a fake degree in cuckoldry
>>
Equal distribution now. Raise inheritance tax. Kill the lackeys supporting their masters.
Do you feel content with the breadcrumbs your master throws, you little cucks?
>>
>>85010843
>>
>>85010833
the best part is that i'm already finished my second degree which is in stem

yeah i'm a fucking wierdo though, not the guy getting really into posting vitriolic personal insults on a basket weaving forum.
>>
>>85010810
>Holodomor
First off, nice meme. Second, you're comparing a supposed famine to child labor, not really "same shit" as you put it, unless you're a retard of course.
>>
>>85010248
I just noticed they put Tito and the Reagan Administration in the same thing despite Tito dying before Reagan ever took office and Yugoslavia collapsing due to ethnic tensions in place from centuries of conflicts (not to mention Tito ponied up to both eastern and western powers).
Holy shit whoever made this must have just gotten their history from leftypol or something.
>>
>>85010888
>nice meme
Not an argument

Also I'd say millions dying from forced labor from communist rule is worse than some kids working in factories
>>
File: 1499869156530.gif (613KB, 498x498px) Image search: [Google]
1499869156530.gif
613KB, 498x498px
>>85007887
You don't see libcucks crying about /pol/ in a thread about marxism (mental retardation). hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>
File: 1497465762435.jpg (53KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]
1497465762435.jpg
53KB, 750x500px
>>85010268
porkies literally aren't people so we're entitled to all of their shit
>>
>>85010843
>he said as he flipped another burger on the grill, seething in rage while preparing to make Fight For $15 posters at home while his wife bangs Jamal with his blessing
>>
>>85010970
lel good luck trying to take any of it
>>
File: Che-guevara.jpg (473KB, 692x948px) Image search: [Google]
Che-guevara.jpg
473KB, 692x948px
>>85010986
His mind can't even comprehend someone acting against his immediate self interest
>>
>>85010878
no qualms talking shit to marxists
I fully despise you
>>
>>85010926
>Not an argument
Neither is "muh holdomor"
>>
>>85010598
are there any commie movies that aren't piles of shit?

>>85010601
>but on capitalism
But with capitalism there is ACTUAL economic growth and not poverty and stagnation.

>Why do you like this then?
Why do you like being told what to do?
Why do you like central banking?
Why do you like not being able to retire?
>>
>>85011039
Man I'm not even a Marxist I just like to argue naively against you fucks because it's so important to you. How does it feel to be hostile towards anyone who disagrees? Must be lonely. I pity you.
>>
File: 1495300700561.jpg (56KB, 546x640px) Image search: [Google]
1495300700561.jpg
56KB, 546x640px
>>85011057
this
>>
>>85010970
I'm a "porkie" (actually majored in something useful in college worked hard for my career) and I promise you if I so much a smell you or your unwashed dirtrag friends on my property I will rain down holy hell on you and every one you care about. You sniveling little shit.
>>
File: image.jpg (29KB, 305x365px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
29KB, 305x365px
>>85011024
JUST
>>
>>85011102
You can just tell the person who made this pic has never been to an eastern european country actually affected by this shit.
Even the fucking Chinese knew when to admit their retarded collectivization programs didn't work when they killed millions of people.
>>
>>85011111
>What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

That's how pathetic you sound right now, lol.
>>
>>85011102
>they didn't kill them on purpose!
>they killed them by accident!
oh so much better then
>>
File: Sao-Paulo-Tuca-Viera-1.jpg (936KB, 2802x1868px) Image search: [Google]
Sao-Paulo-Tuca-Viera-1.jpg
936KB, 2802x1868px
>>85011069
>But with capitalism there is ACTUAL economic growth and not poverty and stagnation.
Oh, so you accept a ruling class and extreme wealth discrepancies because "there is actual economic growth" ?
You do realize how vague that is?
>>
>>85010718
>how can you stop someone who owns some capital from overvaluing it
market competition

there is more than one seller
if there isn't at any time, it just creates a MASSIVE profit opportunity for someone to compete with the other firm and sell cheaper

>then would there not be collusion to raise the prices of certain capital
This was actually tried countless times in the past(gilded age etc) but these firms always broke up because someone would always break the monopoly, the temptation is too huge, even if nobody broke the monopoly, it creates a massive financial incentive for another firm to be created that will break the monopoly
understand?

>what do you do about greed, my friend.
greed is good in a free market
greed is bad with government

>>85010710
>MUH CHILD LABOUR
Oh fuck I LOVE this argument.
Here we go.
Child labor was a fact of human history for millennia long before the gilded age.
Children simply had to work. There wasn't enough resources to have them not working.
It was actually the gilded age and massive increases in economic production that resulted in children not having to work as much.
Year by year living standards increase to the point child labour wason it's way out long before the government stepped in with it's dumb laws.
When third world countries implement dumb anti-child labor laws, the children either starve to death or go into prostitution.
Is this what you want?
>>
File: 1470185671273.jpg (40KB, 600x407px) Image search: [Google]
1470185671273.jpg
40KB, 600x407px
>>85011188
How dare you question almighty capitalism, back to your cage commie scum!
>>
>>85011111
nice quads porkbro
>>
File: very sensible chuckle.gif (1MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]
very sensible chuckle.gif
1MB, 250x250px
itt: commies getting btfo
>>
>>85010843
>Equal distribution now
WOW
Do you honestly want to get an equal share of nothing?
Guess what you get, nothing.
Money does not equal consumer goods you fucking tool.

>>85010872
Please explain why this is relevant and how taking this wealth will help anyone?
This is going to be hilarious.
>>
>>85011188
>posts picture of a country ruled by socialists for the past 15 years
>"capitalism"
Reminder Lula just got sentenced to a decade in prison
>>
>>85011220
Work hard my friend! You can too become rich! it's only a matter of effort! Everyone has the same opportunities!
>>
File: 1349829474556.jpg (24KB, 694x535px) Image search: [Google]
1349829474556.jpg
24KB, 694x535px
>>85010888
>supposed famine
Why do commies even exist?
holy fuck
>>
>>85009859
>the utter faggotry behind this post
>>
>>85011249
This is literally true in the United States. If you aren't successful it's because you're either stupid or lazy or both.
>>
>>85011087
>how does it feel?
feels high-T
and you're not arguing. that little masturbation pep-talk was the height of your intellectual capacity even WITH the fake STEM degrees.
I've seen your faggy trolling style before. the fact that people still do that is pitiful.
>>
>>85011102
The person who made this has shitty genetics and is a useful idiot.
These people actually want to be enslaved LMAO
>>
>>85011213
>It was actually the gilded age and massive increases in economic production that resulted in children not having to work
It was actually those filthy leftists who fought for anti-child labor laws along with things like the 8 hour work day. Fun note i feel like throwing out just for the hell of it, the "gilded age" term was coined by a socialist
>>
>>85011303
>The person who made this has shitty genetics and is a useful idiot.
What did he mean by this?
>>
>>85011249
>this is the mindset of commies
Jesus I'm glad I was raised in a decent family and built up my work skills instead of whining about richfags on a japanese imageboard
>>
>>85011268
You're right, i should have said supposed man-made* famine
>>
>>85011328
The best course of action for people with bad genetics would be to support communism.
In other words, crab mentality.
>>
File: 1491781634327.png (221KB, 793x794px) Image search: [Google]
1491781634327.png
221KB, 793x794px
>>85010970
>porkies literally aren't people
Oh look the literal non human communist turd is trying to talk.

>>85011188
>Oh, so you accept a ruling class
No, I don't give a shit about "classes".

>extreme wealth discrepancies
WAIT LOL
YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE TAKING THEIR MONEY WILL SOMEHOW MAGICALLY ALLOW YOU TO BUY MORE CONSUMER GOODS

The working class already consumes 99% of all consumer goods.

Also why are you posting a picture of a shitty country with very little economic freedom?
>>
>>85011242
You really doubt the superiority of a society without extreme inequality?
>>
>>85011325
You realize anti-child labor laws were put in place because of union appeasment and at the time of their passage child labor had gone massively out of fashion?
Of course you didn't because you're a leftist retard who recycles the same talking points over and over again without using your pathetic drug addled brain once
>>
Is there anything more pathetic than admitting you can't provide for your family and needing no to steal someone else's money in order to do so?
Fucking sad
>>
File: 1490743829973.jpg (45KB, 540x538px) Image search: [Google]
1490743829973.jpg
45KB, 540x538px
>>85010639
>It is illegal to kill communists

And I still don't see why.
>>
>>85010888
>supposed famine
Those millions were abducted by aliens anon!
>>
File: 1480622409669.jpg (627KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]
1480622409669.jpg
627KB, 1000x750px
>>85011240
They get BTFO every single day of their pathetic lives.

>>85011325
>It was actually those filthy leftists who fought for anti-child labor laws
AHHAHAHAHHA
BULLSHIT
You retarded fucking faggot.
Adults had MORE MONEY and prices were coming down like crazy.
Children had to work less and less thanks to economic production.

Do you honestly believe that passing a law 500 years ago would have abolished child labour?
I just fucking told you in the past 20 years or so children have starved to death.
Why do you not have an argument?

The gilded age was the height of american capitalism and it was fucking glorious.

We need the same laws we had back then now.
We would probably have a 20 hour workweek and extremely high living standards.

>>85011328
He's making fun of you.
>>
File: 1494581714860.jpg (240KB, 734x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1494581714860.jpg
240KB, 734x1000px
>>85011375
>appeasment
You're right, capitalists are known for being scared of revolution so from time to time they'll give into certain demands in order to hold power (pic related) if the pressure is strong enough, which it was at the time, hence why as you say it was "out of fashion" but certainly not for the capitalists. If i wanted only reform i'd be a soc-dem.
>>
>>85011443
>making fun of you
It's my first post ITT, man, why would he? I just really didn't understand
>>
>>85011353
But it's not supposed.
It actually happened.
Why are you such a drooling cuck that actually desires his own enslavement? lol

>>85011366
Inequality is irrelevant.
Inequality can mean there is real capital accumulation which is a good thing.
It can also mean massive central banker corporatism which the entire world currently lives under.

Inequality from a free market is what we desire, not inequality that is caused by creating money and giving it to already rich people for doing literally nothing.
>>
>>85011518
>desires his own enslavement
I'm not the one who is class-cucked tho
>>
File: 1491805709364.jpg (14KB, 373x373px) Image search: [Google]
1491805709364.jpg
14KB, 373x373px
>>85011480
Nobody cares.
Socialists need to suffocate.
They need to drown in boiling acid.
They and the central bankers will succumb to this fate.
>>
>>85011480
Yeah, now you're just a re-tard who thinks he's going to overthrow the government and implement the same system that failed throughout the 20th century to the point of collapsing entirely worldwide by 1989.
>>
>>85011365
NO! I dont need more worthless consumer goods. This progress-driven consume-more mindset is rotten.
You are so deep in the shit you can't even understand in the slightest
>>
>>85011551
(You)
>>
File: 1485104464687.png (120KB, 644x598px) Image search: [Google]
1485104464687.png
120KB, 644x598px
>>85011534
>class-cucked
lmao
we've been mocking this shit the entire thread
I can't believe you statist cumlickers even exist

Lets see, I can either be totally enslaved while the state controls every aspect of my life, controls all production and kills me if I step out of line or try to have "fun".

OR

I can live in a society where I have freedom of speech, freedom to own property and enter into contracts, a society where there are millions of different people that own different aspects of the means of production and in order for them to survive they have to bend to MY WILL, the dictatorship of the consumertariat.

Guess which one is the cucked one.

Gas yourself comcuck
>>
File: 1472838100492.png (201KB, 317x275px) Image search: [Google]
1472838100492.png
201KB, 317x275px
Post yfw commies get BTFO
>>
>>85011653
>Guess which one is the cucked one.
The one that you willingly bend over for a boss to fuck you up the ass, no lube?
>>
>>85011619
>NO! I dont need more worthless consumer goods.
You don't need more housing, clothing, food, medicine, technology and porn?

Alright then, if you want to die or whatever, that's your problem.

>This progress-driven consume-more mindset is rotten.
The consume now, save never ideology in USA is SOLELY the result of central banking and keynesianism.
Americans used to save their money and were financially well off before central bankers gained massive amounts of power and used that power.

>>85011655
They can't refute ANYTHING in this thread lmao
>>
>>85011697
>The one that you willingly bend over for a boss
Meanwhile you support unwillingly being beaten, enslaved, not being allowed to think or do anything you want to do?
It seems you have weird sexual fetishes anon.

>muh boss
How is he fucking me? If the working class took his money nobody would even be better off.
If the firm was owned by the "muh working class" it would be the same shit.
Also I don't have to work for a boss.
Also the boss has to compete for workers or the workers will go to another firm so the boss has to provide a good working environment.

HAHAHAHA What a dumb cuck you are.
>>
File: 1498340847726.jpg (131KB, 813x1058px) Image search: [Google]
1498340847726.jpg
131KB, 813x1058px
Can't we just slit every marxist's throat, kill all the central bankers, mass produce capital and resources then live a life of luxury?
>>
>>85011769
I have a strong suspicion your genious train of thought (working class consumes 99% of all consumer goods etc etc) is paper thin but i dont want to spent time and effort refuting it.
Meanwhile, your extreme butthurt is very telling both about your cognitive abilities and current state of mind under capitalism
>>
>>85011871
>I have a strong suspicion your genious train of thought
wow genius, are all marxists this bad at spelling?
fucking retard

>is paper thin
How is a solid fact that cannot be refuted which contradict marxist pseudoscience "paper thin"?

>but i dont want to spent time and effort refuting it.
Because you have no argument desu.

>Meanwhile, your extreme butthurt
AHAHAHAHAHA
This entire thread has been post after post of you people getting shit on and rekt with logical arguments.
Seek help.

