what the FUCK is his problem?
>>84903717
nothing.
He forms his own opinions on things.
>>84903717
Right or wrong he thinks for himself, what's your problem?
he has too much brain power for the race god gave him
>>84903717
he has good taste
>>84903717
From the thumbnail I thought he was getting a haircut and the sheet they put on him just happened to be orange.
>>84903717
He's the opposite man.
>>84903717
>Gay
>Black
>Trump supporter
What's his endgame?
>>84903717
At a certain point his reputation as a "contrarian" became a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy, where it seems some of his reviews tend towards being purposefully oblique and subversive more as a fuck-you to the reader than a legitimate effort at critique. Still though, we need Armond because at his best he's tearing down false idols and at his worst he's still keeping us on our toes.
>>84903717
2accurate2competent
>>84903717
He's patrish and doesn't accept bribes from (((((((((((Disney))))))))))
>>84903717
>Good taste in television & film
>Posts honest opinions
>Dresses nicely
Nothing.
uncle ruckus
>like things he likes
>dislike things he dislikes
>but almost everything he likes or dislikes are the opposite of what most people likes and dislikes
Yeah, what is his problem???
>>84903717
I tought that was Suge Knight
It's pretty telling that most of the time people's complaints about him being a contrarian is followed by a list of childrens' movies that he didn't like, such as Marvelshit.
From the few reviews i 've glanced he suffers from the journalist disease: pointless narcissistic TL;DRs. I damn those editors that reject a journalist's first novel
Ebert is the reference point for film critique
>>84904380
>actually not wrong
>>84903717
he hates being black
He's not the problem, every other critic is.
>>84903853
I raff
too many crackers liking shitty movies, anon.