What are some great conceptual films, like 2001?
REPLY CUNTS
I FINALLY SAW IT AND DON'T SEE WHAT THE BIG DEAL IS
Solaris (1972)
>>84714348
THAT'S FINE
YOU MUST NOT REALLY CARE ABOUT THE CONCEPTS AND IDEAS INVOLVED IN THE FILM
>>84714355
Does that really fit? Was under the impression it was more of a character drama
>>84713604
Lost Highway fits into that category I think? It's a great movie either way. Eraserhead does though, and that's also a great movie
>>84713604
Inland Empire
>>84714388
>YOU MUST NOT REALLY CARE ABOUT THE CONCEPTS AND IDEAS INVOLVED IN THE FILM
>you didn't like the food this person made? you must not like eating
>>84714388
>Does that really fit? Was under the impression it was more of a character drama
oh okay it makes sense now
>>84714393
I'd say Lost Highway fits but not really sure about Eraserhead, neither really seem all THAT focused on specific concepts, they are more abstract
>>84713604
The Holy Mountain
>>84714462
Food analogies are a sign of stupidity, and if you remotely cared about concepts like transhumanism you'd love 2001.
>>84714503
Oh yeah I've been meaning to watch this, looks very good.
>>84714463
Eraserhead is VERY focused on it's subject matter. Maybe, you just didn't understand it. Read up on the tax policies in rural Idaho, during the 1970s. It will become clear.
>>84714590
the concept I got from the movie was fatherhood and fear of it
>>84714590
>Read up on the tax policies in rural Idaho, during the 1970s. It will become clear.
How so?
>>84714462
>food analogies
>IMAGINE BEING AT COMPUTERS
>SO FAT YOU LOOK AND SEE FOOD
>>84713604
The League of Gentlemen: Apocalypse
>>84713604
The fuck are you talking about? It came out in 1968.
>>84714504
don't see how twenty minutes of pretty colors intercut with frames of a dude's eye is representative of any aspect of transhumanism
>>84715266
Of course you don't.
>>84713604
try watching Love
>>84715384
I'll give it a shot, although I definitely prefer films that try to deal with concepts like death, consciousness or scientific ideas.
>>84715282
because it isn't
>>84715615
*notices your bulge*
Also Neon Genesis Evangelion and Ghost in the Shell would both fit this
>>84713604
Andrei Rublev
Stalker
Solaris
watch any Tarkovsky movie and realize Kubrick was a hack
>>84716476
You are the hack my friend