>current state of mind under capitalism
Yes because the "mode of production" magically changes my behavior completely and genetics/instincts has nothing to do with it.
Great pseudoscience.
>>
File: 1478616477920.jpg (64KB, 798x770px) Image search: [Google]
1478616477920.jpg
64KB, 798x770px
>>85011111
>worked hard for my career
>>
Communism should only have currency in the third world, and even there it probably will hurt more than it will help, if you're a communist in the first world you're a pure bourgeois larper.
>>
>>85010152
>>85008521
>much you use tools made by capitalism
never heard this unique and original argument before. pic related
>>85012895
t. doesn't know the definition of bourgeois
>>
>>85012544
he did work hard for it and makes more money than you

he also got quints

what have you ever done?
>>
File: 1461475396579.jpg (101KB, 1200x927px) Image search: [Google]
1461475396579.jpg
101KB, 1200x927px
>>85011655
>>
>>85013019
America is not a meritocracy, and no one should think it is. There exists no tie to the intelligence of work done or the amount of it that guarantees success. Rather to be rich depends more on either being born into it, or being exceptionally good at exploiting others so one may take the bulk of the proceeds for themselves. This is the magic formula for wealth in this ever so “exceptional” land – exploit, exploit, exploit.

Inheritance& exploitation is how the rich get rich. To understand the exploitation aspect takes some understanding of how the rich function. Next to none of the super rich become that way solely by meritocracy. Their income is created through complex webs of utilizing leverage usually to extract some form of passive income. They are the rentier class or con artists, or both.

You only have to look at what the rich are dabbling in.

take Bill Gates, who did some programming for a few years, poorly, and became rich by landing a series of deals with IBM initially, and then by passively making money off the share values of Microsoft. The late Steve Jobs may have been one of the more hands-on billionaires, but even herequiredthousands of enslaved asian handsto extract the kind profits Apple was able to make.

Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson almost certainlyhasorganized crime links, as if owning a casino wasn’t enough of a con to begin with.

Rich DeVos became a billionaire by running a pyramid scheme most are familiar with called Amway.
The Walton family, owners of Wal-Mart, pays a median wage of 10 bucks an hour (far below a living wage), they strong arm vendors, and also rely on products made with working conditions that resemble old world slavery, while having more wealth than the bottom 40% of Americans.

There’s just no way to make that kind of money without having a major market advantage and then profiteering off it. Lie, cajole, coerce, manipulate, bribe, rig, and hustle. These are the tools of the rich.
>>
>>85013013
>le stages of history meme
people laugh at this bullshit
why is socialism the "next stage" of history?
what evidence does marx have to provide for this?
nothing
in fact people resisted socialism and it collapsed

why was the transformation from feudalism to modern democracy so seemless?

Why are you commie tools still breathing?
You couldn't refute any of the arguments in this thread and are still here.
Why are you still here?
Get gassed.
>>
File: 1248912875129.gif (2MB, 460x259px) Image search: [Google]
1248912875129.gif
2MB, 460x259px
>>85008494
>commies hate art
Aren't a lot of artists communists?
>>
>>85013072
>get btfo when he bitches about "YOU USE THINGS MADE BY CAPITALISM"
>sets up a strawman because he is internally triggered and uses it as an argument
get fucked /pol/
>>
>>85013013
>shitty facebook memes
so this is the power of modern marxism
>>
blacked.com
>>
>>85013105
>>85013130
so these are the arguments of the right
>>
File: 1487791428606.jpg (70KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]
1487791428606.jpg
70KB, 720x960px
STOP; before you reply: DON'T
this is a communist cultist spam thread, low quality content that is spammed on the board for easy (You)s. The content of this thread also belongs on another board (/leftypol/)
The best option is to not reply but if you absolutely can't keep your retarded opinion to yourself remember to ensure all your posts are high quality and more importantly saged.
otherwise just report and ignore and continue browsing.
>>
>>85013099
>People that hate communism are /pol/
Fucking kek, kys University student champagne socialist
>>
>>85013099
>"haha everyone says that"
>getting btfo
saying that you hear that argument all the time doesn't mean it's not valid and just pointing out that you hear it all the time doesn't refute it.
>>
File: 1903825h.jpg (91KB, 500x709px) Image search: [Google]
1903825h.jpg
91KB, 500x709px
>>85013134
>>
>>85011961
>uses human nature as an argument
>complains about pseudoscience
>>
File: 4127851293402.png (148KB, 308x308px) Image search: [Google]
4127851293402.png
148KB, 308x308px
>>85010248
>adding Chavez on for guaranteed replies
>>
>>85013192
are you this fucking thick? Or did you just not read my pic related?
>>85013177
cry more
>>
>>85013051
>Rather to be rich depends more on either being born into it
somewhat true but not fully true
countless people still become rich on their own merit alone

>or being exceptionally good at exploiting others
marx' exploitation theory is false and has been proven false ITT
Prove our arguments wrong or kill yourself desu

>Next to none of the super rich become that way solely by meritocracy
bull fucking shit
the majority of them were not handed down their businesses from their families, that is a small minority of capitalists and you know it.

>Next to none of the super rich become that way solely by meritocracy
TOP KEK
That wasn't Steve's fault. He rose their standard of living.
It the fault of their government which forced them to be paid in a currency that was undervalued and which was constantly inflated.
THIS is where people do not get the FULL PRODUCT of their labor, when central banks(which you support) enslave people and enrich governments and corporations.

>The Walton family, owners of Wal-Mart, pays a median wage of 10 bucks an hour
Why do you think prices are so low there you fucking idiot?
Nobody forced these people to work for walmart.
They still make okay money for what they do.
It's a good thing companies exist that have low prices thanks to cheaper labor.

>they strong arm vendors
Good.
Means lower prices.

>and also rely on products made with working conditions that resemble old world slavery
Why is that walmarts fault?

>while having more wealth than the bottom 40% of Americans.
If they gave this wealth to everyone else, would everyone else be better off? Of course not, you idiot.
Also why do you care about their wealth so much?
Why?
>>
>>85013097
the thing is that nobody gives a shit about their terrible art

>>85013099
>>get btfo when he bitches about "YOU USE THINGS MADE BY CAPITALISM"
That WASN'T ME, you gigantic idiot.
I hate that idiotic argument too.
There are far better arguments against socialism that I posted.
Too bad you were unable to refute them.
Brainwashed cuck.
Get gassed leftypol.
>>
>>85013213
Tell me where Marx's exploitation theory was proven wrong ITT, I just got here and am not scrolling through 1000s of lines of meme spam.

All your arguments below that line seem to rely on the exploitation theory being false so I'm not gonna bother with thoae
>>
>>85013212
that shitty facebook meme strawman that conflates two completely different things? is that what constitutes for an argument?
>>
I want /pol/ to leave
>muh hooman nature
Imagine being this dumb
>>
>>85013270
how is saying "you use tools made by capitalism" an argument either? slaves used tools made by slavery, feudalists use tools made by feudalism. It's just not a point.
>>
>>85013212
>cry more
This is the power of Marxism huh
>>
File: 1499940867770.jpg (132KB, 1080x1316px) Image search: [Google]
1499940867770.jpg
132KB, 1080x1316px
Will communists ever address the sexual free market?

If no, don't care. At last under this system I can work a shit job and fuck a prostitute once a month, commies want to deny me even that.
>>
>>85013252
Show me (quote) those arguments. I just got in this thread
>>
File: 1491607196118.jpg (243KB, 1377x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1491607196118.jpg
243KB, 1377x1080px
>211 replies
>35 posters
>>
File: 1485332830922.png (250KB, 416x396px) Image search: [Google]
1485332830922.png
250KB, 416x396px
>>85013199
>>uses human nature as an argument
OF COURSE

Do you not accept the REALITY of human instincts?
lmao, holy fuck don't tell me you're actually retarded enough to not believe in human evolution?
Why don't you believe in evolution?

>>complains about pseudoscience
LMAO
HOLY FUCK
AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Why do you people even exist?
You don't even accept human instincts as fact, yet you claim to be scientific.
Holy fucking shit, this is hilarious.
>>
>>85013213
>word vomit
Why do people feel compelled to talk in length about something they clearly have no clue about? It's Dunning-Kruger in perfection.
>>
>>85013326
Your right, the "work or starve" coercion promoted by capitalism is definitely people organizing our of their own free will and hooman naychur
>>
>>85013284
do you use your phone for work or for creating shitty facebook memes and shilling on /tv/? it doesnt sound like a tool to me, more of a product. I doubt you'd ever give it up too.
>>
>>85009792
>anti semitism, analogous to *wipes nose* some religious prophecy

Haha
>>
>>85013256
>Tell me where Marx's exploitation theory was proven wrong ITT
countless times:
>>85010491
>>85008891
>>85009036

Please refute this.
Nobody has yet.
OH WAIT YOU CAN'T

>All your arguments below that line seem to rely on the exploitation theory being false
Because they are and make no sense.
Labour is not the only input into production.
Also even if laborers got all of the profit, it literally would not benefit them.
>>
File: 1494560977126.jpg (122KB, 550x861px) Image search: [Google]
1494560977126.jpg
122KB, 550x861px
Pinochet did nothing wrong
>>
I've never met a communist that didn't have their rent payed for by their parents
>>
>>85013326
>tfw human instinct forces me to surrender to a specific violently enforced socio-economic system that is only 200 years old and where labor is alienated
You don't even know what anthropology is. You are like an ape, a pathetic, smelly human being. Maybe one day you smash the mirror that enslaves you and see yourself again.
>>
File: faggot.jpg (176KB, 600x716px) Image search: [Google]
faggot.jpg
176KB, 600x716px
>>85013400
>>
I've never understood why Walmart gets so much shit and blame for 'killing small business'. No one is holding a gun to anyones head and forcing them to shop there.
Want walmart to fuck off? Take your business elsewhere. Give your cash to that little mom & pop store.
Its almost as bad as the people who constantly bitch about so few females in STEM jobs and courses in college, as they major in liberal arts.
>>
>>85013382
Pinochet was kinda a bad dude
>>
File: Steven_Pinker.jpg (2MB, 2561x2561px) Image search: [Google]
Steven_Pinker.jpg
2MB, 2561x2561px
>>85013280
>DUDE HUMANS HAVE NO NATURE AND MAN IS A BLANK SLATE
>WHY ARE YOU EVIL RACIST CAPITALIST SCIENTISTS LAUGHING AT ME?

You are admitting you literally don't accept human evolution or neuroscience
We're you even educated in school?
lmao just kill yourself already you creationist
>>
>mfw cant discuss eastern movies because some retards do not know how to do it without brining politics

Seriously, fucking post-Trump and redditors posters. Go die in hell.
>>
>>85010312
There is a full one at the left.
>>
>>85007887
Slavoj zizek has to be the most embarrassing dumbcunt alive, no wonder he's become the contemporary leftist poster boy
>>
File: kek_0.jpg (63KB, 600x520px) Image search: [Google]
kek_0.jpg
63KB, 600x520px
>>85013402
>capitalism is violently enforced
>marxism isn't
>>
>>85013340
>>word vomit
Ahhhh, so this is the power of marxist pseudointellectualism. Getting BTFO and having no arguments.

>Why do people feel compelled to talk in length about something they clearly have no clue about?
If you're so mad then actually refute me then.
OH WAIT, YOU CAN'T
>>
>>85008494
>commies need to be killed desu
Jokes aside they really do
>>
>>85013433
Human nature is descriptive, not prescriptive, you drooling retard.
>inb4 we have to support neoliberal reforms because of NEUROSCIENCE
We live in a world where people lived against their nature, for thousends of years, apperently.
>>
File: Screenshot_2017-07-16-03-44-22.png (449KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2017-07-16-03-44-22.png
449KB, 1080x1920px
>>85013364
doubt all you want, I don't give a shit

>>85013377
>99%
This is literally made up, where these numbers came from I don't know.
Here's a small snippet of Britain's economy in 1982, where workers received 52% of the labor they worked for. 53% if you exclude the bankers.
>>
>>85013435
these aren't "eastern movies" newfag they are modern communist propaganda
>>
>>85013513
*57%
>>
>>85013484
I never said it wasn't. The difference is under socialism, the capitalist class gets oppressed. In capitalism, the working class gets oppressed. The state is always an instrument to ensure the superiority of one specific class. It's that simply.
>>
>>85013358
>"work or starve" coercion promoted by capitalism
Nobody ever said you would get things for free.
In a word of scarcity, why would you believe things would be provided to you for free?
Of course you will have less resources if you do not work.
Socialism is also work or starve. At least in capitalism you can be a neet.

>free will
Free will is an illusion.

>hooman naychur
LMAO IT'S JUST LIKE A CREATIONIST MOCKING EVOLUTION
HOLY SHIT GET A LOAD OF THIS NEUROSCIENCE DENIALIST
>>
File: 20151128_BLP513_facebook.jpg (139KB, 1200x627px) Image search: [Google]
20151128_BLP513_facebook.jpg
139KB, 1200x627px
>>85013432
naw he literally did nothing wrong though
>>
>>85013494
>over 150 years of theory with thousends of scientists, economists, philosophers, etc
>gets debunked by a 20-line post by a retarded /pol/yp
I feel it beneath me to answer to memes. You only deserve to be shot.
>>
>>85013402
>forces me to surrender to a specific violently enforced socio-economic system

>surrender to a system

Sure, if you call voluntary human interaction a "system".

You are basically saying "people have freedom of choice and their freedom is somehow enslaving me".

You make no sense, get gassed.

>that is only 200 years old
Wrong, capital and capitalists are 1000s of years old.

>labor is alienated
lol nobody cares about your marxist cult theories

>You don't even know what anthropology is.
You're a literal marxist. As much as academia is leftist, you people are utterly mocked in universities.
You're like flat earthers.

>You are like an ape
No fucking shit, so are you, you creationist.

