Why is it doing so badly? Spiderman plus RDJ should be making

>>84778016
I'm actually really surprised how much of the movie is actual Spider-Man. I figured from the trailers that it would basically be an Iron Man movie but frankly it wasn't.

It's doing poorly because it's basically a parody of capeshit movies.

The average joe doesn't want an incompetent hero and a villain that isn't evil.

>250M opening weekend worldwide
>doing poorly
Maybe by Avengers standards lol
Are you able to breathe and type at the same time?

>>84778233
>stealing isn't evil

>>84778624
but the government stole from him first. It's a doggy dog world out there

>>84778673
Damn.....

>>84778673
>doggy dog
It's "dog eat dog".

>>84778624
Robin Hood isn't evil

>>84778715
Yes he is

>>84778016
But it isn't doing badly. It's just not doing as well as it could be because it's a 3rd reboot of the same franchise within a 15 year span. This movie did in fact reignite my love for Spider-Man and is the closest to being a legit Spider-Man movie we've ever had. And Yes, I do love the Raimi trilogy.

>>84778673

love that people out there are using 'doggy dog' as a phrase

>>84778689
Hate to be the devils avocado but you're wrong

File: ogsnoop.jpg (56KB, 800x464px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 800x464px

>>84778673
>It's a doggy dog world out there

>>84778016
http://screenrant.com/spider-man-homecoming-opening-weekend-box-office-257-million/
Blunder of the century. Marvel is finished. DC has won

just imagine how poorly it would do without Iron Man

>>84778689
>It's "dog eat dog".
I could care less Anon.

>>84778689
posts like this are a diamond dozen

>>84778814
how mad are you dc faggots. imagine this, MARVEL/SONY is making BANK

File: 130123364454343.jpg (40KB, 635x353px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 635x353px

>>84778844
This shit triggers me so hard irl and people keep using it

>>84778915
It happens a diamond dozen times

File: 1497315368929.jpg (29KB, 182x202px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 182x202px

>>84778016
This fucking poster gets me every time

The original poster is so bad. Can't believe it's official.

>>84778016
RDJ is a manlet, and manlets just aren't attractive to general audiences.

>>84779305
he's maybe a manlet, but he is charismatic as fuck

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cES2pr8x0w

>>84778689
thatsthejoke.jpg

Why is it okay when Tony does it but not for Keaton?

>>84778016
I'll spell it out for you.

c a p e s h i t f a t i g u e

>>84779847
Nah, WW is literally still getting dosh.
If anything this is Marvel comedies fatigue.
Or not even that, is more like Marvel is not getting new people from the regular audience that wouldn't watch one of their comedies anyways.

>>84778689
Why don't you just go ahead and do a 360 and take your ass out of this thread.

>>84778016
It's fine. Just wait to see how much it drops next week

>>84778624
It's not

File: 1490665428058.jpg (51KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1000x563px

>>84778673
>>84778796
>>84778844
>>84778905
>>84780468
DELET THOSE
DELET THOSE RIGHT NOW

File: IMG_0436.gif (491KB, 500x273px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 500x273px

>>84778233
In the case of handling the reissue on the specific title of comic is they let the different artist having total control over the same material oppose to the corporation film making is the collective efforts that overseeing by the same studio. I guess this is the reason why the entry of three different franchises seemingly has the same texture. It's my hypothetical theory, though. Once Tom Cruise kicked off the franchise of "Mission Impossible" by bringing in directors who has different styles of craft to create the freshness on every entry. But Idk what happens to THAT concept. Why don't you text to Mr Lee's twitter account to ask "What's going on ?"?