Daily reminder that Stanley Kubrick is a talentless hack who

>and better
that's where you're wrong, kiddo

>>84644963

Hi Stephen King

File: ikarie xb1.jpg (153KB, 1344x400px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1344x400px

This is the so called greatest director of all time?

>>84645021
Those two shots are not even remotely similar.

>>84645113
t. kubri*k

>>84645139
I am the OP you dingus.

>>84645176
yeah ok kubrick

>>84645176
get out of here Kubrick!

>>84645493
k

>>84644963

Maybe but he retained his artistic integrity and didn't sell out or bow down to anyone; that is a lost art-form in itself.

>>84645750
t. kubrick

File: 1363342346244.jpg (209KB, 682x600px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 682x600px

>>84644963
>he thinks originality exists in film

>>84646029
How does it not?

>>84645940

I would have zero problem being based kubrick since he's one of the most remembered people in the history of cinema.

Welles, Kubrick and QT didn't take shit and I respect them for it; it really does show in their films.

>>84646064
Nigga....

>>84646232
What's wrong?

>>84644963
Are you the same person who thinks Baby Driver is a rip-off of Drive?

Serious question.

>>84646064
Literally everything in film was made during the silent era. All else after is just mixing and matching things already established

>>84646421
Okay, so what movies did King Kong rip off?

>>84646459
The Cabinet of Dr.Caligari

>>84646459
Journey to The Moon

>>84646533
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>84646565
>Wretched beast falls into forbidden love with a beautiful woman
>Fights to keep her under his control

Cabinet did it with a zombie that was actually in a nut house and Kong did it with a giant ape

Haven't you ever heard that there are only like 7 stories that are ever told? Originality is something that only exists to people who've never tried to make anything

>>84646459
You're not getting it. While I don't agree with the person you're responding to that "everything" was set out during the silent era. My argument is that ever since the fucking train pulled up into the station, film, has been a self-referential medium as far as visuals go.

>>84644963
Im going to ignore that Kubrick only did adaptations so the work he did was never his in originality. despite that, its not about the concept but the execution.

why do you mongs not realise this?

>>84644963

The world is about ripping off people. The better you are at it, the more successful and wealthier you´ll be in life.

>>84647204
No it's not.

>>84646533
>>84646559
These movies are not even remotely similar to King Kong.

>>84647781
Maybe you're just too dumb to tell

>>84644963
>and better

That's where you are wrong megautist and korinefag.

>>84645021
>shitty forgettable shot from who knows what shitty as sub B movie
Vs
>great shot from the most memorable scifi film of all time
Huh making me think

Reminder that D.W. Griffith did everything first.

>>84647204
This

>>84647796
How is a bunch of scientists going to the moon in any way similar to King kong?

>>84649436
All stories are essentially different versions of the same thing

muh shots
muh monologues
muh acne