>you smash the mirror that enslaves you
LMAO
Explain how this will benefit me(I've asked you numerous times) or just kill yourself.
Just die.
>>
>>85013545
Show me the psychoanalysis that proves capitalism right.
>>
File: 1491484379278.png (631KB, 1023x766px) Image search: [Google]
1491484379278.png
631KB, 1023x766px
THIS IS NOW A COMMUNIST HATE THREAD
>>
>>85013501
>DUDE THE EARTH IS ROUND LMAO
The church is laughing at you!
This is how you sound
>>
>>85013517
The documentary is not. But the documentry itself does talk about some eastern movies. The thread could also lead to the discussion. But hell! Most of you are are not older than 25 yo.

Dont know shit about politics!
Dont know shit about movies!

Just fucking teenagers

>they are modern communist propaganda
It is hard to believe but I can actually watch a movie without ended up being a commie or nazi.


FUCK YOU ALL
>>
>>85013633
Fuck, meant for
>>85013433
>>
>>85013620
You got me. Communists want to end all white people. This is the sole reason I want to reorganize how my surplus is distributed.
>>
>>85013501
>Human nature is descriptive, not prescriptive, you drooling retard.
I know.
That's my point you fucking idiot.
Marxists simply deny it exists and pretend that DM controls human action.
Marxism is pseudoscience.

>neoliberal
LMAO what is "new" or "liberal" about the present central bank controlled global economy?
tell me

>because of NEUROSCIENCE
yes, reality

>We live in a world where people lived against their nature
No, they lived with their nature.
>>
File: 1490051795161.png (339KB, 460x454px) Image search: [Google]
1490051795161.png
339KB, 460x454px
>>85010166
>mfw the artist who made the original porky propaganda was censored and fucked with by the soviet censors for his whole career and allegedly killed himself although the evidence suggests that the state might have killed him and faked his suicide
brava leftypol, brava!
>>
>>85013536
so the capitalist class includes:
>all ukrainians
>100 million Chinese
>the cossacks
>everyone who disagrees with you politically
>families split up by the Berlin wall
>anyone who wants to leave your country
>all foreigners
>Poland
>a third of the population of Cambodia
>sparrows
sounds a lot more than just 1% desu
>>
>>85013620
>being proud of your racist isnt pathetic
Explain
>>
>>85013620
The caricature in that picture would hate Guns, Germs and Steel because white people dindu nuttin
>>
>>85013634
Look you seem like a decent guy but if youre really older than 25 and still come here you should probably reevaluate your life choices
>>
File: friedmanBTFO.png (41KB, 789x363px) Image search: [Google]
friedmanBTFO.png
41KB, 789x363px
>>85008494
>but zizek is the most brainwashed ideological person around
>is this documentary supposed to be a joke?
Zizek doesn't vouch for some idiotic "post-ideological pragmatism", he just says you have to be aware of ideology. And ideology is mostly subconscious assumptions, the stuff you take for granted.

>>85008642
>>85008459
>free market capitalism.
Capitalism does not function without state intervention. See pic related. It works in theory but not in practice.

>>85010440
nice falseflag, faggot
literally no communist ever claims "real communism", it's a shitty strawman made up by rightists
in the same way "trickle down economics" is only used as a perjorative

>>85010520
>muh job creators
"taking" money was never the point of socialism, it's to abolish it, it's not capitalism with wealth distribution

>>85011213
>market competition
Do you know what competition actually means? It means a company like Microsoft that outperforms others buys up company after company until there is almost no competition.
>>
>>85013634
i think it's more pathetic that you're over 25 years old and are still in college having your rent payed for by your parents. wisdom doesn't always cone with age.
>>
>>85013663
>implying kanye isnt a commie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lYEHdfWMrg
>>
>>85013513
>WAGE OF EXPLOITATION GRAPH

AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS EVEN SAYING?

>52% of their labour
do you even know what this means?
It means the tiny portion of capitalists consume 48% of consumer goods

How in the fuck is such a thing even possible?

NOTHING in your graph is meaningful data.
I am only talking about consumer goods CONSUMED. That's the ONLY thing that matters.

Even if this useless data was 100% instead of 52% workers would be in the same exact position.
>>
>>85013660
>what is liberal about capitalism?
>what is new about the present?
um...
>>
>>85013536
>class
>MUH CLASSES
fucking irrelevant useless information

>>85013574
>>over 150 years of theory with thousends of scientists, economists, philosophers, etc
Marxism is a cult and not taken seriously in modern academia.
Sorry.
>You only deserve to be shot.
Too bad the good guys(the right wing) are the ones with the guns and you whiny cunts have nothing.

Enjoy your delusions and pseudoscience.
>>
File: cruiseships.jpg (87KB, 700x475px) Image search: [Google]
cruiseships.jpg
87KB, 700x475px
>>85013718
>It means the tiny portion of capitalists consume 48% of consumer goods
>How in the fuck is such a thing even possible?
That is perfectly possible. They might not eat 5 times as much but more often than not the stuff they consume is stuff that has way much more labor time put into it. For example, a mansion instead of an appartment. In a way, both the capitalist and the worker occupy just one house.
>>
File: 1495427605783.png (83KB, 339x329px) Image search: [Google]
1495427605783.png
83KB, 339x329px
>>85013658
>I want to reorganize how my surplus is distributed
What the fuck is stopping you from doing that right now? Set up a network with your comrades and you can finally use each others butt plugs and cock rings, because let's be honest that's what this is all really about, all modern commies are closet homosexuals it's obvious as fuck
>>
>>85013619
>psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis was founded by Sigmund Freud (1856-1939).
Welp.
I can clearly say you are a lost individual.
Good luck with your genetic defect that prevents you from thinking things through critically.
Sad.
>>
>>85013770
This is some very specific projecting, anon. That image you attache doesn't help either. Do your parents know you're gay?
>>
>leftists bring up data, theory, factual information
>/pol/ just autistically rees that it's not true
Amazing dialogue.
>>
>>85013678
Explain why it is.
>>
How more BTFO can commies get ITT?
They're on the defense so hard and they cannot defend their retarded religion.
They don't even accept human evolution or instincts.

They actually deny human beings have instincts.
How fucking retarded do you have to be?
lmao
>>
>>85013678
wut
>>
File: pinochet2.jpg (71KB, 594x536px) Image search: [Google]
pinochet2.jpg
71KB, 594x536px
>>85013382
>>85013573
wtf I love USA backed zionist dictators who increase government spending above that of Allende now
>>
>>85013816
>>85013827
Why would you be proud of anything anyone else has done? You didn't do it. Fucking ridiculous. Be proud of your own accomplishments. It's completely nonsensical to be proud of ANYTHING you didn't do.
>>
>>85013658
>Communists want to end all white people.
They do.
>>
>>85013718
>a tiny portion of capitalists consume 48% of consumer goods
except that's not how it works? it means the workers have to work an extra half on hour to pay for their employer's labor. when that worker works 10 hours, he should ideally be able to buy something that requires 10 hours to produce. This is not the case, instead he is buying something that requires 0.52*10 hours to produce.
>>
>>85013856
>redditors
>"left wing"
Half of them are fucking fed plants
>>
>>85013812
all the leftist arguments ITT are
>"muh X"
>"haha I can't believe you believe that"
>shitty memes
>calling everyone they don't like /pol/
>ignoring arguments
>making appeals to authority like your post in order to appear like the more intelligent side
>>
File: wojak3.jpg (28KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]
wojak3.jpg
28KB, 601x508px
>>85013818
>I got BTFO already so I'll just claim strawman and claim victory
Here, read this:
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/wilde-oscar/soul-man/
>>
>>85013871
>read this biased propaganda
every time
>>
>>85013870
all the rightist arguments ITT are
>"muh X"
>"haha I can't believe you believe that"
>shitty memes
>calling everyone they don't like cucks
>ignoring arguments
>making appeals to authority like your post in order to appear like the more intelligent side
>>
>>85013836
allende wanted to kill millions
neck yourself reverse jew shill
>>
File: zizek pepe.jpg (21KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
zizek pepe.jpg
21KB, 500x500px
>>85013856
There's literally nothing wrong with brocialism though. You're grasping at straws here, you won't find your mythical SJW here as every communist on chans is proud of being an anti-idpol class reductionist brocialist.
>>
>>85013842
>Why would you be proud of anything anyone else has done?
Because that's perfectly normal and the only time this is put into question is when we're talking about ethnic groups. If your gf says "hey anon I got the job I always wanted! aren't you proud of me" what do you respond? "No you dumb bitch you did that, not me, I can't possibly be proud of it". Of course not, because you understand that you don't necessarily need to have done something yourself, you just need a connection or sense of belonging towards those who did it. Of course you're not going to be as proud as her, because she was the one who actually did it but so what?
Stop it with this nonsensical weapon grade autism.
Also, "you" don't actually do shit. If you control for genes and SES while growing up, you basically can explain all of the variance in every aspect of your life.
>>
>>85013696
>he just says you have to be aware of ideology
yet he isn't aware of his own brainwashed marxist ideology
hmm really makes you think

>Capitalism does not function without state intervention
Bullshit there were several examples in history of stateless capitalism like medieval iceland and the american midwest
also the less government there is, the more capitalist society is
stay mad

>It works in theory but not in practice.
Milton Friedman was a communist faggot that loved central banks.
How could you claim to be free market and socialize the most important thing in the economy, banking?

>"taking" money was never the point of socialism, it's to abolish it, it's not capitalism with wealth distribution
Okay?
Same exact thing applies.
If you took over the means of production and the workers got the profit instead, they would be in the same position because they consume the same amount of consumer goods.
This was my point.
Get gassed.

>Do you know what competition actually means?
Do you?

>buys up company after company
They can always try, it usually doesn't work out that way and without government patents and IP it's even more difficult.

>until there is almost no competition.
TOP KEK
Many examples of this were tried in history. It only created a MASSIVE profit opportunity for any company that could compete with the larger firms.
Countless "trusts" were broken by the free market this way.
>>
>>85013896
the commie argument
>muh buzzword repeated 1000 times per sentence
>*posts internet link
>fuck you fascist!!!
>>
>>85013868
That's literally the socialism subreddit.
>>85013902
>There's literally nothing wrong with brocialism though
It's as stupid as normal socialism when it comes to economics, it's only slightly less stupid than normal socialism when it comes to social issues.
>>
>>85013723
Ahhhh so according to your logic africa is capitalism, china is capitalism because they have some private control over the means of production.

Again, you retards don't make sense.

Also there's nothing "new" about the current system.
Gas yourself poverty loving commie turd.
>>
File: mutualaid.jpg (28KB, 324x500px) Image search: [Google]
mutualaid.jpg
28KB, 324x500px
>>85013885
>oh no how dare you challenge my worldview
Anything political is biased, you'd have to be a really dumb liberal to not understand this. It's by Oscar Wilde (so not marx or engels or lenin) and it's really short. Let me quote the part that deals with human nature.

>It will, of course, be said that such a scheme as is set forth here is quite unpractical, and goes against human nature. This is perfectly true. It is unpractical, and it goes against human nature. This is why it is worth carrying out, and that is why one proposes it. For what is a practical scheme? A practical scheme is either a scheme that is already in existence, or a scheme that could be carried out under existing conditions. But it is exactly the existing conditions that one objects to; and any scheme that could accept these conditions is wrong and foolish. The conditions will be done away with, and human nature will change. The only thing that one really knows about human nature is that it changes. Change is the one quality we can predicate of it. The systems that fail are those that rely on the permanency of human nature, and not on its growth and development. The error of Louis XIV. was that he thought human nature would always be the same. The result of his error was the French Revolution. It was an admirable result. All the results of the mistakes of governments are quite admirable.

If you have the time for it, read pic related, and then try to claim that communists "deny" basic instincts or human nature.
>>
>>85013896
the problem with communists is that they are so deluded and brainwashed they argue as if everyone already agreed with them
>>
>>85013818
You realize nobody has actually tried to defend Marxism ITT? It's a wasted effort. You don't discuss with autistic children. The thing is you guys literally get your information from con-artists like Molyneux or Lauren Southern, you don't actually know what you are talking about.
>>
>>85013945
private control over the means of production IS capitalism though. Look up personal vs private property. If you don't want to I'll paste the definitions here for you.
>>
>>85013957
TL:DR
>>
>>85013842
>>85013678
>is a phoneposter
>hates white people
Checks out
>>
>>85013899
>reverse jew shill
wew, how many layers of paranoia are you on
take your meds faggot

and refer to the image in >>85013696
>>
>>85013921
>If you took over the means of production and the workers got the profit instead, they would be in the same position because they consume the same amount of consumer goods.
This was my point.
I will take this argument over to /pol/ to be scrutinized by their analytical minds
>>
>>85013962
Daily reminder that almost all economists are neoliberal and that marxian economics is pseudo-science and that the only way to explain this away is to use flat-earth-tier rhetoric.
>>
File: no_suspicion.png (386KB, 550x366px) Image search: [Google]
no_suspicion.png
386KB, 550x366px
I must seize the (You)s of production
>>
>>85013769
>That is perfectly possible.
No it's not LOL
How ignorant and retarded are you.

Even with the tiny amount of cruise ships and mansions, it still makes up about 1-2% of the economy.

For it to be literally 50% of the fucking economy, half of production would have to go to building shit for the capitalist class.
CLEARLY this is not happening.

