what film has the best special effects?

>>84762936
would you?

>>84762936
The one where your mom doesn't look like a fat pig

File: anoes 85b.jpg (277KB, 1920x1082px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1920x1082px

idk, but all of the Nightmare on Elm Street movies are underrated in that regard.

File: IMG_1086.jpg (31KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 306x306px

>>84763032
>shot in the 70's
>""""special"""" effects

>>84762936
is this an explanation for wormholes

>>84762936
>not using wide-rule for the backdrop and college-rule for the hole to improve the illusion

>>84762936
Original star wars trilogy

>>84763217
this right here my familia

File: 1499582925422.jpg (29KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1280x720px

upvote plz

>>84763392
reddit

>>84763052
>elm street was shot in the 80s
>special effects =\= cgi

dumb frogposter

File: It's okay if she's still warm.jpg (55KB, 419x281px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 419x281px

>>84762936
The guinea pig series (at least the first two) had some pretty great special effects. So did cannibal holocaust. The special effects were so good that people thought they were real. Pic related.

>>84762936
Bone Tomahawk

File: 1484908480570 (1).png (2MB, 1377x903px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1377x903px

>>84763032

>>84763429
didn't they killed bunch of animals though?

File: CannibalHolocaustimpale.jpg (98KB, 453x313px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 453x313px

>>84763803
Cannibal holocaust? Yes. Guinea pig? No. There was more to CH's special effects than just the animals though, like pic related. It's not hard to guess the trick but it's still effective imo.

File: anoes 83.jpg (272KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1920x1080px

>>84763749

File: anoes 84.jpg (274KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1920x1080px

>>84763900

>>84763052
Does posting frogs make you into a fucking retard, or do you post frogs because you are a fucking retard

>>84762962
I'm too big

5u

File: anoes 85.jpg (317KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1920x1080px

>>84763919

>>84763409
You're talking about practical effects specifically, I take it?

Special effects would include CGI.

Special effects I would say Jurassic park. They combined physical models and cgi in a way no one really does today.

Practical is harder to say, so many films have great practical effects. Even Hellboy 2 was largely practical (like everything in the troll market). The evil dead remake is practical (and the behind the scenes about it is really interesting). Then you have films like The Thing. Cannibal Holocaust made people think they'd actually killed for it (though this was probably encouraged by producers as a way to generate free publicity).

>>84763973
One of the few musicals I actually like

>>84763749
She was a top qt when she was young

File: IMG_0673.gif (344KB, 476x268px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 476x268px

>>84762936
I like ones that are in "Death Becomes Her", "The Thing", "Jurassic Park", "Jaws", "Star Wars: New Hope", "Brain Dead", & "Aliens".

>>84764354
but it has the worst songs

>>84762936
>I mean, I'm no doctor, but it was like one clean chunk

>>84764591
But it's funny, great special effects, and even though the songs aren't always the best they can be fun (song about how dentists are all sadists always gets me), though it's possible my standards for comedy have been lowered by the constant stream of seth "macbeth" rogen tier comedy films as of recent.