Does John Wick have the deepest lore?

No
>>>/v/

>>84908985
John Wick is exactly what it sets out to be, no more no less. I don't care about the lore because it's merely a vessel for more action scenes and grandiose acting.

If you confuse puddles for lakes, sure.

>>84908992
Name an action movie with a deeper lore then.

>shoots you in the chest then in the head

>>84909019
>baby needs everything spelled out for him

>>84909025
>moving the goalposts
>>>/v/

File: 1463181841594.jpg (40KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 680x680px

>CGI blood

I don't give a fuck how good the action is, CGI blood is fucking unforgivable. Sam Peckinpah is rolling in his grave.

>>84908985
it's a make believe world for people with tattoos and a fetish for blood/body work so they can seem "cool" to normies.

>>84908985
No but it has the dumbest lore. Setting the films in a fantasy universe was a mistake

>>84909093
>Sam Peckinpah
He's a hack anyway

Ye

>>84908985

Fuck yeah, been watching Part 2 repeatedly for days now. It's the best ACTION KINO in the last 10 years I can tell you that for a fact.

The movies are fucking solid action flicks, and both rank in my top ten. I wouldn't say it has a deep lore though, maybe a colorful world

>>84908985
John Wick is a sequel to the first Matrix, the silencer scene in the train station confirms it