I mean, how dumb are you? holy fuck

>the stuff they consume is stuff that has way much more labor time put into it
lol oh you brainwashed marxists thinking all labour time is "equal"
an extremely small portion of the economy is geared towards making cruise ships
if what you were saying is true, it would be a booming industry. like 1 in 10 people would be making cruise ships or mansions when in reality, it's very little

why does reality make you so mad?
>>
>>85013976
>dumb and proud
For your information, Kropotkin is backed by modern anthropologists as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Aid:_A_Factor_of_Evolution#Discussion
>>
>>85013962
Who said anything about 'con-artists like Molyneux or Lauren Southern' you people are insane. You do realize that communism was widely despised BEFORE people like them came along?
>>
File: 1496302958730.png (269KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1496302958730.png
269KB, 1000x1000px
>>85013812
>>leftists bring up data, theory, factual information
BAAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHA

I bet this is the same leftist that got destroyed by the countless arguments and factual data ITT.

You losers have fucking NOTHING and can NOT refute anything we've said.

Just K I L L YO U R S E L F already
>>
>the state of /tv/
Jesus, this is pathetic. No matter what you think of Marxism and Communism it left a visible mark on all kinds of arts. You can discuss something without agreeing with it. I consider most of Hollywood films trashy entertainment but that doesn't mean I can't discuss the history of Hollywood or various movements influencing certain directors.
>>
>>85014010
cruise ships aren't even upper class goods though
>>
pro tip for capitalists: don't type "AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA" between every post. It makes you sound insecure about your arguments.
>>
>>85013921
>If you took over the means of production and the workers got the profit instead, they would be in the same position because they consume the same amount of consumer goods.
Let's have a bunch of faggots profit on their backs instead! It's all the same anyway!
>>
>>85008494
>I literally have no idea what I'm talking about: The post
>>
File: 6782346529562956658589.jpg (12KB, 182x277px) Image search: [Google]
6782346529562956658589.jpg
12KB, 182x277px
>>85013987
But that's wrong anon. Read pic related.
>>
>>85014050
We laugh because you're laughable. Marx unironically called marxism a science and inasmuch as it is falsifiable it has been proven wrong in every single one of its aspects.
>>
>>85014042
>pretends to be new to the thread
>number of posters doesn't go up
stop trying to appeal to authority /leftypol/ this thread was started by you to discuss communism and now that you're getting btfo you try to claim it's just about the movies.
>>
>>85013836
KGB was supporting allende

>>85013865
>it means the workers have to work an extra half on hour to pay for their employer's labor.
No they don't.
They CONSUME 99% of all consumer goods.
You need to refute this or you are clearly wrong.
Refute it. Oh wait you cannot.

> when that worker works 10 hours, he should ideally be able to buy something that requires 10 hours to produce
That's not how it works.
Why do I know this?
Because the working class consumes 99% of all consumer goods. They get what they produce. How much money they get is irrelevant because prices will be forced to adjust to working class consumer demand.
Another reason?
This workers labour input was not the only input into the good.
Stay mad at facts.
>>
>>85014068
Interesting. Your father clearly never praised you enough as a child.
>>
>>85014061
>But that's wrong anon
No, anon, it's right, the percentage of economists who follow marxian economics is minuscule.
>>
>>85014037
Yeah, by Nazis. And modern day alt-right repackages the Nazi bullshit and makes it digestible for alienated virgins like you. There is critique of Marxism out there, and we have engaged with it, but you are not making a critique, you are spouting Internet memes.
>>
>>85014079
>Refute it.
Refute what? You literally made up a number. It's false.
>>
>>85014081
your father pays for everything you buy and it sounds like he praised you too much
>>
>>85014061
>dude I uniroically believe in surplus value
but why?
we've already proven ITT it makes no sense
>>
>>85014081
Yes that would be quite close to bulverism, a tactic often used by marxists. However it falls under the unfalsifiable bullshit part of marxism.
>>
File: 1497328010877.jpg (79KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]
1497328010877.jpg
79KB, 1024x1024px
>>85014060
>WAAAH NO WAH NO YOU DON'T KNOW KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT NO *covers ears in cognitive distress*
>>
>>85014105
>>85014098

Stop denying neuroscience and human nature now, Marxist Commie SJW fools!
>>
>>85014084
>communism was only despised by nazis
lmao
Tell me how much from 1 to 10 you agree with the following sentence.
>If only people REALLY understood marxism then they would agree with it
>>
>>85014115
Are you okay?
>>
File: 1496885620978.png (172KB, 2200x1200px) Image search: [Google]
1496885620978.png
172KB, 2200x1200px
>>85013812
newsflash, linking to a outside source and telling someone to read a 600+ page book on the subject without bringing any actual points yourself is not an argument.

correct way is to condense the central arguments, provide evidence for them and only then link to necessary reading for additional clarification.
>>
>>85013916
>only comes up when its about ethnic groups
No it doesn't, you only get offended when it's about that.
>implying your job example is comparable to being proud of race
Intentionally misleading
>autism
Great argument m8
>>>85013977
I'm not a phone poster?
And I don't hate white people. Did you quote the wrong posts?
>>85014040
Another non argument
>>85014131
>REEEEEE ARGUMENTS ARE MY KRYPTONITE
Impossible to have a discussion with you people.
>>
>>85014117
Are you having a stroke anon? Psychoanalysis isn't neuroscience. It's bad psychology, like marxism is bad economics.
>>
>>85014099
You should read a book before you are making assumptions about it.
>>
>>85014093
You literally made up a number as well.
My number actually makes sense.
take the 0.1% and calculate the consumer goods they actually consume
It's an very tiny portion of the economy

who cares if they have billions?
The fact they don't spend it means the price of consumer goods for the working class goes down. I bet you didn't even know this.
>>
>>85014146
No it's neuroscience which reaffirms my liberal capitalist beliefs. No other economic system confirms human nature!
>>
>>85014084
There is no way you genuinely believe this. There is just no way. This has to be a troll
>>
File: zizeklearning.png (48KB, 359x483px) Image search: [Google]
zizeklearning.png
48KB, 359x483px
>>85013921
>yet he isn't aware of his own brainwashed marxist ideology
But he is, you fucking moron. He openly admits that everything he says is filtered through an ideological lense, how he is influenced mainly by Lacan, Hegel and Marx.
"not being aware" would be if he'd pass his worldview as "common sense"

>stateless capitalism
>medieval iceland
I think you need to look up when capitalism started.

>american midwest
you want the whole world look like a wild west movie? classic ancaps

>friedman was a communist
jeez, is everyone 1 degree to the left of ancapistan a communist now?

>central banks are communism
It's precisely regulatory bodies like central banks that keep capitalism functioning.

>>85013921
>If you took over the means of production and the workers got the profit instead, they would be in the same position because they consume the same amount of consumer goods.
What you are assuming here is more like mutualism, or capitalism with co-ops. Socialism is a mode of production, not a mode of distribution. Society's resources and labor time would be focused on other things than they are now. For example, there'd be no such thing as advertising, imagine the labor time that would free up. It seems to me that you are literally unable to perceive a post-capitalist world, probably because you assume that things which are actually exclusive to capitalism have always existed, when that simply is not the case. Socialism is not socialized capitalism.

>they can always try
There is no try, microsoft simply did it. Government intervention does not make mergers and acquisitions easier, it makes it harder.

>any company that could compete with the larger firms
This can work with software, but not with something like heavy industry. Heavy industry is capital intensive, and you can't easily enter the market and start competing. A factory that has already been developed can produce at a much lower cost.
>>
>>85013072
>why is socialism the "next stage" of history?
It's not the 'next stage', but it's a viable option. Capitalism is about to transcend itself and we're going to have to make major societal changes.

There's a reason Elon Musk supports UBI, by the way. Even billionaires can see the writing on the wall.
>>
>>85014145
>Another non argument
You DON'T have an argument and still believe surplus value is real after it's been debunked countless times ITT

why do you want to be a slave?
lol
>>
>>85014126
It doesn't matter wether people agree or disagree with Marxism. That's not how the world works.
>>
Americans are so fucking delusional hahahaha
They can't wrap their heads around socialist policy in a capitalist system
They just cant get off corporate dick
>>
>>85014145
>No it doesn't
Of course it is, nobody behaves like the moron I described in my example. Nobody ever does that, if your friends/family/loved ones do something good, you're proud of them despite not having actually done it yourself.
And of course it's comparable, if it actually wasn't, you'd be able to refute it instead of just saying "n-no!"
>great argument m8
I actually provided one, your response is just "n-no it's n-not true!"
>>
how come everything a communist does have to be something to do with communism and even when it's not they try to relate it somehow? it seems like their entire personality is based around their ideology.
>>
>Literally every argument in this thread against Communism is a strawman

Really

Makes

You

Think
>>
>>85013943
>That's literally the socialism subreddit.
It's literally bannable there to mention you're from /leftypol/. Or can I now hold /pol/ accountable for /r/the_donald posters?
>>
>>85014154
>I made up a number
>literally calculated from 1983 National Income and Expenditure
Blue Book published by the Central Statistical Office wages and profits

Why do I care? Because the surplus of my labor isn't being put back into the market. This doesn't annoy in the least bit?
>>
>>85014158
Anon, your parody is really bad. Nobody is arguingin that things are true or false depending on whether they affirm capitalism or not, you've got it ass backwards.
>>
>>85014205
>I actually provided one, your response is just "n-no it's n-not true!"
I love the irony in this thread
>>
ITT communist retards get BTFO

Stay in your /leftypol/ and twitter hug-box lane you scumcunts
>>
>>85014178
You can't "debunk" a mathematical fact cucklord
>>
>>85014206
This is not true. Pasolini made a film about Jesus and he was a homosexual communist degenerate. It's even on Vatican's list of best films.
>>
File: 1500019538805.jpg (134KB, 433x480px) Image search: [Google]
1500019538805.jpg
134KB, 433x480px
>>85014214
didn't you just post a strawman right there?
>>
>>85014186
Of course it doesn't, marxism is wrong regardless of what people think but that's not what I asked anon. From 1 to 10, how much do you agree with that sentence?
>>
File: richardspencer.png (166KB, 608x918px) Image search: [Google]
richardspencer.png
166KB, 608x918px
>>85013945
>africa is capitalism, china is capitalism
It is. Subsaharan africa is the "small gubment" utopia you've been looking for. Just compare public spending as % of GDP in any subsaharan country and any western european country.
>>
>>85014235
see
>>85008494
>>85008755
>>85013433
>>85013660
no data or facts. hmm...
>>
File: 798.png (306KB, 593x540px) Image search: [Google]
798.png
306KB, 593x540px
>>85014260
No. You brainlet.
>>
>>85013976
TL;DR on that paragraph I posted or all of mutual aid?
>>
>>85014250
Are you someone from pol that is trying to make leftypol look stupid?
You said that it's stupid to take pride in what someone else did. I presented you with several situations in which it is not stupid at all, in fact it's perfectly normal and healthy. Your reply to this was...what? "no"? Something like that?
>>
File: 1494615716504.jpg (30KB, 248x324px) Image search: [Google]
1494615716504.jpg
30KB, 248x324px
why are you fags constantly trying to convert us? I though communism wasn't a religion?
>>
>>85014171
>But he is, you fucking moron
no, no he doesn't
he claims to
but he really doesn't
>He openly admits that everything he says is filtered through an ideological lense
yet he spews the ideological bullshit anyway and doesn't correct himself
what a turd of an "intellectual"
>how he is influenced mainly by Lacan, Hegel and Marx.
lol what a retard

>I think you need to look up when capitalism started.
I think you need to.
There was always pockets of entrepreneurship. It's like you guys actually think there was a specific year when "capitalism" "started"
retard

>you want the whole world look like a wild west movie?
LMAO you actually don't know the history of the midwest
it was based around polycentric law, homesteading, and claims associations
ancap principals
holywood just bastardized it, it was very very peaceful

>jeez, is everyone 1 degree to the left of ancapistan a communist now?
If you claim to support free markets but still support central banking, you don't support free markets
sorry, retard

>It's precisely regulatory bodies like central banks that keep capitalism functioning.
AHAHHAHA
Holy fuck you ARE brainwashed.
If we abolished central banking and had a natural deflation, the working class would be much more better off and the government would be less powerful.
That's what a free market IS, you brainwashed moron.
>>
>>85014271
I don't have the time to explain to you why that sentence makes no sense in the first place. Ideologies don't make revolutions.
>>
>>85014010
>mansions and cruise ships are the only thing capitalists consume
Damn, I got BTFO. I'm not gonna analyze all of spending behaviour across classes, but it's pretty easy to understand that capitalists buy more (expensive) food, clothes, cars, housing.
>>
>>85014311
>lol
>LMAO
>AHAHHAHA

Is this Tumblr?
>>
>>85014293
...and?
Do we need to prove ether theory is wrong everytime we talk about astrophysics too? Blank-slatism is flat out wrong, every single human trait is heritable to a degree.
>>
File: 1478689793188.jpg (106KB, 649x366px) Image search: [Google]
1478689793188.jpg
106KB, 649x366px
>>85014299
that was a rhetorical question. because you did.
>>
File: tfwtointelligent.jpg (54KB, 680x598px) Image search: [Google]
tfwtointelligent.jpg
54KB, 680x598px
>>85014042
You're too good for this thread, anon. Leave while you can.
>>
>>85014309
It's more of a cult than a religion, since it's been objectively disproven and yet there's a minority of people still think it can work based on the whim of several mad men. Their prophets.
>>
>>85014337
This doesn't mean Capitalism is the human 'default' though, or that it aligns with our idea of human nature. Traits are inherited, but I don't understand how this is an argument against Communism or any ideology.
>>
>>85014079
>KGB was supporting allende
Brezhnev didn't intervene in Chile now did he?
>>
>>85014314
I didn't say anything about revolution, or wanting a revolution or anything of the sort. People can agree with marxism without a revolution happening.
Let's try it one more time, maybe you'll understand it now, do you think that the main reason why people don't think marxism is correct is because they don't really understand it?
>>
>>85014042
>t. communist that got destroyed ITT
>>
>>85014402
>This doesn't mean Capitalism is the human 'default' though
When have I said that? Of course it's not, how the fuck can it be the default position when it didn't exist for most of human history (or prehistory for that matter).
>I don't understand how this is an argument against Communism
It's an argument against blank-slatism, which is advocated by a lot of commies.
>>
>>85014260
>>85014299
>>85014348
can we just go back to smug anime posting and put pinochet and stalin to bed?
I want the old /tv/ back
>>
>>85014257
>having to point out people got BTFO
this is like finishing your own post with "/thread"
make sure to include me in the screencap though, redditor
>>
>>85014171
>What you are assuming here is more like mutualism, or capitalism with co-ops
Mutualism is the purest form of socialism.
It's workers OWNING the means of production with no commie government in the way.

