>>84806032
ynotboth?
Bravery.
>>84806032
How can it be Jewish propaganda if the Jews were the meanest ones in the film?
>>84806111
But they're depicted as the edgy cool anti heroes. The Nazis are basically evil caricatures throughout the film
>>84806081
Came here to post this
It was a well made Jewish propaganda.
I was too young to understand at the time but inserting nigger rebel here and a jew bear there were all nuances of kikery.
Kino is cinema in German so strictly speaking any film is kino. It's a noun not an adjective.
>>84806143
>The Nazis are basically evil caricatures throughout the film
Who? From what I remember:
>the original batch of guys they killed, with the commander being clubbed
>that guy who wanted to be with the Jewess he didn't know was a Jew
>the Germans in the bar
>the German general or lieutenant or whoever he was in the bar
>Waltz
Only Waltz was what you could call "evil caricature" from what I remember.
>>84806209
Fair enough, I suppose they did have a fair bit of humanity in the film. Though the way they depicted Hitler was strictly for some laffs
>>84806032
The movie, not film, signifies Harvey Weinstein ultimate plan to use Tarantino as a vessel for pro-Jewish, anti-white blockbusters, having guided his career from its race-neutral Elmore Leonard early peak then endured his chopsocky grindhouse fetish, to instill in Tarantino that social justice movies exploiting America's dark white past help define him as an "important, serious filmmaker."
We can hope that Tarantino finally breaks away from the Weinsteins. He isn't redpilled, but it's dawning on him that (((they))) don't share his genuine passion for cinema. He'll reclaim his roots before he retires, without Harvey, who will likely have him killed or outed as a hatemonger via MSM.
>>84806032
neither. it was shit after the first 10 minutes
>>84806032
It was well-disguised anti-Jewish propoganda.