>Socialism is a mode of production, not a mode of distribution.
More useless marxist buzzwords, but okay. I already explained even if things are produced by the working class they would be in the same exact position as before they took over the means of production.

>Society's resources and labor time would be focused on other things than they are now.
Oh, so instead of being focused on CONSUMER DEMAND OF THE WORKING CLASS they would be focused on whatever some scumbag statist wanted.
Sounds horrible. I hope you suffocate.

>there'd be no such thing as advertising
That would be retarded, people wouldn't be notified of new products and services they could enjoy.

>imagine the labor time that would free up
labor time is irrelevant you dumb manchild, it's production that matters, nothing else
also advertising is a small section of the economy anyway, it wouldn't really matter

>It seems to me that you are literally unable to perceive a post-capitalist world
lmao man, I question every single fucking thing people bring to me.
a post capitalist world would be a nightmare

We've already seen this happen when socialism was tried in the real world.

>probably because you assume that things which are actually exclusive to capitalism have always existed, when that simply is not the case
Like what?

>microsoft simply did it
No they didn't. There are plenty of OS's out there.

>Government intervention does not make mergers and acquisitions easier, it makes it harder.
I wasn't talking about mergers and acquisitions.
Who gives a shit if a company has a large market share of product?
This doesn't limit your choices.

>but not with something like heavy industry
Explain why it happened with heavy industry countless times during the gilded age?
>>
>>85014309
>why are you fags constantly trying to convert us?
We aren't. OP was asking for marxist kino and /pol/ had to invade as they always do.
>>
>>85014429
>It's an argument against blank-slatism, which is advocated by a lot of commies
What you're calling the 'blank slate' argument, is that humans are versatile creatures and can adapt to any system or society. It's only said in response to Capitalists who claim Communism is bad because of how it goes against human nature.
>>
>>85014519
This could have been a good thread too, if human nature wasn't immediately mentioned.
>>
>>85011697
Damn since when were commies anti semites?
>>
>>85014171
>and you can't easily enter the market and start competing.
>A factory that has already been developed can produce at a much lower cost.
Good.
Companies like this should be the dominant manufacturers.
If the dominant manufacturers fuck up and raise prices or make shitty machines then it's basically a race to see who can compete and destroy the larger firms.
Happened countless times, I don't see why it wouldn't happen again.
>>
>>85014519
>>85014549
>*sob* why won't /tv/ let me shill my political cult in peace *sob*
>>
>>85014512
>a post capitalist world would be a nightmare

The existence of such a surplus of resources, so nobody starves or goes without, would be a nightmare?

Are you fucking psychotic?
>>
>>85014561
There is no point arguing with a status quo apologist. This braindead retard REALLY thinks the current system and american society is the best the human kind has invented so far
>>
>>85014521
>What you're calling the 'blank slate' argument, is that humans are versatile creatures
No, it's the argument that after the revolution greed, egoism, freeloading, any tendency that makes marxism unsustainable magically evaporates because society is different.
>and can adapt to any system or society.
No, they can't, plenty of systems are really bad for humans.
>>
>>85014336
>getting triggered by people laughing at your face

LMAO

>>85014334
>Damn, I got BTFO.
Oh boy this is too good. You have nothing and you are clinging to a cliff.

What else to they consume, food, fancy cars, vacations, jets?
Okay.
Even all of that shit is a drop in the bucket of the american economy because they are so few in number.

Refute me you fucking marxist manchild.
>>
>>85014579
>*sob* why are you fags trying to constantly convert us *sob*
>>
>>85014309
Communism is literally a religion.
They don't accept evolution or human instincts.
They're fucking crazy man.
>>
>>85014311
>no, no he doesn't
>he claims to
>but he really doesn't
>yet he spews the ideological bullshit anyway and doesn't correct himself
>what a turd of an "intellectual"
>lol what a retard
Is this the power of right-wing intellectualism? You have again completely misunderstood Zizek's critique of ideology. His point is that you should be open about it (and he is) instead of trying to mask it and pretending you're some post-ideological pragmatist.

>There was always pockets of entrepreneurship.
>if I redefine capitalism enough I can retroactively project it to any mode of production!
wow amazing, capitalism is when people do stuff, really makes me think
From Wikipedia:
>Market economies have existed under many forms of government, in many different times, places, and cultures. The development of capitalist societies, however, marked by a universalization of money-based social relations, a consistently large and system-wide class of workers who must work for wages, and a capitalist class which dominates control of wealth and political power, developed in Western Europe in a process that led to the Industrial Revolution.

>muh central banks
Look at what happened in Chile, they had multiple crises in a single year and had to re-nationalize banks so they wouldn't fuck everybody's shit up.
>>
>>85014595
That's not the argument at all. Of course those traits would still exist, the point is we can bring about a cultural change that would suppress them. At the very least, we could implement a system where being a greedy sociopath isn't a positive, like it is now.

It's like teaching little kids to share and not be greedy assholes.
>>
>>85014622
Read Kropotkin
>>
>>85013818
You're the ones who get so triggered at the mere mention of Marxism that you have to shit on every thread that even references it and turn it into a COMMIES REEEEEE piss contest.

You're mentally ill.
>>
File: cef.png (160KB, 627x479px) Image search: [Google]
cef.png
160KB, 627x479px
>>85014277
>It is.
Sure if you define capitalism that way.
Alright, lets play by your rules.
You define capitalism as places that have private or bourgeiois control over the means of production.
China has this, north korea has a little bit of this.

Too bad this entire thing is a strawman because we don't necessarily support "capitalism".
We support free markets.
That's where the actual poverty correlation is.

Countries with the freest markets are the most successful and have the highest living standards for their citizens.

Africa is filled with statism and dicatorships.
The same bullshit YOU FAGGOTS want.
>>
>>85014311
>>85014628
>ancap opposing banks
>marxist supporting banks
what
>>
>>85014597
>What else to they consume, food, fancy cars, vacations, jets?
Capitalists do buy more of every commodity, both in quantity and quality. Commodities refers not just to physical goods, but to services aswell. Are you trying to tell me those who make up half of earnings don't make up half of consumption?
>marxist manchild
Why this fixation on marxism? I'm an anarchist. Are you the same kind of person who strawmans socialists as people who accuse everyone of being fascists?
>>
>>85014258
>mathematical fact
lmao like that fact the working class consumes 99% of all consumer goods and that taking over the means of productions will not benefit you and only cause enslavement

holy fuck you are SO MAD lmao
>>
>>85014597
>>getting triggered by people laughing at your face
Dude, it's not that, it's just that it looks like you're having a fucking mental breakdown.
>>
>>85014668
>we can bring about a cultural change that would suppress them
https://youtu.be/mDYNuD4CwlI
>>
>>85007916
Zizek calls everything he doesn't like ideology.
>>
>>85014718
So, let me get this straight: humans have been developing and refining cultures for thousands of years that suppress or control our primitive desires. However, as soon as that's framed in a Socialist perspective, it's magical and couldn't happen?

This is ridiculous. You people talk about human nature and science, but completely ignore the malleability of our species. What we've done in the past 2,000 years alone is incredible. You're a fool if you don't think more change is on the way.
>>
>>85014214
You CANNOT DISPROVE my 99% consumer goods argument
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Why don't you brainwashed commies just give up already?

>>85014227
>>literally calculated from 1983 National Income and Expenditure
I already explained how it didn't describe anything.
Care to refute that?

>Blue Book published by the Central Statistical Office wages and profits
LOL HAHAHA
We weren't even talking about wages and profits.
We were talking about total consumption of consumer goods.
LMAO HOLY FUCK YOU FUCKING RETARD

> Because the surplus of my labor isn't being put back into the market.
lmao you people actually believe in magic and mysticism, holy fuck

you just used labour to produce something, there's no part of your labor that is held back, it's your entire fucking labor

if you consume 99% of what you produce then what is stolen from you?
>>
>>85014761
>However, as soon as that's framed in a Socialist perspective, it's magical and couldn't happen?
It's magical in the sense that socialists don't have any actual way of making it work and it's magical in the sense that no instinct or tendency has been removed or suppressed by society, they're just shaped differently. People might bash each other on the head less frequently, they're still extremely aggressive in other aspects of their lives.
>>
>>85014777
Explain why you prefer a handful of people to benefit from the surplus instead of this being evenly distributed among the workers, even if it means they will have no actual increase in their buying power
>>
>>85014512
>>85014512
>workers OWNING the means of production with no commie government in the way
Welcome to the club, comrade.

>useless marxist buzzwords
Modes of production would be slave society, feudalism, capitalism, socialism. It describes the process of history and the accompanying socio-economic systems.
>things are produced by the working class
What, do you believe in that "vote with your wallet" shit? Consumer behaviour doesn't decide what gets produced, the capitalists do, you can only choose what to consume of what is already produced.
>labor time is irrelevant
No it isn't? The goal is to reduce socially necessary labor time due to increased labor efficiency, mechanization, technology etc.
>Like what?
Like claiming that pre-capitalist market economies were capitalist.
>who gives a shit
I do, it reduces competition.
>during the gilded age
Because the barrier to entry was still low? Try starting up a heavy factory now, c'mon, pull those bootstraps.
>>
>>85014712
>dude I'm not mad
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I would just close the tab if I were you.

>>85014691
>Capitalists do buy more of every commodity, both in quantity and quality.
So?
Even when they do so it's still a drop in the bucket.

>but to services aswell.
So what?
Capitalists consume more products then then do services. It's still a tiny portion of the economy.
When's the last time you heard of someone that works in an industry that makes luxury shit for capitalists? I've worked countless temp jobs, I've worked all around in many states and I've never seen that.

>Are you trying to tell me those who make up half of earnings don't make up half of consumption?
OF COURSE
LMAO WHAT THE FUCK?
Do you faggots actually believe half of the economy goes towards making goods for the 0.01% to consume and enjoy?
That's absolutely insane.

So you think 1 in 2 people work for these industries?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>I'm an anarchist.
Ohhhh, look it's another leftarchist statist cuck that actually thinks he's anti state.
Enjoy pretending democracy is anarchy when it clearly isn't.
>>
>>85014678
might as well be saying "read the bible" when someone critises Christainity
>>
>>85014622
>still repeating the same platitudes
Scroll up a bit, we've gone over this already.

>>85014685
>economic freedom can be measured
wew lad
What is actually going on is that the strongest welfare states (like denmark) also perform really well on this chart. Seriously, go look up the countries on this graph and look at public spending as % of GDP.
>you want statism
I'm not a capitalist though. I want an end to class and state societies.
>>
>>85014687
I'm not a marxist and I'm not defending banks, I'm simply claiming that capitalism is actually unsustainable without government intervention. I don't like banks one bit.
>>
File: 1482808330039.png (345KB, 620x640px) Image search: [Google]
1482808330039.png
345KB, 620x640px
>>85014519
>/pol/ invaded
>the post that derailed the thread was about how great marxism is
>>
>>85014899
>>85014899
Is it too much to expect people to have a basic understanding of communist theory before they start shitposting about "muh human nature"?
>>
>>85014777
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHHHHAHHHA
Get a grip bruv.

Also your 99% consumer goods argument debunks itself. It's a gross oversimplification. Even if it's true just because the working class consumes 99% of consumer goods because they're the largest demographic has nothing to do with them acquiring the actual value of their own labour.
>>
>>85014956
>Is it too much to expect people to have a basic understanding of Christian theory before they start shitposting about "muh human nature"?
>>
>>85014956
Is it too much to expect commies to have an understanding of behavioral genetics before they start shiposting about "there's no freeloading problem in communism because we're all going to join hands together and sing kumbaya"?
>>
>>85014826
>instincts haven't been suppressed by society
>People might bash each other on the head less frequently

The definition of instinct: an innate, typically fixed pattern or behavior in animals in response to certain stimuli. By your own admission, people aren't attacking each other less. The way your average human responds to physical danger or threats is different than what it used to be. Modern society has changed who we are, so we're more productive as a species. Weren't you talking about evolution? That's literally society evolving.

>they're still extremely aggressive in other aspects of their lives
Because it's useful. No one is talking about removing aggression, but you can't deny how it's been transformed over the course of human history.

We even do it to little kids when we teach them morals and how to behave. Uninhibited, they would behave like animals.
>>
>>85014835
>Welcome to the club, comrade.
You're not a mutualist.
In fact you hate mutualists.
Mutalists are idiots but they are the least idiotic form of socialism.

>Modes of production would be slave society, feudalism, capitalism, socialism.
Yes, when used in this context, they are marxist pseudoscience buzzwords.
Why do you people even exist?

>It describes the process of history
It's one of marx's bullshit theories he was proven wrong on.
Socialism isn't the next "stage" of history and there are no magic "laws" of history. Nobody knows what will happen next in society, marx cannot predict shit.

>What, do you believe in that "vote with your wallet" shit?
No shit. It's called reality.

>Consumer behaviour doesn't decide what gets produced, the capitalists do
LMAO It ABSOLUTELY does.
Capitalists cannot make a profit if consumers don't buy their shit.
Do you deny this fact?
Look at holywood pandering to the china market.

>you can only choose what to consume of what is already produced.
Yes and your choices influence what is produced next.
Democracy is authoritarian and needs to be violently opposed.

>The goal is to reduce socially necessary labor time due to increased labor efficiency, mechanization, technology etc.
My point was that labour time isn't the main "unit" of economic production like marx thought it was.

Labor time decreases when people have enough shit to the point where they can work less.

>Like claiming that pre-capitalist market economies were capitalist.
LMAO
there you go again
you can think only in buzzwords
you couldn't respond to my point that there was no exact time when everything became "capitalist"
there were capitalist societies before "capitalism", deal with it

>Try starting up a heavy factory now
Why would I do anything now in this shitty central banker economy that increases the cost of capital goods and fucks over the working class?
>>
>>85014956
Oh god, what's sad about people like you is you're going to learn nothing from this thread and go on and continue trying ti fuck up the free world
>>
File: wrongpredictions.jpg (675KB, 2300x1594px) Image search: [Google]
wrongpredictions.jpg
675KB, 2300x1594px
>>85014876
You're constantly trying to argue this point about consumer goods but I hope you realize there is more to socialism than rectifying this. The goal is to reduce socially necessary labor time and increase leisure time. See pic related, what went wrong with the predictions?
They actually underestimated automation, so socially necessary labor time is even lower than predicted. However, they did not realize we would be kept working the same hours to not harm profits of the capitalist class. Because that's exactly what happened.

>>85014876
>leftarchist statist cuck that actually thinks he's anti state.
not an argument
>>
>>85014777
>If you consume 99% of what you produce
I don't! Holy fucking shit you rightists don't even read the basic economics that you like to wave around like a flag!
48% of my pay goes to pay my "employers", which then goes into the banks instead of trickling down like you capitalists love to claim it will. It's not a hard concept
Just because workers consume 99% of the produce (BEING SOLD), it does NOT mean they consume everything they produce.
>>
>>85014876
will of the majority is not statism, sorry lad
>>
>>85014905
>Scroll up a bit, we've gone over this already.
yes and you got destroyed pretty hard desu

>>economic freedom can be measured
LOL
Oh shit you actually think it can't be.

So in your tiny feces filled brain, you cannot tell the difference between the market based laws of switzerland and the market based laws of vietnam?

To you they are exactly the same even though Switzerland allows a massive amount of economic freedom and vietnam doesn't?

>hat is actually going on is that the strongest welfare states (like denmark)
One of the most free market countries on earth.
really makes you think.
Funny that switzerland is doing better than them when socialist shitholes are failing

>also perform really well on this chart.
What about Greece, Spain, Italy, Venezuela and countless other socialist/social democratic failures?

>I want an end to class and state societies.
Classes are bullshit and YES, you support the state.
If I tried to own private property in your society I would be attacked by a centralized authority
a state
>>
File: feudalism.png (170KB, 1365x393px) Image search: [Google]
feudalism.png
170KB, 1365x393px
>>85015035
>You're not a mutualist.
Ofcourse I'm not, but you do realize that what you were just vouching for (worker owned MoP without government) is literally anarcho-communism?
>Socialism isn't the next "stage" of history
Sure Fukuyama, capitalism is gonna last forever. See pic related.
>capitalists cannot make a profit if consumers don't buy their shit
Consumers can't live if they don't buy the shit capitalists produce.
>Labor time decreases when people have enough shit to the point where they can work less.
I agree though. That's the whole point.
>there were capitalist societies before capitalism
What is feudalism then?
>>85015035
>this shitty central banker economy that increases the cost of capital goods and fucks over the working class
It's called capitalism, comrade :^)
>>
>>85014829
Still waiting a response here, chub
>>
>>85014961
>Get a grip bruv.
Why are you still responding?
Your arguments make no fucking sense.

>Also your 99% consumer goods argument debunks itself. It's a gross oversimplification
LMAO
HOLY FUCK
No it's not.
It means you will get NOTHING for taking over the means of production. NOTHING

>has nothing to do with them acquiring the actual value of their own labour.
AHHAHAHAHA
Holy fuck it's like you're falling off a cliff here.
If they got the "actual value of their labor" and went to spend that money the price would simply rise and they would be in the exact same position.
How unbelievably stupid do you have to be to deny this fact of reality.
What more can you get of what is virtually everything?
I don't understand why socialists' brains are so damaged that they don't understand this shit.
>>
>>85015159
see
>>85015062
>>
>>85015113
>yes and you got destroyed pretty hard desu
You've already posted this like three times, no need to add another post for the screencap, redditor. And I wouldn't call dismissing the Oscar Wilde quote I posted as "propaganda" "destroyed".
>What about Greece, Spain, Italy, Venezuela
All of those have a lower public spending as % of GDP than western european social democracies though. So once again, not an argument.
>>85015113
>If I tried to own private property
What, are you gonna build a factory from scratch? To build capital at all requires the labor of many people. Private property does not mean your house, the clothes on your back or your tootbrush fyi
>ur a statist, dont tread on me bro
Last time I checked it's always been capitalists that use the power of the state to supress worker's revolts and trade unions.
>>
>>85015051
>You're constantly trying to argue this point about consumer goods
because it DESTROYS the LTV

If you got the full product of your labour it would amount to NOTHING
You would have NOTHING
Do you not understand this?
Like how the fuck do you not get this?

>socially necessary labor time
LOL THIS DOESN'T EVEN MEAN ANYTHING

The cheaper consumer goods get in the economy, the less the working class opts to work.

>socially necessary labor time
LOL I can't believe you religiously believe in marxist theories like this
we're you dropped as a child?

>they did not realize we would be kept working the same hours to not harm profits of the capitalist class
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HOLY FUCK
THE WORKING CLASS WERE CONSUMING THE END PRODUCTS OF PRODUCTION THIS ENTIRE TIME

THE PROFIT LEVEL DOESN'T EVEN MATTER

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

HOLY FUCK

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>85015214
>it DESTROYS the LTV
you're being delusional now. everyone else here including your fellow rightists have realized you're batshit insane. not responding to someone who doesn't even know economics.
>>
>>85008844
>>85008891
>>85010255
>>85013658
>surplus doesn't exist EquilibriumFags
>believing in Marginalism after thermodynamics economic relation and Marxist neo-marxists rebuttal of all subjective value theories

>believing in an economics school that give no shit about Empirical evidence and scream [but muh model]

>m m muh marx is ded where actually marx is so fucking huge he is everywhere from post Keynesianism, post Ricardians and being the saint of heterodox economics to every Materialists, Hegelians, psychoanalytics, romantics, idealists, etc.... and every political theoretician with any labor sympathies and revolutionaries to being one of the 3 founding fathers of sociology

Isn't it sad that the thing "libertarians" fetishize the most is the thing they are most dead wrong about? ahahahahhahahahahaha nigs learn real economics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ji_3v5yWLg

https://divulgacionmarxista.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/debunking-economics-steve-keen.pdf
>>
>>85015159
>It means you will get NOTHING for taking over the means of production. NOTHING

They seem to think they will all become millionaires by divvying up the CEOs cash, when most CEOs make 1 million on average yearly, when divided up amongst all the workers of this big corps it is insignificant. I do think they should make less money but it's not a magic fix everything solution like they think it is.

>If they got the "actual value of their labor" and went to spend that money the price would simply rise and they would be in the exact same position.

There was a dipshit /leftypol/er on /v/ unironically suggesting that everyone be given $1 million dollars a year. We desperately tried to show him how that would fuck everything up, yet he just couldn't understand. Everyone in Zimbabwe is a billionaire. The amount of cash doesn't matter if it holds no value, it's really not that fucking hard to understand. Having conversations with people from /leftypol/ makes it very obvious why socialist nations keep failing spectacularly.
>>
>>85015062
>this bullshit image again
First off productivity has NOT increased, GDP has increased, which is a bullshit made up government number.
Secondly that graph ignores total compensation.
Thirdly what happened in 1971 was nixon ended the gold window and let the federal reserve print endless amounts of money.

>rightists don't even read the basic economics
LMAO you people don't even believe in supply and demand and you're actually this brainwashed

>48% of my pay goes to pay my "employers"
LOL
THE PAY DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER

MONEY DOES NOT EQUAL CONSUMER GOODS

THE WORKING CLASS CONSUMES THE CONSUMER GOODS

THE END PRODUCT OF YOUR LABOUR IS CONSUMED BY YOU, YOU GIGANTIC RETARD

>it does NOT mean they consume everything they produce.
except it does
why would it not?
>>
>>85015256
adding some good stuff to educate the Austrians cucks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7nu1nABORk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvBWJWFTZWY
>>
>>85015093
>will of the majority is not statism
It is statism

>hurr enforcing my will upon others isn't statism

leftarchists are just crybabby fascists
>>
>>85015214
>If you got the full product of your labour it would amount to NOTHING
That was never the point though. Marx himself refuted this, you're strawmanning Marx with Lassalle's argument. See "Critique of the Gotha Programme", where Marx criticized Lassalle for insisting on that the workers should "receive the full product of their labor"

>>85015214
>socially necessary labor time isn't real
Jeez, I don't know if you're legitimately autistic or arguing in really bad faith. You don't see me claiming that all terminology you use is capitalist brainwashing.
>HAHAHAHAHAHA
take your meds
>>
>>85015246

The labor theory of value has been debunked for over a century now. Anyone who brings it up unironically is laughed out of the building.
>>
>>85015256
>>85015286
economics doesn't matter, cuck
>>
File: wew.png (383KB, 611x578px) Image search: [Google]
wew.png
383KB, 611x578px
>>85015313
answer the first vid in this post then nigger >>85015286


amuse me
>>
>>85015279
>productivity has NOT increased, productivity has increased
>it's just bullshit you know because it doesn't reaffirm my beliefs
If you're persistent I'll tell you why it isn't bullshit.
>you don't even believe in supply and demand
except I do? you don't seem to understand what banking, trade profit, and non-trade profit are.
>the pay does not equal consumer goods
just because the currency is not turned to commodity it does not mean all my work is coming back to me. It means my labor is being used for meaningless hedge funds and interest rates.
>why would it not?
because my labor power is being stored in the bank rather than put back into the market. I literally just said that.
>>
>>85015303
>See "Critique of the Gotha Programme",

How about you actually fucking explain things instead of deflecting with "g-go read a b-b-book". If you can't explain things in a simple and concise manner then it is a telltale sign that you don't actually know what you're talking about.
>>
>>85015136
>>85014829
2nd request at the deranged maniac rightist
>>
>>85015279
>THE END PRODUCT OF YOUR LABOUR IS CONSUMED BY YOU, YOU GIGANTIC RETARD
>the capitalist sells me back the value i created but still has a profit
What did he mean by this
>>
>>85015369
>>85015303
Marx literally just stated that the product of their labor is a combination of the commodity they receive and the labor power they put in. I'm not sure why he wants you to read the Gotha programme exactly, unless you disagree with marx on that?
>>
>>85015024
You're equivocating the degree of chance you need for communism with the degree of chance of past transformation. It's not even close.
>>
>>85015132
>pic
>DUDE SOCIALISM IS THE NEXT STAGE OF HISTORY AND I BASE THIS ON ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
>THERE ARE REAL LAWS OF HISTORY AND THEY'RE NOT MADE UP BULLSHIT, TRUST ME
How deep into pseudoscience can you get?

>Ofcourse I'm not,
No shit, because you have literal downs syndrome and enjoy being enslaved. Mutualism would be a step up from what you want.

>but you do realize that what you were just vouching for (worker owned MoP without government) is literally anarcho-communism?
I never said I agreed with it, I said it was less dumb. Holy fuck you are a dumb motherfucker.

>capitalism is gonna last forever
Give me one reason it won't.
top kek you guys actually think there will be a cute revolution or something.
Why was socialism tried so many times and failed miserably so people went back to capitalism?

>Consumers can't live if they don't buy the shit capitalists produce.
Bullshit. They can grow their own food.
But nobody wants to do that so they would rather buy from capitalists.
Consumers have a choice of which capitalists to buy. This is why the consumer is in charge in the marketplace.

>That's the whole point.
Bullshit.
You think that getting the full product of your labour will grant you more shit, but it won't and it's impossible.
I already proved you wrong. Your entire theory is a joke.

>What is feudalism then?
Another system that existed in certain places in history.
History is complicated and there are no bullshit "laws".
Just give up kiddo.

>It's called capitalism, comrade :^)
LMAO It's like you're blaming everything on breathing.

hey so there is an axe murderer over there that breaths but there is also a kitten next to him that breathes
>HURRR THEY'RE BOTH THE EXACT SAME THING
Ohhh you cute naive brainwashed leftist manchildren
>>
>It's another "/leftypol/ escapes their containment zone and gets stomped" thread

Calm the fuck down, take your estrogen pills and head back home /leftypol/. Literally no one wants you here. Nobody cares about your failed embarrassment of an ideology you only use as an excuse to sniff your own farts.
>>
>>85015432
Except we debunked every arguer here, now the last guy standing is claiming that 99% of consumer goods going to the workers disproves LTV.
Who got stopped exactly?
>>
>>85015400
>I'm not sure why he wants you to read the Gotha programme exactly,

Because he's just a namedropping twat like all of /leftypol/. It's just them trying to one up each other in one gigantic circlejerk of who is more communist than the other even though none of them understand a damn thing.
>>
>>85015159
>LMAO
>HOLY FUCK
>AHHAHAHAHA
You really need to take your Prozac.

>If they got the "actual value of their labor" and went to spend that money the price would simply rise and they would be in the exact same position.
You clearly don't understand the Labour Theory of Value. Prices wouldn't rise or fall that way in a Communist society. The value of something is directly linked to the labour required to provide it. If you earn 40 hours of labour, you can use that to spend on goods that are equivalently worth 40 hours of labour. Please actually read up on what you're arguing against.
>>
>>85015432
>if i declared victor i won't have to argue
prove to me that marginal utility theory is right go ahead.
>>
File: gothaprogramme.png (35KB, 899x371px) Image search: [Google]
gothaprogramme.png
35KB, 899x371px
>>85015369
To give you the quick rundown, your strawman of Marx's argument that "workers should receive the full product of their labor" was actually something that Lassalle argued for, a contemporary of Marx who got criticized on this very point. Atleast put in the effort to read this single paragraph.
>>
>>85015488
You clearly don't understand the Labour Theory of Value. Prices wouldn't rise or fall that way in a Communist society. The value of something is directly linked to the labour required to provide it. If you earn 40 hours of labour, you can use that to spend on goods that are equivalently worth 40 hours of labour. Please actually read up on what you're arguing against.
kek
Someone got BTFO
>>
>>85015432
>>85015498
and no you can't deprivilege all production input in your model cuz labor is prior to capital and energy is a thermodynamics modeling factor in labor productivity
>>
>>85015422
>Give me one reason it won't.
The fact that it only exists for 200 years, give or take a few dozen. The fact that it shits the bed and causes a huge crisis every so many years.
>>
>>85015168
already debunked here desu:
>>85015279

>>85015205
>You've already posted this like three times
Really hits close to home huh?

>redditor
TOP LAL a marxist is calling me a redditor
Please kill yourself already.
You ACTUALLY think you can get more what what is virtually all consumer goods.
You completely failed to refute a massive hole in socialist theory.

>And I wouldn't call dismissing the Oscar Wilde quote
Nobody cares about your gay quotes. We care about arguments, which you have none.

>All of those have a lower public spending as % of GDP
Ahhhh, I guess that's all constitutes economic freedom then.
Also I guess GDP is a super legit measure of an economy then.
lol you're a joke

>What, are you gonna build a factory from scratch?
What if I start selling pies or something, I gain some capital and decide to hire someone to help me. What's preventing me from doing this?

>>muh toothbruh
Nobody cares about your gay unfunny self hating memes
Libertarians see through socialist bullshit. It's so easy to debunk.
They actually think surplus value is real.
god damn, it's so sad

> it's always been capitalists that use the power of the state to supress worker's revolts and trade unions.
Good
Worker revolts need to be put down and the pinkertons did nothing wrong
btw I never said I was an ancap, but an ancap society would behave in the same way
>>
>>85015477
>Except we debunked every arguer here

Not a single person was debunked. You just came in here, castrated your nutsack, shit on it and started screeching until red in the face while chugging estrogen. People then told you to leave their house and you began swinging your prolapsed anus around like a helicopter blade, flicking chunks of shit all over their rug and couch. We think you should seek help anon.
>>
communism will win check em.
>>
>>85015566
Whatever narrative keeps your ideology at bay, classcuck
>>
>>85015487
refer to >>85015518
>>
>>85015246
>you're being delusional now
LOL

Refute my actual argument or just delete all of your posts.

YOU CANNOT REFUTE MY ARGUMENT

THERE IS NO SURPLUS VALUE

>everyone else here including your fellow rightists have realized you're batshit insane
This entire thread revolved around mocking and debunking marxist/socialist bullshit.

Socialists are legitimately insane to begin with.
>>
>>85015547
>If you earn 40 hours of labour, you can use that to spend on goods that are equivalently worth 40 hours of labour

So 40 hours worth of burger flipping is worth exactly the same of 40 hours of brain surgery?
>>
>>85015564
>debunked
which I refuted there
>>85015365
>>
File: 1352083287839.jpg (23KB, 309x307px) Image search: [Google]
1352083287839.jpg
23KB, 309x307px
>>85015246
>who doesn't even know economics.
>DUDE SURPLUS VALUE IS REAL
>I UNDERSTAND ECONOMICS
>>
File: Anwar1111.png (650KB, 1049x604px) Image search: [Google]
Anwar1111.png
650KB, 1049x604px
>>85015634
respond to this >>85015256
and this >>85015552

i fucking dare you
>>
>>85015634
the guy I'm arguing with doesn't even understand how banking works.
>>
File: so mad.png (315KB, 500x490px) Image search: [Google]
so mad.png
315KB, 500x490px
>>85015256
>>85015286

>muh big words
>DUDE DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM IS REAAAAL
>DUDE IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT OUR THEORIES COMPLETELY IGNORE NEUROSCIENCE/INSTINCTS AND EVOLUTION
>DUDE IT'S TOTALLY OKAY THAT THE CAPITALIST CLASS IS ACTUALLY CONSUMING ALMOST NOTHING AND THE WORKING CLASS CONSUMES VIRTUALLY EVERYTHING THEY PRODUCE

How fucking stupid are you people?
Why do you still exist?

>Marxist neo-marxists rebuttal of all subjective value theories
Yes, batshit insane pseudoscience.

>>believing in an economics school that give no shit about Empirical evidence
Not true at all lol.

>steve keen
AHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
>>
>>85015564
>marxist
Again, why this fixation on marxism? I'm an anarchist.
>d-don't make me read :(
It's a short quote and it debunks your "human nature" argument. Why should I not use it?
>Ahhhh, I guess that's all constitutes economic freedom then.
It means there's less government. Or are you not a libertarian anymore when it's convenient?
>what's preventing me from doing this
The fact that there's no money. And LMAO if you actually believe capital accumulation starts with people selling pies
>ur gay, fuck you
Not an argument. We use Proudhon's definition of private property.
>Worker revolts need to be put down and the pinkertons did nothing wrong
Well, atleast you're being honest now. So much for "I actually care about the working class! The free market will fix it!"
>>
>Imagine being so cucked by Capitalist brainwashing to not this
>>
>>85015698
>THE WORKING CLASS CLASS CONSUMES VIRTUALLY EVERYTHING THEY PRODUCE
they don't
>>85015062
>>85015365
>>
>>85015677
they just like to circlejerk and claim victory
>>
>>85015274
>There was a dipshit /leftypol/er on /v/ unironically suggesting that everyone be given $1 million dollars a year. We desperately tried to show him how that would fuck everything up, yet he just couldn't understand. Everyone in Zimbabwe is a billionaire. The amount of cash doesn't matter if it holds no value, it's really not that fucking hard to understand. Having conversations with people from /leftypol/ makes it very obvious why socialist nations keep failing spectacularly.

THIS

Holy shit leftists are so fucking dumb and O B S E S S E D

>>85015399
>>the capitalist sells me back the value i created but still has a profit
Yes, the money the capitalist has is SAVED.

Money is just a tool that allows you to purchase resources.
I don't understand why you don't fucking get this.

If he gave you all of this money would you be better off?
Would you have more access to consumer goods?

Answer the question you pussy.
>>
>>85015711
>We use Proudhon's definition of private property

So you have to change the definition of words for your argument. Kind of like how SJWs also change the definition of words for their arguments. Hurr racism isn't hating a race it's privilege plus power durrrrr.
>>
>>85015488
>The value of something is directly linked to the labour required to provide it. If you earn 40 hours of labour, you can use that to spend on goods that are equivalently worth 40 hours of labour
doesn't this discourage efficiency? in this framework a work made by an expert in less time than an amateur is less valuable when in practice it clearly isn't.
>>
File: neoliberalism.png (12KB, 578x155px) Image search: [Google]
neoliberalism.png
12KB, 578x155px
>>85015720
Miss me with that utopian shit. Not that I disagree with historical materialism but you shouldn't present socialism as perfect.
>>
>>85015561
>The fact that it shits the bed and causes a huge crisis every so many years.
the great depression was the government's fault the current shitty depression is the government's fault as well

Central banking is cancer
what do you think happens when the state creates trillions and gives it to bankers and corporations?
>>
>>85015753
>change the definition of words
I'd accuse you of the same.
>In his 1849 treatise What is Property?, Pierre Proudhon answers with "Property is theft!" In natural resources, he sees two types of property, de jure property (legal title) and de facto property (physical possession), and argues that the former is illegitimate. Proudhon's conclusion is that "property, to be just and possible, must necessarily have equality for its condition."
>>
>>85009229
When you retards stop realising the magical free market doesn't just solve everything.
>>
>>85015775
>the great depression was the government's fault
It that why FDR's New Deal fixed it?

>Central banking is cancer
It is. It's also an integral part of capitalist society.
>>
>>85015760
The quality of somebody's labour can be tracked in various ways, like by observing how efficiently a worker uses their input materials, how quickly they are in their throughput, and how satisfactory their output product is to who consumes it.

In a Cybernetically planned economy this can be observed easily with digital resources.
>>
>>85015775
>government's fault
even though it was caused by private buyers being unable to refinance their loans to private banks? In both cases? (1929 and 2008)
>>
>>85015365
>>it's just bullshit you know because it doesn't reaffirm my beliefs
If American productivity has increase why is the trade deficit at record highs? Why aren't we exporting all of this "productivity" we are "creating"?

>except I do?
Really. So if the capitalist gave you all of his profits you will be able to buy that many more consumer goods with it with absolutely no change in price?
lmao

>you don't seem to understand what banking, trade profit, and non-trade profit are.
you don't know what any of these terms are.

>does not mean all my work is coming back to me
Yes, yes it does.
Why wouldn't it.

>It means my labor is being used for meaningless hedge funds
bullshit lol
your labour makes REAL THINGS in the economy, products and services
these products and services have to be priced
just because hedge fund managers are playing with federal reserve funny money doesn't change the fact you produced REAL THINGS that have to be CONSUMED one way or another

you are literally talking about fairy tale nonsense

if you produce so many things but you and your class doesn't get to consume them, where do they go? do 90% of what you produce get destroyed in a massive shredder or something?

like holy shit, use common sense.
you people are utterly incapable of logic

>because my labor power is being stored in the bank
LOL
HOLY FUCK
aHAHAHAHA
It's like you really believe labour can be turned into money LITERALLY.
What the fuck man?

If this money stored in a bank was given to you, it would just cause inflation and you wouldn't be better off AT ALL

LMAO HOLY FUCK YOU ARE SO DUMB AND YOU CANNOT REFUTE ME
>>
File: ancom vs ancap.png (24KB, 640x479px) Image search: [Google]
ancom vs ancap.png
24KB, 640x479px
>>85015859
Careful with those arguments. Ancaps will never understand how the state is required to preserve capitalism and thinks we are pro-state when we make these claims.
>>
>>85015897
>you really believe labor can be turned into money LITERALLY
I'm not arguing with you anymore
>>
File: 1492020398205.png (57KB, 812x726px) Image search: [Google]
1492020398205.png
57KB, 812x726px
>>85015906
Lel, why do you worthless irrelevant commies always try so hard?
>>
>>85015906
>the state is required to preserve capitalism
oh this bullshit again

I can't wait for the state to REALLY end and you leftarchists get eaten alive.

You're just authoritarian statists who support democracy.
Brainwashed fools.
>>
>>85015552
>deprivilege
ah another useless marxist buzzword

>cuz
Yeah you're not a baby and you're a real intellectual...

>labor is prior to capital
so?
Explain how surplus value is real when the working class consumes 99% of things?
lol
>>
>>85015698
1-i said no big words.
2-that is not answering anything, you didn't answer you brought a new accusation that i will be more than happy to rebuttal here: much like all hegelian philosophy it views history as a vital part of our relation with the real Kantian subject the absolute, the history here bring not only ideas but attitudes that comes with ideas loaded with them and thus the idea themselves don't come on their own but buy a dialectic [an inner struggle of unity] that brings about such new development in human ideas themselves evolution in marxism was is and will always be there as a reading of modern setting and a rereading of its class relation i can go over this but it is not our main argument and two i am here to talk econ with u

3-that is a straw man i said no such thing quote me saying i dare you straw manning weak ass nigga

4- prove it is batshit nonsense, this is a no argument

5-what is [muh rational model > empirical data] debates between freedman and Hayke?, as Habermas showed, rational agents can have an irrational output from their interaction

6- not an arugment


so.... you made no counterargument you made no correction to me.
you objectively lost to add salt to the wound Hake was proven wrong empirically twice once in tito Yugoslavia and another in the gorbachev USSR
>>
>>85015850
this is a pretty vague statement. the nature of labor varies wildly depending on in what context it is and in many cases the quality of production is invincible to outside analysis. also the idea that someone or something is constantly monitoring your labor seems to discourage experimentation and innovation.
>>
>>85015981
Either way the proletarian outnumber the working class so will of the majority wins.
>>
File: ancom.png (102KB, 752x1668px) Image search: [Google]
ancom.png
102KB, 752x1668px
>>85015906
>ancom
>>
>>85016101
I meant ruling class
>>
>>85016031
>it views history as a vital part of our relation with the real Kantian subject the absolute
wow so it's useless horseshit
sounds great
why do you believe it describes reality?

>the history here bring not only ideas but attitudes that comes with ideas loaded with them and thus the idea themselves don't come on their own but buy a dialectic [an inner struggle of unity]
this sounds like poetic bullshit that is entirely unprovable

>3-that is a straw man
Bullshit
DM is contradictory to neuroscience/instincts etc

>rational agents can have an irrational output from their interaction
That's nice.
Explain how surplus value is real when the workers consume 99% of what they produce?

just kill yourself
>>
>>85016103
>wahhh they outnumber me fuckig statist *sob*, why can't I just MGTOW and live off my own work like human always have, right?
>>
>>85016070
>the nature of labor varies wildly depending on in what context it is
Yeah so how could I possibly not be vague?

>in many cases the quality of production is invincible to outside analysis
Isn't that not the case under the current system too? And if not give examples.

>constantly monitoring your labor seems to discourage experimentation and innovation.
Labour is constantly monitored now by managers and consumers who deem whether what you're doing is sufficient enough to be paid for.
>>
>>85016101
>Either way the proletarian outnumber the working class so will of the majority wins.
Socialism will never gain ground, it's already dead.
>>
File: Delayclose.jpg (93KB, 380x247px) Image search: [Google]
Delayclose.jpg
93KB, 380x247px
>>85015303
>capitalist brainwashing
Are these socialists for real?
>>
>>85016103
are you saying that being excluded from a tribe is statism?
>>
File: acb.jpg (184KB, 870x847px) Image search: [Google]
acb.jpg
184KB, 870x847px
Can't we just kill all socialists, end central banking and allow massive economic production and high living standards?

Kill them all desu.
>>
>>85016103
>but we also think social welfare is important
Stopped reading there
>>
>>85016185
Sorry, I meant crony capitalist corporatist brainwashing. Not REAL capitalism 9_9
>>
Marxists sound like that time cube guy or that crazy christian schizophrenic that developed his own OS.
>>
>>85016220
>end central banking
why not end banking completely? oh right because ancap is just petite-statism with "private" banks, military, and police.
>>
>>85016232
>DUDE ANYTHING THAT HAS PRIVATE CONTROL OVER THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION IS CAPITALISM
>I DON'T CARE THAT THIS DEFINITION INCLUDES COUNTLESS COUNTRIES WITH MANY DIFFERENT IDEOLOGIES/SYSTEMS AND LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE IN THE ECONOMY
It's like blaming "breathing" and "food eating" on everything because murderers and genocidal maniacs also ate food and breathed.

Useless.
>>
>>85016300
Are you trying to say corporatism and crony capitalism aren't capitalism then?
>>
>>85016263
>why not end banking completely?
because banking serves an important function in society, to plan the emergent structure of production and to store wealth for people, also loans and stuff etc xD
>>
>>85016300
>ill ignore over 250 years of economics, history, politics, sociology, etc so i can make up definitions that suit my agenda
>>
>>85016325
Not when you already have infrastructure
>>
>>85016025
>marxist buzzword
fuck you economically illiterate the one who does the deprivilege is your fucking side and make everything equal as substitutable "factors of production"
as :Y=A.L(1-a).K(a)
it is your side that does the subjectivity everything in the production is equal bullshit

>Explain how surplus value is real when the working class consumes 99% of things?
if took a single economic class no matter what school ywn say such a thing in fact your argument is pro marxist af

consumption follow the cycle of C-M-C'
c= commodities [first one is your labor second one is what you buy]
m= money

Capitalists who owns the means of production goes through
M-[C-P-C]-M' < first you see money as an input to capital and [P= production],such money is invested in capital to make more commodities from other committees [metal to metal par as example] and then the C2 sold as a profit M'
The worker Consume what he makes only after he gets Alienated from the other fucking cycle of production the mcm
they are not in the same cycle of production now you understand?
>>
>>85016263
>oh right because ancap is just petite-statism with "private" banks, military, and police.
how is that statism?

leftarchism is pure statism

>>85016323
I'm saying according to your retarded definition they are.

>>85016329
>>ill ignore over 250 years of economics, history, politics, sociology
Yes. I, like every rational person will ignore marxist pseudoscience and other forms of pseudoscience that got things wrong.

We don't support just capitalism, we support free market capitalism.
I don't understand why this is so difficult for you self hating manchildren.

>so i can make up definitions that suit my agenda
Like marxists do all of the time.
>DUDE CAPITALISM KILLED BILLIONS OF PEOPLE

>>85016337
what kind of infrastructure?
you people are so simple minded that complex dynamic societial structures are foreign to you
>>
>>85009737
>live a good life
Keep telling yourself that
>>
>>85009871
>chile today is the best place to live in SA
It's the copper mines aka the one thing he was forced to nationalize before Chile collapsed like Eastern Europe in the 90s
>>
>>85016385
>how are military and police statism
Tyler Durden would be disappointed in you

Let's be PERFECTLY clear, here: You are saying that crony capitalism and corporatism ARE NOT capitalism, is that right?

>dynamic societal structure
>you need debt (definitely different from taxes, right?) and hedge funds up the wazoo to have dynamic infrastructure
topkek
>>
>>85016132
1-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
2-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
3-quote me saying the stuff
4-did in my last post + this vid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7nu1nABORk

you made no point against me you made no correction to any of my points and now you have no point to makke
>>
>>85011443
It's as if you have no idea what the fuck the Labour Movement even was
>>85009485
Not all human action is the result of economic forces
To quote Marx,
"Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past."
>>
File: 1495448127138.jpg (44KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
1495448127138.jpg
44KB, 800x600px
>>85016371
>marxism is advanced economics
lmao it's advanced pseudoscience

>economically illiterate
top kek you're a marxist

>deprivilege
This shit doesn't even mean anything.

>as :Y=A.L(1-a).K(a)
Is this time cube math?
Am I talking to the time cube guy? lol

>ywn say such a thing
Well I just did and you could not refute it.
Too bad.

>in fact your argument is pro marxist af
nope

>M-[C-P-C]-M'
More nonsense math.
You ARE the time cube guy.

>such money is invested in capital to make more commodities from other committees
SO WHAT?
I know capitalists can make money on previous money.
Explain how taking over the means of production will mean more consumer goods for the working class.

They ALREADY CONSUME these resources.
Holy fuck son.

>only after he gets Alienated from the other fucking cycle of production the mcm
AHAHAHAHAHA
This bullshit doesn't even matter

>muh aliums
none of this makes sense

Even if they weren't "alienated" they would still consume the EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF CONSUMER GOODS.

Explain how they would get more, or just delete your post.
Where would the goods come from?

>cycle of production now
define cycle of production
I bet it doesn't mean shit
>>
>>85009938
Are you yourself armed and trained in using a gun and participating in a militia? You talking about how conceptually right-wingers have more guns, instead of what you're doing tells me that you're LARPing right now
>>
>>85016397
>Keep telling yourself that
I live in a rich area that's mostly white and I have a decent job and own a home.

Tell me my life sucks
>>
>>85016449
>Tyler Durden would be disappointed in you
typical for the leftist to like the most reddit of movies

>You are saying that crony capitalism and corporatism ARE NOT capitalism, is that right?
I don't even use the word capitalism personally, it's lost all meaning.
I only use the term free market because it's much more clear.
Socialists enjoy confusing people.

>>you need debt (definitely different from taxes, right?) and hedge funds up the wazoo
Oh, both things that are blown out of proportion on a massive scale in our current economy thanks to central banking.

When central banks had less power in the 50s/60s there was much less debt.
>>
>>85016498
>It's as if you have no idea what the fuck the Labour Movement even was
A bunch of idiots that destroyed production and made everyone a little bit poorer.
Pinkertons were right.

>"Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past."
This is another one of marx's contradictory quotes.
DM states that there are "laws of history" and that human action is the result of these economic forces, that these forces are immutable.
>>
>>85007887
>The year of /ourlord/ 2017
>Not a humanist liberatarian Derridean-post-structural secular agnostic sex-positive anarcho-collectivist

Limahl at y'oll
>>
>>85013072
>transformation from feudalism to modern democracy
>seamless
Are you fucking joking?
>>
>>85016454
>some literally who youtube vid with no views

>you made no point against me
You made no actual point and you specifically did not define your terms so there is nothing to debate.

Answer the question using common sense logic.
How is surplus value is real when the workers consume 99% of what they produce?
>>
>>85016385
I wasn't talking about marxist theory specifically. You've ignored countless others who are pro-capitalism actually.
>>
File: Anwar2.png (32KB, 452x149px) Image search: [Google]
Anwar2.png
32KB, 452x149px
>>85016499
1-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
2-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
3-it is your system that give no priority to any of the production input not mine
4-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
5-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
6-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
7-the point is that the cycles are alienated from each other that they are apart not one and the same workers relation to commodity is that he uses M to get C wanting it's use value
while capitalist uses M and put his hard capital to work to make C to get even more M
they are different cycles you cucccc, the consumption of energy follow thermodynamics laws and your school of Austrian economics ignore that

>they would consume the exact same amount of consumer good
you mean that a worker can pay for the same things as capitalist? wow what a nice model going on there budd so i can buy the 1 million dollar car cuz i have the same buying power as the capitalist ahahahahahah

last- a cycle of production is a system where inputs of C get to be put to shape and be produced and worked on using means of production P to give an outputs as C'
>>
Why are socialists so fucking insane?
lol holy shit

I spent the entire thread asking them to explain how they plan on getting more than 99% of something and they couldn't explain

they're so fucking stupid it's unreal and they don't even accept human instincts

they actually think the collapse of capitalism is inevitable, they think automation will destroy it, even when the price of capital goods comes down and creates a larger service sector economy

why should we not kill these people?

bye lel
>>
File: full metal zizek.jpg (59KB, 786x442px) Image search: [Google]
full metal zizek.jpg
59KB, 786x442px
>tfw don't know about the marxist ideas and don't care
>this somehow offends the /pol/niggers and far-leftards even more than taking a side in their retarded squabbles, apparently making me "a fucking fence-sitter/conformist"
I wouldn't vote Zizek but his ramblings are way above the human norm and if you can't acknowledge it then you are controlled by your own biases.
>>
>>85016720
>1-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
>2-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
>3-it is your system that give no priority to any of the production input not mine
>4-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
>5-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
>6-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate

You have fucking nothing.

>the point is that the cycles are alienated from each other
What "cycles" what the fuck are you saying you incredibly unaware pseudointellectual.

>that they are apart not one and the same workers relation to commodity is that he uses M to get C wanting it's use value
LOL THIS MEANS NOTHING AT ALL

YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN IN REAL TERMS HOW THE WORKING CLASS WILL HAVE MORE RESOURCES
LOL

>the consumption of energy follow thermodynamics laws
The economy has NOTHING TO DO with the laws of thermodynamics.
Holy shit why would you actually think the economy acts like this?
You're fucking embarrassing. No wonder the shitty youtube videos you watch have no views.

>you mean that a worker can pay for the same things as capitalist? wow what a nice model going on there budd so i can buy the 1 million dollar car cuz i have the same buying power as the capitalist ahahahahahah
Holy shit, is english your second language or something?
>>
>>85016746
>he asked
>the answer was the alienation of two production cycles
>a a a i i i won lol bye before i embarrass myself even more.

k it was my pleasure kicking your ass nig
>>
>>85016786
I'll take you to some /pol/ dipshit anyway radical centerist kun
>>
File: 1497680266493.png (448KB, 846x900px) Image search: [Google]
1497680266493.png
448KB, 846x900px
>>85016786
>I wouldn't vote Zizek but his ramblings are way above the human norm
>dude I worship a fat greasy pseudointellectual that contradicts himself on a daily basis

LMAO
>>
File: 1499493403604.gif (157KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
1499493403604.gif
157KB, 500x500px
>>85016826
>alienation of two production cycles

>when someone REALLY thinks they are making logic sense but they're so far in their own ass and unable to define ANY of their terms so they sperg out on the internet
>>
File: DS3 general.jpg (453KB, 1000x681px) Image search: [Google]
DS3 general.jpg
453KB, 1000x681px
>>85016823
1-i told you what a cycle
>last- a cycle of production is a system where inputs of C get to be put to shape and be produced and worked on using means of production P to give an outputs as C'
another straw man? really

2-it means in the world of economics actually a huge fucking a lot
resources =! commodities
nice model there now model it on a mathematical level cuck

>The economy has NOTHING TO DO with the laws of thermodynamics.
Holy shit why would you actually think the economy acts like this?
You're fucking embarrassing. No wonder the shitty youtube videos you watch have no views.
yeh the problem is he btfoed krugman and predicted the 2008 crash so shut up
https://books.google.com.sa/books?id=1LzwCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA194&lpg=PA194&dq=thermodynamics+empirical+economics&source=bl&ots=A3GyJt3k-h&sig=E04-7-UcVd-MirnkY8F5YrV-nQs&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOjrTQZBmMM

last- >5-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate
>>
File: 1493878129473.jpg (11KB, 226x223px) Image search: [Google]
1493878129473.jpg
11KB, 226x223px
>they still honestly believe they are going to gain more consumer goods
>they still believe that money == resources
>they still believe that money == consumer goods

I mean this is common sense shit.

What the fuck is wrong with socialists?
How are they honestly this dumb?
>>
Early Godard
The Grapes of Wrath (1940)
Salt of the Earth (1954)
All of Eisenstein
Dziga Vertov
All of Sergei Parajanov
Novecento (1976)
Earth (1930)
Teorema (1968)
Modern Times (1936)
1900 (1976)
Snowpiercer (2013)
Can Dialectics Break Bricks? (1973)
Tri pesni o Lenine (1934)
Taking Tiger Mountain (1983)
Reds (1981)
Land and Freedom (1995)
Michael Collins (1996)
The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (1972)
I, Daniel Blake (2016)
>>
>>85016956
>>last- a cycle of production is a system where inputs of C get to be put to shape and be produced and worked on using means of production P to give an outputs as C'
Okay.

What does alienation have to do with any of this?

>mathematical level
The problem is your math is pseudo intellectual and makes no sense.

>predicted the 2008 crash so shut up
You seem like a crying baby.
Many people predicted the crash including austrians.
Austrians actually predicted with detail.
Marxists are always predicting a crash.

>last- >5-not an argument you economically philosophically illiterate

You STILL CANNOT EXPLAIN how the working class will have more consumer goods if they took over the means of production.
This is honestly hilarious.
>>
>>85016155
socialists and marxists have small numbers
>>
>>85016957
an ugly strawman quote me saying that i dare fucking you
money is created when banks loan at an interest see vid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxJW7hl8oqM

>muh "common" ""sense" > real math and strong methodology
you are a retard then..
btw till now you didn't prove marginalism
>>
>>85015833
>It that why FDR's New Deal fixed it?
You ARE brainwashed.
The new deal extended the depression.
You worship authority like crazy.
FDR was a piece of shit just like you.
Thread posts: 528
Thread images: 117


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.